Inspecting the Boat What Is the Source of School Support Teams (SSTs)? PUBLIC LAW 107-110, JAN. 8, 2002 115 STAT. 1499 -NCLB (Handout 1)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements

Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Getting Ready at the Local Level Preparing for the Service Provider Self-Review.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Conducting a Comprehensive Needs Assessment. Objectives Identify the components of a comprehensive needs assessment Classify the types of data collected.
Team Teaching Section 7: Monitoring Teacher. The Monitoring Teacher model One teacher assumes the responsibility for instructing the entire class. The.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Improvement Plan Training NCLB. No Child Left Behind Program Series: Improvement Plans.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Developed by ESC Region 12 in partnership with TEA. 9/01/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness
Working Systemically and Title I School Support The Big Picture.
Provide High-Quality Professional Development School Support Team Training Day 3, Session 11.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Trigg County Collaboration Roundtable Discussion “ March 17, 2009.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Johns Hopkins University School of Education 2006 ACTION RESEARCH Eileen Ferrance Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratories Brown University.
M-STEP 2015 Principal’s & PD Facilitator’s Meeting January 8 & 13, 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 The Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education In Collaboration.
STaR Chart Analysis Roberto Martinez EDTC The University of Texas at Brownsville.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Bubble #2 ISAT Standards # 6, 7, 8 What is a “Shared Vision”? Shared Vision: Input & Communication District School Class “Commonly held set of beliefs.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Grade 1.
Phase IV: Taking Action and Monitoring Implementation and Impact.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
RtI/DI Intervention Model for The Public Schools of Petoskey Building Strong, Life-long Learners.
Forming a Team for Smooth Sailing. Phases of the Systemic Work Phase I: Understanding the System Phase II: Analyzing the System Phase III: Planning Action.
School Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of School Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73 slides.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
RESPRO Area 1C Area 1C RESPRO Meeting RESPRO Area 1C November 24, 2009.
Developing the Plan. Tier III Developing the Intervention Plan Developing the Intervention Plan.
1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Leading Formative Instructional Practices January 28 and February 25 Session One: Modules 1, 2, 3 Session Two:
Academy Director Meeting JANUARY 20, 2015 Welcome! Sign-In.
Applying the Skills for Proficient Problem Solving Instructional Intervention Teams Level 3 Training April 7, 2011.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use OCR Grade 6.
Stage 4 Restructuring Stage 5 Alternative Governance.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
LEADERSHIP I & II SEPTEMBER 2011 Collaborative Planning.
LITERACY-BASED DISTRICT-WIDE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Aiken County Public School District January 15, 2016 LEADERS IN LITERACY CONFERENCE.
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
West Virginia Support for Improving Professional Practice (WVSIPP)
Independent Reading: A Structure of the ACPS Literacy Model Catherine Hamilton March 4, 2016 TechFEST.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Results Discussion Karen Cadiero-Kaplan.
Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.
Winding Your Way through Program Details: Titles II-A & VI
Parental Involvement Staff Training
Hello! Today you need… Your reading comp. book. Your reading log.
Quality Comprehensive Improvement System
Welcome, Agenda Review &
Validation Team Exit Report
Schoolwide Programs.
SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System
Validation Team Exit Report
Presentation transcript:

Inspecting the Boat

What Is the Source of School Support Teams (SSTs)? PUBLIC LAW , JAN. 8, STAT NCLB (Handout 1)

A Bird’s Eye View

What Is the Function of SSTs? –Refer to NCLB Law, Section (B) Functions, page 9 –Write some initial thoughts and questions in your “Captain’s Log”

Who can be on the SST crew? Team members may include –ESC Title I staff –ESC Working Systemically staff –Technical assistance providers (TAPs) –Campus administrator mentors (CAMs)

Refer to NCLB Public Law Brainstorm with your table mates... –Qualifications SST members should have –Possible ways to recruit members –SST responsibilities Record this information in the Captain’s Log for future reference –Keep the log handy for updates and to record additional information Who can be on the SST crew?

SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

Function: –(ii) collaborate with stakeholders to design, implement, & monitor a plan to improve student performance Key element of WS: –Engages all levels of the system SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

With which levels do you currently work?  State?  Intermediate (ESC, TAP, CAM)?  District?  School?  Classroom? Please make your notes on the SST/WS side-by-side. SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

Function : –(i) review all facets of the school’s operation Key element of WS: –Examines components within the system SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

What component(s) would you add? Please make your notes on the SST/WS side-by-side. SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

Share one component with someone at your table. You have two minutes! SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

Functions: –(iii) evaluate effectiveness of school personnel –(iv) make recommendations as the school implements the plan Key element of WS: –Examines components within the system SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

WS evaluates the effectiveness of the curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Note: Districts and schools may select the focus of SST services. SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

Quickly! As a group, think of other words that mean evaluate... Assess Weigh Estimate Consider Examine Calculate Approximate Measure Appraise Review Perceive Analyze SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

Indicate what you currently evaluate on the SST/WS side-by-side. Share with a different person one component you evaluate at this time. You have two minutes. SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

Function: –(ii) collaborate with stakeholders to design, implement, & monitor a plan expected to improve student performance Key element of WS: –Develops competencies within the system SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

Reflect silently... –Which competencies do you consciously work on developing with schools and districts? –Which ones would you like to develop? –Record your thoughts on the side-by-side for future reflection. SST Using the Working Systemically Approach

Put It Together As a table group, complete the double bubble below. You have 20 minutes. WSSST ComplianceModel

20 Minutes Left

15 Minutes Left

12 Minutes Left

11 Minutes Left

10 Minutes Left

9 Minutes Left

8 Minutes Left

7 Minutes Left

6 Minutes Left

5 Minutes Left

4 Minutes Left

3 Minutes Left

2 Minutes Left

1 Minute Left

Time is Up!

Putting It Together Trade papers with another table. WSSST ComplianceModel Record new ideas on your personal bubble sheets.

Simile Make table tent with a simile on each side. In the next 10 minutes, complete the following similes: School Support Teams are like ___ and Working Systemically is like _____

10 Minutes Left

9 Minutes Left

8 Minutes Left

7 Minutes Left

6 Minutes Left

5 Minutes Left

4 Minutes Left

3 Minutes Left

2 Minutes Left

1 Minute Left

Time is Up!

Simile Make table tent with a simile on each side. In the next 10 minutes, complete the following similes: School Support Teams are like _____ and Working Systemically is like _____

A Bird’s Eye View