Error Tolerance HN Accounting Network Event 1 March 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Network Event HNC/D Accounting Tuesday 19 February 2013 SQA Update.
Advertisements

Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Hospitality : Practical Cookery National 3, 4 & 5.
Graded Units HN Accounting Welcome Welcome to the training event for HN Accounting The feedback that we received from centres regarding the HN Accounting.
REMEDIATION v REASSESSMENT The True Story Keith B Pearson.
Matthew McCullagh Quality Manager Making the most of Verification Making the most of Verification.
HN Accounting Arrangements Workshop Session 1 Background Review team set up April 2008, comprising representatives from 6 colleges Limited review –structure.
SVQ Management Networking Event March 2011 Verification Update.
HN Accounting Workshop Session 2 Implementation of revised courses.
Hospitality - Practical Cake Craft CPD Presentation.
Centre Quality Assurance Briefing for AIVs January 2013.
Geography CPD Presentation Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs National 3, 4 and 5.
PRO-EAST Workshop1 Achievement of Learning Outcomes: Assessment Methods and Procedures Ian Freeston Engineering Council UK IET Academic Accreditation Committee.
Chemistry CPD Presentation Programme Welcome and outline for event Overview of Internal Assessment in Chemistry Verification –brief outline Key messages.
Computing Science CPD Presentation Internal Verification of National 4 and National 5 Units.
Religious Moral and Philosophical Studies CPD Presentation.
HND ACCOUNTING 2010 Framework – Year 2 Delivery The story so far.
University of Palestine software engineering department Testing of Software Systems Fundamentals of testing instructor: Tasneem Darwish.
Qualifications Update: Physical Education Qualifications Update: Physical Education.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Chemistry : Unit Assessment at Advanced Higher.
Physics CPD Presentation Programme Welcome and outline for event Overview of Internal Assessment in Physics Assessment of Outcome 1 Workshop 1, assessing.
Planning and Delivery of HND Programmes Janet Strain.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
Qualifications Update: Environmental Science Qualifications Update: Environmental Science.
HN Accounting Review Background  Review team set up April 2008, comprising representatives from 6 colleges  ‘Limited’ review –structure of HNC and.
Graded Unit 1 – Practical Exercise
Biology CPD Presentation Aims To supplement previously published information about the internal assessment of Biology Units at National 3, 4 and 5 To.
Qualifications Update: Care Qualifications Update: Care.
Accounting update: Error Tolerance In-Country EV Training May 2012 Workshop D.
Setting up a Course and using the Course Tutor Guide Workshop A Kim Tree.
BTEC Quality Assurance BTEC Foundation Level – Level 3 including Workskills The quality assurance includes three processes: Lead Internal Verifier.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Biology: Unit Assessment at Advanced Higher.
Qualifications Update: Human Biology Qualifications Update: Human Biology.
Entry Pathways General Administration April 2012.
Introducing Assessment Tools. What is an assessment tool? The instrument/s and procedures used to gather and interpret evidence of competence: –Instrument.
Practical Craft Skills CPD Presentation Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs (UASP) National 3, 4 and 5.
Administration and IT CPD Presentation Understanding Unit Assessment National 3, 4 and 5.
Accounting and Finance Verification Group 266 Central Verification Demystified.
Design and Manufacture and Graphic Communication.
HN Accounting Review Update Current position  HNC/HND Accounting awards validated and launched - April 2010  PDAs aligned with the new Units - September.
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Gathering the Evidence (all levels)
F84K 35 Statistics for Business
2017 HN Accounting Network Kim Tree.
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Accounting: Graded Unit 2 F8KF 35
An HN Accounting Practitioner’s Academic Year
Business Graded Units, Business Management, Economics
Annual Professional Development Conference
EV Report Writing Kim Tree. EV Report Writing Kim Tree.
SVQ Business and Administration Network Event 2018
IT in Business: Spreadsheets
HN Accounting Network Kim Tree Writing an Alternative Assessment.
Senior External Verifier Review – 2016/17
Matthew McCullagh Linking the Principles of Assessment to the QA Criteria.
HN Accounting Review. HN Accounting Review Background Based on 5 year cycle, HNC and HND Accounting due for review Consultation indicated that existing.
HN Accounting Network 17 February 2016 SEV Update – Kim Tree.
GU2 Update Kim Tree. GU2 Update Kim Tree SQA Project Unit Specification revised Our GU2 Project Unit Specification revised More guidance.
Effective Standardisation
Update on the Developments in Government Auditing Standards
Annual Professional Development Conference
Annual Professional Development Conference
How will my Degree be Classified
Qualification Verification 2016/17
Senior Verifier - Administration and IT
Internal Verification
Annual Professional Development Conference
Role of the Internal Verifier
Presentation transcript:

Error Tolerance HN Accounting Network Event 1 March 2011

Changes to HN Accounting framework  2010 framework retains a competence based system of assessing learners –Remediation of learners who don’t achieve at their first attempt but are deemed to be a narrow fail –More professional discussion about individual learner’s performance –Development of guidelines about what to do for learners who fall into this category

What is required of assessors?  There has been significant discussion about what is required of assessors in the revised framework.  Exactly the same is required of us as was in the previous 2 frameworks!  We have to assess our learners against agreed standards.

Assessing learners  The content of the Units is largely unchanged  Assessors have been working with the requirements of the qualification for a number of years now  The main difference is the removal of the 70% achievement threshold

Making assessment decisions  Learners still have to prove that they are competent  The way that decisions are made is slightly different  Assessors don't have to get candidates to 70% of available marks but must identify errors of principle and arithmetic.

Professional Judgement  This is not new  Assessors and IVs have always been asked to exercise professional judgement –For example, is it essential that a learner knows to deduct cost of sales rather than add it? –Does it matter if the current assets list hasn't been correctly added?

How do we change our methods?  Must adhere to the requirements of the Unit specification  Centre’s assessment team must meet to discuss Units and assessment instruments  The team’s decisions on these matters should still be recorded  The team’s decision on how to apply the rules should still be recorded so that a consistent approach can be applied

Reassessment or remediation  Each Outcome of each Unit gives guidance on the error tolerance for that topic  There is a common misconception that if learners exceed the error tolerance level they will be required to complete a whole reassessment  Remediation is likely to be more appropriate for some learners who have made errors in specific topic areas

What’s new then?  Your centre’s team should agree on what to accept as errors of principle and errors of arithmetic  Agree as a team and record these decisions  Guidance notes have been prepared by the EV team to aid this process

General guidance –If it is very difficult to make an assessment decision as an assessment team –If you cannot decide if an error is arithmetic or principle –If your decision will take the learner over the error tolerance level for either  Then the general guidance is that the learner should be asked to remediate.

Practical application  Practice exercise