European Community European Regional Development Fund Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme Area 2000 – 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme
Advertisements

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
Commission européenne The European Social Fund Investing in your Future.
Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
The political framework
The Green Arc Vision “Bringing the Big Outdoors closer to everyone – by creating, linking and managing extensive and valued landscapes for people and.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Cyprus Project Management Society
Role and potential small and medium-sized urban areas Latvia’s case
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
Presentation of the workshop results to the plenary session A) Strengthening rural entrepreneurship by connecting the local production with other economic.
TINA VIENNA Urban Technologies & Strategies GmbH Danube Future Leaders’ Conference Petrovaradin, 8-9 July 2010.
PLUREL October 2010 Increased coordination of urban sustainability research in Europe.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14 October.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
Ministry of local Government and Regional Development Polycentric settlement structures (Odd Godal, Adviser, Vilnius, )
Part-financed by the European Union Priority 2 of the BSR Programme External and internal accessibility of the BSR Ryszard Toczek, City of Gdynia.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
Part-financed by the European Union Promoting attractive and competitive cities and regions Arve Skjerpen, Norway Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering.
Baltic Sea Region Programme EU:s strategi för Östersjöregionen, hur nära relation? -Större vikt, mer medel? -Ryssland, Vitryssland -Större roll,
EU Territorial Agenda and aspects related to the Baltic Area Content: Chapter I: Tomorrow´s Territorial Challenges to be tackled today.
1 Urban networking and urban-rural initiatives in the Baltic Sea region The screening report by Wiktor Szydarowski VASAB WG1 meeting, Jurmala, 3 September.
WORLD TRADE GROWTH. GLOBALIZATION Way of life Way of production Keeping in touch with the universal dimension of international trade.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INTERREG IIC Community Initiative concerning Transnational Co-operation on Spatial Planning
Part-financed by the European Union The Baltic Sea Region Programme by the Joint Technical Secretariat BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme.
The Draft Operational Programme Objective 3 Transnational territorial cooperation North West Europe IIIB NWE Joint Technical Secretariat, Lille,
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
How to Use the Structural Funds ? 1.Financing sustainable energy projects. 2.Practical support – RUSE operation. Jana Cicmanova Energie-Cités.
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge Objectives and Activities.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Updated implementation strategy for the remaining Programme period.
PREDSTAVITEV PROGRAMA MED Margarita Jančič Ministrstvo za okolje in prostor Direktorat za evropske zadeve In investicije 10. April 2008, Ljubljana.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
The National Spatial Strategy. Better spread of job opportunities.. Better Quality of Life.. Better places to live in.. NSS Core Messages….
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture 1 EU rural development policy Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission Directorate General.
1 “Energy Security dimension in EU CSDP: Guidelines for the Future” RADM Bruce Williams CBE Deputy Director General EU Military Staff.
The Perspectives and Challenges of Transnational Cooperation in the next European Funding Period Fontwell Park, 17 October 2006 Julia ERIPRET,
NATIONAL INFO-DAY Tirana, Albania, September 16th 2015.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
26/10/20151 European Investment Bank EIB Contribution to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Ruse, 10 May 2010.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Third PSF in Gdansk, June 2003 WORKSHOP INFORMATION Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Joint Secretariat,
EU funding Available EU Structural Funds. Objective 2 / Mål 2 Interreg 4A NORD Kolarctic ENPI CBC Northern Periphery Programme Baltic Sea programme North.
Transnacionalno teritorialno sodelovanje Program Jugovzhodna Evropa Margarita Jančič, MOP,DEZI Novo mesto,17. april 2008.
Baltic Sea - & Nordic and Northern Peripheries Region Dense web of co- operative relationships and interlocking institutions with various memberships,
A project part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) within the BSR INTERREG III B Programme The Defris Project An idea for.
Final Forum Hinterland Berlin Innovative HINTERLAND Some follow-up ideas.
Brainstorming meeting House of Catalonia, Bruxelles 26 March 2014 Territorial Vision and Pathways 2050.
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA 1 INTEGRATED TERRITORIAL INVESTMENT (ITI) PRIORITY FOR EU FUNDING.
© BBR Bonn 2003 Hamburg, May 2007Wilfried Görmar, BBR The “Territorial Agenda” for the European Union – Effects on the Baltic Sea Region Baltic Sea.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat,/Sakari Saarinen / Project Coordinator / NEW BRIDGES Kick-off 4-5 March 2009 New Bridges – Strengthening.
Part-financed by the European Union Workshop 1 Fostering innovations Moderation: Susann Henning, Managing Authority Baltic Sea Region Programme
The National Spatial Strategy. Better spread of job opportunities.. Better Quality of Life.. Better places to live in.. NSS Core Messages….
INFRASTRUCTURE AND HUMAN SETTLEMENTS Presentation by Delegation of the European Union Consultative Group Meeting Technical Session La Palm, Accra, 23/09/2010.
> Balancing urban redevelopment with urban expansion > Integrating transport, land use and infrastructure > Sustaining the vitality and viability of city.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
INTERREG-IIIB CADSES Neighbourhood Program: a general overview
cbss. st/documents/cbsspresidencies/10russian/dbaFile263
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14.
South-East European Space
Thematic platform 1 Competitiveness & Attractivness
The European Social Fund
Main results from the Interreg IVC Capitalisation project Winnet8
Veľký Meder / Nagymegyer 6th November 2014
ESPON, the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network
Strategic Guidelines for EU Territorial Cooperation Programmes Post-2020 Introductory notes. Malta: 26 April Eduardo medeiros 2017.
Presentation transcript:

European Community European Regional Development Fund Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme Area 2000 – 2006

Measure Promoting balanced polycentric settlement structures Objectives:  Strengthening the major urban centres as engines for development through strategic cooperation, enhancing potentials in fields like service supply, R&D, logistics, communication and diminishing deficits in social segregation, nature degradation and pollution;  Supporting sustainable development of the settlement system through new solutions on urban- rural cooperation, regional networking between towns and surrounding areas, organisation of business areas, traffic, communication, land use development, nature protection etc;  Strengthening small and medium-sized cities and villages in rural and peripheral areas through networking and developing of specific economic functions and ensuring adequate living conditions for rural areas through infrastructure solutions adapted to specific rural conditions, taking into consideration the different needs of women respective men.

Measure Creating sustainable communi- cation links for improved spatial integration Objectives:  Supporting regional cohesion and development of polycentric settlement structure,  Promoting interactions between urban and rural areas and improving accessibility of peripheral areas  Strengthening existing networks of regions, cities and other locations (e.g. harbours) through enhanced communication systems and logistic centres,  Combining the development of transport corridors with sustainable spatial/regional development,  Reducing traffic need on corridors and agglomerations already being highly loaded,  Contributing to the development of structurally weaker regions by different forms of information and communication technology,  Supporting extension of existing networks of SME:s and establishment of new networks of SME:s through improved communication systems.

 deliver sustainable development policies in all parts of the BSR,  develop a better integrated BSR,  facilitate the accession process,  guarantee local and regional democratic influence. Priority 3 - Transnational promotion of institution building, strengthening the capacity for spatial development activities This overarching objective can be divided into two specific objectives: 1. To improve the capacity of individual actors to work on issues of importance to spatial development. 2. To improve the capacity to interact sectorally and internationally The overarching objective of this priority is to improve the capacity of institutions in the BSR, directly or indirectly involved in spatial development activities:

1. The first specific objective to improve the capacity of individual actors to work on issues of importance to spatial development. This is implemented through e.g.:  an improved capacity to identify the challenges facing spatial development, including an international overview,  improved methods by which the organisation can identify, discuss and decide on issues of importance to spatial development,  exchange of information on methods by which development strategies can be established for a sustainable regional development,  improving the capacity to build an efficient business environment, including for instance e-commerce, telemetric services and courier services. 2. The second specific objective is to improve the capacity to interact sectorally and internationally through e.g.:  promoting institutions capable of trans-sector analysis and action by establishing the proper types of networks,  promotion of systems through which trans-national co- operation can be run in an efficient way,  strengthening the involvement of women in the decision making process in institutions and networks. Priority 3