Implementation of a 3D halo neutral model in the TRANSP code and application to projected NSTX-U plasmas S. S. Medley 1, D. Liu 2, M. V. Gorelenkova 1,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potential Upgrades to the NBI System for NSTX-Upgrade SPG, TS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
Advertisements

Fast-Ion-D-Alpha and Solid-State NPA Diagnostics for NSTX-U NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
Study of tearing mode stability in the presence of external perturbed fields Experimental validation of MARS-K/Q and RDCON codes Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park.
NSTX-U T&T TSG Contributions to FY15 JRT NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U.
Summary of Presentations on Plasma Start-up and Progress on Small ST devices from STW2011 R. Raman University of Washington, Seattle, WA The Joint Meeting.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman Final XP Review June 5, 2009 NSTX Supported by.
NSTX Team Meeting June 25, 2010 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
NSTX Status and Plans College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York.
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting Jan. 3, 2013 NSTX Team Meeting Jan. 3, 2013 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
NSTX Team Meeting May 28, 2008 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL.
Quality Assurance Readiness for Operations Review Judy Malsbury, Head of QA Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014.
PCS Navigation D. Mueller January 26-28, 2010 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS.
Current status of high k scattering system J. Kim 1, Y. Ren 2, K-C. Lee 3 and R. Kaita 2 1) POSTECH 2) PPPL 3) UC Davis NSTX Monday Physics Meeting LSB-318,
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: Charged Fusion Product Diagnostic FIU Werner U. Boeglin Ramona Perez, Alexander Netepenko, FIU D.S. Darrow PPPL.
1 Update on Run Schedule R. Raman NSTX Team Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 08 February, 2006 Work supported by DOE contract numbers DE-FG02-99ER54519 AM08,
Supported by Office of Science Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U.
Simple As Possible Plasmas (SAPP) on NSTX Adam McLean, ORNL Boundary TSG Session NSTX Research Forum Dec. 2, 2009 NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado.
NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew.
Radiative divertor with impurity seeding in NSTX V. A. Soukhanovskii (LLNL) Acknowledgements: NSTX Team NSTX Results Review Princeton, NJ Wednesday, 1.
NSTX Team Meeting July 21,, 2011 NSTX TF Update NSTX Team Meeting July 21, 2011 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
NSTX Effects of NTSX Upgrades on DiagnosticsFebruary 8, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns.
Beam Ion Profiles with the SSNPA Diagnostic Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL.
Direct measurement of plasma response using Nyquist Contour Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park 1, M. J. Lanctot 2, J. E. Menard 1,Y.Q. Liu 3, R. Nazikian 1 1 Princeton.
NSTX-U Program Update J. Menard NSTX-U Team Meeting B318 May 7, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto.
Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA.
Second Switching Power Amplifier (SPA) Upgrade Physics Considerations Discussion S.A. Sabbagh 1, and the NSTX Research Team 1 Department of Applied Physics,
ASC Five Year Plan Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
1 R Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller 1, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell 1, J. Menard 1, R. Maqueda 2 et al. University of Washington, Seattle 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Xp705: Multimode ion transport: TAE avalanches E D Fredrickson, N A Crocker, N N Gorelenkov, W W Heidbrink, S Kubota, F M Levinton, H Yuh, R E Bell NSTX.
Development of Improved Vertical Position Control S.P. Gerhardt, E. Kolemen ASC Session, NSTX 2011/12 Research Forum Location Date NSTX Supported by College.
1 Roger Raman for the NSTX Research Team University of Washington, Seattle NSTX Run Usage 27 February – 5 May, 2006 NSTX Mid-Run Assessment PPPL, Princeton,
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
Energy Confinement Scaling in the Low Aspect Ratio National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) S. M. Kaye, M.G. Bell, R.E. Bell, E.D. Fredrickson, B.P.
Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by.
NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design Review June , NSTX Supported by Vacuum Pumping, Gauging and RGA Systems W. Blanchard Princeton Plasma.
NSTX Team Meeting February 7, 2007 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX H. Yuh (Nova Photonics) and the NSTX Group, PPPL Presented by S. Kaye 4 th T&C ITPA Meeting Culham Lab, UK March.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman XP Review - ASC Feb 2, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
NSTX-U Collaboration Plans for UCLA PI: Neal A. Crocker Co-PI: Prof. Troy Carter Grad. Student (planned 2 nd year onward) PPPL Research Contacts and Collaborators:
NSTX Team Meeting December 21, 2009 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
Enhancement of edge stability with lithium wall coatings in NSTX Rajesh Maingi, Oak Ridge National Lab R.E. Bell, B.P. LeBlanc, R. Kaita, H.W. Kugel, J.
Effect of 3-D fields on edge power/particle fluxes between and during ELMs (XP1026) A. Loarte, J-W. Ahn, J. M. Canik, R. Maingi, and J.-K. Park and the.
NSTX-Upgrade Magnetics And Related Diagnostics SPG NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
First results of fast IR camera diagnostic J-W. Ahn and R. Maingi ORNL NSTX Monday Physics Meeting LSB-318, PPPL June 22, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
NSTX NSTX TF, PF and umbrella Upgrade Internal ReviewFeb 24, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA.
NSTX NSTX LidsJuly 6, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar.
NSTX Team Meeting June 30, 2009 College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics.
Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX S.M. Kaye, PPPL ITPA PPPL 5-7 Oct Confinement and Transport in NSTX: Lithiumized vs non-Lithiumized Plasmas Culham.
Planning for Toroidal Lithium Divertor Target for NSTX and Supporting Experiments on CDX-U/LTX R. Kaita Boundary Physics Science Focus Group Meeting July.
Upgrades to PCS Hardware (Incomplete) KE, DAG, SPG, EK, DM, PS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
NSTX 2007 MHD XP Review – J. Menard 1 Optimization of RFA detection algorithms during dynamic error field correction Presented by: J.E. Menard, PPPL Final.
Presently Planned Vacuum-Side Diagnostics for the NSTX-Upgrade Center Column NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
XP-945: ELM Pacing via Vertical Position Jogs S.P. Gerhardt, J.M. Canik, D. Gates, R. Goldston, R. Hawryluk, R. Maingi, J. Menard, S. Sabbagh, A. Sontag.
Preliminary Results from XP1020 RFA Measurements J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA NSTX Monday Physics.
V. A. Soukhanovskii, XP1002 Review, 9 June 2010, Princeton, NJ 1 of 9 XP 1002: Core impurity density and P rad reduction using divertor condition modifications.
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting –Masa Ono August 15, 2014 NSTX-U Team Meeting August 15, 2014 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
Advanced Scenario Development on NSTX D. A. Gates, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team 50th APS-DPP meeting Dallas, TX November 17, 2008 College W&M Colorado.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: M.I.T. Plasma Science and Fusion Center Abhay K. Ram, Paul Bonoli, and John Wright NSTX-U Collaborator Research.
1 Roger Raman for the NSTX Research Team University of Washington, Seattle Update on the NSTX Run Plan PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 15 May, 2006 Supported by Office.
Monitoring impact of the LLD Adam McLean, ORNL T. Gray, R. Maingi Lithium, TSG group preliminary research forum PPPL, B252 Nov. 23, 2009 NSTX Supported.
Comments on HC Measurements for NSTX- Upgrade SPG CS Upgrade Meeting 11/2/11 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Correlation between Electron Transport and Shear Alfven Activity in NSTX College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX K. Tritz, S. Kaye PPPL 2009 NSTX Research Forum PPPL, Princeton University Dec. 8-10, 2008 Transport and Turbulence.
Neutron diagnostic calibration transfer XMP D. Darrow and the NSTX Research Team XMP & XP review meeting Control Room Annex June 11, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
NSTX Team Meeting April 5, 2006 Supported by Office of Science College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL.
XP-950: XP-950: Dependence of metallic impurity accumulation on I p and the outer gap in the presence of lithium deposition S. Paul, S. P. Gerhardt are.
NSTX NSTX Upgrade Project – Final Design ReviewJune 22-24, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL.
Presentation transcript:

Implementation of a 3D halo neutral model in the TRANSP code and application to projected NSTX-U plasmas S. S. Medley 1, D. Liu 2, M. V. Gorelenkova 1, W. W. Heidbrink 2, L. Stagner 2 18 th International ST Workshop November 3 - 6, 2015 Princeton NJ NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U Purdue U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Illinois U Maryland U Rochester U Washington U Wisconsin Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew U Ioffe Inst RRC Kurchatov Inst TRINITI KBSI KAIST POSTECH ASIPP ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep U Quebec

NSTX 2 Abstract Implementation of a 3D halo neutral model in the TRANSP code and application to projected NSTX-U plasmas, S.S. Medley, D. Liu, M.V. Gorelenkova, W.W. Heidbrink and L. Stagner A 3D halo neutral code developed at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory and implemented for analysis using the TRANSP code is applied to projected National Spherical Torus eXperiment- Upgrade (NSTX-U plasmas). The legacy TRANSP code did not handle halo neutrals properly since they were distributed over the plasma volume rather than remaining in the vicinity of the neutral beam footprint as is actually the case. The 3D halo neutral code uses a “beam-in-a-box” model that encompasses both injected beam neutrals and resulting halo neutrals. Upon deposition by charge exchange, a subset of the full, one-half and one-third beam energy components produce first generation halo neutrals that are tracked through successive generations until an ionization event occurs or the descendant halos exit the box. The 3D halo neutral model and Neutral Particle Analyzer (NPA) simulator in the TRANSP code have been benchmarked with the Fast-Ion D-Alpha simulation (FIDAsim) code, which provides Monte-Carlo simulations of beam neutral injection, attenuation, halo generation, halo spatial diffusion, and photoemission processes. When using the same atomic physics database, TRANSP and FIDAsim simulations get excellent agreement on the spatial profile and magnitude of beam and halo neutral densities and the NPA energy spectrum. The simulations show that the halo neutral density can be comparable to the beam neutral density. These halo neutrals can double the NPA flux, but they have minor effects on the NPA energy spectrum shape. The TRANSP and FIDAsim simulations also suggest that the magnitudes of beam and halo neutral densities are relatively sensitive to the choice of the atomic physics databases.

NSTX 3 Arrangement of the NPA Sightlines on NSTX-U The solid-state Neutral Particle Analyzer (ssNPA) diagnostics (blue arrays) view across both NBI #1 and NBI #2 in the horizontal midplane. Both of the sightlines measure predominantly passing energetic ions..

NSTX 4 Illustration of “beam-in-box” model for the TRANSP 3D halo neutral code Note only beam primary neutrals are shown. Schematic of the 3D halo neutral generation process

NSTX 5 Injected beam neutral density (a) and halo neutral density (b) as a function of distance along the E||B NPA sightline

NSTX 6 Beam primary and 3D halo neutral density profiles Comparison of beam primary and total halo neutral densities (a) and the composition of the halo neutral density over multiple generations (b) along the E||B NPA sightline.

NSTX 7 Comparison of E||B NPA signals with and without 3D halo neutrals. Comparison of the charge exchange neutral flux time evolution Comparison of the charge exchange neutral emissivity along the NPA sightline

NSTX 8 Comparison of the charge exchange energy spectra for the E||B NPA sightline with and without 3D halo neutrals

NSTX 9 Injected beam neutral density (a) and halo neutral density (b) as a function of distance along the ssNPA NPA sightline

NSTX 10 Beam primary and 3D halo neutral density profiles Comparison of beam primary and total halo neutral densities (a) and the composition of the halo neutral density over multiple generations (b) along the ssNPA sightline.

NSTX 11 Comparison of ssNPA signals with and without 3D halo neutrals. Comparison of the charge exchange neutral flux time evolution Comparison of the charge exchange neutral emissivity along the NPA sightline

NSTX 12 Comparison of the charge exchange energy spectra for the ssNPA sightline with and without 3D halo neutrals

NSTX 13 Comparison of particle pitch, v || /v, for the ssNPA and E||B NPA emissivity distributions along the sightlines depicted in the NSTX-U layout

NSTX 14 Profiles of (a) temperature, (b) electron density, ion density, and impurity density and (c) toroidal rotation are shown for a projected NSTX-U discharge at t=2.5s. Main input plasma profiles of TRANSP and FIDAsim simulations

NSTX 15 Comparison of NPA energy spectrum at t = 2.5 s with and without halo neutrals for the captioned NPA sightlines. The TRANSP simulation results are shown in red, and the FIDAsim simulation results are plotted in blue. The TRANSP and FIDAsim simulations results overlap.

NSTX 16 Benchmarking of beam and halo neutral densities calculation in TRANSP and FIDAsim codes with a NSTX-U projected discharge

NSTX 17 Benchmarking of the NPA simulator in the TRANSP and FIDAsim codes with a projected NSTX-U discharge

NSTX 18 Beam deposition through charge exchange with thermal ions (a) full energy c, (b) half energy, and (c) third energy components

NSTX 19 Comparison of TRANSP and FIDAsim beam and halo neutral densities the codes use their own standard cross section tables TRANSP uses ADAS310, while FIDAsim mainly uses ADAS and Janev 2004 report.

NSTX Summary An upgrade to the halo neutral simulation in the TRANSP code has been completed using a 3D halo neutral “beam-in- a-box” model that encompasses both injected beam and halo neutrals. A subset of the full, half and one-third beam components produce halo neutrals upon deposition by charge exchange that are tracked through multiple generations until the halo neutrals are ionized or exit the box. The TRANSP NPA simulator was used to show that the 3D halo neutrals increase the NPA flux by factors ~ 2.3 – 2.8 above charge exchange on the beam primary neutrals alone, depending on the elected NPA sightline. 20