Writing Your Standards WCC Accreditation Training Julie Brown Al Konuwa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

Training Guide. `
What is Assessment? The university, with the support and encouragement of President Hitt and the Vice President team, engages in the institutional effectiveness.
Goal Setting and Self Assessment: Teaching Lifelong Learning Skills Stacy Potts, MD Allison Hargreaves, MD.
WRITING Educational Objectives, Learning Outcomes Mi-Suk Shim, Ph.D. Spring 2006 DIIA.
The Nuts and Bolts to Administrative Unit Outcomes (AUOs) Franklin P. Ow, Ph.D East Los Angeles College Assistant Professor, Chemistry Learning Assessment.
Higher Learning Commission (North Central Association) Comparison/Evaluation of AQIP and PEAQ Michelle Johnston.
Assessing the Assessment Process: Developing a rubric for reporting at Virginia Tech Ardian Daku, Pamplin College of Business; Ryan Cook, Counselor Education;
Accreditation Climate Survey MC GAP May 1, Overview  Administered Fall 2012 via  Directly linked to the Accreditation Standards  Modeled.
Rubrics-Based Evaluation of a Statewide System of Support A Tool to Enhance Statewide Systems of Support.
Continual Commitment to Accreditation and Educational Improvement March 22, 2012.
Community Health Assessments: Requirements and Models April 25, 2013 Gianfranco Pezzino Senior Fellow Kansas Health Institute.
What CIOs Need to Know.  Meridith Randall – ACCJC ALO for 17 years for 3 different colleges; never had a college receive a sanction; has written multiple.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Cosumnes River College Refreshing our Vision, Mission & Values Students, Faculty, Staff & Administration March 28, 2008.
TaskStream Training Presented by the Committee on Learning Assessment 2015.
Developing Persuasive Grant Proposals Sponsored Research Office Skidmore College Saratoga Springs, NY First thoughts: What do you wish to accomplish with.
Accreditation Challenges in Multi-College Districts ASCCC Accreditation Institute Friday, February 20, 2015, 3:45 pm - 5:00 pm Bill Scroggins, President,
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Re-accreditation Workshop Private Higher Education Institutions 6 August 2008.
COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE Strategic Planning Steering Committee Session V September 7, 2012.
Draft Self-Study Report in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Presentation to DASB June 29, 2011.
University of Alaska Anchorage Institutional Perspectives Standards Process Tom Miller, Vice Provost and ALO.
Academic Assessment Accountability: Are we what we say we are? Program Improvement: How can we be even better? External audiences: SACS.
KATHY CLARK PETERSEN, PH.D. STUDENT DEVELOPMENT, ASSISTANT TO THE VICE PRESIDENT MICHELLE CHEATEM ASSOCIATE DEAN OF STUDENTS JASPA SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
Accomplishing the Mission Mission and institutional effectiveness expectations in the revised Accreditation Standards Prepared for MPC Academic Senate.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
Accreditation Themes Institutional Commitment Institutional Integrity.
WEAVEonline Assessment & Planning Management System June 16 th, 2011 Jennifer L. Gray.
English II Text Structures IIB. Author’s Purpose: a writer’s reason for writing. The author ALWAYS has a reason for writing. Examples of Author’s Purpose.
Assessment Accountability: Are we doing what we say we are doing? Program Improvement: How can we be even better? External audiences: SACS.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE Strategic Planning Steering Committee Session IV July 27, 2012.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
Accreditation Update to ICC Student Development & Services March 16, 2015 Gohar Momjian Associate Vice Chancellor of Institutional Development Accreditation.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Office of Service Quality
CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE INTERNAL AUDIT FRAMEWORK January 25, 2016 Audit Committee Meeting Presented by: Ruthe Holden, Internal Audit Manager.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
 Chabot College Accreditation Meeting April 29, :00-1:30 PM Pres Presented by: Jim Mathews Dr. Stacy Thompson.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Program Level Assessment for Continuing Studies Programs.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Classified Leadership Institute 2016 Hope Ell Theresa Rees Misty Burruel Sherrie Guerrero ACCREDITATION, PROGRAM REVIEW, AND THE CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONAL.
Institutional Self Study in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Laney College 900 Fallon Street Oakland, CA Accrediting Commission for Community.
Associated Students Training October 1, 2015
Making it meaningful and manageable!
Committee Orientation
Accreditation 2016 Session 1.
“The Visitors are Coming” – Accreditation 401
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 4TH EDITION Chapter 33
Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo Shelley Blackman, Evergreen Valley
Zaida O’Connor, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, College of the Canyons
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Eligibility Requirements and Commission Policies
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Assessment components
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Writing Your Standards WCC Accreditation Training Julie Brown Al Konuwa

Parts of the Responses State the Standard – Copy from “Guide to Evaluating Institutions” E.G. Standard I: Institutional Mission and Effectiveness – “The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes achievement of student learning and to communicating the mission internally and externally……..” – Copy sub-standard from “Guide to Evaluating Institutions” E.G. Standard I-A. Mission – “The institution has a statement of mission that defines the institution’s broad educational purposes……..”

Parts of the Responses Descriptive Summary – (Here, we attempt to demonstrate that the institution meets the description of this standard. We must also attempt to answer the questions in the “Guide” relative to what is occurring at our college. We must provide evidence for our statements in this narrative. We must always attempt to weave in the themes.

Parts of the Responses Self-Evaluation – ( Here, we either meet or partially meet the standard. If we do, we attempt to justify how we meet this standard. If we don’t completely meet the description, we must formulate a planning agenda that describes how we will meet them by the mid-term review or the next accreditation cycle). Planning Agenda – (Here, we discuss or describe plans to accomplish any gaps towards fully meeting the standard.)

Examples from Other Colleges Golden West – Standard III-A Butte – Standard I-A College of the Canyons – Standard II-A Santa Rosa Junior College –Standard II-B Berkeley City College – Standard IV - A

Break