Specially Designed Instruction Designed to reduce or eliminate the barriers related to a disability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Evaluation of Special Education Teachers
Response to Intervention Presented by: Agnes B. Domingo EDSP 6345, HBU, Spring 2014.
February 2007IDEA Partnership1 Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention Fundamentals for Educators and their Partners.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Multi-tiered Systems of Support Improving Outcomes for All Office of Special Programs.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. July 2007 IDEA Partnership 2 The IDEA Partnership acknowledges the work of the National Association of State.
Response to Intervention Edward Daly & Todd Glover University of Nebraska- Lincoln.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
Adapted Physical Education Position Paper Revised Dec 2011.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
F LORIDA ’ S I MPLEMENTATION OF M ULTI - TIERED S YSTEM OF S TUDENT S UPPORTS (MTSSS) Bambi J. Lockman, LL.D. Bureau Chief, Exceptional Education and Student.
Response to Intervention
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
The ABCs of RTI: Background and the Basics. Questions we will cover about RTI 1.What is RTI anyway? 2.Why do it? 3.What’s so wrong with the way we’re.
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Building Common Language and Understanding.
Webinar 1: Overview. 1. Overview  Link to SLD Rule  Multi-tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)  Systems of Assessment 2. Introduction to Tiers  Tier 1:
Importance of Building Family and Community Engagement for Implementing a Multi-Tiered System of Support There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Opener Write an “elevator speech” –the amount of time spent on an elevator between floors—describing Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) to: Family.
Response to Intervention Up the Tiers to Special Education Dr. Meg Carroll Professor, Saint Xavier University, Chicago RtI.
Multi-Tiered System of Support TMCSEA Psych Focus Group 12/17/13.
Response to Intervention By Kristy Shinaver. What is Response to Intervention (RtI)?  A multi-tiered method of service delivery in which all students.
H HOW SPECIAL SERVICES (IEPs, IFSPs, 504s PLANS) FIT WITHIN THE EDUCATIONAL FRAMEWORK Judy Hackett, EdD Superintendent NSSEO.
Problem Solving and RtI ASCA Conference Denver, 2007 Rich Downs School Counseling Consultant Student Support Services Project Florida Department of Education.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Using the Problem Solving to Improve Outcomes for Students with Disabilities Presented by: Kelly Justice, Regional Coordinator Beth Hardcastle, Regional.
North Carolina Read to Achieve. The Goal “The goal of the State is to ensure that every student read at or above grade level by the end of third grade.
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
Overview, Considerations, and Implementation Sharon Hance Erie 1 BOCES SETRC Information for this presentation.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Board of Education Meeting September 10, Special Education Quality Review - Monitor compliance related to programs and services provided to students.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
From “Opportunity” to Outcomes: Bridging the Gap Between IEP Development and Implementation in General Education Presented by: Beth Hardcastle, Regional.
Teaching Students Who are Exceptional, Diverse,
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Using Problem Solving to Improve Outcomes for Students with Disabilities Presented by: Beth Hardcastle, Regional Coordinator Kelly Justice, Regional Coordinator.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
What IS RtI?. National RtI Model “Response to Intervention” –Born out of Reauthorization of Special Ed Law (IDEA 2004) Two Models of RtI: –Problem-Solving.
Using Problem Solving to Improve Outcomes for Students with Disabilities Presented by: Beth Hardcastle, Regional Coordinator Kelly Justice, Regional Coordinator.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
RtI: A Framework for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORTS Presented by Adrienne T. Dixson, Specialist, Response to Intervention Antonio Burgess, MTSS Instructional Facilitator March.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
A Perspective on RTI Dr. Mary E. Dahlgren. This powerpoint is an excerpt from a presentation at Neuhaus Education Center by Mary E. Dalgren, Ph.D., on.
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Department of Exceptional Student Education
The Principles of Data Use in a RtI / 3-Tier Model
Reason to suspect disability
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities
Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

Specially Designed Instruction Designed to reduce or eliminate the barriers related to a disability

Federal Legislation The reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 2004 made it clear that students with disabilities are to be considered first and foremost as general education students.

Specially Designed Instruction

Considerations Concern that students “get less” after determined eligible for ESE services Confusion re: “intensive” v. “specialized” instruction Lack of seamless transition Persistence of parallel systems/silos Need for unified Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS)

Reading Data for SWDs

Math Data for SWDs

Assumptions SPED does not equal RED (Tier 3 or Tier 4) SWDs should be accessing support/instruction throughout all tiers ESE students are General Education students first Integrating a system of support means addressing Consensus, Infrastructure, Implementation Regardless of eligibility status, a robust Tier 1 improves outcomes for all students Special education support should improve general education outcomes Problem-solving is a four-step process RtI is part of Step 4

“Problem-solving/RtI does not ‘start’ and ‘end’ like the traditional ‘pre-referral’ process. It is an ongoing, cyclical way of work that applies to all students enrolled in school and continues for students who are receiving special education and related services.” ~Florida DOE Technical Assistance Paper for SLD Eligibility (Florida PS/RtI Project, 2007)

Shifts in focus… Under IDEA, IEP is no longer the exclusive responsibility of special ed teacher…shift toward developing IEP for improvement in general education Performance goals and indicators for SWDs are more closely aligned with goals for students without disabilities IEP plays more important role than ever before in provision of services to SWDs

Shifts (con’t) Shift in focus from “opportunity” to outcomes SWDs not just to “benefit from” gen. ed. curriculum, but meet gen. ed. standards Focus on measurable post-school goals Accountability for the performance of the subgroup of students with disabilities and for closing the achievement gap between this subgroup and all others.

What about SWD and Specially Designed Instruction (SDI) Students eligible for services in accordance with IDEA – IEP that specifies and entitles SDI (need and disability) Tier 1 – Student learning and progress on grade level standards are the purpose of providing SDI Tier 2 – SDI is implemented when small groups of students are receiving supplemental interventions to address a specific need for explicit practice in a targeted skill Tier 3 – Distinction between tier 3 and SDI: SDI is a set of services entitled to on IEP applying IDEA, but pedagogy is the same (individualized).

SDI Mythbusters students with disabilities are to be considered first and foremost as general education students. Students, once determined eligible for ESE services, are removed from additional support. “intensive” and “specialized” instruction are the same or are different. Seamless transition from one support to another is essential for a unified MTSS Under IDEA, IEP is no longer the exclusive responsibility of special ed teacher…shift toward developing IEP for improvement in general education Performance goals and indicators for SWDs are more closely aligned with goals for students without disabilities IEP plays more important role than ever before in provision of services to SWDs