UNC Modification Proposal 0192 National Grid Distribution Proposal 0182: “ Introduction of DNO obligations to facilitate resolution of unresolved USRVs”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-code User Pays. 2 What we will cover Background Current Services Governance Arrangements What is working well What is not working as well.
Advertisements

Funding UKLink Process changes (User Pays). 2 Purpose of Presentation  Review of User Pays  Principles  Application to date  National Grid NTS observations.
NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity Charges – Credit Arrangements (UNC TPD V3.3.4) Simon Trivella – 14 th January 2009 Distribution Workstream.
Review of industry code governance 26 March 2010.
USRV Incentives Review Chris Warner. USRV Resolution Responsibility and Occurrence  E8.1.1  “…the User shall investigate Reconciliation Values that.
UNC Modification Proposal Revised Timescales for LDZ Shrinkage Arrangements Simon Trivella – 25 th September 2008 Distribution Workstream.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
UNC Urgent Modification Proposal 0275 Supplemental Analysis and Timeline.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Proposed Agreement For Identification And Administration Of Unregistered Sites Chris Warner Network Code Manager.
Credit Arrangements During a Prolonged Emergency Mark Cockayne and Jayne McGlone 11 December 2006 Whilst all reasonable efforts have been made to verify.
Transfers and Trades Transmission Workstream
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Modification Proposal 0220 – “Invoicing Arrangements for Late Payments” National Grid (Distribution) Comments Chris Warner.
Operating Margins UNC Sub Group Tuesday 2nd December 2008.
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 2 7 th May 2008 Substitution Example.
Mod Clarifications Transmission Workstream 6 August 2009.
11 User Pays User Committee 11th January Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Mar 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
UNC Modification Proposal 0229 Guidelines document.
11 User Pays User Committee 16th February Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
Draft Modification Proposal: Population and Maintenance of Market Sector Code within Sites & Meters Simon Trivella –25 th February 2010 Distribution Workstream.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
1 New proposal extending the services created by Modification 279 historic asset and read data Modification 279 created an annual report (on request at.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Performance Assurance 21st May Incentives. USRV’s – Incentive Regime Charges are based on a range of standards USRV Period runs from 21 st of one month.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.
UNC0376A - Increased Choice when applying for NTS Exit Capacity – User Pays initial thoughts Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 01.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Transfers and Trades Special Transmission Workstream
Connected System Exit Points Options for strategic regime change Chris Warner.
Development Modification Proposal: Introduction of an Inter-day Linepack Product Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Proposal to modify Standard Special Conditions A4, A5 and D11 of the Gas Transporter licence Distribution Charging Methodology Forum (DCMF) 13 August 2007.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
SoS Report PAC – 13th December 2016.
Supply Point Capacity BSSOQ and Supply Point ratchets
David Addison / Steve Deery
Distribution workstream 29th January 2009
Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Transmission Workstream February 2009
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
CSEP NExA Update Marie Clark ScottishPower 28th September 2006.
UNC Trader User – Licence obligations
Modification Proposal 0192 – Draft Business Rules.
Chris Warner Network Code Manager
Connected System Exit Points Administration Options
Chris Warner Network Code Manager
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Connected System Exit Points Administration Options
UNC Modification Proposal 0172 National Grid Distribution
UNC Modification Proposal 0362
Supply Point Capacity BSSOQ and Supply Point ratchets
Topic raised at July 2009 Distribution Workstream
Project Nexus Workgroup
Proposer: Transporter /
Service Delivery USRV Statistics.
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
UNC Modification Proposal 0229
Information Provision for Transitional Exit Capacity
DNO Obligations to Facilitate Resolution of Unresolved USRVs
Nexus Workstream 30 April 2009.
Assignment of NTS Entry Capacity – Work currently being Undertaken
Transmission Workstream 05 November 2009
Erika Melén, Senior Settlements Analyst Modification Proposal 141a
Proposer: Steve Mulinganie, Gazprom Energy Panel Date: 20th June 2019
Presentation transcript:

UNC Modification Proposal 0192 National Grid Distribution Proposal 0182: “ Introduction of DNO obligations to facilitate resolution of unresolved USRVs” UNC Distribution Workstream – 28 th February 2008 Chris Warner

Draft High level Business Rules  ‘Back stop’ terms requiring DNO to assume role of ‘last resort’ resolver of USRV  New definition required when USRV status changes (becomes [x]SRV)  Does not preclude User from entering into any ‘non-code’ arrangements with xoserve or any other agent to facilitate resolution of USRV

Draft High level Business Rules  Optimal period before status change  User must have opportunity and incentive to resolve  Code Mods 0637 & 0141  Between 18 months – 2 years optimal  Primary obligation to resolve USRV is with the User (who was registered when ‘filter failure’ occurred).  Evidence that clearance rates continues up to 2 years then slows significantly

Draft High level Business Rules  Upon status change USRV User to provide relevant data (where possible) upon request from DNO  Upon status change User may still resolve (up to point that DNO approves [x]SRV) but charge still applies  ‘Reasonable endeavours’ provision for DNO to resolve [x]SRV.  At DNO’s discretion, where not practicable to resolve, deemed allocation applied and [x]SRV lapses.

Draft High level Business Rules  Where site visit necessary, relevant User to facilitate access to property  DNO decision on resolution and subsequent billable volumes not subject to query in respect of the volume pursuant to TPD S4 by any User. DNO decision binding  Service chargeable irrespective of whether [x]SRV resolved or deemed allocation applied  Resolution of [x]SRV may result in new USRV. DNO will approve automatically.