Analyses of Calls for Service (911) Involving Drugs 1 Council of State Governments Justice Center Calendar Year Total Citywide Calls Calls in LEAD Zone.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pretrial Release and Diversion
Advertisements

Criminal Procedure: Pretrial
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
Presented By: Aki Nearchou, LBSW & Brian Fuller, PH.D. KCMHSAS
Bernard Warner, Secretary.  Over 7 million people in the US are under community supervision.  More than 50% of parolees and 37% of probationers fail.
Georgia Behavioral Health Legislative Caucus. Mental Health Courts in Georgia Appalachian Circuit Superior Court (Pickens, Gilmer and Fannin Counties)
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
SMART JUSTICE SYMPOSIUM Lt. Joanne Lake Spokane County Sheriff’s Office Detention Services Assistant Facility Commander-Geiger.
Police chiefs | formerly incarcerated people | pretrial service administrators | probation officials | state legislators | substance abuse treatment providers.
VA Programs for Justice-Involved Veterans
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial
Community Corrections.  Community Corrections are the subfield of corrections in which offenders are supervised and provided services outside jail or.
Alternatives to Incarceration and Care Coordination May 12, 2015.
Presentation to the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission April 13, 2015 Judy Clarke, Executive Director, Virginia Center For Restorative Justice Mark.
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention April 2 & 3, Square miles 1,000,000 + people 10 th largest U.S. city 4 th Safest U.S. city.
UNIT 2B: THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS. Steps In a Trial - Felony  1. Crime Occurs  2. Investigation  3. Arrest  4. Booking  5. Initial Appearance.
HOPE Probation H awaii’s O pportunity P robation with E nforcement October 2012 Judge Steven S. Alm First Circuit Court, Honolulu, Hawai`i
When Does Criminal Justice Realignment Take Effect? 1 Eligible felonies sentenced to county jail: applies to any person sentenced on or after October 1,
Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment New York County Alternatives to Incarceration Program Bradley Jacobs Deputy Director, Behavioral Health Programs.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Juvenile Justice How and why juvenile justice differs from adult justice.
Partners in Crisis: 2011 Annual Conference 1 Improving Responses to People with Mental Illnesses in the Criminal Justice System: Getting to the Next Level.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2010 Board of Parole Hearings Revocation Trends.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Chapter 2 Sentencing and the Correctional Process Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
58 th Annual IDA Conference & Tradeshow September 21-24, 2012 A Special Prosecution Program to Reduce Crime in Minneapolis The Downtown 100 Community Courts.
Understanding Disproportionate Minority Contact in Onondaga County A project to reduce racial disparities in Onondaga County’s Juvenile Justice System.
Mental Health Diversionary Program Purpose: To reduce the number of mentally ill clients incarcerated or insufficiently served while aiding in recovery.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Criminal Procedure Chapter 16.2 Review. What is a crime? An action that breaks the law Felonies are serious crimes Misdemeanors are less serious crimes.
Presentation on the Phase 1 Report on the Home Confinement Program Orange County, Florida August 6, 2013.
BY JIMI L ♥ VELAND The Criminal Justice Process. Crime is reported – investigated by police. If there is enough evidence, police give the case to the.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Your Vote Counts, Preferences For The Future. Should courts, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers and detention services be provided with increased.
Navigating the Justice System. 4-1  Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process.  Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Criminal Cases YOU BROKE THE LAW! Now What?. Criminal Cases A crime is an act that breaks a federal, state, or city law A crime is an act that breaks.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
DELAWARE OFFICE OF DEFENSE SERVICES DELAWARE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE STATE OF DELAWARE PUBLIC DEFENSE COUNSEL AT PRETRIAL Hon. J. Brendan O’Neill,
Enforcing Firearms Surrender
Jail Diversion Programs
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Douglas County, KS Criminal Justice Intercept Practices
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Violations Arrest Max-outs Violations 4 local jails in Fulton County
Safety and Justice Challenge: An Effort to Reduce the Jail Population
FY17: Briefing on Jail Bed Contingency Funds
Summit County Probation Services
Sentencing Reform in CA
Jail Population Management and Pretrial Practice in California
Iowa Stepping Up Summit: Conducting Timely Screenings and Assessments Des Moines, Iowa October 24, 2017 Travis Parker, MS, LIMHP, CPC Senior Project Associate-Policy.
Dependency Court Flowchart
PRETRIAL JUSTICE IDAHO
Unit 2B: The Criminal Justice Process
Garry Herceg Consultant Pretrial Justice Institute
THE STEPS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM!
Problem-Solving Courts
Substance abuse & criminal charges {Bridges Not Barriers}
A Decade of Youthful Offender Supervision
What works across Intercepts
Presentation transcript:

Analyses of Calls for Service (911) Involving Drugs 1 Council of State Governments Justice Center Calendar Year Total Citywide Calls Calls in LEAD Zone % of Calls in LEAD Zone Calls in Capitol Hill Zone % of Calls in Capitol Hill Zone % of Calls Across Both Zones %162610%55% %207212%60% %15749%63% %13677%60% 2015 (thru May) %5986%56% Total %72379%59% Density analyses reveal three substantial concentrations of calls for service for drug-related concerns Downtown – Pike/Pine Downtown – Pioneer/Occidental Capitol Hill – Pike/Pine & Cal Anderson The concentration has ebbed but still represents ~60% of all drug-related calls for service The LEAD Zone is 1.51 square miles (~2% of total Seattle area) The Capitol Hill Zone would be.35 square miles (~0.5% of total Seattle area)

Analyses of Drug-Related Arrests 2 Council of State Governments Justice Center Calendar Year Total Citywide Arrests Arrests in LEAD Zone % of Arrests in LEAD Zone Arrests in Capitol Hill Zone % of Arrests in Capitol Hill Zone % of Arrests Across Both Zones %1117%52% %686%50% %869%54% %618%46% 2015 (thru May) %207%48% Total %3467%51% Density analyses reveal three substantial concentrations of drug- related arrests similar to calls for service. Downtown – Pike/Pine Downtown – Pioneer/Occidental Capitol Hill – Pike/Pine & Cal Anderson There is a broader diffusion of arrests than calls, but these three areas still represent close to or above 50% of all city-wide drug- related arrests. For the entire time period (2011 – May 2015) across the entire city, 3,531 individuals accounted for the 4,634 total arrests. Half of all individuals arrested citywide on drug-related charges had such an arrest in these zones (1,768 people in 2,350 arrests) 1,507 individuals had arrests in the LEAD Zone 296 individuals had arrests in the Capitol Hill Zone 35 individuals had an arrest in both zones

Analyses of Booked Drug Arrests 3 Council of State Governments Justice Center Density analyses reveal similar high-density areas for arrests that resulted in jail bookings. Downtown – Pike/Pine Downtown – Pioneer/Occidental Capitol Hill – Pike/Pine & Cal Anderson The pattern for arrests leading to bookings appears to follow the trend in where arrests occur, with no evidence of particular areas producing a disproportionate concentration of bookings. Calendar Year Total Citywide Bookings Bookings in LEAD Zone % of Bookings in LEAD Zone Bookings in Capitol Hill Zone % of Bookings in Capitol Hill Zone % of Bookings Across Both Zones %1058%53% %617%51% %749%54% %569%47% 2015 (thru May) %177%48% Total %3138%51%

Crime Concerns in King County/Seattle (CY2012) 4 Council of State Governments Justice Center ~33,500 King County Jail Bookings ~10,800 (32%) SPD ~22,700 (68%) Others (16% KCS) ~6,000 (55%) Misd 20% (I) 25% (F) ~10,500 (46%) Misd 12 % (I) ~9,600 (42%) Felony 70% Have at least one prior KCJ booking in past 10 years 9% have at least 1 felony arrest in last 2 years 40% have a prior drug arrest 53% have a prior property crime arrest 53% have a prior felony arrest 24% have a prior violent crime arrest 2% prison incarceration in prior 2 years 12% DOC incarceration history 2% High/mod MH Need 28% FTA charge 63% Have at least one prior KCJ booking in past 10 years 9% have at least 1 felony arrest in last 2 years 36% have a prior drug arrest 49% have a prior property crime arrest 50% have a prior felony arrest 21% have a prior violent crime arrest 2% prison incarceration in prior 2 years 9% DOC incarceration history 1.5% High/mod MH Need 40% FTA charge 1,179 individuals booked by SPD and Others on Misdemeanors in 2012

Best Practices Options for Frequent Offenders on Low-Level Charges Contact/ArrestPre-trial/CourtSanctions Policy/Statute Police have increased opportunities to cite and release Police have increased opportunities for issuing desk appearance tickets in lieu of detention System/Flow Pre-booking assessment center where police, HHS, NGO, prosecutors, and defense have a role in determining diversion eligibility (LEAD, Crisis, etc.) including use of a brief pre-trial risk/need Low crime/flight risk are given a court day (reminder system), booked, and released Targeted warnings for persistent low- level offenders Coordinated Restorative Justice outreach for justice involved homeless Policy/Statute Re-direct funds to support a pre- trial monitoring unit to supervise completion of service/fine/program requirements Accelerated Misdemeanor system – 1-week pre-plea agreement case dismissed if complete community service (30 days) (two levels – 1 st time and chronic) Presumed Deferred Sentencing for low-level, limited history offenders System/Flow Pre-trial risk instrument informs bail request/decision Prosecution utilizes pre-trial monitoring for increased deferred prosecution Increased utilization of community court (dismissal if complete) Swift, certain & fair sanctions for violating diversion/deferral conditions Policy/Statute Enroll diverted individuals & those coming off monitoring in ACA System/Flow Pre-trial risk instrument informs bail request/decision Prosecution utilizes pre-trial monitoring for increased deferred prosecution Increased utilization of community court Swift, certain & fair sanctions for violating diversion/deferral conditions

A Potential Solution – The Person-Centered Justice Model In partnership with the King County Jail, Seattle Police Department, King County Prosecutor, Seattle City Prosecutor, King County Diversion & Reentry Services, King County Superior Court, Seattle Municipal Court, Seattle Probation Services, and King County Community Corrections, establish a secure, PRE-BOOKING ASSESSMENT CENTER, that would serve the following functions: 1.Police securely drop-off arrested individual/individual in non-emergency crisis and return to patrol 2.Working in tandem, the relevant prosecutor’s office, a SPD officer, jail or diversion staff, and a community service provider complete a validated clinical and actuarial risk/need assessment of the individual to recommend: Pre-hearing detention/bail recommendation Referral to LEAD/CDF Referral to Seattle Probation/KC Community Corrections pre-trial monitoring with assessment identified service needs/level Desk Appearance Ticket Key Benefits: Would allow LEAD to function citywide Validated bail/RoR assessment Identification and early engagement of evidence-based practices to decrease risk of re-offense Quick diversion of first-time, low-frequency, low-severity offenders to proportionate sanction