Pre-decisional: For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Mars 2020 Project Engineering Assessment.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Concept Overview for 2 mt Case “2 mt case”: integrated payloads of no more than 2 mt can be landed on the surface of Mars; extension of current Mars EDL.

Advertisements

A GEOSCIENCE-BASED DIGITAL MAPPING APPROACH FOR MSL LANDING-SITE SELECTION K.L. Tanaka, J.A. Skinner, Jr., and T.M. Hare Astrogeology Team, U.S. Geological.

Paper Presentation CST 294 – Topic: Interactive Graphics & Visual Analytics Experiences using Visualization Techniques to Present Requirements, Risks to.

VI. Descent and Terminal Guidance for Pinpoint Landing and Hazard Avoidance Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman.

Terrain Relative Navigation for Pinpoint Landing using Cubesats

PRE-DECISIONAL DRAFT; For planning and discussion purposes only 1 1 March 4-5, 2008 Evolution of Lunar to Planetary Landing A.Miguel San Martin Mars Science.

MEPAG National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Presentation to MEPAG.

Technology Enabling the Exploration of Mars Brooke Tuttle ITMG – PowerPoint Presentation 11/18/2008.

Jairus Hihn Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Domain-Oriented Modeling, Estimation and Improvement for Aerospace November 2,

8/28/2005ECEN5543 Req Elicitation1 Targets of Requirements Engineering ECEN 5543 SW Engineering of Standalone Programs University of Colorado, Boulder.

Remnant buttes Long/lat: (in random order) E, 23.89N E, 23.95N E, 23.98N E, 24.04N E, 24.05N E, 24.14N.

ENG 450: Potential Projects Nilton O. Renno, Professor Manish Mehta, Graduate Student University of Michigan.

Ares Aloft: Martian Atmospheric Entry and In-Situ Resource Use via CubeSat Jeffrey Stuart Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.

Ken Farley, Project Scientist Ken Williford, Deputy Project Scientist

Flying, Hopping and Perching Microbots for Extreme Environment Exploration Deployed Using CubeSats Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic.

Enabling Deep Space CubeSat Missions: Telecommunication challenge

November 21, 2014 Mars Cubesat/Nanosat Workshop Flux-Pinned Interfaces for Martian Applications Laura Jones G&C Systems Engineer, Jet Propulsion Laboratory,

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Flight-like Flight Software Testing Methods Celina A Garcia Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology ©2009 California Institute of.

K. Mease 10/11/06 1 Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Henry Samueli School of Engineering University of California, Irvine K. D. Mease Professor SAE Aerospace.

Mars Exploration Directorate National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California.

Filling Mars Human Exploration Strategic Knowledge Gaps with Next Generation Meteorological Instrumentation. S. Rafkin, Southwest Research Institute

Mars 2020 Project Matt Wallace Deputy Project Manager August 3, 2015.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Mars Exploration Directorate.

Pre-decisional: For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Mars 2020 Project EDL Landing Site.

Daryien Golden, Eric Nguyen.  Rocket- Atlas V  Weight- 4,806 pounds. including fuel  Instruments-  1- High resolution cameras to capture images and.

Opportunity Taken: The Value of Diverse Career Experience Dr. Robert D. Braun Alvin Seiff Memorial Lecture June 18, th International Planetary Probe.

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS; FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY File name: MSLOutcomes_v11.ppt Potential MSL Outcomes and Discovery Response Joy Crisp, David Beaty,

NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology August 4, 2015 Austin Nicholas Landing Site Considerations Related to the Potential Sample.

MSL Status/Update for MEPAG John Grotzinger 1, Joy Crisp 2, and Ashwin Vasavada 2 1 California Institute of Technology 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Mars 2020 Project Planetary Protection Topics for Landing Site Selection Doug Bernard Mars.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Michelle Viotti, Manager,

Exploration of Mars By: Micah Cluey. Facts ● The exploration of mars has taken place over hundreds of years, beginning in earnest with the invention and.

C. Viviano-Beck, A. Brown, E. Amador, J. Mustard, and K. Cannon NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted by, NASA, JPL,

Evaluating New Candidate Landing Sites on Mars: Current orbital assets have set the new standard for data required for identifying and qualifying new Mars.

J. Grant and S. Wilson Landing Site Imaging Update MEPAG Meeting February 25, 2015 Monrovia, CA NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been.

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA Current Orbiter Capabilities for Future Landing Site Selection Richard Zurek.

PREDECISIONAL FOR PLANNING AND DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1 Humans to the Martian System Preliminary Summary of Strategic Knowledge Gaps P-SAG (jointly sponsored.

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 NMP 2-1 EW M ILLENNIUM P ROGRA NNMM Program Overview Dr. Christopher Stevens Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of.

PROPOSED 2018 Joint Rover Mission Plans for Proposed 2018 NASA & ESA Joint Rover Mission Landing Site Selection Matt Golombek Mars Exploration Program.

NASA’s Exploration Plan: “Follow the Water” GEOLOGY LIFE CLIMATE Prepare for Human Exploration When Where Form Amount WATER NASA’s Strategy for Mars Exploration.

Lin Li Amelia Earhart Fellow 2015 ZONTA - DISTRICT 11 CONFERENCE 2015.

Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5

Barry Weiss 1/4/ Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Quality Elements in ISO Metadata Design for Proposed SMAP Data.

Mars Science Laboratory Landing Site Workshop 1 Xanthe-Hellas-Elysium-Isidis LSC / 01 / 06/06 NMMNHS 1 Four Proposed Mars Science Laboratory Landing Sites.

Mars Landing Site Selection Activities Mars Landing Site Selection Activities: An Update on MSL and Future Missions John Grant, Matt Golombek, John Grotzinger,

1 st Mars 2020 Landing Site Workshop - Introduction John Grant and Matt Golombek NASA/JPL-Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER:

East Melas Chasma: Insight into Valles Marineris Matt Chojnacki & Brian Hynek Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space the University of Colorado.

Enabling Capabilities A Robotic Field Geologist Access to a site mapped from orbit Long life, mobility, capability to explore a local region Remote sensing.

MEPAG Meeting October 4, 2012 Monrovia, CA Dave Des Marais, MEPAG Chair NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted by,

SAS-05-SpecTRM-TeamX- Meshkat 1 Infusing SpecTRM in the TeamX environment Leila Meshkat¹, Kathryn Weiss², Michael Luna¹, Nancy Leveson² 1: Jet Propulsion.

Mars Science Laboratory 1st Landing Site Workshop Pasadena, CA — 31 May – 2 June Fine-layered Meridiani crater for the MSL Landing Site L. V. Posiolova,

National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.

Information Quality Cluster - Introduction H. K. (Rama) Ramapriyan Science Systems and Applications, Inc. & NASA Goddard Space Flight Center David Moroni.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California CLARREO GPS RO/AJM-JPL.

MAPPING MARS CRATER LANDING SITES & MODELLING CRATER DYNAMICS COMPUTERS IN GEOLOGY TERM PROJECT STEPHANIE SHAHRZAD NOVEMBER 7, 2015.

The Mars Society THE MARS SOCIETY San Diego THE MARS SOCIETY —San Diego—

Latest Findings from NASA’s Curiosity Mars Rover Mission: One Year on Mount Sharp Ashwin Vasavada, Project Scientist for Curiosity, NASA Jet Propulsion.

Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.

Introduction: The Mawrth Vallis region has been identified by the Mars Express OMEGA and MRO CRISM instruments as a region with abundant hydrated phyllosilicate.

MSL Landing Site Selection Activities John Grant and Matt Golombek Co-chairs, MSL Landing Site Steering Committee *Please note that members of the Press.

Mission to Mars. Why Mars? Mars has long been the subject of human interest.” Explore the potential previous and future ability to sustain life Test technology.

Towards Standards for Goal-Based Operations

Seismic network of landers on Mars: Proposed positioning of landing ellipses and evaluation of the encountered range of slopes Michael G., Hauber E., Oberst,

Carbon Dioxide and GIS CO2 Virtual Science Data Environment

Patricia Craig, Ph.D. Planetary Science Palooza LPSC 2017

Curious about Curiosity?

Mars as Seen from Phobos

Going to Gale Crater Matt Golombek Mars Exploration Program Landing Site Scientist, JPL Malin and Edgett 2000.

Presentation transcript:

Pre-decisional: For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Mars 2020 Project Engineering Assessment Summary Mars 2020 Project August 4-6, 2015 Mars 2020 Landing Site Workshop #2

Mars 2020 Project Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pre-Decisional: For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Summary 2 #Sitew/o TRNw/ TRNSurface 1NE Syrtis 2Nili Fossae 3Nili Carbonate N/A 4Jezero Crater 5AHolden Crater (MSL) 5BHolden Crater (Land-On) 6McLaughlin Crater 7SW Melas 8Mawrth Vallis 9East Margaritifer = in family with MSL risk = out of family with MSL risk = somewhat out of family with MSL risk EDL Key Surface Key

Mars 2020 Project Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pre-Decisional: For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only TRN is needed to safely access many of the top sites –If TRN is not baselined, project will use the science priority list from this workshop and attempt to identify additional non-TRN sites –Project will also work to improve high priority “maybe” non-TRN sites Surface productivity should be a factor in site selection and our assessment capability is maturing Mars Program is not imposing any site selection constraints for future missions Summary 3