Define the initial management vision Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 4 © Christina Lehmann 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building Sustainable Networks David Gosling Enhancing Student Employability Co-ordination Team.
Advertisements

Page 1 The Ecosystem Services Approach and TEEB in the context of German Development Cooperation TEEB Country Studies – Learning from Experience and how.
EngageNY.org ©2012 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
2A. Develop a Formal Action Plan: Results Chains Conservation Coaches Network Workshop Presentation.
ESE Einführung in Software Engineering X. CHAPTER Prof. O. Nierstrasz Wintersemester 2005 / 2006.
Strategic and Systems Thinking for the Public Sector - 29th-31st March 1999 Why use Oval Mapping? * useful method for being able to see the whole picture.
CP — Concurrent Programming X. CHAPTER Prof. O. Nierstrasz Wintersemester 2005 / 2006.
SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses SWOT Opportunities Threats.
Determine conservation objects: (biodiversity-dependent) human wellbeing objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 3 © Christina Lehmann.
Determine conservation objects: biodiversity objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 2 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Analysis of systemic activity and the strategic relevance of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis.
Organizational Learning (OL)
Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 12 © Pierre Ibisch.
Operational planning and implementation of measures Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 25 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 15 © Christina Lehmann 2015.
Analysis of knowledge and manageability of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre.
Creating a Learning Community Vision
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Decreasing births < 39 weeks gestation without medical indication and improving birth registry accuracy project Creating Your Team Storyboard Instructions.
Monitoring of results, impacts and research Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 26 © CEEM 2014.
1 Fostering Networks for academic sharing Prof. Muhammad Aslam Adeeb The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Revision and validation Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
©2013 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Reflection and roadmap: CFR assessment and roadmap development.
Learning in Networks and challenges related to the competence development of educators 5th Nordic Conference on Adult Learning Nordic Network for Adult.
© 2015 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Identification of existing strategies and “strategy mapping” Phase III Evaluation, prioritisation and strategy formulation Step 17 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Knowledge and non-knowledge management Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 27 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Climate Financing: Stakeholder Mapping. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F.
Exercise: Pros and Cons of National Climate Funds.
Results webs, goal and objective setting and monitoring design Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation Step 24 © Pierre.
Mbombela Climate Change Workshop 2 5 November 2015 Civic Centre Hall, Mbombela.
Analysis and filling of strategic gaps: the development of complementary strategies Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation.
Define the geographical scope of management Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 1 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Organise, revise and complete the systemic conceptual model Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 8 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Evaluation and revision of the underlying concept Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 29 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
Analysis of climate finance policy instruments. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T
Spatial analysis and priority setting Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 9 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
International climate finance governance: role play.
© 2014 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
© 2014 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Numerical Methods Multidimensional Gradient Methods in Optimization- Example
EngageNY.org ©2012 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Results Chains. Copyright and Use Terms Under this license, you are free to share this presentation and adapt it for.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Goals & Strategies © Foundations of Success December 2008.
Assessment of the current status of the biodiversity objects Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 5 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
SCEL Framework for Educational Leadership
Identifying contributing factors to threats
Assessment and prioritization of existing strategies
Phase II Systemic Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Step 6
PowerPoint Guidance for State Presentations
Morning Reflections / Today’s objectives
Visualisation of systemic relationships
Assess criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors
An overview of pedagogical learning theories
Pre and post workshop assessments
Overview of this module
Module I.4 The NAP Chat Trainer: [Name]
Module I.5 Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In Trainer: [Name] Country teams that want to realize key NAP tasks need to have a good.
Module 0.1 Participants introduction / Preliminary stocktaking Trainer: [Name] Note to trainer:   During the NAP country-level training, the participants.
Module I.3 Process overview on NAP Trainer: [Name]
Module V.2 NAP as a living document Trainer: [Name]
Visualisation of systemic relationships I
GE-McKinsey 9-Box Matrix
Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation
Four-step approach (2) Identify adaptation options
Effective Health and Safety Committees – Part Two
Module I.3 Process overview on NAP Trainer: [Name]
Presentation transcript:

Define the initial management vision Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 4 © Christina Lehmann 2014

Credits and conditions of use 4. Define the initial management vision2 You are free to share this presentation and adapt it for your use under the following conditions: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). You may not use this work for commercial purposes. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you must remove the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management logo, and you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar conditions to this one. © Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, 2014 The Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management strongly recommends that this presentation is given by experts familiar with the adaptive management process in general (especially as designed as the Conservation Measures Partnership’s Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation) as well as the MARISCO Method itself. This material was created under the leadership and responsibility of Prof. Dr. Pierre Ibisch and Dr. Peter Hobson, co- directors of the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, which was jointly established by Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development and Writtle College. Compare: Ibisch, P.L. & P.R. Hobson (eds.) (2014): The MARISCO method: Adaptive MAnagement of vulnerability and RISk at COnservation sites. A guidebook for risk-robust, adaptive, and ecosystem-based conservation of biodiversity. Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde (ISBN ). 195 pp. - The Powerpoint Presentation was conceived by Christina Lehmann and Pierre Ibisch. Authors of graphs and photographs are indicated on the corresponding slides. Supported by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on behalf of the Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ).

4. Define the initial management vision3

Learning objectives 4. Define the initial management vision4 Participants understand the use of defining a joint management vision to create a consensual orientation and motivation of the working group and stakeholders for the further more detailed planning process (defining management goals, strategies, activities and objectives). Participants have a clear understanding of a vision statement (in contrast to conservation goals or objectives) and have the skills to develop one with a team.

? Outline What does defining the initial management vision mean? Why do we define the initial management vision? How do we define the initial management vision? Practical Tips 4. Define the initial management vision5

? What does defining the initial management vision mean? First formulation of ideal future management and condition of the area of interest and desired outcomes Inclusion of concrete ideas and important aspects 4. Define the initial management vision6 Vision © Christina Lehmann 2014

? Why do we define the initial management vision? Helps to orientate activities, and management goals and objectives Stimulates consensual strategic thinking which builds the baseline for goal formulation 4. Define the initial management vision7 Result: More effective and easier start for a detailed situation and vulnerability analysis in “Phase II” © Christina Lehmann 2015

? How do we define the initial management vision? Setting of ideal-seeking outcomes Vision ≠ Goal/ Objective → must not be too prescriptive (no timelines or outcomes) but open and encouraging Formulating ideal conditions for biodiversity and human wellbeing → strive for the best result 4. Define the initial management vision8 Reflection of holistic approach → all aspects can be considered Recommendation: Record agreed upon management visions on a white poster for display until planning and/or vision-revisiting are complete © Pierre Ibisch 2014

? Practical Tips Visions may be written as complete short paragraphs, sentences and bullet points Keep vision visible throughout the rest of the first workshop as well as the second one A short coffee break for reflection and exchange should follow this step 4. Define the initial management vision9 © Microsoft © Christoph Nowicki 2013 © Christina Lehmann 2014 © Pierre Ibisch 2014