Optimization of waveguide geometry in the CLIC-G structures Hao Zha 13/08/2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to RF for Accelerators
Advertisements

Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
Single-Cell Standing Wave Structures: Design
PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
Choke-mode Damped X-band Structure for CLIC Main Linac Hao ZHA, Jiaru SHI CERN Sep 27, 2011 Jiaru Shi, LCWS11 Workshop, Granada1.
Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
CLIC High-Gradient Development Program Update
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg, July 2012 Simulation of fields around spring and cathode for photogun D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
July Alexej Grudiev, Improvement of CLIC structure. Possible improvement of the CLIC accelerating structure. From CLIC_G to CLIC_K Alexej.
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS DESIGN AND FORTCOMING Vasim Khan & Roger Jones V. Khan LC-ABD 09, Cockcroft Institute /14.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
8/24/2015Pengda Gu, Structure Meeting Study on 30GHz Pulse Compressor 1.Simulation of a multi-cavity RF pulse compressor using a coupled resonator model.
RF particle acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
Investigation threads on fabrication technologies for the CLIC X-band Accelerating Structures C. Rossi on behalf of the CLIC X-band Activity Thanks for.
Zenghai Li SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LHC-CC13 CERN, December 9-11, 2013 HOM Coupler Optimization & RF Modeling.
Course B: rf technology Normal conducting rf Part 5: Higher-order-mode damping Walter Wuensch, CERN Sixth International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Overview of CLIC main linac accelerating structure design 21/10/2010 A.Grudiev (CERN)
2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction to the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Design. I. Syratchev.
RF structure design KT high-gradient medical project kick-off Alberto Degiovanni TERA Foundation - EPFL.
SPL Seminar 2012 BE-RF-LRF HOM couplers for SPL cavities Kai Papke 1 Comparison of different design approaches.
New RF design of CLIC DB AS Alexej Grudiev, BE-RF.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
2.1 GHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL June 15, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  June 15, 2015.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
TE 01 -TE 02 DLDS Elements BINP-KEK
Frequency-domain study of acceleration & beam loading based on a circuit model by raquel fandos.
Network parameter transformation
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure.
CLIC choke-mode structure Hao Zha 2013-Oct-09. Outlines 1. Choke-mode structure design; 2. Optimization on RF parameters; 3. Experiments. 4. Future plan.
Hybrid designs - directions and potential 1 Alessandro D’Elia, R. M. Jones and V. Khan.
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
Optimization of CLIC-G structure & Design of CLIC open structure Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) Valery Dolgashev (SLAC) 27/01/2015.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
Tolerances coming from RF Alexej Grudiev 24 Nov 2014 X-band accelerating structure review.
The US High Gradient Collaboration Vision for Research and Development on Ultra High Gradient Accelerator Structures Sami Tantawi, SLAC ( on behalf of.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
ELI and other things A. D’Elia 1. C-BAND STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-BUNCH RF LINACS: ELI_NP PROPOSAL Bunch charge 250 pC Number of bunches 40 Bunch distance.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
RF Dipole HOM Electromagnetic Design
New test structures for CLIC (RF design)
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
Franck Peauger, Riccardo Zennaro
X-band high-power variable RF splitter
A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS
RF Power Generation and PETS Design
LHC Crab Cavity Conceptual Design at SLAC
Summary of the test structure design
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
TCLIA/TCTV transverse impedance simulation
TCLIA/TCTV broad band transverse impedance
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
Progress in the design of a damped an
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer structure (PETS)
TCLIA/TCTV transverse BB impedance versus gap size
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
TCLIA/TCTV transverse BB impedance versus gap size
Presentation transcript:

Optimization of waveguide geometry in the CLIC-G structures Hao Zha 13/08/2014

When eow increase: Geometry of CLIC-G cell Beam axis b c ac=eow*bc bc iw/2 w/2 ldw 45 o rdw Optimized for magnetic field -- c -- eow=ac/bc Optimized for wakefield damping -- iw: waveguide opening -- w: wavegude width Independed parameters: Note : In all the next slides, if you see “maximum magnetic field”, the eow should have been optimized!

safety distance Compact waveguides There is safety distance between cells and loads. Smaller waveguide has shorter safety distance

RF test model for dipole modes Like wakefield monitor, measure the S-matrix for 4 waveguide port. Reflection of each port may refer a dipole modes. Port 1 Port 2 Port 4 Port 3 Frequency of first dipole mode

Circuit model Cavity Waveguide 1:N’ N:1 Cavity : Transmission line with higher Z 0 Waveguide: Transmission line with lower Z 0 Junction: Impedance converter

Compared with Gdfidl Cells with different apertureCells with different waveguide width

Annoying frequency shift Test cube resonator + 2 waveguide Dimension: 20mm*20mm*12mm Q is almost exactly same Analytical frequency of TE 101 Mode But the frequency has a shift

Study on waveguide geometry Sweep on waveguide width and opening. Width↓, Q↓, H-field↓, Opening↓, Q↑, H-field↓, Width Opening

Optimum waveguide width Why smaller width have better damping effect: Impedance match Here is CLIC-G Different waveguide width for middle cell Optimum waveguide width for cells

Sweep on First cell Optimum width = 10.3mm

Optimum on width & opening Width↓, Q↓, H-field↓, Opening↓, Q↑, H-field↓, Width ↓ and Opening ↓, Q==, H-field↓↓ Contour line of width and opening : Optimum width = 9.9mm

Original cell/Optimized width/Optimized width & opening Original cellOptimized widthOptimized width & opening Max-E field (MV/m) Max-H field (KA/m) ↓3.940↓↓ Max-Sc (MW/mm2) ↓4.102↓↓ Vg (%c) ↑1.696↑↑ R/Q (Mohm/m) ↑14929↑↑ Q ↑5655↑↑

Mid cell Optimum width = 10mm Optimum width = 9.7mm

Last cell Optimum width = 9.7mm Optimum width = 9.5mm

New design for CLIC-G CellsOptimized widthOptimized width & opening widthOpeningWidthopening First10.3mm8mm9.9mm7.98mm Middle10.0mm8mm9.8mm7.94mm Last9.7mm8mm9.7mm7.90mm Original cellOptimized widthOptimized width & opening

Tapered cells (26 regular cell+2matching cell) Original cell Input power = 63.1 MW Optimized width Input power = 62.4 MW Optimized width & opening Input power = 62.1 MW ↓1.3↓2.6

Wakefield results W(s=0.15m) [V/pC/m/mm] Original: 5~6 Optimized width: 1~3 Optimized width & opening: 1~3 Original cell Optimized width Optimized width & opening

Thank you