AT-VAC SPC 07-07-2008Nicolaas KOS Beam Screens for Inner Triplet Magnets LHC Upgrade Phase 1 Nicolaas KOS  LHC Upgrade phase 1  Inner triplet BS Requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recap of heat loads and peak doses from HL-LHC Q1 to Q7 L.S. Esposito, F. Cerutti HL-LHC WP3 meeting, 22 May 2014.
Advertisements

Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Upgrade Plan of KEKB Vacuum system Pre-kickoff KEK1 Y. Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group Contents Challenges for vacuum system Designs for.
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
ENERGY DEPOSITION IN HYBRID NbTi/Nb 3 Sn TRIPLET CONFIGURATIONS OF THE LHC PHASE I UPGRADE FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
R. Ostojic, WAMSDO, 19 May 2008 LHC Insertion Region Upgrade Phase I 1.Upgrade goals and milestones 2.Review of IR systems: main findings 3.The emerging.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
WP 13 : Beam Diagnostics Conceptual Specifications Rhodri Jones (BE/BI)
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Possible HTS wire implementation Amalia Ballarino Care HHH Working Meeting LHC beam-beam effects and beam-beam interaction CERN, 28 th August 2008.
YONG WANG, BO ZHAN, GJIE WANG National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory University of Science and Technology of China Key vacuum technologies.
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
Beam screens in IT phase 1
Technical agreement n 3 New SC Magnets activities P. Fessia (G. De Rijk), D. Reynet, J.M Rifflet.
February 13, 2012 Mu2e Production Solenoid Design V.V. Kashikhin Workshop on Radiation Effects in Superconducting Magnet Materials (RESMM'12)
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
Experimental Sectors Ray Veness / AT-VAC With many thanks to G.Foffano + W.Cameron TS/MME Patrick Lepeule / AT-VAC.
Thursday Summary of Working Group I Initial questions I: LHC LUMI 2005; ; ArcidossoOliver Brüning 1.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department 4 h May 2015 R. Kersevan, C. Garion, V. Baglin2 Preliminary Design of the HL-LHC Shielded Beam.
C. Garion Presentation Outline  Overview of the inner triplet interconnections  Q1/Q2, Q2/Q3 interconnections  General view  Working conditions  Compensation.
JRA on Development of High Temperature SC Link Motivation Work Packages Partners & resources Amalia Ballarino Esgard open meeting CERN,
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department 4 h May 2015 R. Kersevan, C. Garion, V. Baglin2 Preliminary Design of the HL-LHC Shielded Beam.
4/27/06 1 US LHC ACCELERATOR RESEARCH PROGRAM brookhaven - fermilab – berkeley - slac US LARP Inner Triplet Cryogenics and Heat Transfer LARP Collaboration.
Heat loads and cryogenics L.Tavian, D. Delikaris CERN, Cryogenics Group, Technology Department Accelerators & Technology Sector Friday, October 15, 20101HE-LHC'10.
FCC Week 2015, Washington Cooling the FCC beam screens
LHC Collimators Phase 2 - Visit to Plansee 28th August Materials for Phase II collimators.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department 22 nd January 2015 C. Garion2 Beam Line Interconnection: snapshot of present design principles.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
TAS-Q1 Status & what if exercise Etude [HL-LHC] TAS-Q1.
Shielding the 140 mm option F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team.
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioWorkshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam absorbers, 4 th Sept 2007 LHC Collimators (Phase II): What is an ideal material.
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
A liner in the Corrector package A Cu liner has been inserted in the gap between the CBT and the coil aperture of all the corrector package elements (see.
31/07/08Review new IRs: Energy Deposition1 Energy Deposition in the New IRs Francesco Cerutti, Marco Mauri, Alessio Mereghetti, Ezio Todesco, Elena Wildner.
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
Ultra-vacuum components and systems
TAXS and TAXN ABSORBERS - OVERVIEW
HL-LHC Aperture Update
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Machine-Experiment Interface
Preliminary Y-chamber specifications – First draft
R. Kersevan, TE-VSC-VSM 30/06/2016
Cedric Garion, TE-VSC-DLM, WP12
SiD Solenoid Status and Plans
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
Challenges for FCC-ee MDI mechanical design
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
Cooling Update (25 February 2014)
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
Discussion on the TDI impedance specifications
Update on beam screen issues
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Wednesday Summary of Working Group I
Revised estimates of heat loads and radiation damage in the IT and D1
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
Muon Collider SR and IR Magnets
Review of Quench Limits
F.Pasdeloup, H.Prin, L. Williams
Presentation transcript:

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screens for Inner Triplet Magnets LHC Upgrade Phase 1 Nicolaas KOS  LHC Upgrade phase 1  Inner triplet BS Requirements  Proposals  Examples of cross-sections  Aperture  Manufacturing issues  Next steps

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS LHC Upgrade Phase 1  V. Baglin and N. Kos represent AT-VAC in the LHC Insertions Upgrade Working Group (LIUWG)  As part of the LHC upgrade activities, the LHC Insertions Upgrade Working Group is mandated to develop conceptual and technical designs of the new layout of the inner triplets and other directly associated equipment in the ATLAS and CMS high-luminosity insertions. The goal of this stage of the upgrade is to be able to focus the beams at the two IPs to a spot size corresponding to b* of 0.25 m, and to reliably operate the LHC with a luminosity of about 2×10 34 cm -2 s -1.

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS LHC Upgrade Phase 1  The new insertions will be based on the available magnet technology, in particular on the use of Nb- Ti superconducting cables produced for the LHC, and will respect the present interfaces with the two experiments, the available cryogenic cooling capacity and other infrastructure in IR1 and IR5.  The Working Group reports to the Project Leader for the LHC Upgrade Activities and informs the management of the AB and AT Departments. The studies will be summarized in the Conceptual and Technical Design Reports, to be issued in 2008 and  

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS LHC Upgrade phase 1  Only IR1 and IR5 (ATLAS and CMS)  No modification of Q6 and beyond  Displacement of Q5 and Q4-D2 towards arc  Rotation of beam screens in Q5, Q4 and D2  Replacement of D1, Q3, Q2 and Q1 Larger aperture (cold bore ID 119 mm for 130 mm bore magnets TBC) New design beam screens, interconnections and CWT’s  Redesign of TAS and VAX zone between TAS and Q1

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screen for upgraded triplets – Requirements-  Control gas density in beam tube  Provide sufficient H and V aperture (without BS rotation)  Operation at 5-20 K or K  Evacuate heat load  Non-magnetic (μ < 1.005)  Withstand forces during quench  Only for Q1 : Absorber to intercept debris from IP

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS BEAM SCREEN OPERATING TEMPERATURE RANGES 5 – 20 K40 – 60 K Data compiled by V. BAGLIN AT-VAC

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screen for upgraded triplets – Requirements -  Control gas density in beam tube  Provide sufficient H and V aperture (without BS rotation)  Operation at 5-20 K or K  Evacuate heat load  Non-magnetic (μ < 1.005)  Withstand forces during quench  Only for Q1 : Absorber to intercept debris from IP

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Power deposition from collision debris TAS Q1 Q2 Q3

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screen - Proposals  2 mm P506 stainless steel for mechanical stability during quench and low magnetic perm. (μ ≤ 1.003)  Cu layer on inner surface to homogenise the BS temperature and give low impedance  ≥ 5 % pumping slot surface  4 laser welded cooling tubes to evacuate heat load (ΔT ≈ 3K between BS and He at 4 x 1 W/m)  Identical BS cross sections in Q1, Q2, Q3 (+D1)  Absorber positioned inside Q1 beam screen

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Race Track Design Based on existing beam screen design. Well suited for continuous forming; difficult to press as half shells.

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Octagonal Design 42º 48º Well suited to press as half shells. Compromise on aperture.

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Optimised octagonal design 42º 48º Well adapted to press as half shells. Increased aperture compared to octogonal design.

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Absorber in Q1 BS –1- - BS pumping slots partially masked - Pumping slots to be machined through thick absorber - Absorber weight (8 mm ss) 18 kg/m - Total BS weight (l = 10 m) 240 kg

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Absorber in Q1 BS –2- - BS pumping slots remain accesible - Cu plated P506 (11 kg/m) or Cu-alloy (13 kg/m) - Machined sections, unit lenghts to be defined - Screwed / brazed onto inner BS surface - RF contacts between sections ? - Half-aperture loss 9.8 mm compared to Q2 / Q3 - Q1 total beam screen weight 170 kg

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Optimised octagonal design - main dimensions in 119 ID CBore 116 ± ± ± ± rows, 50% transparency  5.1 %

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Radial BS size (corner) at RT for given cold bore diameter OV = ID/2 -  ID/2 - g - (d+  d) -  b * OV = ID/2 -  ID/2 - g - (d+  d) -  b * Where:OV = nominal vertical beam screen outer half-dimension [mm] ID = nominal cold bore inner diameter [mm]  ID = tolerance on cold bore inner diameter [mm] g = minimum radial gap [mm] d = nominal BS support thickness [mm]  d = tolerance on BS support thickness [mm]  b = tolerance on beam screen outer half-dimension [mm] *) Vacuum Technical Note 01-13, EDMS

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Half-Aperture (corner) at 5K for given cold bore diameter AV = (ID/2 - 3  ID/2 - 2g - d - 3  d - 4  b - w -  w - bss ) * Where:AV = vertical beam screen half-aperture [mm] = thermal contraction factor for P506 from 293K to 5K ID = nominal cold bore inner diameter [mm]  ID = tolerance on cold bore inner diameter [mm] g = minimum gap [mm] d = nominal sliding ring thickness [mm]  d = tolerance on the sliding ring thickness [mm]  b = tolerance on beam screen outer half-dimension [mm] w = nominal beam screen wall thickness [mm]  w = tolerance on beam screen wall thickness [mm] bss = beam screen straightness error [m/m] = longitudinal distance between rings [mm] *) Vacuum Technical Note 01-13, EDMS

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Half-Aperture (corner) at 5K for given cold bore diameter AV = (ID/2 - 3  ID/2 - 2g - d - 3  d - 4  b - w -  w - bss ) = 53.0 AV = beam screen half-aperture between corners [mm] = thermal contraction factor for P506 from 293K to 5K ID = nominal cold bore inner diameter [mm]119  ID = tolerance on cold bore inner diameter [mm]1.44 g = minimum gap [mm]0.1 d = nominal sliding ring thickness [mm]0.4  d = tolerance on the sliding ring thickness [mm]0.03  b = tolerance on beam screen outer half-dimension [mm]0.25 w = nominal beam screen wall thickness [mm]2.075  w = tolerance on beam screen wall thickness [mm]0.06 bss = beam screen straightness error [m/m]0.001 = longitudinal distance between rings [mm] 400

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Potential gain in half-aperture at zero tolerances AV = (ID/2 - 3  ID/2 - 2g - d - 3  d - 4  b - w -  w - bss ) Half-aperture gain  ID = tolerance on cold bore inner diameter [mm] =  d = tolerance on the sliding ring thickness [mm] = 0+ <0.1  b = tolerance on beam screen outer half-dimension [mm]=  w = tolerance on beam screen wall thickness [mm] = 0+ <0.1 bss = beam screen straightness error [m/m] =

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Potential gain in half-aperture for pre-measured cold bore ID AV = (ID/2 - 3  ID/2 - 2g - d - 3  d - 4  b - w -  w - bss ) dif = measured minimum ID – specified minimum ID ID’ = ID + dif/2 (assuming specified maximum ID unchanged) ΔID’ = ΔID – dif/2 half-aperture increase = dif/4 + 3dif/4 = dif Example : Specified minimum ID = 119 – 1.44 = mm Measured minimum ID = 118 mm Half-aperture increase = dif = 118 – = 0.44 mm !!!! Requires availablility of all cold bores before finalising the BS design !!!!

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Heat load ΔT ~ 3K between beam screen inner surface and He for 1 W/m per cooling tube Support heat load estimated 10 x the value for arc beam screens Q1 Q3 CW-transition : 5 W radiative 3 W conductive + 8 W total BS cool.tubes W/m BS supports 0.05 W/m BS cool.tubes W/m BS supports 0.05 W/m BS cool.tubes W/m BS supports 0.05 W/m Electr.cloud 1 W/m Debris W/m Total W/m CW-transition : 5 W radiative 3 W conductive + 8 W total Q2B BS cool.tubes W/m BS supports 0.05 W/m 10 m Q2A 10 m Electr.cloud 1 W/m Debris W/m Total W/m Electr.cloud 1 W/m Debris W/m Total W/m Electr.cloud 1 W/m Debris W/m Total W/m

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Manufacturing Issues  Lead time for P506 steel strip >12 months  Co-laminator (Heraeus, D) not interested !/?  Former/welder (Butting, D) not interested !  Octagonal design is more adapted to be built from pressed half shells than race track design  Cu-layer can be applied by means of electroplating (higher RRR, thinner layer)  Absorber attachment+thermalisation

AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Next steps  Finalisation of input parameters : CB diameter, magnet lengths and interconnect lengths  Continue discussions with CERN workshops (finishing, forming and welded, Cu-plating)  Optimize BS cross section and wall thickness