Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leaders Facilitate Teamwork
Advertisements

WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. TELL KENTUCKY Survey Data Analysis School-Based Decision Making Council Training Kentucky Teaching.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
SYSTEM CHANGE: MIRACLES IN PROGRESS TEACHER INDUCTION, MENTORING AND RENEWAL November 4, 2006 Dr. Carol Rolheiser Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
District 5750 Presidents-elect Training Seminar Moush Tourian District Governor Nominee Weatherford Rotary Club Roles and Responsibilities 1.
HANCOCK CENTRAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM SEPTEMBER 14, 2012.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
CCSS Mathematics Leadership Team Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Examining Monitoring Data
Session Materials  Wiki 
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
District XXXX Presidents-elect Training Seminar 1 Session 8: Goal Setting.
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
School Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of School Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73 slides.
Materials  Wiki 
Necessary Conditions. Washington Education Association Educational Service Districts Association of Washington School Principals Washington Association.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2015 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. TELL KENTUCKY Survey Data Analysis.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Spring, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
Providing Leadership for Improving Mathematics Achievement NJ Abbott Secondary Initiative, Grades 6-12 Academic Rigor Gayle Mills November 14, 2005 Southern.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
From SEF to SIP March 24, Content Objectives Participants will 1. Understand SIP law 2. Explore the CNA 3. Explore the Plan-Do-Check-Act Model for.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
Session Materials  Wiki
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
District Continuous Improvement Team September 17, 2013.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
1. What can effective planning with technology look like? 2. How do we support our teachers in their planning in this digital age? 3. How might TPACK.
October 20 th, Beliefs and Expectations for Site Council Seek and listen to the insights of all stakeholder perspectives and groups. Deal with issues.
Phase IV: Taking Action and Monitoring Implementation and Impact.
Materials  Wiki 
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
ESD Regional Workshop Year 1 Workshop 2. Welcome Back to the Leadership Academy.
Materials  Wiki 
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
1 Sample Introductory Rounds Session, Day 2. Learning Goals By the end of Day 2, we will:  Understand the elements of the instructional core  Be familiar.
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Educator Evaluation and TPEP in Washington State Changes to the law for Procedures for Evaluation are now addressed in: RCW 28A.405 WAC.
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password: summer10

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 2

Session Norms  Be present  Participate actively:  Ask questions  Share connections  Listen  Work together as a community  Invite and welcome contributions of every member 3

Outcomes  Reconnect and share progress, ideas, resources  Examine the polarities we manage in our work with TPEP  Understand newly developed rules and guidelines around evaluation and implications for districts  Identify decisions that need to be made by the district in order to implement the new evaluation system  Begin to design and flesh out a district process for teacher evaluation  Update Communication Plan

TPEP Core Principles 5 1. The critical importance of teacher and leadership quality 2. The professional nature of teaching and leading a school 3. The complex relationship between the system for teacher and principal evaluation and district systems and negotiations 4. The belief in professional learning as an underpinning of the new evaluation system 5. The understanding that the career continuum must be addressed in the new evaluation system 6. The system must determine the balance of “inputs or acts” and “outputs or results”

Polarity Management  Dilemma or tension among two values  Requires management rather than problem solving  Either/or perspective replaced by both/and  Both values in service of a higher purpose  Both values are good and necessary  Challenge is to manage the right balance

Example 7

High Student Achievement Low Student Achievement and Evaluation Professional Growth Benefits of Professional Growth Benefits of Evaluation Consequences of focusing too much on growth Consequences for focusing too much on evaluation

Take a moment to reflect on the current system in your district. Is there a balance of professional growth and evaluation? What factors contribute to your current reality? What might you need in order to reach your optimal state? Team Discussion

Close Reading Jigsaw  Groups of 4 are most ideal  Suggested heterogeneous group composition  Teacher  Principal/AP  Central Office Staff  Union Partner

 Number off 1-4  Teams > 4, assign two people to 3 and 4  As you read, highlight assigned topic 1. practices already in place in your district 2. practices that are different than current practice 3. practices that are required by law 4. practices that are not required by law but support teacher growth  Whip – Each person shares what they learned (up to 3 minutes per person)  Whip – Each person identifies one implication for the work moving forward. Record on chart paper.  Continue whip until all implications are exhausted

Student Growth  Examine the three student growth criteria  Identify implications and decisions  Brainstorm possible assessments  What evidence/artifacts would be necessary in order to rate these portions of the rubric?