Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPANY MAINTENANCE MANUAL
Advertisements

Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
USG INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM AUDIT: ACHIEVING SUCCESSFUL AUDIT OUTCOMES Cara King Senior IT Auditor, OIAC.
Integrity Management Program Special Permits (IMP-SP) Draft Administrative Plan 12/5/2007.
Responsible CarE® Process Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
Contractor Safety Management
Overview of Key Rule Features
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
Self Declaration Protocol EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005.
1 MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATION’S FOODSERVICE AND RETAIL FOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
Center for Offshore Safety
IN FOCUS LEGAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS RECYCLER QUALIFICATION OFFICE MARCH 2014.
Multnomah County Health Department ►Essential Services ►FDA Food Standards ►PACE Tools for Food Program Excellence Lila Wickham March 17, 2004 ♣
Integrity Management Inspection Process Don Moore, OPS Central Region.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Harold Winnie, CATS Manager (Central Region) Leak detection for.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Chapter 6 Software Implementation Process Group
Certificate in Pipeline Construction, Welding & Inspection LECA LEXTON ENERGY CORPORATE ACADEMY Copyright 2013 Lexton Energy Incorporated PCWI delivered.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Authorization Basis Plan Steven Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting December 10 – 11, 2009.
Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.
HQ Expectations of DOE Site IRBs Reporting Unanticipated Problems and Review/Approval of Projects that Use Personally Identifiable Information Libby White.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) Rule.
SENG521 (Fall SENG 521 Software Reliability & Testing Software Product & process Improvement using ISO (Part 3d) Department.
1 DIMSA A Distribution Integrity Management SME Approach August – 2009.
Federal Aviation Administration Maintenance "Personal Minimums" Federal Aviation Administration DOT/FAA.
Maintenance "Personal Minimums"
The Global Health Network Marijke Geldenhuys 19 September 2014 Adhering to the GCP Principles.. what does that even mean?
Important informations
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.4. Pre-disposal waste management Safety Standards.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Office of Pipeline Safety Qualifications of Individuals: Protocol Review Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Process Louisiana Pipeline Safety Seminar August 2003.
Supplemental Education Service Providers Becoming a Supplemental Education Service Provider.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Stephanie Weidman Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Management of Change ► The health, safety, security, environmental, technical and other impacts of temporary and permanent changes are formally assessed,
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Approvals and Permits Division Isreal Mallard Transportation Specialist,
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING JAMES BACHMAIER
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
Lessons Learned from Integrity Management Inspections Byron Coy – OPS Eastern Region Derick Turner – OPS Southern Region May 17, 2005.
OPS Observations, Expectations, and Concerns Zach Barrett (OPS) Direct Assessment Workshop November 4, 2003.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Cost effective while providing customer focused solutions.
INGAA Quality Management Systems White Paper Supporting Pipeline Construction.
Firefighter Emergency Escape Systems New York State Department of Labor Public Employee Safety and Health (PESH)
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 1 The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Application and Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Training.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
1 RIGHT SOLUTIONS RIGHT PARTNER Industrial. 2 RIGHT SOLUTIONS RIGHT PARTNER Testing & Inspection Asset Care Industrial.
National Food Control Systems
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
Quality assurance for Manufacturing Dressed Cavities for SPS prototype cryomodule C. Parente (HL-LHC Technical Quality Officer) Date:
Strategy for conformity of non-standard cryogenic equipment
Document Evaluation Process May 2005 Revision
FEDERAL PROGRAMS FINANCE
Cranes, Hoists and Lifting Devices Identification
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
Environmental Commitments
QA Reviews Lecture # 6.
HQ Expectations of DOE Site IRBs
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)
Presentation transcript:

Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002

Office of Pipeline Safety Protocol Objectives Ensure operator’s remediation process is adequate to ensure safety and environmental protection Determine operator has implemented process effectively

Office of Pipeline Safety Program Element Requirement § (h) -- What actions must an operator take to address integrity issues? (1) General requirements. °take prompt action to address all anomalous conditions °remediate those that could reduce a pipeline’s integrity °demonstrate remediation will ensure long-term integrity of the pipeline

Office of Pipeline Safety Program Element Requirement § (h) (2) Discovery when operator has adequate information to determine condition presents a threat to integrity no later than 180 days after an integrity assessment

Office of Pipeline Safety Remediation Process Review Is process formally documented, reviewed and approved? Does process clearly document actions required and responsibilities? Does the process address all of the requirements found in § (h)? Does data feed back into the operator’s other integrity-related processes?

Office of Pipeline Safety Remediation Process Review Does process assure compliance with § ? °should address operator’s procedures for making repairs °must ensure repairs are made in a safe manner °should address applicable requirements for a design and construction noted in §195 Subparts C and D, respectively °should incorporate existing, recognized industry practices and standards for pipeline repairs

Office of Pipeline Safety Process Implementation Review Has the operator implemented its remediation process? Was a prioritized schedule prepared? Was a operating pressure reduced or pipeline shut down for all Immediate Repair Conditions? Were temporary reductions in operating pressures calculated appropriately?

Office of Pipeline Safety Process Implementation Review Were changes to the original remediation schedule handled appropriately? Were technical basis and justification for schedule changes valid? Was remediation accomplished in accordance with the operator’s process and procedures requirements?

Office of Pipeline Safety Remediation Schedule Should be consistent with § (h) (3) and (4) requirements based on severity of identified conditions Operators should consider other factors in prioritizing within those severity categories For all conditions, clock starts on day of discovery

Office of Pipeline Safety Remediation Schedule If remediation schedule cannot be met and operator cannot provide safety through a temporary reduction in operating pressure, operator must notify OPS

Office of Pipeline Safety Immediate Repair Conditions Operators MUST temporarily reduce operating pressure or shut down the pipeline until repairs are completed Pressure reductions °must be based on pressures pipe has actually experienced °must be calculated using the formula in B31.4, Section 451.7, if applicable, or engineering justification if not. °cannot exceed 365 days without further remedial action

Office of Pipeline Safety Immediate Repair Conditions Temporary pressure reductions should be determined and implemented immediately upon discovery “Immediately” being, as soon as it can practically be accomplished

Office of Pipeline Safety Remediation Methods Areas of inspection will include: Excavation Plans Repair methods & criteria Procedures & personnel qualification (welding, NDE, NDT)

Office of Pipeline Safety Expectations Formal documentation of remediation process including copies of reference procedures and documents Inclusion of requirements consistent with § (h) Use of repair methods consistent with industry standards Documentation of excavation and repairs