Jon Juett April 21, 2014.  Selected very recent papers  Includes some student level event / conference papers  UM Health Counseling Program  Correctly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Computing FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Evaluation Kleanthous Styliani
Advertisements

International Technology Alliance In Network & Information Sciences International Technology Alliance In Network & Information Sciences Paul Smart, Ali.
Cognitive Systems, ICANN panel, Q1 What is machine intelligence, as beyond pattern matching, classification and prediction. What is machine intelligence,
Haystack: Per-User Information Environment 1999 Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Eytan Adar et al Presented by Xiao Hu CS491CXZ.
Date : 2014/12/04 Author : Parikshit Sondhi, ChengXiang Zhai Source : CIKM’14 Advisor : Jia-ling Koh Speaker : Sz-Han,Wang.
 Andisheh Keikha Ryerson University Ebrahim Bagheri Ryerson University May 7 th
Dialogue – Driven Intranet Search Suma Adindla School of Computer Science & Electronic Engineering 8th LANGUAGE & COMPUTATION DAY 2009.
0 General information Rate of acceptance 37% Papers from 15 Countries and 5 Geographical Areas –North America 5 –South America 2 –Europe 20 –Asia 2 –Australia.
Industrial Ontologies Group Oleksiy Khriyenko, Vagan Terziyan INDIN´04: 24th – 26th June, 2004, Berlin, Germany OntoSmartResource: An Industrial Resource.
1 DCS861A-2007 Emerging IT II Rinaldo Di Giorgio Andres Nieto Chris Nwosisi Richard Washington March 17, 2007.
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
Ontologies: Making Computers Smarter to Deal with Data Kei Cheung, PhD Yale Center for Medical Informatics CBB752, February 9, 2015, Yale University.
Managing Large RDF Graphs (Infinite Graph) Vaibhav Khadilkar Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas FEARLESS engineering.
ONTOLOGY SUPPORT For the Semantic Web. THE BIG PICTURE  Diagram, page 9  html5  xml can be used as a syntactic model for RDF and DAML/OIL  RDF, RDF.
The 2nd International Conference of e-Learning and Distance Education, 21 to 23 February 2011, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Prof. Dr. Torky Sultan Faculty of Computers.
Challenges in Information Retrieval and Language Modeling Michael Shepherd Dalhousie University Halifax, NS Canada.
GUI: Specifying Complete User Interaction Soft computing Laboratory Yonsei University October 25, 2004.
revised CmpE 583 Fall 2006Discussion: OWL- 1 CmpE 583- Web Semantics: Theory and Practice DISCUSSION: OWL Atilla ELÇİ Computer Engineering.
RuleML-2007, Orlando, Florida1 Towards Knowledge Extraction from Weblogs and Rule-based Semantic Querying Xi Bai, Jigui Sun, Haiyan Che, Jin.
Steps Toward an AGI Roadmap Włodek Duch ( Google: W. Duch) AGI, Memphis, 1-2 March 2007 Roadmaps: A Ten Year Roadmap to Machines with Common Sense (Push.
EXCS Sept Knowledge Engineering Meets Software Engineering Hele-Mai Haav Institute of Cybernetics at TUT Software department.
The Cognitive Perspective in Information Science Research Anthony Hughes Kristina Spurgin.
Author: James Allen, Nathanael Chambers, etc. By: Rex, Linger, Xiaoyi Nov. 23, 2009.
University of Dublin Trinity College Localisation and Personalisation: Dynamic Retrieval & Adaptation of Multi-lingual Multimedia Content Prof Vincent.
AnswerBus Question Answering System Zhiping Zheng School of Information, University of Michigan HLT 2002.
School of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin University
Ontology-Driven Automatic Entity Disambiguation in Unstructured Text Jed Hassell.
Abstract Question answering is an important task of natural language processing. Unification-based grammars have emerged as formalisms for reasoning about.
©2003 Paula Matuszek CSC 9010: Text Mining Applications Document Summarization Dr. Paula Matuszek (610)
1 USC INFORMATION SCIENCES INSTITUTE CALO, 8/8/03 Acquiring advice (that may use complex expressions) and action specifications Acquiring planning advice,
Towards A Context-Based Dialog Management Layer for Expert Systems Victor Hung, Avelino Gonzalez & Ronald DeMara Intelligent Systems Laboratory University.
Alexey Kolosoff, Michael Bogatyrev 1 Tula State University Faculty of Cybernetics Laboratory of Information Systems.
P2P Concept Search Fausto Giunchiglia Uladzimir Kharkevich S.R.H Noori April 21st, 2009, Madrid, Spain.
Problems in Semantic Search Krishnamurthy Viswanathan and Varish Mulwad {krishna3, varish1} AT umbc DOT edu 1.
BioRAT: Extracting Biological Information from Full-length Papers David P.A. Corney, Bernard F. Buxton, William B. Langdon and David T. Jones Bioinformatics.
Streamflow - Programming Model for Data Streaming in Scientific Workflows Chathura Herath.
Towards a Method For Evaluating Naturalness in Conversational Dialog Systems Victor Hung, Miguel Elvir, Avelino Gonzalez & Ronald DeMara Intelligent Systems.
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
Next Generation Search Engines Ehsun Daroodi 1 Feb, 2003.
Semi-Automatic Quality Assessment of Linked Data without Requiring Ontology Saemi Jang, Megawati, Jiyeon Choi, and Mun Yong Yi KIRD, KAIST NLP&DBPEDIA.
Trustworthy Semantic Webs Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas Lecture #4 Vision for Semantic Web.
User Profiling using Semantic Web Group members: Ashwin Somaiah Asha Stephen Charlie Sudharshan Reddy.
Digital Libraries1 David Rashty. Digital Libraries2 “A library is an arsenal of liberty” Anonymous.
Contact : Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier, Patrick Gallinari, Jean-Gabriel Ganascia LIP6, UPMC, 8 rue du Capitaine Scott, Paris, France
Progress Report - Year 2 Extensions of the PhD Symposium Presentation Daniel McEnnis.
Semantic Web Portal: A Platform for Better Browsing and Visualizing Semantic Data Ying Ding et al. Jin Guang Zheng, Tetherless World Constellation.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Dalit Gasul Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Haifa CRI-Project Review Day, Tuesday, February 26, 2008.
Vermelding onderdeel organisatie 5 maart The future of databases DBDM 07/08 Leiden Bas van den Berg, Patrick van Kouteren, Rosa Meijer, Mathijs.
Semantic Wiki: Automating the Read, Write, and Reporting functions Chuck Rehberg, Semantic Insights.
GoRelations: an Intuitive Query System for DBPedia Lushan Han and Tim Finin 15 November 2011
User Errors in Formulating Queries and IR Techniques to Overcome Them Birger Larsen Information Interaction and Information Architecture Royal School of.
AQUAINT Mid-Year Workshop: Observations and Comments Jimmy Lin MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem School of Engineering and Computer Science Academic Year: 2011/2012 Instructor: Jeff Rosenschein.
Interaction Styles Common interaction styles command line interface menus natural language question/answer and query dialogue form-fills.
SEMANTIC WEB Presented by- Farhana Yasmin – MD.Raihanul Islam – Nohore Jannat –
BBY 464 Semantic Information Management (Spring 2016) Semantic Query Languages Yaşar Tonta & Orçun Madran [yasartonta, Hacettepe.
Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems (9 th Ed., Prentice Hall) Chapter 12: Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems.
Automated Question Answering Suggestion Using User Expert and Semantic Information การแนะนำการตอบคำถามอัตโนมัติ โดยใช้ข้อมูลผู้เชี่ยวชาญ และข้อมูลเชิง.
Market Intelligence Analysis
Keyword Search over RDF Graphs
Open question answering over curated and extracted knowledge bases
Information Retrieval and Web Search
Reading Report: Open QA Systems
Information Retrieval and Web Search
CSc4730/6730 Scientific Visualization
CSE 635 Multimedia Information Retrieval
CS246: Information Retrieval
McGraw-Hill Technology Education
Education & AI High level discussion points relating ‘techniques / tools’ to possible ‘projects’
Presentation transcript:

Jon Juett April 21, 2014

 Selected very recent papers  Includes some student level event / conference papers  UM Health Counseling Program  Correctly respond to emotion  Follow tree-based conversation  Detect deception, infer progress, etc.

 First automated system by Green et al in 1961  Early systems domain specific  Open domain problem initially too large  Internet makes more data sets available and searches more common  Database querying becomes faster  Open domain QA research resumes

 Computationally inexpensive  Current bottleneck in initial search  Can scale with dataset growth  Especially Internet  Fully automated  Except if cooperative steps with user included  Finds short, correct answers  User-friendly

 Like a Google Search  Uses primitive techniques  Bag of Words  Easier task  Returns entire likely relevant documents  Leaves answer extraction step to user

 In an open domain, cannot rely on domain specific knowledge  General world knowledge only  Conglomeration of components  Many systems overlap, plug-in techniques

 Cooperative Component  Not restricted to literal answers  Allows clarification of question for better answer  Can build up information on user interests, system may even lead conversation to do this

 Database approaches  Semantic via Resource Description Framework (RDF) Triples ▪ (subject, verb, object) ▪ Answer true/false or factoid ▪ Efficiently increase answer database  Template matching ▪ Use machine learning to cluster questions ▪ Templates can correct for typos and abbreviations ▪ Only need to store an answer to each cluster ▪ Novel questions matched to closest cluster

Question WordGoogle Answer RatioSemantic Web Answer Ratio What When Where Which Who How0.50 How old How long0.98 How many0.50 Najmi et al, 2013

 Response to unnatural feel of non-affective dialogue systems  Sense user emotional state  Punctuation, word choice, capitalization, emoticons  Simulate emotions  Speech synthesis, emoticons, nonverbal behavior  Attempt to influence user emotion  Extend to poll online communities  Composed of perception layer, control layer, and actuator-communicator layer

 Complex automated evaluation beyond state of the art  Multi-step reasoning  Real-time question answering  Language of user, query, data  Answer extraction  Customize to user preferences

 Fader, Anthony, Zettlemoyer, Luke, Etzioni, Oren, "Paraphrase-Driven Language for Open Question Answering," University of Washington ACL  Melo, Dora, Rodriues, Irene Pimenta, Nogueira, Vitor Beires, "A Review on Cooperative Question-Answering Systems,"  Najmi, E.; Hashmi, K.; Khazalah, F.; Malik, Z., "Intelligent Semantic Question Answering System," Cybernetics (CYBCONF), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, vol., no., pp.255,260, June 2013  Skowron, Marcin, "Affect Listeners: Acquisition of Affective States by Means of Conversational Systems," Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp January  Tyagi, Deepali, Joshi, Tejas, Ghule, Dhanashri, Ameya, Joshi, "An Interactive Answering System using Template Matching and SQL Mapping for Natural Language Processing," International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, vol. 2, issue 2, pp , February 2014