The Effect of Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach to Students Critical Thinking Skills Niphon Chanlen Science Education Prof. Brian Hand.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Knowing By Engagement: Measuring elementary students practical epistemologies Mary Grace Villanueva Brian Hand Department of Teaching and Learning, University.

Advertisements

Claims, Evidence, Reasoning

Introduction to Action research

LINDSAY CLARE MATSUMURA HELEN GARNIER BRIAN JUNKER LAUREN RESNICK DONNA DIPRIMA BICKEL June 30, 2010 Institute of Educational Sciences Conference Evidence.

Using Computer-Simulated Case-Based Scenarios to Improve Learning Department of Health Professions College of Health & Public Affairs University of Central.

Adrian School of Performing Arts AYP Report. Trends Overall, the rate of students not meeting required criteria has increased over the past three years;

Critical Thinking Critical Thinking is Unnatural Defining Critical Thinking Educating Critical Thinkers Critical Thinking is Unnatural Defining Critical.

ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.

2009 – 2010 School Improvement Plan (Phase II) For Cathedral School.

Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II

NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.

The Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) [1] is an inquiry-based approach that links writing, reading, and science laboratory activities. The SWH emphasizes.

Principles of Powerful Teaching and Learning for Social Studies

ISD 200 Week 5 CRITICAL THINKING IMMIGRATION INSTRUCTORS: Mari Acob-Nash Ryan Packard.

Library Resources for Common Core State Standards in Physical Education How to Teach P.E. and E.L.A. at the Same Time.

AIG PD The Gifted Learner in the 21 st Century A Total School Approach Critical Thinking.

Boston Debate League and Boston Public Schools Evidence Based Argumentation: Engaging English Language Learners in Boston Public Schools Brandon Finegold,

Interactive Notebooks in the middle school Social Studies classroom EDSS 8420 Lindsey Banos.

Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.

DELIA A. ARCISO Researcher The Effect of Using Multimedia and Team Teaching on the Science Achievement Level of Fourth Year Students of Libertad National.

Striving to Link Teacher and Student Outcomes: Results from an Analysis of Whole-school Interventions Kelly Feighan, Elena Kirtcheva, and Eric Kucharik.

Presented by: Devonna Abner Kelly Philbeck. Step 1: Determine needs Step 2: Create specific learning goals based on pre- assessment Step 3: Create and.

Writing in Science in Action. Group Norms  Do homework.  Arrive on time with WISIA.  Be respectful.  Be positive.  Be active, attentive and focused.

SciencePLUS (Promoting Learning & Understanding for Students) Network A Federally Funded Project through the Math-Science Partnership and the Kentucky.

Assisting GPRA Report for MSP Xiaodong Zhang, Westat MSP Regional Conference Miami, January 7-9, 2008.

Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.

Effects of SWH Classroom on Critical Thinking Consultants: Suwiwat Witchakool, Hyung Jin Kim.

Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.

An Illinois Math and Science Partnership collaboration with Peoria Public Schools Bradley University’s Elementary Math, Science and Technology Education.

Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Hilary Rhodes, PhD Ellen Bobronnikov February 22, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.

Teaching Assistants Facilitating Conceptual Understanding in an Introductory Chemistry Laboratory Course Using the Science Writing Heuristic: Quantitative.

June’s remodeling 2013 Summer Institutes | Changing Teacher Practice  Changing Student Outcomes Remodeling Session Rolling Out the Reasons for Engaging.

Teacher Professional Development When Using the SWH as Student-Oriented Teaching Approach Murat Gunel, Sozan Omar, Recai Akkus Center for Excellence in.

Chapter 1 Psychological Science The Need for Psychological Science.

Second Language Classroom Research (Nunan, D. 1990) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sehnaz Sahinkarakas.

A Closer Look Quality Goals Appropriate Assessments.

Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov Hilary Rhodes January 11, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.

Critical Thinking Curriculum Model Bill Robertson University of Texas at El Paso Teacher Education Department Science & Technology Education.

Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.

Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov January 6, 2009 Common Issues and Potential Solutions.

T tests comparing two means t tests comparing two means.

Annual Progress Report Data Ankeny Community Schools.

Research methods 16 th January Research methods Important to have a clear focus for your research. Hypothesis Question Grounded data.

Research Designs. Types of Research Quantitative - Quantitative - Uses data Uses data numbers– statistics numbers– statistics Can be descriptive Can be.

Teaching Integrated Literacy Lessons by Aligning Reading and Writing Standards and Incorporating Reciprocal Processing Strategies to Improve the Writing.

FA#1 - Science Class Observation & Analysis - Overview—  In this field assignment you will be observing a science class conducted by your field teacher.

The following can be used to as a prompt for a lesson leading a group of students through the hurricane think The lesson can act as an analogy to how new.

Will group collaboration in a 4 th grade classroom help improve students understanding in Social Studies content? By: Shiuli Arshad Dr. Sharon O’Conner.

National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.

Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.

Writing in Science in Action. Group Norms  Do homework.  Arrive on time with WISIA and material.  Be Respectful  Be Positive.  Be Active, Attentive.

Approaches to Language Teaching William E. Yugsán April 7, 2015.

Created by Dan Bechtold, Donegal School District Alecia Carcamo, School District of Lancaster Kathy Deisley, Warwick School District Mindy O’Brien, York.

Environment Matters “The Library’s space is your place!”

SCIENCE INSTRUCTION FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES: CURRENT BEST PRACTICES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS William J. Therrien, Ph.D. University of Iowa The research.

Ohio’s Mathematics Science Partnership All New OMSP Programs must use the Survey of Enacted Curriculum.

1 The Difference Maker: A Progress Monitoring Process The University of Oklahoma College of Continuing Education Center for Early Childhood Professional.

SNRPDP Self Evaluation

Issues in Evaluating Educational Research

Integrating Peer Collaboration to Improve Social Studies comprehension

Comparing Two Populations or Treatments

What we know and believe is based on reason

Field Experiences and Clinical Practice

Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative

Consequential Validity

Jessica Mandell CBSE 7202 Spring 2017

The Relationship between Fidelity of Implementation and Classroom Quality in Early Childhood Education Katerina Sergi, M.A.1, Giorgio Carlo Cappello, Ph.D.1,

Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013

The Elements of Reasoning

4.9 Critical Evaluation AICE THINKING SKILLS.

Presentation transcript:

The Effect of Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach to Students Critical Thinking Skills Niphon Chanlen Science Education Prof. Brian Hand

What is SWH? Science-inquiry approach Integrating literacy into science classroom Focusing on claim and evidence, and argumentation

Cornell Critical Thinking Test “Critical thinking is reasonable and reflective thinking focused on deciding what to believe or do” (Ennis, Millman and Tomko, 2005) 5 Subscales Induction Deduction Observation Credibility Assumption Content independent test/ Score: 0-76

Procedure Experiment group The SWH professional development –(Pre) The Cornell Critical Thinking Tests –Baseline Test –ITBS Test –Implementing the SWH approach –(Post) The Cornell Critical Thinking Tests

Procedure Control group –(Pre) The Cornell Critical Thinking Tests –ITBS Test –Implementing the any approach –(Post) The Cornell Critical Thinking Tests

Participants SWH (N)Control (N) Teacher116 Student300 (5 th -6 th )200 (5 th -8 th )

Data GroupPre-CTPost-CT SWH Control GroupPre-CTPost-CT SWH Control Year 1Year 2 GroupPre-CTPost-CTDelayed-Post CT SWH-SWH Control-Control SWH-Control Year 1-2

Goals Writing an article about the effect of the SWH approach to the critical thinking skills Possibility of future statistical analysis

Statistical Analysis Plan Split-plot ANOVA : – main effect of group –main effect of time (pre&post) –Interaction between group and time

Level of analysis –Overall total –Subgroup IEP SES Gender

Result

Cornell Critical Thinking Test Group Year 1Year 2 Pre-test (SD)Post-test (SD)Pre-test (SD)Post-test (SD) Treatment40.43 (7.28)46.31 (7.54)41.75 (7.74)46.65 (7.80) Control42.10 (8.39)45.22 (8.65)43.52 (8.47)45.11 (8.55)

Year 1Year 2 SWH Control Cornell Critical Thinking Test : Effect Size