C R E S S T / U C L A UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies Center for the Study of Evaluation National Center for Research on Evaluation,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
Advertisements

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Examining Background Variables of Students with Disabilities that Affect Reading Jamal Abedi, CRESST/University.
Principal Investigators: Martha Thurlow & Deborah Dillon Introduction Assumptions & Research Questions Acknowledgments 1. What characteristics of current.
1/27 CRESST/UCLA A Sample of CRESST Research Ronald Dietel Arizona Educational Research Organization Phoenix, AZ - October 19-20, 2006 UCLA Graduate School.
Reliability for Teachers Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1 Reliability = Consistency.
ELL-Language-based Accommodations for Content Area Assessments The University of Central Florida Cocoa Campus Jamal Abedi University of California, Davis.
Surveys of Enacted Curriculum – English Language Learner Project Jacqueline Iribarren Abby Potter John Smithson Shelley Lee.
1 Performance of English Language Learners on the 2008 Grades 3-8 ELA Tests David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting.
The Differential Trajectories of High School Dropouts and Graduates By: Gregory P. Hickman, Ph.D. Mitchell Bartholomew Jennifer Mathwig Randy Heinrich,
C R E S S T / U C L A Issues and problems in classification of students with limited English proficiency Jamal Abedi UCLA Graduate School of Education.
1/∞ CRESST/UCLA Towards Individualized Instruction Using Technology Gregory K. W. K. Chung Annual CRESST Conference Los Angeles, CA – January 22, 2007.
Are Accommodations Used for ELL Students Valid? Jamal Abedi University of California, Davis National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student.
The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.
C R E S S T / U C L A Improving the Validity of Measures by Focusing on Learning Eva L. Baker CRESST National Conference: Research Goes to School Los Angeles,
1/16 CRESST/UCLA Alternative Assessment for English Language Learners Christy Kim Boscardin Barbara Jones Shannon Madsen Claire Nishimura Jae-Eun Park.
Jamal Abedi University of California, Davis/CRESST Presented at: The Race to the Top Assessment Program Public & Expert Input Meeting December 2, 2009.
AACC 1 Helping States and Regional Centers Meet NCLB Goals: State Accountability Systems Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CRESST Conference January 22-23,
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Computer in Education Jiaying Zhao CSE 610 Western Oregon University.
Computer in Education Jiaying Zhao CSE 610 Western Oregon University.
Oregon State Mathematics Assessment By Sandy Kralovec.
1 ELLs and Secondary Mathematics Examining the Convergence of Mathematics and Language.
Different Skills? Identifying Differentially Effective Teachers of English Language Learners Ben Master, Susanna Loeb, Camille Whitney, James Wyckoff 5.
Assessment Accommodations for English Language Learners: Implications for Policy-Based Empirical Research By: Erin Burns.
Jamal Abedi University of California, Davis/CRESST Validity, Effectiveness and Feasibility of Accommodations for English Language Learners With Disabilities.
Creating Assessments with English Language Learners in Mind In this module we will examine: Who are English Language Learners (ELL) and how are they identified?
The Benefits of a Face-to-Face Support Mathematics Class for Project IDEAL PCC Advanced-level Adult ESL Students Enrolled in SkillsTutor Online Kimberlee.
The University of Central Florida Cocoa Campus
Identifying the gaps in state assessment systems CCSSO Large-Scale Assessment Conference Nashville June 19, 2007 Sue Bechard Office of Inclusive Educational.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research on Making Large-Scale Reading Assessments More Accessible for Students with Disabilities June.
Texas Comprehensive SEDL Austin, Texas March 16–17, 2009 Making Consistent Decisions About Accommodations for English Language Learners – Research.
CRESST ONR/NETC Meetings, July 2003, v1 1 ONR Advanced Distributed Learning Language Factors in the Assessment of English Language Learners Jamal.
C R E S S T / U C L A Impact of Linguistic Factors in Content-Based Assessment for ELL Students Jamal Abedi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information.
CRESST ONR/NETC Meetings, July 2003, v1 ONR Advanced Distributed Learning Linguistic Modification of Test Items Jamal Abedi University of California,
1/27 CRESST/UCLA Research findings on the impact of language factors on the assessment and instruction of English language Learners Jamal Abedi University.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
1 An Introduction to the SIOP Model Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
CRESST ONR/NETC Meetings, July 2003, v1 ONR Advanced Distributed Learning Impact of Language Factors on the Reliability and Validity of Assessment.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
C R E S S T / U C L A UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies Center for the Study of Evaluation National Center for Research on Evaluation,
Do we have enough evidence on the validity of accommodations to justify the reporting of accommodated assessments? Jamal Abedi University of California,
Further Research Baker, E., Goldschmidt, P., Martinez, F., & Swigert, S. (February, 2002). In search of school quality and accountability: Moving beyond.
Manor School Progress Tracking Contents Introduction3 Summary of Findings Free School Meal Progression5 Gender Progression6 Special.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.
1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
Jamal Abedi CRESST/University of California,Los Angeles Paper presented at 34 th Annual Conference on Large-Scale Assessment Boston, June 20-23, 2004.
Practical Guidelines for the Education of English Language Learners David J. Francis, Ph.D. Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics.
C R E S S T / U C L A Psychometric Issues in the Assessment of English Language Learners Presented at the: CRESST 2002 Annual Conference Research Goes.
Jamal Abedi, UCLA/CRESST Major psychometric issues Research design issues How to address these issues Universal Design for Assessment: Theoretical Foundation.
Critical Issues Related to ELL Accommodations Designed for Content Area Assessments The University of Central Florida Cocoa Campus Jamal Abedi University.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
How to avoid misclassification of English Language Learners with Disabilities Presented at: Supporting English Language Learners with Disability Symposium.
NCLB Assessment and Accountability Provisions: Issues for English-language Learners Diane August Center for Applied Linguistics.
Minnesota Assessments June 25, 2012 Presenter: Jennifer Dugan.
Examples: Avoid Using Synonyms in Problems An issue that can create difficulties is to use a synonym for a word somewhere in the problem. Consider the.
Project VIABLE - Direct Behavior Rating: Evaluating Behaviors with Positive and Negative Definitions Rose Jaffery 1, Albee T. Ongusco 3, Amy M. Briesch.
BY MADELINE GELMETTI INCLUDING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND ENGLISH LEARNERS IN MEASURES OF EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Evaluating Outcomes of the English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Program in Secondary Schools: Methodological Advance and Strategy to Incorporate.
ELL-Focused Accommodations for Content Area Assessments: An Introduction The University of Central Florida Cocoa Campus Jamal Abedi University of California,
2016 CAASPP Results Overview and Reflection August
Interactive Whiteboard Use and Student Achievement
Common Core Update May 15, 2013.
District Performance Framework
CEM Primary Overview.
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Impact Analyses for VAM Scores
Compendium CD of NRC Reports on Assessment of Student Learning
Presentation transcript:

C R E S S T / U C L A UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies Center for the Study of Evaluation National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Recent Research Findings on Assessment Accommodations for English Language Learners Jamal Abedi 2000 CRESST Conference: Educational Accountability in the 21 st Century September, 2000

C R E S S T / U C L A A Summary of CRESST Studies on the Impact of Language Background on Students’ Content-Based Performance Language Background as a Variable in NAEP Mathematics Performance (Abedi, Lord, & Plummer, )  Analyses of existing NAEP data  ELL students performed significantly lower on the long items than non-ELL  The percentage of omitted not-reached items were significantly higher for ELL students  The performance of ELL students was significantly lower on linguistically complex items  Student Perception Study  Original and linguistically modified items were presented to both ELL and non-ELL students  An overwhelming majority of ELL students preferred the simplified versions  ELL students indicated the it would be more productive for them to use the simplified version  Accuracy Test Study â ELL students performed significantly lower than non-ELL students in reading â ELL students performed significantly lower than non-ELL students in math â However, the performance gap between ELL and non-ELL was reduced with the linguistically modified version of test

C R E S S T / U C L A  Three versions of math test items were used  Original English  Linguistically modified English  Spanish translated version  Booklets were randomly assigned to students within a classroom  All students performed slightly higher on the linguistically modified version  Spanish speaking students taking the Spanish translated version performed significantly lower than others, this may be due to the issue of language of instruction Impact of Selected Background Variables on Students’ NAEP Math Performance (Abedi, Lord, & Hofstetter, 1997)

C R E S S T / U C L A NAEP Math Performance and Test Accommodations: Interactions with Student Language Background (Abedi, Hofstetter, Baker, & Lord, 1998)  Three different forms of accommodations were used:  Extra time  Glossary  Glossary + extra time  Standard NAEP condition  The three accommodation strategies along the standard condition were randomized within the classrooms across ELL and non-ELL groups  Extra time increased performance of all students slightly  Glossary without extra time did not have much impact on the students’ performance  Glossary with extra time had a big impact on the performance of both ELL and non-ELLs  However, the impact of glossary with extra time was more evident with non- ELL students. This raised concern over the validity of accommodations

C R E S S T / U C L A Analyses of Existing Data on the National Large-Scale Assessments (Abedi, Leon, 1999, Abedi, Leon, & Mirocha, 2000)  The performance gap between ELL and non-ELL students was largest in reading.  The performance gap between ELL and non-ELL decreased as we moved from reading to science and form science to math.  For some subscales of math (such as math computation) there was not any gap between ELL and non-ELL students  The reliability coefficients for ELL test scores were substantially lower than those for non-ELL.  Our results indicated that language factor may act as a source of measurement error for ELL students.

C R E S S T / U C L A