From Errors to Stereotypes: Different Levels of Cognitive Models in School Algebra  Élisabeth DELOZANNE (CRIP5 Paris 5) Christian VINCENT (Math teacher)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Formative Assessment Item Bank Fulton County Schools Mathematics Professional Development August 12, 2010 Essential Question: How do we use the FCS Mathematics.
Advertisements

Data to Instruction Eric Lech Session Objectives Understand differences in assessments and their impact on instruction Understand the.
Assessing with technology in France New problems and a new tool (Casyopée) Jean-Baptiste LAGRANGE Equipe de Didactique des Mathématiques, Université Paris.
The Development of Mathematical Proficiency Presented by the Math Coaches of LAUSD, District K Based on: Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics,
Common Core Initiative FAQ Who is leading the Common Core State Standards Initiative? The Council of Chief State School Officers.
TONIGHT’S AGENDA K - 5th Grade Math
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
Designing a Continuum of Learning to Assess Mathematical Practice NCSM April, 2011.
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
Artificial Intelligence
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Providing Tutoring Service through Accumulating Interaction Data Chi-Jen LIN Fo Guang University, Taiwan.
1 The Pépite project Élisabeth Delozanne, Paris Universitas, UPMC D. Prévit, B. Grugeon, F. Chenevotot Automatic Multi-criteria Assessment of Open-Ended.
Unit 15 Assessment in Language Teaching. Teaching objectives By the end of the lesson, students should be able to:  know what assessment is and how it.
Writing Instructional Objectives
Cognitive Science Overview Design Activity Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory Cognitive Flexibility Theory.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
M ATH C OMMITTEE Mathematical Shifts Mathematical Practices.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Boot Camp Spring  Choose a class and complete a Context for Learning for this class. (It can be the same class as the literacy tasks, but YOU MUST.
All You Need to Know about CMP3 Marta Miko Marketing Manager, Middle Grades Math 2014 National Sales Meeting.
PERCENTAGE AS RELATIONAL SCHEME: PERCENTAGE CALCULATIONS LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A.F. Díaz-Cárdenas, H.A. Díaz-Furlong, A. Díaz-Furlong, M.R. Sankey-García.
September, Network for New Science/Math Teachers September 24, 2010 Meeting 1, Year 2 Lexington, KY University of Kentucky Partnership Institute.
How to read the grade level standards Standards Clusters Domains define what students should understand and be able to do. are groups of related standards.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
Out with the Old, In with the New: NYS Assessments “Primer” Basics to Keep in Mind & Strategies to Enhance Student Achievement Maria Fallacaro, MORIC
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
Transitioning to the Common Core: MDTP Written Response Items Bruce Arnold, MDTP Director California Mathematics Council – South Conference November 2,
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Math Night For Parents. How To Do Math Group discussions Cooperative tasks iPad presentations Problem solving strategies Daily review.
This module was developed by Carrie Ziegler, Nathan Auck, and Steve Jackson. They are the three principle designers of the course, Principles to Actions,
Standards for Mathematical Practice #1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. I can: explain the meaning of a problem. choose the right.
Technology in the classroom. UM weather Great way to begin a day or class –Links to 300 weather sites –Links to 700 web cams to view weather –Radar and.
Project 2 CCSSM Interpretation Guide Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Summer Institute 2011.
LEARNING DISABILITIES IMPACTING MATHEMATICS Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
Integrating Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Mathematics and Science.
Prepared by M.A. Sana Yousif Ahmed College of Languages English Department Evening Classes.
Cognitive Science Overview Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory.
PROBLEM AREAS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION By C.K. Chamasese.
Linguistic Markers to Improve the Assessment of students in Mathematics: An Exploratory Study Sylvie NORMAND-ASSADI, IUFM de Créteil Lalina COULANGE, IUFM.
Common Core and the Arts Connections, Collaborations and Myths.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
LINGOT Project: Monitoring the Learning of Algebra according to Students’ Cognitive Profiles Élisabeth DELOZANNE CRIP5 (Paris 5) Brigitte GRUGEON-ALLYS.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
LEARNING DISABILITIES IMPACTING MATHEMATICS Ann Morrison, Ph.D.
USING VIDEO TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THE MATH PRACTICES LOOK LIKE IN K-5 CLASSROOMS.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
Individual Project CCSSM Interpretation Guide. Three Components Part 1. Standard or Set of Standards Part 2. Interpretation of the Standard Part 3. “Check.
1 Classroom Assessment Compiled by Linda Blocker.
Monitoring and Assessment Presented by: Wedad Al –Blwi Supervised by: Prof. Antar Abdellah.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Introduction to Math Methods Math Standards. Why can math be fun? Math can be fun because… it can have so much variety in topics. many different ways.
Natalija Budinski Primary and secondary school “Petro Kuzmjak” Serbia
Mathematical Practice Standards
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Assessment of Learning 1
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
Numeracy Skills Framework
PROBLEM SOLVING CHECKLIST
Prepared by: Toni Joy Thurs Atayoc, RMT
Presentation transcript:

From Errors to Stereotypes: Different Levels of Cognitive Models in School Algebra  Élisabeth DELOZANNE (CRIP5 Paris 5) Christian VINCENT (Math teacher) Brigitte GRUGEON-ALLYS, Lalina COULANGE, Jean-Michel GELIS (DIDIREM Paris 7), Jeannine ROGALSKI (Paris 8) 1 1 E-learn05

2 2 Overview  The Pépite project  Studies on teachers’ diagnosis activity  Stereotypes of students’ competence in algebra  Monitoring learning activities  Conclusion

3 3 The Pépite Project  Objective  To help teachers diagnose student's competence in algebra in order to better regulate learning  Multidisciplinary project  3 objectives  Diagnostic  Learning  Dissemination of research results among teachers

4 4 An educational study (Grugeon 1995, Artigue et al. 2001)  A set of exercises to test students  3 kinds of problems: ― Technical, modeling and interpretation  An analysis grid to characterize students' usual answers  Students’ profiles  A quantitative description ― Success rates on mastered skills  A qualitative description ― Meaning of letters, algebraic calculus, translation between representations and types of justification  A diagram to describe the flexibility between representations ― Algebraic, numerical, geometric, and natural language

5 5 Pépite software P ÉPI T EST P ÉPI P ROF Automatic Analysis of the whole test P ÉPI D IAG Automatic Coding of each exercice End-users: Students Teachers Researchers Checking by a human

6 6 Example : Blandine

7 7 Example : Aliou

8 8 Teachers’ diagnostic activity  Diagnosis  Focused on the class or a group of students rather than on individual students  Often expressed in categories of students ― Overall achievement : Good & quick, average & quick, average & slow, students with many difficulties ― Well-known errors  Closely linked with action ― Especially : experienced teachers  Pépite : interesting but too demanding + It reveals "hidden knowledge" − Difficulty of computer access, too much time required to administer the test, not enough support for teachers to capitalize on the results of the diagnosis

9 9 Using Pépite : What teachers asked for ?  Remediation proposals according to profiles  A “cognitive geography” for the whole class  Grouping of students  …

10 Monitoring learning activities for the whole class  Problem: an articulation between  Catering for individual students  Whole class management  Objective: Grouping of students  Based on an accurate didactical analysis of the algebraic competence  Supported by technology  How to do it?  Stereotypes of students’ profiles  Learning situations linked with stereotypes

11 Stereotypes  Objective  Conceptual tools to articulate personalization and whole class management  Definition  Stereotype = a class of students’ personal cognitive profiles  How are they used in the project?  To present a single student’s diagnosis: ― The stereotype it belongs to ― The student’s personal features  To propose adapted learning situations ― Stereotypes:  To choose learning activities to work on in priority ― Student's personal features:  To tune parameters to activities

12 Blandine's Stereotype & Personal features UA3, T3, AC3

13 Anissa'sStereotype & Personal features

14 Cognitive geography of the class 2nd10 (10 th grade) UA3 T3 CA3 UA3 T3 CA2 UA3 T2 CA3 UA2 T3 CA3UA2 T3 CA1

15 Stereotypes and teaching strategies  Step 1 : to destabilize erroneous rules  Counter-examples with numbers (T3) or surface areas of geometrical figures (T2)  Expressions ― CA3 : a²=2a ; 5 +3a = 8a etc. ― CA2 : a²+b² = (a+b)² etc.  Step 2 : to re-build knowledge  UA3 : task of generalization or proof in order to make sense of letters  UA2 : to write equations and to solve them  Step 3 : to use algebra in different contexts

16 Conclusion  Stereotypes  Based on an accurate didactical analysis of the domain  Supported by technology  As a way for grouping students and to organize learning activities in a classroom that fit to the students' personal cognitive profiles  Experiments are currently in progress to evaluate these teaching strategies  We observe that teachers need time to appropriate these tools in their daily practices  Future : design of learning environments  Automatically tune the parameters to the student's personal features

17 Web sites Software download and research documents Documents for teachers (in French) (formation continue, la compétence algébrique du collège au lycée) Thank you!