Dirac neutrino dark matter G. Bélanger LAPTH- Annecy based on G. B, A.Pukhov, G. Servant CERN-PH-TH/2007-083.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joe Sato (Saitama University ) Collaborators Satoru Kaneko,Takashi Shimomura, Masato Yamanaka,Oscar Vives Physical review D 78, (2008) arXiv:1002.????
Advertisements

Outlook: Higgs, SUSY, flavor Ken-ichi Hikasa (Tohoku U.) Fourth Workshop, Origin of Mass and SUSY March 8, 2006, Epochal Tsukuba.
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Phenomenological Aspects of SUSY B-L Extension of the SM 1 Shaaban Khalil Centre for Theoretical Physics British University in Egypt.
MSSM in view of PAMELA and Fermi-LAT Ts. Enkhbat 2 nd workshop on LHC physics, CYCU, Chungli Based on: arXiv: B. BajcB. Bajc, Ts. E, D. K. Ghosh,
Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter UC Irvine Dec 2010.
F. Richard Feb 2003 A Z’ within the ‘Little Higgs’ Scenario The LHC/LC Study group meeting CERN.
Intro to neutralino dark matter Pearl Sandick University of Minnesota.
Going after the Dark at Colliders David Berge (CERN)
Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.
Little Higgs Model Dark Matter and Its Implications at the LHC Chuan-Ren Chen (NTNU) KIAS-NCTS Joint Workshop High-1 2/9 – 2/15 In collaboration.
Little Higgs Dark Matter and Its Implications at the LHC Chuan-Ren Chen (NTNU) XS 2014, 5/6/2014 In collaboration with H-C Tsai, M-C Lee, [hep-ph]
Work with M. Carena, E. Pontón, C. Wagner NPB (06) [ph/ ] and hep-ph/ work in progress Phenomenology of Warped Models with Custodial Symmetry.
The positron excess and supersymmetric dark matter Joakim Edsjö Stockholm University
1 Discovering New Physics with the LHC Nadia Davidson Supervisor: Elisabetta Barberio EPP Nobel Prize for Physics in 2010:
B. Dutta Texas A&M University Phys.Rev.Lett.99:261301, 2007; To appear Inflation, Dark Matter and Neutrino Masses Collaborators: Rouzbeh Allahverdi, Anupam.
Mia Schelke, Ph.D. Student The University of Stockholm, Sweden Cosmo 03.
.. Particle Physics at a Crossroads Meenakshi Narain Brown University.
QCD Effects on Direct Detection of Wino Dark Matter
Significant enhancement of Bino-like dark matter annihilation cross section due to CP violation Yoshio Sato (Saitama University) Collaborated with Shigeki.
EuroGDR, 13 th December 2003 Dan Tovey CERN, 18/03/2004 G. Bélanger 1 Uncertainties in the relic density calculations in mSUGRA B. Allanach, G. Bélanger,
Quintessino model and neutralino annihilation to diffuse gamma rays X.J. Bi (IHEP)
SUSY Dark Matter Collider – direct – indirect search bridge. Sabine Kraml Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Grenoble, France ● 43. Rencontres.
Relating dark matter and radiative Seesaw neutrino mass scales without beyond SM gauge symmetry Xiao-Gang He 1. Introduction 2. Radiative seesaw and dark.
1 EXTRA DIMENSIONS AT FUTURE HADRON COLLIDERS G.F. Giudice CERN.
The Dark Side of the Universe What is dark matter? Who cares?
Takehiro Nabeshima University of Toyama ILC physics general meeting 9 jun Phenomenology at a linear collider in a radiative seesaw model from TeV.
Hep-ph/ , with M. Carena (FNAL), E. Pontón (Columbia) and C. Wagner (ANL) Light KK modes in Custodially Symmetric Randall-Sundrum José Santiago Theory.
Masato Yamanaka (Saitama University) collaborators Shigeki Matsumoto Joe Sato Masato Senami arXiv: [hep-ph]Phys.Lett.B647: and Relic abundance.
DARK MATTER CANDIDATES Cody Carr, Minh Nguyen December 9 th, 2014.
Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry in collaboration with M. Quiros (IFAE) and P. Ullio (SISSA/ISAS) Alessio Provenza (SISSA/ISAS) Newport Beach.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Theoretical Issues in Astro Particle Physics J.W. van Holten April 26, 2004.
Search for Extra Dimensions at ATLAS Ambreesh Gupta University of Chicago PASCOS 2003 T.I.F.R, Mumbai, 3-8 January 2003.
Ohio State DUSEL Theory Workshop Stuart Raby Underground Detectors Investigating Grand Unification Brookhaven National Lab October 16, 2008.
22 December 2006Masters Defense Texas A&M University1 Adam Aurisano In Collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, Nikolay Kolev*,
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
Yukawa and scalar interactions induced by scalar relevant for neutrino masss generation are: Since is assumed to be an exact symmetry of the model has.
Neutralino relic density in the CPVMSSM and the ILC G. Bélanger LAPTH G. B, O. Kittel, S. Kraml, H. Martyn, A. Pukhov, hep-ph/ , Phys.Rev.D Motivation.
Long-lived superpartners in the MSSM Alexey GLADYSHEV (JINR, Dubna / ITEP, Moscow) PROTVINO, December 25, 2008 PHYSICS OF FUNDAMENTAL INTERACTIONS PHYSICS.
Latest New Phenomena Results from Alexey Popov (IHEP, Protvino) For the DO Collaboration ITEP, Moscow
The Search For Supersymmetry Liam Malone and Matthew French.
Supersymmetric B-L Extended Standard Model with Right-Handed Neutrino Dark Matter Nobuchika Okada Miami Fort Lauderdale, Dec , 2010 University.
Jonathan Nistor Purdue University 1.  A symmetry relating elementary particles together in pairs whose respective spins differ by half a unit  superpartners.
Diquark Higgs production at LHC Nobuchika Okada Theory Division, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) In collaboration with Rabindra Nath.
M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai (arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D77:015006, 2008 D. Demir, M. Frank, K. H., S.K. Rai, I.Turan ( arXiv: ) Phys.Rev.D78:035013,
Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity 1 Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: E. Asakawa ( Meiji-gakuin.
Z’ Signals from KK Dark Matter Sabine Riemann (DESY) LCWS, Stanford, March 18-22, 2005 Outline  Universal extra dimensions (UED)  KK dark matter?  Sensitivity.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
Xenon100 collaboration gives a stringent constraint on spin-independent elastic WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section. Ton-scale detectors for direct detection.
Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter April 2011.
The study of q q production at LHC in the l l channel and sensitivity to other models Michihisa Takeuchi ~~ LL ± ± (hep-ph/ ) Kyoto Univ. (YITP),
An interesting candidate?
Generating Neutrino Mass & Electroweak Scale Radiatively
Topics in Higgs Portal Dark Matter
Dark Sectors for and anomalies
John Kelley IceCube Journal Club 27 February 2008
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
MSSM4G: MOTIVATIONS AND ALLOWED REGIONS
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
Thermal sneutrino dark matter in an inverse seesaw model
Testing the Standard Model and Beyond
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
Physics at a Linear Collider
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Dark Matter Explanation in Singlet Extension of MSSM
Can new Higgs boson be Dark Matter Candidate in the Economical Model
Presentation transcript:

Dirac neutrino dark matter G. Bélanger LAPTH- Annecy based on G. B, A.Pukhov, G. Servant CERN-PH-TH/

Outline Motivation Direct detection Relic density An explicit example : the LZP model Signals and conclusion

Motivation Although evidence for Dark Matter has been accumulating over the years, still do not have evidence what this dark matter could be Natural link DM ~100GeV range and EWSB: new physics at weak scale can also solve both EWSB and DM Weakly interacting particles gives roughly the right amount of DM, Ωh 2 ~0.1 Supersymmetric models with R-parity have good candidate (neutralino LSP) but many other possibilities exist only need some symmetry to ensure that lightest particle is stable UED, Little Higgs, Warped Xtra-Dim … Superweakly interacting particles might also work (gravitino) Examine different candidates and study prospects for direct/indirect detection, collider searches

Dirac right-handed neutrino Typical framework: sterile Dirac neutrino under SM but charged under SU(2) R Phenomenologically viable model with warped extra-dimensions and right- handed neutrino (GeV-TeV) as Dark Matter was proposed (LZP) Agashe, Servant, PRL93, (2004) – see explicit example later Models with LR symmetry and UED also can have RH neutrino dark matter Hsieh, Mohapatra, Nasri, PRD74, (2006). Stability requires additional symmetry, but symmetry might be necessary for EW precision or for stability of proton Explore more generic model with stable ν R 1GeV– few TeV and examine properties of this neutrino ---- reexamine LZP model

Annihilation First assume only SM+ ν R ν R can couple to Z through ν’ L - ν R mixing Main annihilation channel – Z exchange Ff, WW, Zh Also Higgs exchange

Direct detection - limits Detect dark matter through interaction with nuclei in large detector Many experiments underway and planned In 2007 – new results announced from Xenon (Gran-Sasso) best limit ~factor 6 better than CDMS (Ge,Si) E. Aprile, APS 2007

Direct detection : Dirac neutrino Dirac neutrino: spin independent interaction dominated by Z exchange (vector-like coupling)  very large cross- section for direct detection coupling Zν R ν R cannot be too large also constraint from LEP : invisible decay of Z Z exchange: also main mechanism for annihilation of ν R Zν R ν R coupling cannot be too small Vectorial coupling : elastic scattering on proton << neutron σ νp = (1- 4 sin 2 θ W ) σ νn For Majorana (neutralino) σ νp ~ σ νn Z,h νν

Relic density vs elastic scattering g z =g/x Higgs exchange contribute for annihilation (near resonance) and for direct detection, << Z exchange, only relevant for weak coupling to the Z Uncertainties in DD limit – e.g velocity distribution of DM (up to factor 3) WMAP

Direct detection limits -WMAP Current DM experiments already restricts ν R to be ~M Z /2, ~M H /2 M( ν R ) > 700GeV Other mechanism for not so heavy neutrino DM? Relic density computed with micrOMEGAs_2.0, WMAP

Extending the gauge group (LR) New Z’ (… and W’)- SU 2L XSU 2R XU 1 Could introduce τ’ partner ν’ +new quarks Constraints on Z’ from EW precision: mixing small ~10 -3 (T parameter) Assume Z’ couples only to third generation fermions : weakens EW constraints but induces FCNC – constraints also depend on quark mixing matrices Mz’~ 500GeV Coupling of ν R to Z can also be induced by Z- Z’ mixing Heavy Z’ that couples to 3 rd gen.: no effect on DD Effect of W’ in annihilation not so important

Relic density vs elastic scattering’ As before viable neutrino DM around M Z /2, M H /2 Depending on M Z’ can have neutrino ~ 200GeV Not considered coannihilation Need to specify properties of extra fermions excluded

The LZP model Warped Xtra-Dim (Randall-Sundrum) GUT model with matter in the bulk Solving B violation in GUT models  stable KK particle Example based on SO(10) with Z 3 symmetry: LZP is KK RH-neutrino Agashe, Servant, hep-ph/ Many features of our generic model: LR symmetry with KK W’,Z’ gauge bosons Many new generations of KK fermions, most are multi-TeV, lighter ones are those of third generation (choice of BC for heavy top quark) Zν R ν R coupling induced via Z-Z’ mixing or ν R- ν’ L mixing Z’ ν R ν R coupling ~1, Z’ couples to 3 rd generation fermions H ν R ν R coupling small

… LZP model Free parameters : masses of KK fermions, mass of KK gauge boson, M H, coupling of Z’(g) Couplings to KK particles from wave functions overlap LZP is Dirac particle, coupling to Z through Z-Z’ mixing and mixing with new LH neutrino Zν R ν R cannot be too large otherwise elastic scattering on nucleon too large Z-Z’ mixing ~1/M 2 Z’ - gZ too large if Mz’<3-4TeV

Relic density of LZP Qualitatively recover results of first study (Agashe, Servant), new features Precise evaluation of relic density in micromegas_2.0 Include Higgs exchange Include all coannihilations Compatibility with WMAP for LZP ~ 50GeV and TeV depending on M KK Large cross-sections for direct detection Signal for next generation of detectors in large area of parameter space (10 -9 pb)

Coannihilation Possibility to have LZP in range GeV with coannihilation Coannihilation decreases Ωh 2 but no effect on direct detection rate Need small mass differences (NLZP-LZP) ~few %

Signals - Colliders Higgs decay into invisible -- LHC: weak boson fusion+ZH ILC Z invisible : LEP constraint OK As in MSSM : search for new particles Long-lived τ’ : if τ’ nearly degenerate with ν’: can decay outside detector signal : charged massive particle (only for small region of parameter space) – searches at Tevatron, LHC + ILC More likely τ pair production and signal 2l+missing energy -1

Signals - Colliders Only one study of LHC potential: signal for KK quarks in LZP model – b R has no Z 3 charge Pair produced via gg Decay into tW 4W+bb final state Z’ search but only couples to W bosons and 3 rd generation -- difficult Identify model, determination of parameters … still need to be studied, will involve DM detection Dennis et al. hep-ph/ Signal 3W in jets 1W leptonic Dijet mass distribution

Signals – indirect detection In LZP model Hooper, Servant, hep-ph/ Good prospects for detecting HE neutrinos from the sun – M ν’ <100GeV, ν’ pairs annihilate directly into ν pairs : accessible to AMANDA (max 5-10 events/yr) and Antares Also good signal in positron –Pamela LZP annihilation near galactic center might give gamma rays signal

Comparisons of DM scenarios

Summary Dirac RH neutrino is viable DM candidate Mass range 40GeV-few TeV Need resonance annihilation and/or coannihilation for M<700GeV Distinctive feature: expect large signal in direct detection Need to further study collider potential for detecting new particles