The interaction between the media and the public opinion: social media becoming a source of information in Luxembourg LU EMN NCP David Petry 04 November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU)
Advertisements

European experience with migration and integration problems: Ways for overcoming xenophobia and extremism ELDR&YABLOKO International Conference Youth under.
Belgium, the Netherlands & Luxembourg Brian James.
Tampere FINNISH DEMOCRACY AND CITIZENSHIP TAMPERE Timo Rajala Chairman of the City Council of Akaa Welcome, everybody!
38th Conference of the Directors of EU Paying Agencies
Canadian Immigration and Citizenship
Who belongs to the European Union?
This version of the presentation has a recorded commentary that you can listen to as you watch. You shouldn’t try to press any buttons or click the mouse.
CHAPTER 2 SECTION 5 The European Union. Objectives  Learn about the history of the European Union.  Understand the purpose of the European Union. 
Use the maps on pages 267 and 322 of Europe to brainstorm different cultural factors in Europe. 1.Do you think that this diversity causes problems within.
FRANCE National Identity & Immigration. Definitions l Immigration not just sensitive political issue l opportunity to examine social ties, national integration.
Working, Living and Health Conditions - Legal and Illegal Migrant Workers, the Czech Republic ECRP Eurocores, February 21-22, 2008 Irish School of Ecumenics,
Business in a Global Economy
Business in a Global Economy. Read: You may not know it but you’re a part of the global marketplace. You might buy clothes made in Taiwan. Turnover your.
Robert Gründemann & Sjiera de Vries 5th european conference on promoting workplace health, Linz, June Dutch grant scheme for age management.
Citizenship. Who are we? What do we look like? Making a single nation out of such diverse people is difficult. What is a citizen, and what does it take.
Public opinion on integration and immigration - how does Britain compare? Bobby Duffy Head of International Social Trends Unit February 2007.
European Union.
Domestic work – a legislative frame in the EU? ETUC Seminar Brussels, April 2005 Wiebke Düvel European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education.
Workforce on the move: the case of Luxembourg Fabienne Becker & Adolfo Sommarribas LU EMN NCP 26 June 2013 Warsaw, Poland.
 Definition: an organization that consists of a number of parties or groups united in an alliance or league.  Give Russia the idea that Europe was against.
Ipsos Survey A study of the Business Section of the Your Europe Portal. 1.
Nationality and (in) migration ENAR Policy Seminar Brussels,
Czech Immigration Policy Lenka Šíšová. Foreigners in CR – 2004 Nationality: Ukrainian – Slovak – Vietnamese – Polish – Russian.
1SEEurope network meeting April 2005 National transposition of SE legislation: an overview A preliminary report Lionel Fulton Labour Research Department.
How to be a European Geert Hofstede Groningen 10 juni 2004 Desiderius Erasmus
Standard SS6G5b: Describe the purpose of the European Union and the relationship between member nations.
Powerpoint Presentatie Sandra Viersen Sandra Viersen Michelle Hermans Michelle Hermans Judith Dijkstra Judith Dijkstra Wouter Eksterkater Wouter Eksterkater.
Novi sad - 20 April 2007 Workers’ Mobility Within EU 27 ECAS - European Citizen Action Service Claire Damilano- Legal officer.
The European Union. The European Union is a group of countries around Europe which have joined together to form political and economic agreements There.
Political Map of Europe Western European Countries.
The Essential European Union. First things first… The EU is a Supranational Organization consisting of 28 individual nations. Initially started in 1951.
Standard SS6G5b: Describe the purpose of the European Union and the relationship between member nations.
In the Neighborhood of the Camp Kistarcsa 2012 The new member states of the European Union and possibilities for the expansion (workshop) Presented by.
Conducting the visa liberalization agreement by General Nenad Banović Head of the Border Police Directorate.
Estimation of emigration flows by using immigration figures in receiving countries Michel POULAIN GéDAP UCL Belgium.
Country profile: Luxembourg. Why Luxembourg? Multilingual citizens rather than monolingual regions High percentage of foreign population and workers Small,
I will: Know how and why the EU was created. Understand the benefits of being part of the EU.
1 Expert group meeting established to support the enforcement of road safety related traffic offences Paris, 11 December 2015 Cross-Border Enforcement.
Welcome to the ISWC 2009 Doctoral Consortium Chantilly, Virginia 24 October, 2009.
Europe’s Refugee Crisis After Paris The Refugee Crisis After Paris and Cologne Beverly Crawford UC Berkeley.
Purpose of the European Union For its members to work together for advantages that would be out of their reach if each were working alone Believe that.
Comparing Britain with other nations: problems of measuring if and how we differ Roger Jowell, City University Director, European Social Survey Gresham.
Making a persuasive argument: interactive workshop.
Western Europe Chapter 3 Section 3 West Central Europe Today.
Capitalising on the Global Trends for Recruitment Ann Swain, CEO, APSCo Recruitment Live 25th November 2014.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OF EU FUNDED PROJECT A QUALITY SERVICE FOR VULNERABLE PEOPLE 1 Presentation by Nadja Salson, TUNED coordinator EPSU policy officer.
Activities in Germany. Stuttgart Town Hall We visited the town hall in Stuttgart on where we were given an introduction into the work of the.
REGIONAL GROUPING & EUROPEAN UNION GROUP MEMBERS: MADHAV NEUPANE LAXMI SADAULA PRAYASH NEUPANE.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 2– Freedom Movement for Workers Bilateral.
Stuttgart – a multicultural city. Some facts 40 % of Stuttgart’s population have a migrant background (about 200,000 people ) which is the highest number.
Maria João Valente Rosa
The European Union © 2014 Brain Wrinkles.
Marion Burkimsher Affiliated to the University of Lausanne
October 2012 Brussels, Belgium
The European Union.
Marcom International for OSHA
European Union.
The European Union.
The European Union © 2014 Brain Wrinkles.
The European Union THE EU
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
EU: First- & Second-Generation Immigrants
EUROPEAN UNION the “EU”
Why Do States Cooperate with Each Other?
The European Union © 2014 Brain Wrinkles.
The European Union © 2014 Brain Wrinkles.
UK/EU Developments February 2019.
Presentation transcript:

The interaction between the media and the public opinion: social media becoming a source of information in Luxembourg LU EMN NCP David Petry 04 November 2014

1.General information on Luxembourg 2.Immigration to Luxembourg 3.Research project 4.Analysis of online newspapers 5.Explanation of topics 6.Quantitative analysis (See Annex 1) 7.Summary of comments 8.Analysis 9.Conclusions

1. General information on Luxembourg

Area : km 2 Population: Total Luxembourgish citizens: Total foreigners: EU citizens: (86,2%) Third-country nationals: (13,8%) Source: STATEC 01/01/2014

Total domestic workforce: Total residents: (55,9%) Luxembourgish residents: EU citizens residents: TCN residents: Total cross-border workers: (44,1%) Belgium: Germany: France: Source: STATEC 2 nd trimester 2014

2. Immigration to Luxembourg

2 nd half 19 th century Labour immigration from Germany and Italy Bilateral agreement with Italy; German immigration stopped after the Second World War Bilateral agreement with the Netherlands Bilateral agreement with Portugal and the Republic of Yugoslavia Major immigration waves to Luxembourg

Source: STATEC 01/01/2014

Source: Directorate of immigration, Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs

3. Research project

First picture of comments of articles on immigration in the social media in Luxembourg

4. Analysis of online newspapers

Online newspapersNumber of visitors of 12 years of age and more % of the population Total audience % % % % % (local) % % Most consulted online newspapers of Luxembourg Source: Study TNS ILRES Plurimedia Luxembourg 2013/2014 Press release

5. Explanation of topics

4 chosen topics for the initial research: 1.Nationality law 2.Immigration law 3.Reception facilities 4.Right to vote 2 chosen topics: 1.Reception facilities 2.Right to vote

6. Quantitative analysis (See Annex 1)

TopicOnline newspaper Number of articles Highest number of comments per article Total number of commentsFacebookTwitterGoogle+ Reception facilitieslequotidien.lu38213/// lessentiel.lu/fr lessentiel.lu/de rtl.lu tageblatt.lu wort.lu/de6/0000 wort.lu/fr5/0000 Right to votelequotidien.lu2337/// lessentiel.lu/fr lessentiel.lu/de / rtl.lu tageblatt.lu wort.lu/de wort.lu/fr

7. Summary of comments

Reception facilities  “…We have enough problems here in Luxembourg. We should first redress the balance here!” (lessentiel.lu, )  “…The ministry has only to send them back and housing problems will be resolved no?!...” (lessentiel.lu, )  “ …Criminality has risen. One only has to read the newspaper and one will see who are the people who break into houses…” (rtl.lu, )  “…We shouldn’t let them in. Enough with this asylum tourism at OUR expense!…” (tageblatt.de, )

 “There is no war anymore in the Balkans and some are already part of the EU, so why accept refugees who aren’t ?” (lessentiel.lu, )  “…Why don’t we speak to them rather than talk about them? Why is it so difficult to share, to understand? Why all this fear? Why this hate? Why?” (rtl.lu, )

 “…It’s a fact that it will not be long before Luxembourgish nationals will be outnumbered…” (rtl.lu, )  “If foreigners don’t take our nationality, than they don’t want to vote either!” (wort.lu, )  “To Luxembourgers only!!! Living in the country and speaking the language… For me it’s a categorical NO to voting rights for all…” (lessentiel.lu, )  “…They pay taxes, social contributions and generate prosperity in our country with their workforce…” (tageblatt.lu, ) Right to vote

8. Analysis

Content of comments similar among newspapers Negative comments outreach positive comments Negative comments as an expression of xenophobia Positive comments as a reaction to negative comments Snowball effect creation of discourses Creation of discourses aggressiveness of comments Provision of additional information

9. Conclusions Snowball effect Comments ≠ public opinion Im/balance of comments vs. social media Perspectives First step of a broader research project In-depth analysis of discourses