Using indicators for program management and program assessment Draft framework with examples Donna Podger (916) 445-5269.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Toward a Vision for a National System of Natural and Environmental Resource Indicators.
Management, Leadership, & Internal Organization………..
Copyright © 1997 CompassPoint Nonprofit Services What Does a Strategic Plan Look Like & How Do You Keep It Relevant? Anushka Fernandopulle CompassPoint.
Introduction: Towards an Integrated Reporting System for Marine Protected Areas in the Baja to Bering Sea (B2B) Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
The Value of What We Do Dan Phalen US EPA Region 10.
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
Workshops for implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity through the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans Module 2 The Biodiversity.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
7 Chapter Management, Leadership, and the Internal Organization
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
PAGE # 1 Presented by Stacey Hancock Advised by Scott Urquhart Colorado State University Developing Learning Materials for Surface Water Monitoring.
ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Presentation to the Governor’s Water Summit April 17, 2007 Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch and Diane.
Roadmap Name Strategic Roadmap #n Interim Report April 15, 2005.
1 Measuring Performance of Resource Management Responses Rich Juricich (DWR) David Groves (RAND)
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda Item: 15 Chu ISHIDA(JAXA) on behalf of Rick Lawford, GEO Water CoP leader GEO Water.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounts: A Proposed Outline and Road Map Sixth Meeting of the UN Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting.
Eric R. Johnson Hillsborough County, (Tampa) FL
1 Analytical Tools, Data & Scenarios Workshop July 29, 2004 California Water Plan Update 2004.
1 Beyond California Water Plan Update 2005 California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum Annual Meeting, March 3 rd, 2005.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
OPERATIONAL PLAN OVERVIEW Office of Planning and Budget Division of Administration State of Louisiana October 2006.
Types of evaluation examine different aspects of performance Resources (Inputs) ActivitiesOutputs Short-Term Outcomes Intermediate Outcomes (through customers)
Presented by Margaret Robbins Program Director, TMCEC.
Dr. Jana Jagodick Polytechnic of Namibia, 2012 Project Management Chapter 3 Project Management for Strategic Goal Achievement.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
17. STEP 5: MONITOR, EVALUATE & ADAPT 1 Essential EAFM Date Place 17. Steps 5.1 & 5.2 Monitor, evaluate & adapt Version 1.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
1 Records Exchange Advice, Communication, and Technical Support (REACTS) State Strategic Plan Overview December 14, 2011.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM PARTNERSHIP MANAGEMENT BOARD MEETING MAY 9, 2012 ANNAPOLIS, MD Social Science Action Team: Incorporating Social Science into the.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
Harmonization Project FAS Meeting Harmonization project and ISSAI 200 Purpose and scope of the project The purpose is to provide a conceptual basis.
FY2012 ChesapeakeStat Development Team Enhancements – content, design, function 1.Redesign Goal Overview Pages Objective: Communicate the mission and vision.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Adaptive Management and the Delta Plan “Include a science-based, transparent, and formal adaptive management strategy for ongoing ecosystem restoration.
Delta Stewardship Council Delta Plan Performance Measures Council Briefing July 25, 2014.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
1 Bringing Global Thinking to Local Sustainability Efforts: A Collaborative Project for the Boston Region James Goldstein Tellus Institute.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES ICES cooperative research report.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Logic Models: The Pathway Model.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
What is it about? Presents first results of applying MAES analytical framework and outlines the advantages and constraints of European ecosystem assessments.
Draft example: Indicators for water supply reliability and storage projects Presented by Steve Roberts (Department of Water Resources, Storage Investigations)
1 Recommended Next Steps For Improving Quantitative Information California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting August 17, 2005.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
IPCC Key challenges facing communities, and approaches to solutions that enhance resilience: through NAPs Climate and Health Summit 2014 Investing.
NFM: Modular Template Measurement Framework: Modules, Interventions and Indicators LFA M&E Training February
In the Framework of: Financed by: Developed by: Business Planning for Water Associations Prepared by Water Supply and Sewerage Association of Albania SHUKALB.
Introduction to Group Work. Learning Objectives The goal of the group project is to provide workshop participants with an opportunity to further develop.
April 4, 2011 Princesa VanBuren Hansen Environmental Quality Board.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program Implemented Jointly by Department of Water Resources and State Water Resources Control Board.
A Guide to SDG Interactions: from Science to Implementation
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
2014 Strategic Plan Presentation to the Goddard Contractors Association Rebecca Spyke Keiser Associate Deputy Administrator for Strategy and Policy Contributions.
Project Management Process Groups
Changing the Game The Logic Model
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Presentation transcript:

Using indicators for program management and program assessment Draft framework with examples Donna Podger (916)

Revised framework for indicators Evolution of what has come before Consistent with current efforts Framework to organize and present existing monitoring data, provide mechanism to bring science and monitoring together and identify gaps.

Proposed Approach Phase 1: Refine framework Phase 2: Try it out – develop examples Independent science review Phase 3: Develop core set of indicators (web) Independent science review Phase 4: Refine core indicators and develop publication Independent science review Phase 5: Develop more complete set of indicators Independent science review Phase 6: Annual refinement – update of website, develop publication Independent science review

Why use indicators? To help understand relationships between cause and effect (indicators) To assess progress towards program goals (performance measures)

Indicators for different audiences Technical audience Develop and refine common understanding of the system In-depth, detailed, indicators at different scales Product: detailed web-based, GIS based, “drill down” for details Non-technical audience Describe progress towards goals Fewer simple indicators and summarization of technical data Product: annual publication

3 levels of indicators 1. Administrative indicators ($, projects, programs) 2. Driver indicators (factors influencing outcome, including management actions) 3. Outcome indicators (environmental state, DWQ, water supply reliability)

Conceptual Models

Conceptual models Be explicit as possible Based on current scientific knowledge Describe linkages between drivers and outcomes, including a discussion of importance, understanding and predictability Basis of discussion for expected outcomes of management actions Can be quantitative models

Benefits of conceptual models Documents rationale for decision making Allows multi-disciplinary review and discussion Reduces chances of faulty reasoning or unintended consequences Provides a basis for incorporating new information and continually improving knowledge of system

Ideas for web-based communication product

CALFED Bay Delta Program Using indicators to inform science, management and adaptive management The CALFED Bay Delta Program is using indicators to help understand the relationships between management actions and outcomes related to program goals. For a summary of the program as a whole, click on the mission statement below or on the elements of the graphic on this page. The mission of the CALFED Bay Delta Program is to develop a long-term comprehensive plan that will restore ecological health and improve water management for beneficial uses of the Bay Delta system. To find out more about progress towards each of the program’s goals: click on each of the goals listed below: Improve water supply reliability Restore the Bay-Delta ecosystem Improve water quality Enhance levee stability in the Delta CALFED Bay Delta Program Back to indicators home page

2. Introduction slide 3. Framework overview Framework Process Glossary 4. Program indicators and PM 5. Overall programWater supply reliability Water qualityEcosystem Restoration Levee Integrity 6. Entire program Policy WSR PolicyDWQ PolicyERP PolicyLevees Policy 7. Entire program Implementation 8. Entire program Cause & effect WSR Implementation DWQ Implementation ERP Implementation Levees Implementation WSR Cause and effect DWQ Cause and effect ERP Cause and effect Levees Cause and effect Other WQ Cause and effect Other WQ Implementation Other WQ Policy

CALFED Bay Delta Program The mission of the CALFED Bay Delta Program is to develop a long-term comprehensive plan that will restore ecological health and improve water management for beneficial uses of the Bay Delta system. The diagram at the right shows the relationship between the 3 levels of indicators and policy, management and science. A series of web pages explains the policy, implementation and outcomes related to the goals of the CALFED Bay Delta program. Click on the arrows to the right or the list below to find out more about the overall program: What are the goals defined by policy makers and the resources allocated to reach them? How are the resources being implemented into actions? How are actions and other factors causing progress towards goals? To find out more about the specific progress and goals of the program, click on the links below: Improve water supply reliability Restore the Bay-Delta ecosystem Improve water quality Enhance levee stability in the Delta Back to indicators home page

CALFED Bay Delta Program : Policy and Administrative Indicators This slide will describe or be a portal for explanations about who / how policy decisions are made including: Defining the goals and objectives for the program Giving short-term directions / plans Allocating resources to achieve the goals There may also be links to related organizations that make policy decisions and allocate resources to areas of mutual interest. Policy decision makers Defining goals and objectives Setting direction Allocating resources to achieve goals Administrative indicators Back to indicators home page

CALFED Bay Delta Program : Implementation and Driver Indicators This page will give a summary / portal to discuss how resources are being implemented to achieve actions. This will include a description of investigative efforts, monitoring, planning, and implementation actions. Implementation agencies Resources allocated InvestigationsMonitoring Actions Planning Administrative indicators Driver indicators Back to CBDA indicators page

CALFED Bay Delta Program : Understanding cause and effect Drivers and Outcome indicators System-wide Conceptual Model Geographic Information Access Water supply reliability Ecosystem Restoration Water Quality Levee system integrity Outcomes Drivers Actions Uncontrollable factors This page will give a summary / portal to discuss an overall conceptual model that integrates the four program objectives, and presents information on key outcome indicators for each of the program goals. Back to CBDA indicators page

Levee Integrity CALFED Objective: Enhance Levee Stability in the Delta The mission of the CALFED Bay Delta Program is to develop a long-term comprehensive plan that will restore ecological health and improve water management for beneficial uses of the Bay Delta system. The diagram at the right shows the relationship between the 3 levels of indicators and policy, management and science. A series of web pages explains the policy, implementation and outcomes related to the goals of the CALFED Bay Delta program. Click on the arrows to the right or the list below to find out more about the overall program: What are the goals defined by policy makers and the resources allocated to reach them? How are the resources being implemented into actions? How are actions and other factors causing progress towards goals? Back to indicators home page