Program review Experiences from within and without Char Mehrtens UVM Geology Experiences from within and without Char Mehrtens UVM Geology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

Carolyn M. Byerly, Ph.D., professor Department of Journalism and Graduate Program in Mass Comm & Media Studies TENURE: BASIC INFO AND ISSUES.
1 Closing the Loop: How to Do It and Why It Matters.
WRITING Educational Objectives, Learning Outcomes Mi-Suk Shim, Ph.D. Spring 2006 DIIA.
PROGRAM PRIORITIZATION Open Forum January 16, 2013.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Tips and guidelines.  Too much time  First, do no harm: many things do appear to be going well. Let’s not screw them up.  Why help others evaluate.
Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
The Course Ajar: Principles and Practices for Multi-Section Program Design Ed Nagelhout Department of English UNLV Faculty Research Institute ● 5 March.
Assessment Plans Discussion CLAS Unit Heads Maria Cimitile, Associate Dean, CLAS Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer January 11, 2006.
Understanding Teaching Effectiveness and Assessment Projects.
Portfolio Development Teaching David Acker, Associate Dean Extension John Lawrence, Associate Dean Research Joe Colletti, Senior Associate Dean April 22,
PROGRAMS AND MISSION STATEMENTS Beginning the Process For the Instructional Learning Outcomes Council (I-LOC) Created by Michael Gos.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Assistant Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Texas Christian University TAMU Assessment Conference 2011.
Program-level Outcomes Assessment RSC FORENSIC SCIENCE.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Instructors & Clinical Faculty Art Spisak, Associate Provost for Faculty Affairs Julie Masterson, CHHS Fellow, Faculty Development Tracy Dalton, Sr. Instructor.
PEGGY MAKI, PH.D. EDUCATION CONSULTANT IN ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING PRESENTED AT CCRI SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 Assessment at Three Levels: Institution, Program,
Department Mission Statement and Program Learning Outcomes.
Participation  Participation is crucial for value addition in all social, economic and political activities.  In CUE the following feature should be.
Faculty Portfolios Cindy C. Wilson, Ph.D., C.H.E.S. Professor Department of Family Medicine Uniformed Services University.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
LeMoyne-Owen College December 15, 2009 Mimi Czarnik, Professor of English and Dean of Humanities Becky Burton, Associate Professor of Biology Alverno College,
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
UCF University-wide System for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Dr. Julia Pet-Armacost Assistant VP, Information, Planning, and Assessment University.
Academic Program Review Chair’s Workshop John E. Sawyer, Ph.D. Associate Provost Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Model for Sustaining Departmental Student Outcomes Assessment Russ E. Mullen, Mary H. Wiedenhoeft, Thomas A. Polito, Sherry L. Pogranichniy, and Michelle.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
August 15th 2007 Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes by Kirby Hayes.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
SCC Annual Operational Planning Why Plan????
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
UK Office of Assessment. The LEARNING Initiative Dual Track Implementation Strategy Completion Dates Not actively engaged in program level assessment.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
1 UST Support for Institutional Effectiveness: Information for Academic OA Plan Writers.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC 1 3/10/14.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
D2L Refresher Upload content into the Content section in a D2L course
Consider Your Audience
Assessment-driven Core Reform
Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment
U n i v e r s i t y o f W a s h i n g t o n
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
General Education Assessment Revision Plan Proposal
Lib Ed Assessment and the First Year Experience
Mid-Term or Promotion Evaluation
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Curriculum Committee Report
Mid-Term or Promotion Evaluation
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
planning THE ASSESSMENT CYCLE
Presentation transcript:

Program review Experiences from within and without Char Mehrtens UVM Geology Experiences from within and without Char Mehrtens UVM Geology

WithinUVM: Prior to a 10yr program review our Department revised its curriculum around goals-based learning approach for an individual course: student learning outcomes student learning outcomes content topics content topics assignments assignments pedagogy pedagogy assessment assessment

We applied the same approach to curricular revision: Geology degrees (B.A. B.S. M.S.) What do we want students to be able to do What do we want students to be able to do when they graduate? What are the content (=courses) that will What are the content (=courses) that will help them get there? What kinds of activites/projects do we do What kinds of activites/projects do we do in our courses? How will we assess outcomes (student How will we assess outcomes (student learning achievement) from these activities?

Writing the narrative to the self-study portion of the review was “easy,” in part because I could discuss all that we had done to begin the assessment process (mission statement, goals-based learning for courses, learning outcomes for the three degrees). Even if we didn’t have much data I could demonstrate a plan. So, don’t panic if your program review is coming and you’re just starting the process.

10 year program review at UVM: Fixed format - based on the university’s strategic plan Institutional data set: ex: SCH, F:S ratios, numbers of graduates, numbers of incoming first year student majors We added to this: Our data sets Our data sets Data to place our dept in an institutional context; challenge is our small size and need to document quality (vs quantity) Data to place our dept in an institutional context; challenge is our small size and need to document quality (vs quantity) Data to compare our dept to peer institutions (I got to choose these) Data to compare our dept to peer institutions (I got to choose these)

Section Three. Standards and Criteria Standard I: The program has a clear and publicly stated purpose that contributes to the mission of stated purpose that contributes to the mission of the University the University Criterion 1: Program contributes to the mission of the University and the College University and the College a)Preparing students for productive, responsible, and creative lives and creative lives b)Supporting research and creative activities that generate new knowledge and understanding, and generate new knowledge and understanding, and enrich the intellectual environment enrich the intellectual environment c)Promoting examination of diverse perspectives and experiences and experiences d)Applying knowledge to contemporary problems e)Encouraging students to use knowledge to benefit society and to develop qualities of good citizenship and society and to develop qualities of good citizenship and leadership. leadership. Example:

Data sets to support the narrative: Examples of annual data and trends: Number of student theses, internships Number of student theses, internships Number of students going on to grad school (and where) Number of students going on to grad school (and where) Graduate acceptance rates (compared to Bio and Chem) Graduate acceptance rates (compared to Bio and Chem) Number of NSF fellowship recipients Number of NSF fellowship recipients Number of refereed publications/public presentations Number of refereed publications/public presentations Percentage of respondents employed in the field within 3 years Percentage of respondents employed in the field within 3 years Faculty productivity (publications, external funding, journals/grant agencies reviewing) Faculty productivity (publications, external funding, journals/grant agencies reviewing) Many of these are proxies

Without: External reviews Reviewers are provided with a written document, 1 or 2 volumes - narrative and data set The narrative and data set are so important for placing the department in context of the institution and also nationally (peer institutions) The narrative may address specific departmental concerns (ex, resource issues or to provide an outsider’s view of a particular problem); sometimes clearly articulated or sometimes present between the lines

The importance of the data set!! If you want your audience to understand your program you need to present departmental and institutional data You want to build a case for what you perceive are your needs It provides the external reviewers with the information they need to craft questions for their site visit

Summarize the results of assessment of student learning outcomes: how you know that you are being effective or or you have a strategy to improve assessment