By development we mean
By sustainable we mean …. (able to be maintained) ……managing the world’s development in a manner consistent with the continued healthy functioning of the Earth’s ecosystems, oceans, atmosphere and climate.
The world as seen by a development economist GDP per capita PPP adjusted
Nordhouse
richpoor GNP PPP/person $26,320$4,450 population (billion) % increase/year % with HIV/AIDS infant mortality rate 6/100059/1000 children/woman life expectancy 7665 % urban 7641 people/km Today’s divided world
Global GDP per capita PPP adjusted - displayed with country area proportional to parameter Source:
GDP Wealth increases 7yr doubling 10 yr doubling
GDP = C + I + E + G C = Consumer Spending I = Investment made by industry E = Excess of Exports over Imports G = Government Spending
HDI - Human Development Index ° Literacy - nu. in school c/w those who should be. ° Health - life expectancy ° GDP - the usual measure of welfare Add them up, normalize, range from.0 to Norway is top rank, Niger bottom (2007) US is #10, China #86,Australia #3
GDP can be high and development low
Life expectancy
Gapminder
The distribution appears to have two parts
Gapminder Which direction is causation? Does improved health create wealth, or does wealth lead to improved health?
Infant mortality
Maternal mortality
Young female illiteracy
Growth in tertiary education
Scientific research output (publications)
Human development HDI A few countries are re-ordered but top and bottom remain
Global GDP per capita PPP adjusted - displayed with country area proportional to parameter Source:
Human development declines
The Economist Nov 2009: Somalia wins worst country ranking
Maybe measures that emphasize wealth are misleading The Happy Planet Index! GDP per capita PPP adjusted Life expectancy x Life satisfaction Ecological footprint
Even the Happy Planet Index is bi-modal The Happy Planet Index!
Welfare has been achieved very unevenly around the world (regardless of the measure). What governs the current global distribution of welfare? Does geography/environment matter?
The world as seen by a development economist GDP per capita PPP adjusted
GDP per capita as a function of latitude. Poverty has a latitudinal dependence (J. Sachs)
xtxt X t+1 45 ° X t+1 = F( x t ) Simplest growth scenario
xtxt X t+1 Solow growth More realistic growth model
xtxt X t+1 Solow growth Are poor countries here?
xtxt X t+1 Stagnation - poverty trap xcxc Growth
Development curves seem to be bimodal? Gapminder
Development curves seem to be bimodal? Gapminder
xtxt X t+1 xcxc Growth Stagnation
xtxt X t+1 xcxc Growth Stagnation
What causes this development gap?
How big is the problem?
Add 1.5 billion people (3 billion is more likely) and allow the top to continue to prosper, then closing the development gap requires a 6-8 Fold increase in world economic output.
BUT since the industrial revolution world economic output has increased at least 40 Fold (some say 50) and population has increased 4-5 fold. So, on average, we are 10 times better off than we were before the industrial revolution.
All we need to do to close the gap is achieve a: 6-8 fold increase economic for only a 50% population increase What’s the problem?
If the current rate of economic growth were to continue on average (forget inequalities) then by the end of the century the world’s economic output would have increased by ??
80 fold
The industrial era growth in prosperity has been very uneven (the development discussion) and was achieved at a time when resources needed for growth were essentially limitless relative to population. Ample evidence now suggests that many biophysical and geophysical limits are being approached and the ideal world development may be unattainable.
Can development get started?
Can prosperity be maintained?
Malthus was not entirely right
Population total Growth rate % IR 1960
Population growth arises serious questions 50% growth Everybody in the 60”s UN projections of population increase
Demographic transition
Age pyramids in rich and poor regions
What causes this development gap?
Climate is zonal, the tropics are under the most stress now In a warmer world there will be more stress
62 Why are the climate zones – deserts, rainforests, glaciers, etc -- where they are? For more information about this map see: Climate Zones according to Köppen
63 A three cell structure Hadley Cell Mid-L. Cell Polar Cell
64 Rain forests here Deserts here
65 Climate zones are (almost) rainfall zones
Malaria Ecology Index
Overlap of Hookworm and Malaria
Agro-ecological zones
Does this say that aggressive appropriation of energy assets is needed for growth?
World coal production
World coal proven reserves
Carbon dioxide per capita 2002
Ecological debtors and creditors >50% in debt > 50% in credit
Is aggressive appropriation of the biosphere necessary for development or a consequence of it?
Is wealth or poverty the greatest threat to biodiversity loss?
The developing world cannot catch up to the top billion along the pathway that got us here without very alarming consequences for the future of the planet.
Nor can the top billion having taken one pathway to prosperity continue along the same pathway without very alarming consequences for the future of the planet.
Is this the only way development can happen? What is this graph telling us? Some measure of prosperity Some measure of use of natural capital
Ideal green spot What is this graph telling us? Some measure of prosperity Some measure of use of natural capital
What is this graph telling us? Some measure of prosperity Some measure of use of natural capital
“Are our dealings with nature sustainable? Can we expect world economic growth to continue for the foreseeable future? Should we be confident that our knowledge and skills will increase in ways that will lessen our reliance on nature despite our growing numbers and rising economic activity?” Sir Partha Dasgupta