IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BEAM PIPE BEYOND FIRST CRYOSTAT ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1. N. Souchlas BNL (Oct. 5, 2010)
Advertisements

IDS120j WITH/WITHOUT GAPS SH#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/14/2012) 1.
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Neutrino Factory Mercury Flow Loop V. Graves C. Caldwell IDS-NF Videoconference March 9, 2010.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF/IDS Hg Vessel Layout 30 Jun 09 Cryostat 2 Front Drain Mercury Vessel Concept Matthew F. Glisson.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
IDS120h: Be WINDOW DETAILED CALCULATION, SHIELDING VESSELS, RESULTS FOR DIFFERENT GLOBAL STEPS Nicholas Souchlas (9/20/2011) 1.
MC/NF TARGET SHIELDING STUDIES. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/29/2010)‏ 1.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
Preliminary Analysis of the Target System Magnets 1.Version with a 6-T copper magnet insert 2.Version with a 6-T high-temperature superconductor insert.
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Mar. 9, 2010 (Update of talk on Feb. 9, 2010)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.
 Stephen Brooks / UKNF meeting, Warwick, April 2008 Pion Production from Water-Cooled Targets.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Apr. 20, 2010.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 3. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/28/2010)‏
IDS120h POWER DEPOSITION AND Hg POOL STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas (7/26/2011) 1.
STUDY II: m1507 vs. m1510 IDS120f: m1507/MCNP vs. M1510/MCNP vs. FLUKA IDS120f vs. IDS20g GEOMETRY IDS90f: B10/B11 SHIELDING RING(S) STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas.
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1..
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
Energy deposition for intense muon sources (chicane + the rest of the front end) Pavel Snopok Illinois Institute of Technology and Fermilab December 4,
Review of Recent IDS120 Target Concepts Van Graves October 31, 2013.
IDS120j WITHOUT GAPS AND WITH MAXIMUM SIZE GAPS ( aka ''NIGHTMARE'' CASE SCENARIO ) SC#4, SC#7 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS. Nicholas Souchlas,
20to2T5m100cm Images Van Graves February 13, 2014.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS EFFECTS OF Be WINDOW WATER.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET. (From STUDY II to IDS120f geometries) NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL)‏ ‏ 1.
DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET STATION. Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012) 1 DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
IDS120j WITH GAPS SC#3 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS WITH MAX GAPS SC#3, SC#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS, DP AND SC TOTAL DP WITH VARYING.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. BP#1(STST/W), SH#1, BeWindow,SC#8.
KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Finalizing the C- and Hg-Target Configurations for 6.75-GeV Proton Beams Present studies are for a carbon.
Target Magnets & Shielding Bob Weggel Particle Beam Lasers, Inc. Magnet Optimization Research Engineering, LLC. March 5,
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE mars1510 ( DESKTOP ) vs. mars1512 ( PRINCETON CLUSTER ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/28/2012) 1.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Chicane shielding and energy deposition (IPAC’13 follow-up) Pavel Snopok IDS-NF phone meeting June 4, 2013.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.
Institutional Logo Here July 11, 2012 Muon Accelerator Program Advisory Committee Review (FNAL July 11-13, 2012)1 The Front End.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
Multiprocessing/MARS15(2012)/Princeton Cluster (IDS120j w/t Resistive Magnets: New Hg Module) X. Ding UCLA (4/11/2013)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
IDS120i GEOMETRY. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. (using Ding's optimized parameters)
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BP#2 WITHIN FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc.
Neutrino Factory Target Vessel Concept Update V. Graves Target Studies EVO June 12, 2012.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review (Update Aug 12) Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Target Proposal Feb. 15, 2000 S. Childress Target Proposal Considerations: –For low z target, much less power is deposited in the target for the same pion.
MARS15 Studies of Impact of LBNF Target/Horn Optimization on the Hadron Absorber 6 th High Power Targetry Workshop Merton College, Oxford April 12, 2016.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
BNL solenoid capture workshop: magnet challenges are not trivial Summarized by Tengming Shen
PPAC Jonathan Olson University of Iowa HCAL November 11-13, 2004.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR IDS80 (NO IRON PLUG/YOKE), ADDING SHIELDING IN 75 TO 80 cm (WC/H 2 O, B, Cd). NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL) Dec. 14, 2010‏ ‏ 1.
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
IDS120h: PROTON P0-P14 TRAJECTORY FOOTPRINT
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE
1 Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/15/2011)
1 Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012)
Presentation transcript:

IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BEAM PIPE BEYOND FIRST CRYOSTAT ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (7/25/2012) 1

IDS120j GEOMETRY, NO RESISTIVE COILS: WITH 20 cm GAPS *********************************************************** # SIMULATIONS USING LOWEST GRADE W BEADS IN SHIELDING ( OF 15.8 g/cc ) # BP SEGMENTATION STUDIES AFTER THE FIRST CRYOSTAT ( CRYO#2/3/4 ). *********************************************************** >SIMULATIONS CODE: mars1512 ( USING MCNP CROSS SECTION LIBRARIES ) >NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF: MeV >SHIELDING: 60% W + 40% He ( WITH STST VESSELS) >PROTON BEAM POWER: 4 MW >PROTON ENERGY: E = 8 GeV >PROTON BEAM PROFILE: GAUSSIAN, σ x = σ y = 0.12 cm >EVENTS IN SIMULATIONS : N p = 500,000 2 IDS120j GEOMETRY, NO RESISTIVE COILS: WITH 20 cm GAPS *********************************************************** # SIMULATIONS USING LOWEST GRADE W BEADS IN SHIELDING ( OF 15.8 g/cc ) # BP#2 SEGMENTATION STUDIES WITHIN THE FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL. *********************************************************** >SIMULATIONS CODE: mars1512 ( USING MCNP CROSS SECTION LIBRARIES ) >NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF: MeV >SHIELDING: 60% W + 40% He ( WITH STST VESSELS) >PROTON BEAM POWER: 4 MW >PROTON ENERGY: E = 8 GeV >PROTON BEAM PROFILE: GAUSSIAN, σ x = σ y = 0.12 cm

IDS120j: REPLACING RESISTIVE MAGNETS AND FILLING UPPER HALF OF Hg POOL WITH SHIELDING. GENERAL OVERVIEW (LEFT), POOL REGION DETAILS (RIGHT). [20 cm GAPS] SH#1 SH#1A SH#2 SH#1A Hg POOL SH#4 SH#3 Hg POOL SH#1 2 cm THICK STST OUTER TUBE CRYO#1 CRYO#4 CRYO#3 CRYO#2 2 cm THICK STST BEAM PIPE BEAM PIPE EXTENDS HALF WAY UPSTREAM TO THE POOL SH#1 10 cm THICK STST RIGHT FLANGE Hg POOL STARTS ~ 85 cm AND EXTENDS ALL THE WAY TO THE END OF THE FIRST CRYOSTAT ~ 370 cm. 3 SHVS WALLS, Hg POOL VESSEL DOUBLE WALLS, Be WINDOW, He GAP IN Be WINDOW AND IN HG POOL HAVE NOMINAL VALUES FOR THEIR THIKNESS. STRESS FORCES ANALYSIS, LOCAL DPD DISTRIBUTION AND ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS WILL DETERMINE THEIR VALUES.

IDS120j: WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS. DETAILS OF THE DOUBLE STST Hg POOL VESSEL (LEFT, MIDDLE) AND THE DOUBLE Be WINDOW (RIGHT). [20 cm GAPS] 2 cm THICK STST INNER Hg POOL VESSEL WITH 1 cm He GAP FOR COOLING. TWO 0.5 cm THICK Be WINDOWS AT THE END OF CRYO#1 WITH 0.5 cm He GAP BETWEEN THEM FOR COOLING. 10 cm THICK STST RIGHT / LEFT FLANGE OF SHVS#4, SHVS#1 / SHVS#2 WITH 20 cm GAP BETWEEN THEM. 4

IDS120j: DETAILS OF THE DOUBLE WALL Hg POOL VESSEL ENVISIONED BY VAN GRAVE. ( PLOTS ARE FROM VAN GRAVE'S 6/12/2012 PRESENTATION ) 5 He GAS WILL BE FLOWING BETWEEN THE TWO WALLS FOR COOLING. VESSEL FILLED WITH He COOLED THE BEAM PIPE IN THAT AREA WILL BE PART OF THE POOL VESSEL W BEADS FOR SCs SHIELDING. AND REMOVING THE HEAT LOAD WILL BE A CHALLENGING TASK. SEGMENTATION ANALYSIS WILL BE PERFORMED TO DETERMINE THE AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION.

X CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION. Rap ( z ) < r < Rap ( z ) + dr cm dr = 2.00 cm N r = 1 bins < z < cm dz = cm N z = 60 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 720 ''pieces'' Volumes calculated using a closed form expression. 6 IDS120j: yz CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION IN CRYO#2 REGION y z

7 z = 400.0z = 371.0x = 0.0 z = 800.0z = 900.0z = X AND Z CROSS SECTIONS WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION (1) x y φ = 0 0 φ = 90 0 IDS120j: yz AND xy CROSS SECTIONS WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION y z

8

9 log(DPD)

10

11

12 SUM OF DP FROM 720 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF BP#2 : kW TOTAL DP IN BP#2 : kW BP#2 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # ~ 38 kW IS DEPOSITED IN BP#2 PART WITHIN THE SECOND CRYOSTAT WITH ~ 6 m LENGTH. # LOWEST DPs ( DPDs ) ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE - x DIRECTION WHILE MOST OF THE DP IS BETWEEN 255 AND 315 DEGREES ( - y DIRECTION ). AS WE MOVE FURTHER DOWNSTREAM THE ASSYMETRY IN THE DP ( DPD ) AZIMUTHAL DISTRIBUTION DECREASES. # IT APPEARS THERE IS NO SMOOTH DECREASE OF THE DP ( DPD ) WITH z. ONE CAN SEE FOR EXAMPLE FROM THE 255 AND 285 DEGREES DISTRIBUTIONS THERE IS FAST DECREASE FROM ~ cm TO ~ cm AND THEN THERE IS A SPIKE AT ~ cm. # MAXIMUM DPD IS ~ 95 mW/g NEAR THE BEGINNING OF THE PIPE ( WITHIN CRYO#2 REGION ) IN THE LOWER HALF OF THE PIPE, AS ONE MAY EXPECT. # A PERIODIC FUNCTION WITH AN EXPONENTIAL DECAYING AMPLITUDE MAYBE IS A GOOD FIT FOR THE AZIMUTHALLY AVERAGE DP ( DPD ) AS A FUNCTION OF z.

X CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION. Rap ( z ) < r < Rap ( z ) + dr cm dr = 2.00 cm N r = 1 bins < z < cm dz = cm N z = 60 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 720 ''pieces'' Volumes calculated using a closed form expression. 6 IDS120j: yz CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION IN CRYO#3 REGION y z Rap ( z ) < r < Rap ( z ) + dr cm dr = 2.00 cm N r = 1 bins < z < cm dz = cm N z = 36 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 432 ''pieces'' Volumes calculated using a closed form expression. END OF TAPER REGION 13

x = 0.0 X AND Z CROSS SECTIONS WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION (1) x y φ = 0 0 φ = 90 0 IDS120j: yz AND xy CROSS SECTIONS WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION y z z = 972.0z = z = z = z =

15

10 log(DPD) 16

17

18

11 SUM OF DP FROM 720 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF BP#2 : kW TOTAL DP IN BP#2 : kW BP#2 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # ~ 38 kW IS DEPOSITED IN BP#2 PART WITHIN THE SECOND CRYOSTAT WITH ~ 6 m LENGTH. # LOWEST DPs ( DPDs ) ARE EXPECTED ALONG THE - x DIRECTION WHILE MOST OF THE DP IS BETWEEN 255 AND 315 DEGREES ( - y DIRECTION ). AS WE MOVE FURTHER DOWNSTREAM THE ASSYMETRY IN THE DP ( DPD ) AZIMUTHAL DISTRIBUTION DECREASES. # IT APPEARS THERE IS NO SMOOTH DECREASE OF THE DP ( DPD ) WITH z. ONE CAN SEE FOR EXAMPLE FROM THE 255 AND 285 DEGREES DISTRIBUTIONS THERE IS FAST DECREASE FROM ~ cm TO ~ cm AND THEN THERE IS A SPIKE AT ~ cm. # MAXIMUM DPD IS ~ 95 mW/g NEAR THE BEGINNING OF THE PIPE ( WITHIN CRYO#2 REGION ) IN THE LOWER HALF OF THE PIPE, AS ONE MAY EXPECT. # A PERIODIC FUNCTION WITH AN EXPONENTIAL DECAYING AMPLITUDE MAYBE IS A GOOD FIT FOR THE AZIMUTHALLY AVERAGE DP ( DPD ) AS A FUNCTION OF z. SUM OF DP FROM 432 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF BP#2 : kW TOTAL DP IN BP#2 : kW BP#2 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # kW IS DEPOSITED IN BP#2 PART WITHIN THE THIRD CRYOSTAT WITH ~ 4.5 m LENGTH. # THERE IS STILL NO SMOOTH DECREASE OF THE DP ( DPD ) WITH z. ONE CAN SEE FOR EXAMPLE RELATIVELY STRONG VARIATIONS IN THE DP ( DPD ) FOR THE 285 AND 315 DEGREES DISTRIBUTIONS FROM ~ 10 m TO ~ 12 m. # IN GENERAL THERE ARE OSCILLATIONS IN THE DP ( DPD ) DISTRIBUTION ALONG THE AXIAL DIRECTION WITH DECREASING AMPLITUDE AS THE AVERAGE VALUE OF THESE TWO GRADUALLY DECREASES. IT IS CLEAR THESE VARIATIONS ARE NOT A RESULT OF STATISTICAL UNCERTAINTIES / NOISE. # MAXIMUM DPD IS ~ 18 mW/g NEAR THE BEGINNING OF THE PIPE ( WITHIN CRYO#3 REGION ) IN THE LOWER HALF OF THE PIPE ( ~ 285 deg.), WHICH SHOWS THE AZIMUTHAL ASSYMETRY CREATED AT THE TARGET REGION EXIST EVEN AT ~ 10 m DOWNSTREAM. 19

X CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION. Rap ( z ) < r < Rap ( z ) + dr cm dr = 2.00 cm N r = 1 bins < z < cm dz = cm N z = 60 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 720 ''pieces'' Volumes calculated using a closed form expression. 6 IDS120j: yz CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 / BP#3 SEGMENTATION IN CRYO#2 / CRYO#4 REGION y z R ap = 30 cm 30.0 < r < 32.0 cm dr = 2.00 cm N r = 1 bins < z < cm dz = cm N z = 64 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 768 ''pieces'' 20

x = 0.0 X AND Z CROSS SECTIONS WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION (1) x y φ = 0 0 φ = 90 0 IDS120j: yz AND xy CROSS SECTIONS WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 / BP#3 SEGMENTATION y z 21 z = z = z = z = z =

15 22

11 SUM OF DP FROM 768 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF BP#3 : 7.04 kW TOTAL DP IN BP#3 : kW BP#3 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # ~ 7 kW IS DEPOSITED IN BP#3 PART WITHIN THE FOURTH CRYOSTAT WITH ~ 4.5 m LENGTH. # RELATIVE LARGE FLUCTUATIONS APPEAR TO BE NOW IN ALMOST ALL DIRECTIONS. THEY DON'T APPEAR TO BE DUE TO STATISTICAL UNCERTAINTIES. # MAXIMUM DPD IS ~ 11 mW/g NEAR THE BEGINNING OF THE PIPE ( WITHIN CRYO#4 REGION ) z ~ 1500 cm ALONG THE - x DIRECTION. SUM OF DP FROM 432 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF BP#2 : kW TOTAL DP IN BP#2 : kW BP#2 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # kW IS DEPOSITED IN BP#2 PART WITHIN THE THIRD CRYOSTAT WITH ~ 4.5 m LENGTH. # THERE IS STILL NO SMOOTH DECREASE OF THE DP ( DPD ) WITH z. ONE CAN SEE FOR EXAMPLE RELATIVELY STRONG VARIATIONS IN THE DP ( DPD ) FOR THE 285 AND 315 DEGREES DISTRIBUTIONS FROM ~ 10 m TO ~ 12 m. # IN GENERAL THERE ARE OSCILLATIONS IN THE DP ( DPD ) DISTRIBUTION ALONG THE AXIAL DIRECTION WITH DECREASING AMPLITUDE AS THE AVERAGE VALUE OF THESE TWO GRADUALLY DECREASES. IT IS CLEAR THESE VARIATIONS ARE NOT A RESULT OF STATISTICAL UNCERTAINTIES / NOISE. # MAXIMUM DPD IS ~ 18 mW/g NEAR THE BEGINNING OF THE PIPE ( WITHIN CRYO#3 REGION ) IN THE LOWER HALF OF THE PIPE ( ~ 285 deg.), WHICH SHOWS THE AZIMUTHAL ASSYMETRY CREATED AT THE TARGET REGION EXIST EVEN AT ~ 10 m DOWNSTREAM