GE Project EDSGN 100 Section 8 Group 7 12/6/15 Objective: To design a cost-effective freight shipping system that reduces smog and meets EPA requirements,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobile Source P2: Vehicle Idle Reduction Mike Moltzen EPA Region 2 Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable Summer Conference New York City,
Advertisements

Steve Moorman Mgr Business Development, Advanced Technologies Babcock & Wilcox CO2 Emission Reduction from Coal Fired Plants FutureGen 2.0 CO2 Capture.
Center for Air Quality Studies SmartWay ℠ Applications for Cross-Border Drayage Trucks By Monica Beard-Raymond, Carlos Duran, Joe Zietsman, Reza Farzaneh,
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Assessment and future challenges for Pan-European Corridors IV, V, and VII Dr. Vasileios Zeimpekis Design, Operations & Productions Systems Lab Department.
CO 2 Reduction Measures in Freight Sector in Japan by Shinji NAKAGAWA Ministry of Transport Japan.
© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)
Introduction to Freight Transportation Unit 1: Defining the Freight System.
CONGESTION PRICING Traffic Solution or Tax Scheme?
Supply Chain Management Managing the between all of the parties directly and indirectly involved in the procurement of a product or raw material.
April 22, 2008Promoting Green Supply Chains1 Promoting Green Supply Chains in North America Progress and Perspective Arnold Maltz, Ph.D. April 22, 2008.
Cake B. Smart Grid Description –Communication between grid and appliances –Peak load shaving and elimination of vampire loads CO 2 savings from distribution.
 NACTS  North American Aspiration  Greening of the trucks, fuels, stops, and roads  How to get there AGENDA.
Solutions: Preventing and Reducing Air Pollution
Satawu and transport climate jobs ITF Climate Change workshop Durban 1 st and 2 nd December 2011.
CE 515 Railroad Engineering Unit-Train Operations Special Freight and Package Services Source: Armstrong Ch 14 & 16 “Transportation exists to conquer space.
Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Final Rule National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 21,
Amtrak Emissions Reduction Initiatives Ellen McDermott February 23, 2005.
1 1 CRTPA Board Meeting 09/20/2010. CSX Corporation (NYSE: CSX) CSX Transportation – serves every major population and industrial center east of the Mississippi;
Caitlin Michele Ambesi & Matthew Otto Burchhardt.
Transport support in foreign economic activity
1 CEE Areas of Specialization Construction Environmental Geotechnical Structures Transportation Water Resources.
Study conducted for the Coalition of Alabama Waterway Associations by Troy University Center for International Business and Economic Development.
NITROGEN TIRE PRESSURE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR GOVERNMENT FLEET EXPO.
“Clean” and Efficient Public Transportation Kapil Kanhai Yik Ho.
Prof. Ashok Advani - Jaipuria Institute of Management, Noida
Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Background & Strategies Local Government Climate Change Summit Washington, DC April 10, 2008 Paul Bubbosh,
EPA Activities - Tires Lois Platte September 19, 2002.
VICS Empty Miles Time Is UP! Production growth will eventually stop and production will peak. Production is already past its peak in 54 of the 65 largest.
Port of Green Bay. Today, the Port of Green Bay is a vital part of the NE Wisconsin economy, our history and our lives. It is critical to the wellbeing.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Upcoming Funding Opportunities Rosalva Tapia June 3, 2009 National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Management Conference 2009.
Greening Freight & Transportation Corridors Commission for Environmental Cooperation Mapping the road to a sustainable future.
Problem Statement Shipping and importing food wastes unnecessary fuel and money when it can easily be bought from a local source.
ATA’s Sustainability Initiative Bob Pitcher V.P., State Laws American Trucking Associations.
Union Pacific Railroad Comments February 23, 2005.
2015 Emerald Coast Transportation Symposium Stephanie Lane, Director CSX Industrial Development November 13, 2015.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
Networks of Best Practice for Sustainable Energy Development in the Asia-Pacific Region.
CHAPTER 14 UNIT–TRAIN OPERATIONS. The Unit-Train Bulk commodity freight (coal, grain, minerals) Moves as a unit from origin to designation, large producers.
Evan Tony - Thomas Landi - Peter Son - Team “Freight- ened”
Insert a DP2 Photo here Insert Your Design Team Photo here GE Transportation Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section.
Freight, Fuel, and Emissions Emily Rapp, Jennifer Friel, Nicholas Roberto, Jonathon Young.
GE Transportation Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section 001 Team Flying Wombat / Team #4 Cody Heaton, personal.psu.edu/csh5267,
GE Transportation Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section 001 Team OVD /Team #8 Oscar Agip, sites.psu.edu/osa5057,
Insert a DP2 Photo here GE Transportation Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section 001 Team Armadillo, Team #7 Dan.
GE Transportation Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section 001 Team Swag / (Design Team 5) Adam Granito,
Insert a DP2 Photo here GE Transportation Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Introduction to Engineering Design EDSGN 100 Section 001 Locomotive Professionals.
GE Transportation Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section 002 Team Uno: The Bleeding Frogs Britta Beleski (personal.psu.edu/bnb5252)
Pittsdelphia Transportation Proposal EDSGN 100 Sec 008 December 07, 2015 Mayra Oyola Ricky Tishler Nina Brajovic Mario Rombold.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PART I: CONTEXT, CONCEPTS AND CHARACTER IZATION.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © (—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) DESIGN GUIDE This PowerPoint 2007 template produces.
Georgia Council on Economics Education Planes, Trains, Boats, and Automobiles.
Expertise SR 710 North Study An Evaluation of the DEIR/EIS Presentation to the City of San Gabriel City Council February 2, 2016 Leland C Dolley, Special.
2007 Emissions Inventory. Topics First emissions inventory under Clean Air Action Plan (CAAP) Emissions inventory methodology Cargo throughput changes.
GE Transportation Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section 002 The Inglorious Brezniaks / (Team 2) (Mahesh P. Pai,
Records.

McNeil Siding Extension
Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC)
The Current State of the Railroad Industry
2017 Integrated Resource Plan
Freight, Fuel, & Emissions
Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Presented to: Prof. Berezniak
AAPA Environment Committee
Optimizing ship energy efficiency
Class 8 Truck Efficiencies: 2018:2025 and the Impact on Metropolitan, Regional and Megaregional Truck Freight Distribution and Highway Funding Report:
Freight Shuttle Partners
Twin 33s Update Monday, June 10, 2019.
& Where PUBLIC BENEFITS PRIVATE ENTERPRISE Intersect.
Presentation transcript:

GE Project EDSGN 100 Section 8 Group 7 12/6/15 Objective: To design a cost-effective freight shipping system that reduces smog and meets EPA requirements, while maintaining or increasing freight capacity into Philadelphia. Definition of the Problem Space: Stakeholders: The primary stakeholders are the planning commission and the city residents. The secondary stakeholders are GE and EPA. Current System: Currently in Philadelphia, approximately 165,000 tons of freight and coal are shipped into the port city by train, truck, and boat from a 500 mile radius. There are 20 freight loads, 5 mineral and coal and 15 other, various freight. Last year, freight and coal entering the city of Philadelphia was shipped 81% by truck, 10% by rail, and 9% by ship. Smog, engine emitted NOx, is a major complaint from the public. Also, the Tier 2 locomotives are soon going to be required to meet the EPA Tier 3 requirements, which reduce NOx by 26% and particulate matter by 50%. For 2015, EPA has changed their standards to Tier 4 requirements which reduces NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70%. Multimodal System: Multi-modal transportation is the shipping of goods by two or more modes of transportation. The benefits to multi-modal transportation include faster transit of the freight, reduced congestion, lower costs, and reduction of the cost of exports. Creating a multimodal system allows freight to be distributed immediately within the system because all modes of transportation are available. We decided to place our multimodal system around an existing sea port because that will save construction costs. (Fig. 1) Costs: Trucking is the quickest and most expensive way to move freight and shipping is the most energy efficient when comparing ships and trucks. Retrofitting locomotives will cost the most, and buying new locomotives will save roughly 1.5 billion dollars, so we decided in the long run it would be best to buy new locomotives and sell the others. The trains will solely be used for moving the coal and minerals which make up 60,000 tons of the total freight per day, which will help cut down on the smog by upgrading to Tier 4 and not using only trains to transport 165,000 tons. The other 105,000 tons of freight will be shipped by a combination of ship and truck based on cost and emission efficiency. Specifications: A. Reduce NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70% B. Least costly combination of ship, truck, and rail in a multimodal system C. Maintain freight capacity of 165,000 tons per day D. Maintain positive public opinion; eliminate noise at locations greater than a 10 mile radius, decrease congestion (500 trucks on the road removed each year), jobs created, multimodal system visually organized E. Delivery time no longer than one more day. Pairwise Comparison: Analysis: Comparison of Ideas: Cost Effective Positive Public Opinion On Time Delivery Maintained Freight Capacity Reduced Emissions Brainstorms: 52,500 tons by truck 52,500 tons by ship 35,000 tons by truck 70,000 tons by ship 17,500 tons by truck 87,500 tons by ship 26,250 tons by truck 78,750 tons by ship 60,000 tons by rail Multimodal System Deliveries distributed to city Evaluation: Weighted Selection Matrix Summary: Figure 1: Map location and map showing 500 mi radius of system. ABCDERow TotalRow Total/Total A B 1/3 2/ C 1/21 1/ / D 1/3 1/ / E 1/31 2/ /2 By Truck1/3 By Truck1/4 By Truck1/5 By Truck 1/2 By Ship2/3 By Ship3/4 By Ship4/5 By Ship WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score A43.4% % % %52.17 B15.8% % % % C17.8% % % %50.89 D11.2% % % % E11.8% % % % Total Rank Continue?NoYesNo The benefits to a multimodal system are to decrease distribution costs, decrease congestion, increase on time delivery, and decrease the cost of exports. Brainstorm 1Brainstorm 2Brainstorm 3Brainstorm 4 Cost1.1 B1.6 B1.3 B Emissions1.8 T lbs CO25.6 T lbs CO22.8 bs CO23.8 T lbs CO2 Public OpinionNegativePositiveNeutralPositive Throughput165,000 tons On Time DeliveryBadGoodOkayGood Best Solution:

Objective: To design a cost-effective freight shipping system that reduces smog and meets EPA requirements, while maintaining or increasing freight capacity into Philadelphia.

GE Project EDSGN 100 Section 8 Group 7 12/6/15 Objective: To design a cost-effective freight shipping system that reduces smog and meets EPA requirements, while maintaining or increasing freight capacity into Philadelphia. Definition of the Problem Space: Stakeholders: The primary stakeholders are the planning commission and the city residents. The secondary stakeholders are GE and EPA. Current System: Currently in Philadelphia, approximately 165,000 tons of freight and coal are shipped into the port city by train, truck, and boat from a 500 mile radius. There are 20 freight loads, 5 mineral and coal and 15 other, various freight. Last year, freight and coal entering the city of Philadelphia was shipped 81% by truck, 10% by rail, and 9% by ship. Smog, engine emitted NOx, is a major complaint from the public. Also, the Tier 2 locomotives are soon going to be required to meet the EPA Tier 3 requirements, which reduce NOx by 26% and particulate matter by 50%. For 2015, EPA has changed their standards to Tier 4 requirements which reduces NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70%. Multimodal System: Multi-modal transportation is the shipping of goods by two or more modes of transportation. The benefits to multi-modal transportation include faster transit of the freight, reduced congestion, lower costs, and reduction of the cost of exports. Creating a multimodal system allows freight to be distributed immediately within the system because all modes of transportation are available. We decided to place our multimodal system around an existing sea port because that will save construction costs. (Fig. 1) Costs: Trucking is the quickest and most expensive way to move freight and shipping is the most energy efficient when comparing ships and trucks. Retrofitting locomotives will cost the most, and buying new locomotives will save roughly 1.5 billion dollars, so we decided in the long run it would be best to buy new locomotives and sell the others. The trains will solely be used for moving the coal and minerals which make up 60,000 tons of the total freight per day, which will help cut down on the smog by upgrading to Tier 4 and not using only trains to transport 165,000 tons. The other 105,000 tons of freight will be shipped by a combination of ship and truck based on cost and emission efficiency. Specifications: A. Reduce NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70% B. Least costly combination of ship, truck, and rail in a multimodal system C. Maintain freight capacity of 165,000 tons per day D. Maintain positive public opinion; eliminate noise at locations greater than a 10 mile radius, decrease congestion (500 trucks on the road removed each year), jobs created, multimodal system visually organized E. Delivery time no longer than one more day. Pairwise Comparison: Analysis: Comparison of Ideas: Cost Effective Positive Public Opinion On Time Delivery Maintained Freight Capacity Reduced Emissions Brainstorms: 52,500 tons by truck 52,500 tons by ship 35,000 tons by truck 70,000 tons by ship 17,500 tons by truck 87,500 tons by ship 26,250 tons by truck 78,750 tons by ship 60,000 tons by rail Multimodal System Deliveries distributed to city Evaluation: Weighted Selection Matrix Summary: Figure 1: Map location and map showing 500 mi radius of system. ABCDERow TotalRow Total/Total A B 1/3 2/ C 1/21 1/ / D 1/3 1/ / E 1/31 2/ /2 By Truck1/3 By Truck1/4 By Truck1/5 By Truck 1/2 By Ship2/3 By Ship3/4 By Ship4/5 By Ship WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score A43.4% % % %52.17 B15.8% % % % C17.8% % % %50.89 D11.2% % % % E11.8% % % % Total Rank Continue?NoYesNo The benefits to a multimodal system are to decrease distribution costs, decrease congestion, increase on time delivery, and decrease the cost of exports. Brainstorm 1Brainstorm 2Brainstorm 3Brainstorm 4 Cost1.1 B1.6 B1.3 B Emissions1.8 T lbs CO25.6 T lbs CO22.8 bs CO23.8 T lbs CO2 Public OpinionNegativePositiveNeutralPositive Throughput165,000 tons On Time DeliveryBadGoodOkayGood Best Solution:

Definition of the Problem Space: Stakeholders: The primary stakeholders are the planning commission and the city residents. The secondary stakeholders are GE and EPA. Current System: Currently in Philadelphia, approximately 165,000 tons of freight and coal are shipped into the port city by train, truck, and boat from a 500 mile radius. There are 20 freight loads, 5 mineral and coal and 15 other, various freight. Last year, freight and coal entering the city of Philadelphia was shipped 81% by truck, 10% by rail, and 9% by ship. Smog, engine emitted NOx, is a major complaint from the public. Also, the Tier 2 locomotives are soon going to be required to meet the EPA Tier 3 requirements, which reduce NOx by 26% and particulate matter by 50%. For 2015, EPA has changed their standards to Tier 4 requirements which reduces NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70%. Multimodal System: Multi-modal transportation is the shipping of goods by two or more modes of transportation. The benefits to multi-modal transportation include faster transit of the freight, reduced congestion, lower costs, and reduction of the cost of exports. Creating a multimodal system allows freight to be distributed immediately within the system because all modes of transportation are available. We decided to place our multimodal system around an existing sea port because that will save construction costs. (Fig. 1) Costs: Trucking is the quickest and most expensive way to move freight and shipping is the most energy efficient when comparing ships and trucks. Retrofitting locomotives will cost the most, and buying new locomotives will save roughly 1.5 billion dollars, so we decided in the long run it would be best to buy new locomotives and sell the others. The trains will solely be used for moving the coal and minerals which make up 60,000 tons of the total freight per day, which will help cut down on the smog by upgrading to Tier 4 and not using only trains to transport 165,000 tons. The other 105,000 tons of freight will be shipped by a combination of ship and truck based on cost and emission efficiency.

Problem Statement:

GE Project EDSGN 100 Section 8 Group 7 12/6/15 Objective: To design a cost-effective freight shipping system that reduces smog and meets EPA requirements, while maintaining or increasing freight capacity into Philadelphia. Definition of the Problem Space: Stakeholders: The primary stakeholders are the planning commission and the city residents. The secondary stakeholders are GE and EPA. Current System: Currently in Philadelphia, approximately 165,000 tons of freight and coal are shipped into the port city by train, truck, and boat from a 500 mile radius. There are 20 freight loads, 5 mineral and coal and 15 other, various freight. Last year, freight and coal entering the city of Philadelphia was shipped 81% by truck, 10% by rail, and 9% by ship. Smog, engine emitted NOx, is a major complaint from the public. Also, the Tier 2 locomotives are soon going to be required to meet the EPA Tier 3 requirements, which reduce NOx by 26% and particulate matter by 50%. For 2015, EPA has changed their standards to Tier 4 requirements which reduces NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70%. Multimodal System: Multi-modal transportation is the shipping of goods by two or more modes of transportation. The benefits to multi-modal transportation include faster transit of the freight, reduced congestion, lower costs, and reduction of the cost of exports. Creating a multimodal system allows freight to be distributed immediately within the system because all modes of transportation are available. We decided to place our multimodal system around an existing sea port because that will save construction costs. (Fig. 1) Costs: Trucking is the quickest and most expensive way to move freight and shipping is the most energy efficient when comparing ships and trucks. Retrofitting locomotives will cost the most, and buying new locomotives will save roughly 1.5 billion dollars, so we decided in the long run it would be best to buy new locomotives and sell the others. The trains will solely be used for moving the coal and minerals which make up 60,000 tons of the total freight per day, which will help cut down on the smog by upgrading to Tier 4 and not using only trains to transport 165,000 tons. The other 105,000 tons of freight will be shipped by a combination of ship and truck based on cost and emission efficiency. Specifications: A. Reduce NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70% B. Least costly combination of ship, truck, and rail in a multimodal system C. Maintain freight capacity of 165,000 tons per day D. Maintain positive public opinion; eliminate noise at locations greater than a 10 mile radius, decrease congestion (500 trucks on the road removed each year), jobs created, multimodal system visually organized E. Delivery time no longer than one more day. Pairwise Comparison: Analysis: Comparison of Ideas: Cost Effective Positive Public Opinion On Time Delivery Maintained Freight Capacity Reduced Emissions Brainstorms: 52,500 tons by truck 52,500 tons by ship 35,000 tons by truck 70,000 tons by ship 17,500 tons by truck 87,500 tons by ship 26,250 tons by truck 78,750 tons by ship 60,000 tons by rail Multimodal System Deliveries distributed to city Evaluation: Weighted Selection Matrix Summary: Figure 1: Map location and map showing 500 mi radius of system. ABCDERow TotalRow Total/Total A B 1/3 2/ C 1/21 1/ / D 1/3 1/ / E 1/31 2/ /2 By Truck1/3 By Truck1/4 By Truck1/5 By Truck 1/2 By Ship2/3 By Ship3/4 By Ship4/5 By Ship WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score A43.4% % % %52.17 B15.8% % % % C17.8% % % %50.89 D11.2% % % % E11.8% % % % Total Rank Continue?NoYesNo The benefits to a multimodal system are to decrease distribution costs, decrease congestion, increase on time delivery, and decrease the cost of exports. Brainstorm 1Brainstorm 2Brainstorm 3Brainstorm 4 Cost1.1 B1.6 B1.3 B Emissions1.8 T lbs CO25.6 T lbs CO22.8 bs CO23.8 T lbs CO2 Public OpinionNegativePositiveNeutralPositive Throughput165,000 tons On Time DeliveryBadGoodOkayGood Best Solution:

Specifications: A. Reduce NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70% B. Least costly combination of ship, truck, and rail in a multimodal system C. Maintain freight capacity of 165,000 tons per day D. Maintain positive public opinion; eliminate noise at locations greater than a 10 mile radius, decrease congestion (500 trucks on the road removed each year), jobs created, multimodal system visually organized E. Delivery time no longer than one more day. ABCDERow Total Row Total/Total A B 1/3 2/ C 1/2 1 1/ / D 1/3 1/ / E 1/31 2/

GE Project EDSGN 100 Section 8 Group 7 12/6/15 Objective: To design a cost-effective freight shipping system that reduces smog and meets EPA requirements, while maintaining or increasing freight capacity into Philadelphia. Definition of the Problem Space: Stakeholders: The primary stakeholders are the planning commission and the city residents. The secondary stakeholders are GE and EPA. Current System: Currently in Philadelphia, approximately 165,000 tons of freight and coal are shipped into the port city by train, truck, and boat from a 500 mile radius. There are 20 freight loads, 5 mineral and coal and 15 other, various freight. Last year, freight and coal entering the city of Philadelphia was shipped 81% by truck, 10% by rail, and 9% by ship. Smog, engine emitted NOx, is a major complaint from the public. Also, the Tier 2 locomotives are soon going to be required to meet the EPA Tier 3 requirements, which reduce NOx by 26% and particulate matter by 50%. For 2015, EPA has changed their standards to Tier 4 requirements which reduces NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70%. Multimodal System: Multi-modal transportation is the shipping of goods by two or more modes of transportation. The benefits to multi-modal transportation include faster transit of the freight, reduced congestion, lower costs, and reduction of the cost of exports. Creating a multimodal system allows freight to be distributed immediately within the system because all modes of transportation are available. We decided to place our multimodal system around an existing sea port because that will save construction costs. (Fig. 1) Costs: Trucking is the quickest and most expensive way to move freight and shipping is the most energy efficient when comparing ships and trucks. Retrofitting locomotives will cost the most, and buying new locomotives will save roughly 1.5 billion dollars, so we decided in the long run it would be best to buy new locomotives and sell the others. The trains will solely be used for moving the coal and minerals which make up 60,000 tons of the total freight per day, which will help cut down on the smog by upgrading to Tier 4 and not using only trains to transport 165,000 tons. The other 105,000 tons of freight will be shipped by a combination of ship and truck based on cost and emission efficiency. Specifications: A. Reduce NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70% B. Least costly combination of ship, truck, and rail in a multimodal system C. Maintain freight capacity of 165,000 tons per day D. Maintain positive public opinion; eliminate noise at locations greater than a 10 mile radius, decrease congestion (500 trucks on the road removed each year), jobs created, multimodal system visually organized E. Delivery time no longer than one more day. Pairwise Comparison: Analysis: Comparison of Ideas: Cost Effective Positive Public Opinion On Time Delivery Maintained Freight Capacity Reduced Emissions Brainstorms: 52,500 tons by truck 52,500 tons by ship 35,000 tons by truck 70,000 tons by ship 17,500 tons by truck 87,500 tons by ship 26,250 tons by truck 78,750 tons by ship 60,000 tons by rail Multimodal System Deliveries distributed to city Evaluation: Weighted Selection Matrix Summary: Figure 1: Map location and map showing 500 mi radius of system. ABCDERow TotalRow Total/Total A B 1/3 2/ C 1/21 1/ / D 1/3 1/ / E 1/31 2/ /2 By Truck1/3 By Truck1/4 By Truck1/5 By Truck 1/2 By Ship2/3 By Ship3/4 By Ship4/5 By Ship WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score A43.4% % % %52.17 B15.8% % % % C17.8% % % %50.89 D11.2% % % % E11.8% % % % Total Rank Continue?NoYesNo The benefits to a multimodal system are to decrease distribution costs, decrease congestion, increase on time delivery, and decrease the cost of exports. Brainstorm 1Brainstorm 2Brainstorm 3Brainstorm 4 Cost1.1 B1.6 B1.3 B Emissions1.8 T lbs CO25.6 T lbs CO22.8 bs CO23.8 T lbs CO2 Public OpinionNegativePositiveNeutralPositive Throughput165,000 tons On Time DeliveryBadGoodOkayGood Best Solution:

Brainstorms:

60,000 tons by rail

Brainstorms: 60,000 tons by rail 26,250 tons by truck 78,750 tons by ship

Brainstorms: 60,000 tons by rail 17,500 tons by truck 87,500 tons by ship

Brainstorms: 60,000 tons by rail 35,000 tons by truck 70,000 tons by ship

GE Project EDSGN 100 Section 8 Group 7 12/6/15 Objective: To design a cost-effective freight shipping system that reduces smog and meets EPA requirements, while maintaining or increasing freight capacity into Philadelphia. Definition of the Problem Space: Stakeholders: The primary stakeholders are the planning commission and the city residents. The secondary stakeholders are GE and EPA. Current System: Currently in Philadelphia, approximately 165,000 tons of freight and coal are shipped into the port city by train, truck, and boat from a 500 mile radius. There are 20 freight loads, 5 mineral and coal and 15 other, various freight. Last year, freight and coal entering the city of Philadelphia was shipped 81% by truck, 10% by rail, and 9% by ship. Smog, engine emitted NOx, is a major complaint from the public. Also, the Tier 2 locomotives are soon going to be required to meet the EPA Tier 3 requirements, which reduce NOx by 26% and particulate matter by 50%. For 2015, EPA has changed their standards to Tier 4 requirements which reduces NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70%. Multimodal System: Multi-modal transportation is the shipping of goods by two or more modes of transportation. The benefits to multi-modal transportation include faster transit of the freight, reduced congestion, lower costs, and reduction of the cost of exports. Creating a multimodal system allows freight to be distributed immediately within the system because all modes of transportation are available. We decided to place our multimodal system around an existing sea port because that will save construction costs. (Fig. 1) Costs: Trucking is the quickest and most expensive way to move freight and shipping is the most energy efficient when comparing ships and trucks. Retrofitting locomotives will cost the most, and buying new locomotives will save roughly 1.5 billion dollars, so we decided in the long run it would be best to buy new locomotives and sell the others. The trains will solely be used for moving the coal and minerals which make up 60,000 tons of the total freight per day, which will help cut down on the smog by upgrading to Tier 4 and not using only trains to transport 165,000 tons. The other 105,000 tons of freight will be shipped by a combination of ship and truck based on cost and emission efficiency. Specifications: A. Reduce NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70% B. Least costly combination of ship, truck, and rail in a multimodal system C. Maintain freight capacity of 165,000 tons per day D. Maintain positive public opinion; eliminate noise at locations greater than a 10 mile radius, decrease congestion (500 trucks on the road removed each year), jobs created, multimodal system visually organized E. Delivery time no longer than one more day. Pairwise Comparison: Analysis: Comparison of Ideas: Cost Effective Positive Public Opinion On Time Delivery Maintained Freight Capacity Reduced Emissions Brainstorms: 52,500 tons by truck 52,500 tons by ship 35,000 tons by truck 70,000 tons by ship 17,500 tons by truck 87,500 tons by ship 26,250 tons by truck 78,750 tons by ship 60,000 tons by rail Multimodal System Deliveries distributed to city Evaluation: Weighted Selection Matrix Summary: Figure 1: Map location and map showing 500 mi radius of system. ABCDERow TotalRow Total/Total A B 1/3 2/ C 1/21 1/ / D 1/3 1/ / E 1/31 2/ /2 By Truck1/3 By Truck1/4 By Truck1/5 By Truck 1/2 By Ship2/3 By Ship3/4 By Ship4/5 By Ship WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score A43.4% % % %52.17 B15.8% % % % C17.8% % % %50.89 D11.2% % % % E11.8% % % % Total Rank Continue?NoYesNo The benefits to a multimodal system are to decrease distribution costs, decrease congestion, increase on time delivery, and decrease the cost of exports. Brainstorm 1Brainstorm 2Brainstorm 3Brainstorm 4 Cost1.1 B1.6 B1.3 B Emissions1.8 T lbs CO25.6 T lbs CO22.8 bs CO23.8 T lbs CO2 Public OpinionNegativePositiveNeutralPositive Throughput165,000 tons On Time DeliveryBadGoodOkayGood Best Solution:

Evaluation: 1/2 By Truck1/3 By Truck1/4 By Truck1/5 By Truck 1/2 By Ship2/3 By Ship3/4 By Ship4/5 By Ship WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score A43.4% % % % B15.8% % % % C17.8% % % % D11.2% % % % E11.8% % % % Total Rank Continue?NoYesNo

GE Project EDSGN 100 Section 8 Group 7 12/6/15 Objective: To design a cost-effective freight shipping system that reduces smog and meets EPA requirements, while maintaining or increasing freight capacity into Philadelphia. Definition of the Problem Space: Stakeholders: The primary stakeholders are the planning commission and the city residents. The secondary stakeholders are GE and EPA. Current System: Currently in Philadelphia, approximately 165,000 tons of freight and coal are shipped into the port city by train, truck, and boat from a 500 mile radius. There are 20 freight loads, 5 mineral and coal and 15 other, various freight. Last year, freight and coal entering the city of Philadelphia was shipped 81% by truck, 10% by rail, and 9% by ship. Smog, engine emitted NOx, is a major complaint from the public. Also, the Tier 2 locomotives are soon going to be required to meet the EPA Tier 3 requirements, which reduce NOx by 26% and particulate matter by 50%. For 2015, EPA has changed their standards to Tier 4 requirements which reduces NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70%. Multimodal System: Multi-modal transportation is the shipping of goods by two or more modes of transportation. The benefits to multi-modal transportation include faster transit of the freight, reduced congestion, lower costs, and reduction of the cost of exports. Creating a multimodal system allows freight to be distributed immediately within the system because all modes of transportation are available. We decided to place our multimodal system around an existing sea port because that will save construction costs. (Fig. 1) Costs: Trucking is the quickest and most expensive way to move freight and shipping is the most energy efficient when comparing ships and trucks. Retrofitting locomotives will cost the most, and buying new locomotives will save roughly 1.5 billion dollars, so we decided in the long run it would be best to buy new locomotives and sell the others. The trains will solely be used for moving the coal and minerals which make up 60,000 tons of the total freight per day, which will help cut down on the smog by upgrading to Tier 4 and not using only trains to transport 165,000 tons. The other 105,000 tons of freight will be shipped by a combination of ship and truck based on cost and emission efficiency. Specifications: A. Reduce NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70% B. Least costly combination of ship, truck, and rail in a multimodal system C. Maintain freight capacity of 165,000 tons per day D. Maintain positive public opinion; eliminate noise at locations greater than a 10 mile radius, decrease congestion (500 trucks on the road removed each year), jobs created, multimodal system visually organized E. Delivery time no longer than one more day. Pairwise Comparison: Analysis: Comparison of Ideas: Cost Effective Positive Public Opinion On Time Delivery Maintained Freight Capacity Reduced Emissions Brainstorms: 52,500 tons by truck 52,500 tons by ship 35,000 tons by truck 70,000 tons by ship 17,500 tons by truck 87,500 tons by ship 26,250 tons by truck 78,750 tons by ship 60,000 tons by rail Multimodal System Deliveries distributed to city Evaluation: Weighted Selection Matrix Summary: Figure 1: Map location and map showing 500 mi radius of system. ABCDERow TotalRow Total/Total A B 1/3 2/ C 1/21 1/ / D 1/3 1/ / E 1/31 2/ /2 By Truck1/3 By Truck1/4 By Truck1/5 By Truck 1/2 By Ship2/3 By Ship3/4 By Ship4/5 By Ship WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score A43.4% % % %52.17 B15.8% % % % C17.8% % % %50.89 D11.2% % % % E11.8% % % % Total Rank Continue?NoYesNo The benefits to a multimodal system are to decrease distribution costs, decrease congestion, increase on time delivery, and decrease the cost of exports. Brainstorm 1Brainstorm 2Brainstorm 3Brainstorm 4 Cost1.1 B1.6 B1.3 B Emissions1.8 T lbs CO25.6 T lbs CO22.8 bs CO23.8 T lbs CO2 Public OpinionNegativePositiveNeutralPositive Throughput165,000 tons On Time DeliveryBadGoodOkayGood Best Solution:

Analysis: Brainstorm 1Brainstorm 2Brainstorm 3Brainstorm 4 Cost1.1 B1.6 B1.3 B Emissions1.8 T lbs CO25.6 T lbs CO22.8 bs CO23.8 T lbs CO2 Public OpinionNegativePositiveNeutralPositive Throughput165,000 tons On Time DeliveryBadGoodOkayGood

Analysis: Best Solution Multimodal System Deliveries distributed to the city

GE Project EDSGN 100 Section 8 Group 7 12/6/15 Objective: To design a cost-effective freight shipping system that reduces smog and meets EPA requirements, while maintaining or increasing freight capacity into Philadelphia. Definition of the Problem Space: Stakeholders: The primary stakeholders are the planning commission and the city residents. The secondary stakeholders are GE and EPA. Current System: Currently in Philadelphia, approximately 165,000 tons of freight and coal are shipped into the port city by train, truck, and boat from a 500 mile radius. There are 20 freight loads, 5 mineral and coal and 15 other, various freight. Last year, freight and coal entering the city of Philadelphia was shipped 81% by truck, 10% by rail, and 9% by ship. Smog, engine emitted NOx, is a major complaint from the public. Also, the Tier 2 locomotives are soon going to be required to meet the EPA Tier 3 requirements, which reduce NOx by 26% and particulate matter by 50%. For 2015, EPA has changed their standards to Tier 4 requirements which reduces NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70%. Multimodal System: Multi-modal transportation is the shipping of goods by two or more modes of transportation. The benefits to multi-modal transportation include faster transit of the freight, reduced congestion, lower costs, and reduction of the cost of exports. Creating a multimodal system allows freight to be distributed immediately within the system because all modes of transportation are available. We decided to place our multimodal system around an existing sea port because that will save construction costs. (Fig. 1) Costs: Trucking is the quickest and most expensive way to move freight and shipping is the most energy efficient when comparing ships and trucks. Retrofitting locomotives will cost the most, and buying new locomotives will save roughly 1.5 billion dollars, so we decided in the long run it would be best to buy new locomotives and sell the others. The trains will solely be used for moving the coal and minerals which make up 60,000 tons of the total freight per day, which will help cut down on the smog by upgrading to Tier 4 and not using only trains to transport 165,000 tons. The other 105,000 tons of freight will be shipped by a combination of ship and truck based on cost and emission efficiency. Specifications: A. Reduce NOx emissions by 76% and particulate matter by 70% B. Least costly combination of ship, truck, and rail in a multimodal system C. Maintain freight capacity of 165,000 tons per day D. Maintain positive public opinion; eliminate noise at locations greater than a 10 mile radius, decrease congestion (500 trucks on the road removed each year), jobs created, multimodal system visually organized E. Delivery time no longer than one more day. Pairwise Comparison: Analysis: Comparison of Ideas: Cost Effective Positive Public Opinion On Time Delivery Maintained Freight Capacity Reduced Emissions Brainstorms: 52,500 tons by truck 52,500 tons by ship 35,000 tons by truck 70,000 tons by ship 17,500 tons by truck 87,500 tons by ship 26,250 tons by truck 78,750 tons by ship 60,000 tons by rail Multimodal System Deliveries distributed to city Evaluation: Weighted Selection Matrix Summary: Figure 1: Map location and map showing 500 mi radius of system. ABCDERow TotalRow Total/Total A B 1/3 2/ C 1/21 1/ / D 1/3 1/ / E 1/31 2/ /2 By Truck1/3 By Truck1/4 By Truck1/5 By Truck 1/2 By Ship2/3 By Ship3/4 By Ship4/5 By Ship WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score WeightRank Weighted Score A43.4% % % %52.17 B15.8% % % % C17.8% % % %50.89 D11.2% % % % E11.8% % % % Total Rank Continue?NoYesNo The benefits to a multimodal system are to decrease distribution costs, decrease congestion, increase on time delivery, and decrease the cost of exports. Brainstorm 1Brainstorm 2Brainstorm 3Brainstorm 4 Cost1.1 B1.6 B1.3 B Emissions1.8 T lbs CO25.6 T lbs CO22.8 bs CO23.8 T lbs CO2 Public OpinionNegativePositiveNeutralPositive Throughput165,000 tons On Time DeliveryBadGoodOkayGood Best Solution:

Summary: Cost Effective Positive Public Opinion On Time Delivery Maintained Freight Capacity Reduced Emissions The benefits to a multimodal system are to decrease distribution costs, decrease congestion, increase on time delivery, and decrease the cost of exports.