Horns, Hadron production etc. (from hadron production to neutrino beam) A.K.Ichikawa KEK 200/9/26 Study on horns Changing -beam energy Hadron.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
The FAIR Antiproton Target B. Franzke, V. Gostishchev, K. Knie, U. Kopf, P. Sievers, M. Steck Production Target Magnetic Horn (Collector Lens) CR and RESR.
T2K neutrino experiment at JPARC Approved since 2003, first beam in April Priorities : 1. search for, and measurement of,   e appearance  sin.
for a neutrinos factory
ISS, 23 September 2005E. Gschwendtner, CERN1 Beam Instrumentation at CNGS 1. Introduction 2. Layout 3. Beam Instrumentation 4. Summary.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
CHIPP 2 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP-K2K-T2K 1. The K2K and T2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5.
30 June 2008M. Dracos, NuFact081 Challenges and Progress on the SuperBeam Horn Design Marcos DRACOS IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg NuFact 08 Valencia-Spain, June.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
Target & Horns Fluxes were distributed. W/ J-PARC type 2.5 o, 2 o, 3 o. Target cooling evaluation and test Target stress analysis Serious stress analysis.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
Target & Horns A.K.Ichikawa Fluxes were distributed. W/ BNL-type and J-PARC type. Target cooling test Comparison of various carbons Energy deposit on 1.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
Fermilab Neutrino Beamline to DUSEL Mike Martens Fermilab PAC November 3, 2009.
HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents SksMinus status –SKS magnet trouble –Magnetic field study.
LAGUNA/LBNO WP4: secondary beam line status report M. Calviani, P. Velten, A. Ferrari, I. Efthymiopoulos, C. Lazaridis (CERN) + M. Zito, V. Galymov (CEA),
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University.
Low energy ν-beam for EUROSB Marcos Dracos, Nikos Vassilopoulos IPHC Strasbourg, IN2P3/CNRS.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Fermilab, May, 2003 Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U. Tokyo ・ Introduction ・ JHF-Kamioka neutrino project -overview- ・ Physics in phase-I ・ Phase-II ・ Summary Outline.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
Current Status and Possible Items around ‘neutrino beam’ Horn Target Remote maintenance tools Decay volume window and collimator muon monitor Many items.
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details,
Mass production (Super-K) Setup of jnubeam – 3 horn 250 kA – 30-GeV proton beam of Gaussian distribution (  x,y = cm) – On center, parallel beam.
Anders Kirleis Stony Brook University The Design Of A Detector For The Electron Ion Collider.
Beam MC progresses for beam MC sub-group. Summary of update in 09b,c,10a 09b Geometry of baffle, target, 1st horn, dump and MUMON is updated. 09c MUMON.
Interaction Length A. Murakami. L = (interaction length of proton in carbon by PDG) change of constant : means uncertainty of L (change 0.8, 0.9,
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
HARP measurements of pion yield for neutrino experiments Issei Kato (Kyoto University) for the HARP collaboration Contents: 1.HARP experiment Physics motivations.
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
J-PARC neutrino experiment Target Specification Graphite or Carbon-Carbon composite cylindrical bar : length 900mm, diameter 25~30mm The bar may be divided.
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday.
Proposal for the study to define what is really necessary and what is not when the data from beam, ND and SK are combined A.K.Ichikawa 2008/1/17.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
Comparison HARP data with GEANT4 and MARS Simulations NUFACT06, UC Irvine 28 August 2006 Stephen Brooks 1, Paul Soler 2, Kenny Walaron 2 1 Rutherford Appleton.
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
Neutrino Beam MC We propose to adopt ‘jnubeam’ as the official T2K code for flux calculation. –It is well established and almost ready for flux calculation.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
1 Translation from Near to Far at K2K T.Kobayashi IPNS, KEK for K2K beam monitor group (K.Nishikawa, T.Hasegawa, T.Inagaki, T.Maruyama, T.Nakaya,....)
BNL neutrino beam. Optimization and simulations Milind Diwan June 10.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Horn focusing effect 2.Beam stability (direction/flux) 3.Beam.
Beamline for the LBNE Project Heidi Schellman for the LBNE collaboration.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
Horn and Solenoid options in Neutrino Factory M. Yoshida, Osaka Univ. NuFact08, Valencia June 30th, A brief review of pion capture scheme in NuFact,
KEK Radiation Related Topics neutrino beam construction subgroup Yuichi Oyama (KEK) and target monitor subgroup for.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Status of the FAIR Antiproton Target K. Knie.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
NuMI Flux, Leonidas Aliaga William & Mary July 25, 2012 Current Uncertainties And Future Plans International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super Beams.
Challenges and Progress on the SB Horn Design
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
Horn and Solenoid Options in Neutrino Factory
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Presentation transcript:

Horns, Hadron production etc. (from hadron production to neutrino beam) A.K.Ichikawa KEK 200/9/26 Study on horns Changing -beam energy Hadron production

Study on horns

Brief comment on the horn design status Till now, in the beam MC simulation, horns proposed in BNL-E889 was used. 2.2m D in = 1.9cm , I=250kA Sapphire target (Al 2 O 3,  =4g/cm 3 ) D=0.64 cm, L=45cm 1st horn c.f. K2K D in =3.0cm , I=250kA In addition, heat load from radiation Need realistic design work

 production –Model- Momentum and angle of   =const.+const./ MARS 50GeV, graphite  = /p MARS 50GeV :  = /p 30GeV :  = /p GFLUKA+GCALOR 50GeV :  = /p 30GeV :  = /p FLUKA GeV :  = /p 30GeV :  = /p

Momentum region of  ’s w/ BNL-type horn, 2.5°OAB  ’s contributing E <1.2GeV >1.5GeV/c >1.7GeV/c

4.4m W/ fixed current, r x 2 L x 2, Wx2 to obtain same optics. 2.2m D in = 1.8cm  D in = 3.6cm  Scaling laws

BNL-type horn1 K2K horn1 OAB1 o WBB w/ K2K horns D in = 1.8cm  D in = 3cm 

1m Inner conductor 4.6cm  I = 250 kA 1.7GeV 2GeV 2.5GeV 3GeV 4m Target in the horn 1m 10m 4m Target outside the horn

6cm , I=250kA 22cm , I=500kA 2.5m 1.4m 1m 36kA/cm K2K 35kA/cm 2 66cm  One idea for ‘1 st horn’ Till now, only 60% flux have been achieved…..

~3m The other idea for ‘1 st horn’ ~250kA, D in ~4cm  ~500kA

Heat Load from Radiation Graphite  =1.8g/cm 3 Water t=5mm Air t=6mm Inner cond. Al t=4mm In total, 34kJ/3.3E14 protons = Hz cf. K2K heat load in the target from the current = 1.4 kW (surface area ~x 7) In the graphite target, 64kJ/3.3E14 protons in total 30mm  60mm   t~14 o Z R Z R

Strategy to change peak energy

Change the neutrino beam energy Side View Top view To SK/HK OAB 2° OAB3° Decay Volume Unofficial

Dipole magnet gap 1m×1m×1m One method is changing the beam axis. The other…. OAB+Bending Magnet Oyabu’s talk

Hadron production model

jnubeam : neutrino beam simulation code developed from K2K code DV shape : incorporate actual shape target & horns : still BNL-type. calculation of -flux at SK for all decays by weighting Hadron production model 1. Models built-in Geant3. e.g. GFLUKA.. 2. Various models using Input via stdout | stdin. > MARS | jnubeam > FLUKA2000 | jnubeam

GFLUKA MARS FLUKA2000 OAB2.5 o E p =50GeV Graphite 0.74cm  45cm

Comparison of different proton energy and different OAB2.5 o 50 GeV (10 21 POT) 30 GeV (10 21 POT) 30 GeV (10 21 x 5/3POT) GFLUKA MARS FLUKA Absolute flux (E <1.5GeV) x10 7 /cm 2 /yr e #( e)/#(  E <1.5GeV) 50 GeV30 GeV GFLUKA1.14%0.87% MARS0.90%0.86% FLUKA %0.83% (Target is graphite but the dimension is BNL-type.)

Comparison of different proton energy and different OAB2.5 o 50 GeV30 GeV#30 GeV/#50GeV GFLUKA63%57% - 9.5% MARS66%61%  7.6% FLUKA200064%59%  7.8% NC #NC/#CC(E <1.5GeV) High Energy tail #(E >1.5GeV)/#(E <1.5GeV) 50 GeV30 GeV#30GeV/#50GeV GFLUKA9.6%7.6%  21% MARS11.5%9.5%  17% FLUKA %8.8%  18%

Effects on SK observable MARS 50 GeV !!!! Graphite 45cm !!!!!

MARS 30 GeV !!!! Graphite 45cm !!!!!

P beam =5~120 GeV/c From R.Raja, NUFACT02

Summary or discussion item Horns : realistic design gathering ideas Changing the beam energy OAB vs OAB+bending Hadron production MIPP (30 GeV vs 50 GeV)

Supplement

Types for the 1 st horn (a) (b) (c) (d) MINOS K2K, CERN, BNL (2nd horn) (  -factory)

Beam Direction For both SK and possible HK. Decay pipe

Event rate at SK MARS 50GeV !!!Graphite 45cm target!!!