Ron Owston Dean, York University Faculty of Education 4th International Conference on e-Learning and Distance Education -Riyadh March 2015 Student engagement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Advertisements

PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING & CAPACITY BUILDING
Quality Matters! Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design Susan Bussmann and Sandy Johnson NMSU Quality Matters Institutional.
Team Teaching Section 2: Traditional Team Teaching.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
SITE Presentation JANE STRICKLAND (IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY) A. W. STRICKLAND (IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY)
Are You Smarter Than a 5 th Grader? Are You Smarter Than a ? th Grader? 1,000,000 5th Level Topic 1 5th Level Topic 2 4th Level Topic 3 4th Level Topic.
Do the Data Support our Assumptions? Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.
Dr. Hari Singh School of Business Humboldt State University.
CIS 101 Meeting the Challenges in a Blended Learning Course.
Blended/hybrid Learning Discussion Knowledge Team March 2008 Online only Both online and f2f F2f only.
A Look at Online Teaching and Learning at UCF Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.
NTID Technology Symposium June 2010 Gary Long James Mallory Richard Fasse Carol Marchetti.
WHO IS THE ONLINE STUDENT? Barbara Truman-Davis Director, Course Development & Web Services Dale Voorhees Coordinator, Course Development Barbara Truman-Davis.
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Contributions by Sue Groh and Hal White.
Data on Student Learning Office of Assessment University of Kentucky.
Using Lecture123 in an English Hybrid Course David Buck, English Instructor Burlington County College 10 March 2006.
LL TCH 490 Blended Learning in the 21 st Classroom Dr. Han Liu Department of Teacher Education Shippensburg University Blended Learning.
Introduction to Blended Learning Richard Walker E-Learning Development Team University of York Definitions & Design Principles.
Expanding Blended Learning Through Tools and Campus Programs A UCF/AASCU Project Thomas Cavanagh, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President, Distributed Learning.
Preparing for and Teaching Hybrid Courses Midwest EDUCAUSE March 25, 2003 Mary Sudzina, Ph.D. University of Dayton Robert Kaleta, Ph.D. & Carla Garnham.
Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 Results Online and Blended Learning Views of Ohio’s K-12 Students, Parents, Teachers and Administrators.
Objectives 1. ) Describe online learning
SLIDE 1 Innovations Conference March SLIDE 2 The National Lone Star Report Aligning Technology with Student Success.
E-Learning: Education Anytime, Anywhere Randy Rodgers Walden University.
Tammy Muhs General Education Program Mathematics Coordinator University of Central Florida NCAT Redesign Scholar Course Redesign: A Way To Improve Student.
Creating an Online Faculty Development Course Lisa Ames.
LSE 2009 Staff Survey – Presentation to Staff Briefings 15 th /16 th March 2010.
The Mechanics of Putting Your Courses Online Summer Institute 2003 Lesley Blicker, Office of Instructional Technology
An Online Learning Case Study Board of Governors Distance Learning Workshop March 23, 2011 Dr. Joel L. Hartman, Vice Provost & CIO University of Central.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
SUCCESSFULLY PREPARING ALL STUDENTS FOR THEIR FUTURES SE 256 TH STREET, KENT, WA | TECH TALKS: TOOLS WORTH KNOWING Professional.
Dr Fiona J. L. Handley Centre for Learning and Teaching.
Tammy Muhs, Ph.D. Assistant Chair, Mathematics Department University of Central Florida NCAT Redesign Scholar Getting Started with Course Redesign.
BLENDED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: UTILITY OR FUTILITY?
New Millennium Learners Chuck Dziuban Patsy Moskal University of Central Florida.
Distance Learning - Trends and Issues CAAHEP Summer Workshop July 19, 2013 Boston, Massachusetts Darcy W Hardy, PhD.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Interactive Feedback. center.
Gouri Banerjee, Ph. D. Dept. Math & IT, Emmanuel College Boston, Massachusetts. 1 Gouri Banerjee Blended Learning Environments, 2010.
INTRODUCTION TO BLENDED LEARNING Bill Wisser, Ph.D. Simmons College 24 April 2012.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015.
Shaking Up Statistics: A Blended Learning Perspective My Vu, Erin M. Buchanan, Kayla Jordan, Marilee Teasley, Kathrene Valentine Missouri State University.
Metro Technology Centers Emphasizing Academics in the Career Tech Classroom.
Instructional Design Strategies for Online Course Dr. Alisa Cooper Instructional Technologist & English Faculty Glendale Community College Online Course.
Preparing K-12 Students for Higher Education MVU Online Learning Symposium Kellogg Conference Center February 8, 2007 Michael Wahl, MCCVLC.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
MAKING THE SHIFT: FROM CLASSROOM TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN
SALG Student Assessment of Learning Gains Suzanne Aurilio, Mark Laumakis CDI Online, July 14,2009.
Pedagogical Standards and Sustainable Distance Education Programming Karen Gersten Associate Provost for Academic Programs and Faculty Development Laura.
Building Learning Communities with Hybrid Courses NMC Online Conference on Social Computing November 2004 Robert Kaleta and Alan Aycock University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
ABSTRACT In this study, structural equation modeling is applied to examine the determinants of students’ satisfaction and their perceived learning outcomes.
Chapter 9 Review How can you measure employee engagement levels over time?
Capabilities Analysis Briefing for Chancellor and Senior Leaders.
Margaret Fraiser UW-Milwaukee Challenges and Strategies for Teaching Online Courses.
Definition and Rationale Blended/Hybrid Learning Dan Cabrera.
Teaching and learning online: Perceptions of UAF Rural Campus Instructors Victor and Natalia Zinger UAF.
The journey towards successfully flipping the classroom: a community of practice approach MINNESOTA ELEARNING SUMMIT July 29th 2015 Minnesota Technical.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
Applying Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Blended Learning Blogging and Collaborative Activity Design R Papworth, R Walker & W Britcliffe E-Learning.
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
Closing the loop: How to redesign a course for blended learning
Missouri State University
A Tale of Two Contexts: Student Perceptions of Adaptive Learning
Adapting to Adaptive Learning
Anthony (Tony) Picciano – City University of New York
A Fully Integrated Print and Digital Program
Priority Areas The unit plan submitted for the competition must be aligned to one of the four GOSA Priority Areas. Your plan should match all components.
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
Presentation transcript:

Ron Owston Dean, York University Faculty of Education 4th International Conference on e-Learning and Distance Education -Riyadh March 2015 Student engagement in blended learning: A three year study

2 My focus today… 1. What is blended learning? 2. Why should it interest you? 3. What are findings of my study?

1. So what is blended learning? SIRI help – what is blended learning? Answer: …a formal education program in which a student learns at least in part through online delivery and instruction…

Basic definition… Source: Sloan-C report Blending-In

definition Blended learning is an approach to course design that brings together the best of both face-to-face and online learning.

Takes best advantage of both worlds Source: Graham, 2006

Designing for Blended Learning Face-to-face  spontaneous  ephemeral  peer influence  passion  subjective Online  reflective  permanent  < intimidating  reason  > rigor integrate complement Adapted from Norm Vaughan

9 Student perspective 2. Why should blended learning interest you? Institutional perspective Faculty perspective

10 Student Perspective: Blended learning clearly improves accessibility Allows for flexibility in students’ study, work, and life balance

Students don’t want “all tech, all the time” ECAR 2007 survey n= 27,675

Students indicated strong satisfaction in my survey of Canadian 8 universities (n=2,714) “Overall, I am quite satisfied with this [blended] course” – average 70% (range %)

I would take another course in the future that has both online and face-to-face components [at York U] N = courses

Students more satisfied with blended than fully online courses 39% Fully online (N = 1,526) Blended (N = 485) 41% 11% 9% Very Satisfied UnsatisfiedSatisfied Neutral 38% 44% 9% Very Unsatisfied 3% 5% 1% Percent Dziuban & Moskal, Univ. of Central Florida (n.d.)

Taking this course increased my interest in the material [York U]

17 BUT, what about improving learning? % getting grades above C (N= 139,444 students) Dziuban & Moskal, Univ. of Central Florida (n.d.) Blue = F2F Green = Blended Purple = Online

Same pattern continues at UCF…

Further evidence… “Students who took all or part of their class online performed better, on average, than those taking the same course through traditional face-to-face instruction.” (51 studies, effect size = +0.24) US DoE, 2009

A student’s perspective…

Instant feedback Shared understanding of content Flexible Online flowed into classroom Any time, anywhere

Challenges for students Transition – from a passive to an active learning approach Study and time management skills, esp. low achievers Expecting that fewer classes equates to less work Accepting responsibility for completing individual & team activities

23 High satisfaction Get to know students better Adds flexibility to your schedule Faculty perspective on blended… Reinvigorates teaching

Challenges for faculty Workload/tenure issues Resistance to change-why bother? Time consuming initially Managing with scarce support for course redesign Learning to use new technologies

Institutional perspective…cost avoidance Online and blended courses allowed UCF to avoid more than $7 million in construction costs $277,000 in annual operating costs (Hartman, 2007) Our calculations show that 100 new courses will yield about $12 million in income and cost $1.5 million  ROI 8:1 (

Improved classroom utilization ( Hartman, 2007)

Challenges for the institution Is blended learning consistent with vision? Is there an action plan? Incentives in place? Academic recognition in place? Is it sustainable?

3. What are findings of my 3 year study? 5 large (~300/students) first year Fine Arts courses surveyed, N=2094 Asked for perceptions compared to other courses they’ve taken Scale 1 to 5 (SD, D, N, A, SA)

Findings for student involvement: as compared to other courses taken

Findings for student interactions in course

Findings for technology use

Findings on student learning

33 Blended learning can lead to greater student engagement BUT The instructor role is critical Are you willing to try blended learning? Questions/comments? In summary…

Follow up …