September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oscillation formalism
Advertisements

HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
MINOS+ Sterile Neutrino Studies J.Thomas UCL J.Evans (UCL), A.Gavrilenko (W&M), M.Matthis (W&M)A.Sousa(Harvard) UCL.
Neutrino Oscillation Physics at a Neutrino Factory Rob Edgecock RAL/CERN-AB.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
Degree of polarization of  produced in quasielastic charge current neutrino-nucleus scattering Krzysztof M. Graczyk Jaroslaw Nowak Institute of Theoretical.
Slepton Discovery in Cascade Decays Jonathan Eckel, Jessie Otradovec, Michael Ramsey-Musolf, WS, Shufang Su WCLHC Meeting UCSB April
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
Neutrino-CH 19 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP and K2K 1. The K2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5. conclusions.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Howard Budd, Univ. of Rochester1 Vector and Axial Form Factors Applied to Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Scattering Howard Budd University of Rochester (in collaboration.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
Background Understanding and Suppression in Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments with Water Cherenkov Detector Chiaki Yanagisawa Stony Brook.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
1/16 MDC post-mortem redux Status as of last CC meeting: –True values of cross-section and oscillation parameters were used to reweight the ND and FD MC.
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
Search for CP violation in  decays R. Stroynowski SMU Representing CLEO Collaboration.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 Confidence Intervals and Upper Limits Confidence intervals (CI) are related to confidence limits (CL). To calculate.
A. Blondel, M.Campanelli, M.Fechner Energy measurement in quasi-elastics Unfolding detector and physics effects Alain Blondel Mario Campanelli Maximilien.
A Monte Carlo exploration of methods to determine the UHECR composition with the Pierre Auger Observatory D.D’Urso for the Pierre Auger Collaboration
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Effects of exotic interactions in Neutrino Oscillations in matter Mario Campanelli Université de Genève Andrea Romanino Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
2 Atmospheric Neutrinos Atmospheric neutrino detector at Kolar Gold Field –1965.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
A taste of statistics Normal error (Gaussian) distribution  most important in statistical analysis of data, describes the distribution of random observations.
NEUTRINO PHYSICS 1. Historical milestones 2. Neutrinos at accelerators 3. Solar and atmospheric neutrinos 4. Neutrino oscillations 5. Neutrino astronomy.
Long Baseline Neutrino Beams and Large Detectors Nicholas P. Samios Istanbul, Turkey October 27, 2008.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
1 Iterative dynamically stabilized (IDS) method of data unfolding (*) (*arXiv: ) Bogdan MALAESCU CERN PHYSTAT 2011 Workshop on unfolding.
Steve Geer IDS Meeting CERN March Neutral Currents and Tests of 3-neutrino Unitarity in Long-Baseline Exeriments Steve Geer Barger, Geer, Whisnant,
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
First Look at Data and MC Comparisons for Cedar and Birch ● Comparisons of physics quantities for CC events with permutations of Cedar, Birch, Data and.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
Dynamics of  →       F. Ambrosino T. Capussela F. Perfetto.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
A bin-free Extended Maximum Likelihood Fit + Feldman-Cousins error analysis Peter Litchfield  A bin free Extended Maximum Likelihood method of fitting.
1 Searching for Z’ and model discrimination in ATLAS ● Motivations ● Current limits and discovery potential ● Discriminating variables in channel Z’ 
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
A different cc/nc oscillation analysis Peter Litchfield  The Idea:  Translate near detector events to the far detector event-by-event, incorporating.
Update on my oscillation analysis Reconstructed Near detector data event Reconstructed Near detector MC event Truth Near detector MC event Truth Far detector.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
1 Translation from Near to Far at K2K T.Kobayashi IPNS, KEK for K2K beam monitor group (K.Nishikawa, T.Hasegawa, T.Inagaki, T.Maruyama, T.Nakaya,....)
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Sensitivity to New Physics using Atmospheric Neutrinos and AMANDA-II John Kelley UW-Madison IceCube Collaboration Meeting Baton Rouge, LA April 10, 2006.
PAC questions and Simulations Peter Litchfield, August 27 th Extent to which MIPP/MINER A can help estimate far detector backgrounds by extrapolation.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
Neutrino Interaction measurement in K2K experiment (1kton water Cherenkov detector) Jun Kameda(ICRR) for K2K collaboration RCCN international workshop.
Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
Andrea Chiavassa Universita` degli Studi di Torino
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Physics with the ICARUS T1800 detector
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Presentation transcript:

September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure In collaboration with M. Campanelli Supervised by A. Blondel

September 10, 2002M. Fechner2 Introduction Study of low energy Super Beam + water Cherenkov detector Quasi elastic events are dominant (< 1 GeV) and easier to reconstruct than DIS But they require taking into account detector efficiency and nuclear physics effects (Fermi motion, Pauli blocking) Most previous studies rely on counting the number of oscillated events General unfolding method based on the Monte Carlo re weighting technique in order to recover spectral information

September 10, 2002M. Fechner3 Neutrino energy reconstruction CC quasi elastic interactions: only the lepton can be observed (proton below Cherenkov threshold) For a target nucleon at rest, neutrino energy can be exactly reconstructed from lepton information only But in the presence of nuclear effects this does not work any more

September 10, 2002M. Fechner4 Fast Monte Carlo simulation Two body kinematics Center of mass lepton angle distribution given by in Gaisser et al. (1986) Fermi momentum k F =225 MeV/c (nucleon momentum isotropic in sphere of radius k F ) n p  kFkF

September 10, 2002M. Fechner5 Fast Monte Carlo simulation Pauli blocking: outgoing proton momentum p > k F Nuclear potential well: Standard SPL+UNO event rates considered (baseline 130 km i.e. CERN->Fréjus). Detector resolution (from SuperK): Angular resolution:  ~3° (for e and  ) Momentum resolution:  (E  )/E  ~3%  (E e )/E e ~

Energy reconstruction Using the above formula for e and  at low energy (< 1.5 GeV) E gen E reconstructed e  Perfect detection Detector resolution only Nuclear effects only All effects included 6

Results of the MC simulation 20% average resolution, 5% negative bias Erec-Egen Resolution e  e  7

September 10, 2002M. Fechner8 Need for an unfolding method  disappearance Using true energy Using reconstructed energy Oscillation dip invisible Large water Cherenkov illuminated by SPL->Fréjus superbeam 200 kTyear exposure

September 10, 2002M. Fechner9 Fitting for oscillation parameters in presence of distorting effects Classical problem in HEP Solution: Monte Carlo reweighting (used previously e.g. at LEP for W mass fits) Principle: Production of a large MC correspondence table between the real quantity (E gen ) and the measured one (E rec ) and approximate each data event with the MC events sufficiently close to it Since only one MC sample is produced, using a given set   of oscillation parameters, events are given a weight according to the ratio of oscillation probabilities

September 10, 2002M. Fechner10 The box method 2 sets of data: ‘experimental’ sample (uses SPL spectra) MC sample For each data event: box around measured value. All MC events inside the box are good approximations of the data and used in the likelihood

Box reweighting at work Reconstructed distribution MC events in the box reconstructed generated Data event Image of the box weights MC correspondence table

September 10, 2002M. Fechner12 Likelihood function Likelihood function with 2 factors, one from the spectral shape (i.e. box method) and the other describing the Poisson probability for the number of events Where  is the weight and  is the oscillation param. set Counting Spectral shape (box method)

September 10, 2002M. Fechner13 Comments on the results We have used binned data (20 MeV wide bins): sum over bins rather than events MC sample ~500 times larger than ‘exp.’ sample The method is general and not limited to event reconstruction in water Cherenkov detectors

September 10, 2002M. Fechner14 Fits to  m 2 32 Error ~1%Good linearity and precision over the whole relevant range  m 12 = 0 eV 2 sin 2 2  23 =1, sin 2 2  13 =0.05

September 10, 2002M. Fechner15 Fitting the atmospheric parameters 2D plots in the plane ‘Counting’ likelihood: large open contours due to correlations ‘Spectral’ likelihood: uses the reweighting method to extract the maximal amount of information from the spectrum Plots  m 23 =  m 12 = tan 2  12 =0.4 sin 2 2  23 =0.95 sin 2 2  13 =0.02  =0 Using the parameters

Counting Spectral reconstruction Error on  m 2 ~ eV 2 Error on sin 2 2  ~ 2% Counting +box

September 10, 2002M. Fechner17 Precision on  13   does not modify the energy spectrum (in 1rst approximation)  information mostly contained in the number of events, so the reweighting does not improve the measurement of sin 2 2  13 sin 2 2  13  m 2 23  m 23 =  m 12 = tan 2  12 =0.4 sin 2 2  23 =0.95 sin 2 2  13 =0.02  =0 Counting only Counting + box

September 10, 2002M. Fechner18 Application to CP-violation Same oscillation parameters in MC and ‘experience’ With neutrinos only and 200 kTyear, sin 2 2  13 =0.02,   Need for antineutrinos !  m 23 =  m 12 = tan 2  12 =0.4 sin 2 2  23 =0.95 Counting only Counting+box

September 10, 2002M. Fechner19 CP-violation: higher statistics 10fold increase: 2000 kTyear, sin 2 2  13 =0.04,  At 3  CL,  but impossible to measure. Counting only Counting + box Neutrinos only !

September 10, 2002M. Fechner20 CP-violation: using antineutrinos Neutrinos ‘exp.’ sample : 200 kTyear statistics sin 2 2   =0.02,  Antineutrino ‘exp.’sample : 1000 kTyear stats sin 2 2   =0.02,  MC sample: 600 times larger than ‘exp.’ with: sin 2 2   =0.04,  Likelihood computed with  and  m 23 = eV 2  m 12 = eV 2 tan 2  12 =0.4 sin 2 2  23 =0.95

September 10, 2002M. Fechner21 antineutrinos neutrinos If the box method is not used: With the reweighting method: Error on  is ~3 times worse Counting only ~120° ~35° Counting+Box

September 10, 2002M. Fechner22 Conclusion Spectral information is essential in a Super Beam experiment Distortion due to detector and nuclear effects is large Necessity of using adequate unfolding technique to recover spectral information MC reweighting method is very general and can unfold any effect provided they are described correctly in the MC Very good precision on main oscillation parameters. Significant improvements in the CP violation sector.