Using Fluorescence X-rays for Non-invasive Biopsy Team members: Savannah Gill Kelvin Lin Mike McHugh Trey Reece Derric Williams Advisors: Dr. Frank Carroll.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Biomedical Imaging Lecture 3
Advertisements

RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
Formation Characteristics
IMAGE QUALITY.
X-ray Diffraction. X-ray Generation X-ray tube (sealed) Pure metal target (Cu) Electrons remover inner-shell electrons from target. Other electrons “fall”
The waves spread out from the opening!
Interference and Diffraction
Control of Scatter Radiation Beam Restricting Devices
Resident Physics Lectures
Medical Imaging X-Rays I.
Imaging Science FundamentalsChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science Medical X-ray Imaging System Imaging Science Fundamentals.
BME 560 Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods
BME 560 Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods
Computed Tomography RAD309
RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
The Origins of X-Rays. The X-Ray Spectrum The X-Ray Spectrum (Changes in Voltage) The characteristic lines are a result of electrons ejecting orbital.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Simulations 2. Sensitive area of the detection plane 3. Example of a workable solution 4. Geometrical efficiency of the photon.
Instrumental Chemistry Chapter 12 Atomic X-Ray Spectroscopic.
Radiation Sources in medicine diagnostic Radiology
Planar X-ray Imaging Measure the integeral of the linear attenuation coefficient over the beam path through the object. has two main contributions 1.Photoelectric.
MET 61 1 MET 61 Introduction to Meteorology MET 61 Introduction to Meteorology - Lecture 8 “Radiative Transfer” Dr. Eugene Cordero San Jose State University.
Unit 1 Physics Detailed Study 3.6 Chapter 15: Medical Physics.
8.1 PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF X-RAYS
Factors affecting the X-Ray output
X-Ray Production & Emission
X-Ray Production & Emission
Seeram Chapter 11: Image Quality
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY I – RAD 365 CT - Scan
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Resident Physics Lectures Christensen, Chapter 6Filters George David Associate Professor Department of Radiology Medical College of Georgia.
Topic 29: Remote Sensing 29.1 Production and use of X-rays 29.2 Production and uses of ultrasound 29.3 Use of magnetic resonance as an imaging technique.
Using Fluorescence X-rays for Non-invasive Biopsy Team members: Savannah Gill Kelvin Lin Mike McHugh Trey Reece Derric Williams Advisors: Dr. Frank Carroll.
Medical Image Analysis Medical Imaging Modalities: X-Ray Imaging Figures come from the textbook: Medical Image Analysis, Second Edition, by Atam P. Dhawan,
Quality Control.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) – Shoots a high energy beam of electrons (waves of electrons) at a target. Electron gun Focusing coil Objective lens.
Resident Physics Lectures
Fundamental Limits of Positron Emission Tomography
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
Young/Freeman University Physics 11e. Ch 38 Photons, Electrons, and Atoms © 2005 Pearson Education.
CT Instrumentation and X-ray system
Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension (ESA Cosmic Vision ) or the Compton Scattering polarimetery challenges Ezio Caroli,
The waves spread out from the opening!
Wave superposition If two waves are in the same place at the same time they superpose. This means that their amplitudes add together vectorially Positively.
Radiographic Equipment
X-rays discovered in 1895 by Wilhem Roentgen Roentgenology – Branch of medicine dealing with x-ray or gamma rays in diagnosis and treatment. Radiology.
The NA62 rare kaon decay experiment Photon Veto System Vito Palladino for NA62 Coll.
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging Luke Powers Chris Weaver Jonathan Fermo Alfred Luk BME 273, Group 22 04/06/2005.
Phase Contrast sensitive Imaging
Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging Luke Powers 1, Alfred Luk 1, Christopher Weaver 1, Jonathan Fermo 1 Advisors: Paul King, Ph.D. 1 ; Frank E. Carroll,
Low Angle X-ray Scattering (LAXS) for Tissue Characterization Dr M A Oghabian.
Status of E14 G.Y.Lim IPNS, KEK. E14 Experiment Step-by-step approach to precise measurement of Br( K L    ) KEK-PS E391a J-PARC E14 (Step-1) J-PARC.
Stacy Kopso, M.Ed., R.T.(R)(M).  Xray photon loses energy and changes direction  Responsible for most of the scatter that fogs the image  Related to.
Considerations on the possibility of Phase Contrast Mammography using ICS sources B. Golosio a, P. Delogu b, I. Zanette b, M. Carpinelli a, G. L. Masala.
Basis of Mammography F. Milano Dept. Clinical Physiopathology University of Florence
X-ray tube.
Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging Luke Powers Chris Weaver Jonathan Fermo Alfred Luk BME 273, Group 22 02/23/2005.
An early x-ray by Wilhem Rontgen
Barium & Iodine Imaging Physics
EMR 2 The Compton Effect. Review of Photoelectric Effect: Intensity Matters - the greater the intensity/brightness, the greater the photoelectric current.
1 Opto-Acoustic Imaging 台大電機系李百祺. 2 Conventional Ultrasonic Imaging Spatial resolution is mainly determined by frequency. Fabrication of high frequency.
Computed Tomography Data Acquisition
X-Radiation.
Using Fluorescence X-rays for Non-invasive Biopsy
Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging
Using Fluorescence X-rays for Non-invasive Biopsy
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Optimization of Phase Contrast Imaging
The waves spread out from the opening!
Presentation transcript:

Using Fluorescence X-rays for Non-invasive Biopsy Team members: Savannah Gill Kelvin Lin Mike McHugh Trey Reece Derric Williams Advisors: Dr. Frank Carroll Dr. Ed Donnelly Mr. Robert Traeger Mr. Gary Shearer

Project Background Current Methods are Invasive Our Project Hopes To Rid Detection Process of Needles, Anesthetic, & Pain Reduce radiation dose to patient Rid of contrast agent Reduce Time & Complications

Market Potential Conventional Methods Mammography High False Negative Rate Cheap, Simple, Ubiquitous MRI High False Positive Rate More Sensitive More Costly Safer Mammography X-Ray Image

Objective Monochromatic X-rays Fire X-rays of only one energy (or wavelength) An alternative noninvasive method for biopsy Use SAXS emissions from elements in tissue

Project Description Small Angle X-ray Scattering

Project Description Task 1: Decrease the size of the x-ray

Task 2: Block off the extra x-ray Project Description

Task 3: Determine Material d R Project Description

Completed Work Radiation Safety Badge training Literature search Initial estimated photon scattering angle: 5°-15° Designed and created a double layer collimator Tested collimator Dec. Feb.Mar.Apr. Nov. Jan.

Current Status Jan. Feb. Mar.Apr.Nov.Dec. Built beam stop Developing better method for alignment of Kevex X-ray Collecting images of different material using Kevex x-ray Writing an algorithm to help determine the percent composition of the elements

Current Work: Collimator Modified Collimator Added Second 5-aperture panel of Pb/Al

Current Work: Beam Stop Circular in shape to block transmitted beam Comprised of lead Need a beam stop large enough to block beam, yet small enough to allow scattering to reach detector Work geometry to determine size

Apparatus Schematic X-Ray Collimator & Sample Translational Stage MAR 345 Detector 25.4 cm39.4 cm68.6 cm 14.2 cm

Geometry Collimator & Sample Translational Stage MAR 345 Detector

Geometry 5-15° ? Maximum = cm Minimum = 39.4 cm Use geometry to predict radius of scattering

Radius of Scattering Maximum Distance = cm 111.8*tan(5°) = 9.8 cm 111.8*tan(15°) = 30.0 cm 111.8*tan(10°) = 19.7 cm Minimum Distance = 39.4 cm 39.4 *tan(5°) = 3.4 cm 39.4 *tan(15°) = 10.6 cm 39.4 *tan(10°) = 6.9 cm

Beam Stop Construction Made 2 circular beam stops 5 cm diameter 7.5 cm diameter

Schematic Modifications Maximum detector distance unusable Detector radius only 17.1 cm Small angle scattering likely to go beyond detector Moved detector up 65 cm At 5°, scattering radius = 4.1 cm At 10°, scattering radius = 8.3 cm At 15°, scattering radius = 12.5 cm

Preliminary Results Stopped Beam No Sample 30 Second Exposure Very little scattered photons Beam Stop 17.1 cm

Preliminary Results (Cont’d) Cuvette Only Polystyrene 30 Second Exposure Slight Halo

Preliminary Results (Cont’d) Water in Cuvette 30 Second Exposure Many Scattered Photons No obvious rings or scattering pattern

Preliminary Results (Cont’d) Water Only (Cuvette Subtracted) 30 Second Exposure Lots of scattering

Scattered X-rays Incident Beam Pure Sample θ Scattered Xrays The angle of the scattered x-rays is a function of the Energy(keV) of the incident x-rays and the atomic characteristics of the sample. Where c is the speed of light, E is the energy of the photon, and q is the momentum transfer, f(n, Θ, λ)

Reducing Noise – Incident Beam Size Incident Beam Pure Sample Wide Ring Created Detector

Reducing Noise – Incident Beam Size Incident Beam Pure Sample Thin Ring Created Detector

Reducing Noise – Sample Thickness Pure Thick Sample Wide Ring Created Detector Incident Beam

Reducing Noise – Sample Thickness Thin Ring Created Detector Incident Beam Thinner Sample

Reducing Noise – Monochromatic Beam Thin Ring Created Detector Incident Beam Thin Sample Polychromatic

Reducing Noise – Monochromatic Beam Thin Ring Created Detector Incident Beam Thin Sample Monochromatic

Next Step Take x-ray image for different elements Find average intensity of each element Find ideal histogram for each substance. Compare samples of normal adipose tissue to cancerous tissue

This Week… Fire x-rays through several scenarios Using holes of size 0.2cm,0.4,0.6,0.8, and 1.0cm With the beam-stop at distances of 0.25m, 0.5m, 0.75m, 1.0m,1.25 and 1.5m.

Test Subjects Synthetic breast tissue Pure elements Crystalline substances Sample Frozen breast tissue Dead Mice Engineering Hamburger Anything we can get our hands on…

Dates to Come Determine ideal hole/beam stop combination Before March 1 st Construct more efficient hole/beam stop 1 Week after ideal combination is completed Test other materials (Water, plastic, copper) By march 15th Test tissue materials (Breast/Mouse samples) By the end of march

Questions?