MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire. Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market True-Up Discussion RMS Meeting 03/13/02 Draft Only for Discussion Purposes.
Advertisements

Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC February 5, 2004.
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
Retail Sub-Committee Update Robert Connell June 14, 2002.
1 Load Research Sampling (LRS) Project Summary 12/16/2004.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
RMS Update to TAC August 7, RMS Update to TAC ► At July 9 RMS Meeting:   RMS Voting Items:
Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis Presentation to RMS November 8, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.
Ambit Energy May 10, Page 2 Agenda Company Overview Customer Acquisition/Order Process Communications DNP Process Usage/Billing Challenges Q&A.
1 Update to RMS December 8, Texas SET 4.0 Change Controls
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
1 Update from ERCOT Retail Market Services to RMS Additional Material February 12, 2004.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
RMS Update to TAC January 3, Goals Update ► Complete and improve SCR745, Retail Market Outage Evaluation & Resolution, implementation and reporting.
Market Metrics Working Group 2006 Accomplishments 2007 Goals Chair – Bill Reily – TXU Electric Delivery Vice Chair – Kyle Patrick – Reliant Energy Kyle.
Profiling Working Group August 2, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting August 22, 2006.
1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT June 10, Supporting Reports Section.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
MARS Taskforce COPS Update May 12, Execution MilestonesBaseline DateStatus Technical Architecture Complete 05/15/2009On Schedule Development Complete07/24/2009On.
Market Impact Assessment TF Final Report to RMS June 11, 2008.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott February 27,
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Rob Connell May 1, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update.
RMS Update to TAC April 7, RMS Voting Items  RMGRR032- Transaction Timing Matrix Corrections Includes updates to Appendix D to correct examples.
TX SET v2.1 Implementation Plan. Table of Contents A.Shut Down Procedure B.Shut Down Timeline Details C.Conference Calls D.Additional Contingencies.
Texas SET Version 3.0 Production Implementation Plan.
1 RMS TAC Update April 3, Test Plan Flight Dates It is the practice of RMS to approved the dates for future testing flights. This enables new.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT May 14, Supporting Reports Section.
1 MVI/MVO Workshop June 3 – 12, 2002 Workshop Results.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force November 14, 2002.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Retail Transaction Processing.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
Tuesday, October 6, 2015 (following RMS) COPS-RMS-WORKSHOPShttp://
1 Update on the 867_03 Contingency Plan Nancy Hetrick February 25, 2003.
RMS Update to TAC October 5, RMS Activity Summary 2008 Test Flight Schedule Update on TAC directive relating to identifying issues with net metering.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Customer Protection and 814_08 Issue (Phase 2 – Potentially Late 08s) Background Completed Items Next Steps.
1 Critical Retail Issues RMS Update RMS Meeting Results 2/01 RMS Formed 3/01 RMS Identified “pent-up” issues Tx Set transaction development Service Order.
Retail Market Subcommittee (RMS) Update Kathy Scott April 9, 2013Commercial Operations Subcommittee 1.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Update to RMS August 4th, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline Timely execution of a customer rescission after completion.
Issue 2007-I071 Modify Cancellation Window to Accept Cancels Closer to SMRD.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Follow up from April RMS presentation Expedited Switch/Customer Rescission (Retail Customer Choice Team)
Update to RMS December 18, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
Market Metrics Working Group RMS Update: June 13, 2007.
Retail Market Update August 6, Load Profile Guides In accordance with section § (e) (3) and PUCT Project 25516, Load Profiling and Load Research.
1 TDTWG March 4, 2009 Performance Measures Overview.
Update to RMS January 10, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
1 Move-In Move-Out Task Force Update to RMS May 15, 2003.
RMS Update to TAC November 1, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR057, Competitive Metering Working Group Name Change (VOTE) Update on RMS Working Group and.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC March 4, 2004.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
COMET Working Group Progress Report. Contents of Report Provide COMET Recommendations, with May 6 revisions (Vote) –Competitive Meter Approval Process.
1 Purpose  To gain executive-level commitment from key market participants to take a leadership role in quickly improving retail transaction processing.
MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.
1 TDTWG Update to RMS Wednesday May 6, Primary Activities 1.Reviewed ERCOT System Outages and Failures 2.Reviewed Service Availability 3.Reviewed.
RMGRR058 Overview RMS Meeting – August 15, Background / Reference PUCT Substantive Rule 25.43(n)(8) Protocol Customer Billing Contact.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
Market Metrics RMS March 13 th, 2002 ERCOT MetCenter.
Update to RMS February 2, 2016 TX SET. Texas SET January Meeting Update Elections – Chair: Diana Rehfeldt, TNMP – Vice Chair: Kyle Patrick, NRG TMTP Changes.
Module 1 From Bundled Utilities to Current Market Design.
1 Market Participant Default Joint Taskforce Update and Report on Recent Customer Transition Activity Report to WMS August 17, 2005.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
Retail Market Update November 6, Flight Time Lines Retail market has several market occurring in the second quarter Flight 0304, GISB.
Presentation transcript:

MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire

Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information to evaluate the transactional performance of the retail electric market. Performance Data provided by ERCOT – To PUCT and All Market Participants TDSP – To PUCT and CRs CR – To PUCT

Survey Participants 4 TDPS’s 8 Competitive Retailers Survey responses represent the majority of the customer load ERCOT

Survey Responses How long does it take to prepare, send and file the Quarterly Performance Metrics? CR’s ranged from 1 to 4 hours per quarter Produce 1 to 4 reports per CR TDSP’s ranged from 1 day to 3 weeks per quarter Produced 46 to 70 reports per TDSP ERCOT spends 460 hours per quarter Produces 1266 reports per quarter

Survey Responses How do you send / receive the quarterly performance metrics reports? ERCOT and TDSP’s hand deliver report to PUCT, other reports are sent via … CD’s CSV files Mail Electronic filings

Survey Responses Does your company use the Quarterly Performance Measurement reports? Consensus from responses were that the reports are useful to some (6 positive responses), primarily as a Market indicator or for executive reporting The data received is not useful to resolve day to day issues, as it is produced for the previous quarter. Report is cumbersome, too much data for some participants

Survey Responses What components of the report are useful? Move-in and Switch completion percentages Transaction volumes ERCOT and TDSP volumes and percentages

Survey Responses What additional metrics would you like to add? CR’s TDSP field performance, date wanted vs. actual Track 824 rejects by type and transactions Actual field completion times for MVI, MVO and Re-Connects Re-connects after DNP’s 867’s sent within Protocols, Off cycle reads and re- reads. TDSP’s Safety Nets Inadvertent Gains Meter Test 824’s sent within Protocols 814 PC’s sent MVI’s received with 48 hours prior notice ERCOT planned and unplanned outages

Survey Responses Would your Company support a web- based electronic file exchange method for quarterly reporting? All CR’s support web-based reporting ( 2 responses expressed concern about security) All TDSP’s support web-based reporting

Next Steps / Recommendation PUCT staff has stated that a new Performance Metrics Rule may be opened for the purpose of evaluating current and future reporting requirements. This survey will be available to PUCT staff for consideration in future Rule Making. MMWG recommends to RMS that an investigation be conducted to analyze cost and benefits of utilizing a web-based file exchange method to support standardization and downloading of reporting.