SCREENING FOR DISEASE. Learning Objectives Definition of screening; Principles of Screening.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Screening and Prevention
Advertisements

Screening & Prevention AK Nayyar. Prevention Primary Secondary Tertiary.
Validity and Reliability of Analytical Tests. Analytical Tests include both: Screening Tests Diagnostic Tests.
SCREENING CHP400: Community Health Program-lI Mohamed M. B. Alnoor
Prevention and Screening MMS Year 4 Public Health Workshop in O&G.
Screening in arterial disease: ethical and methodological issues P Lacroix and V Aboyans.
Azita Kheiltash Social Medicine Specialist Tehran University of Medical Sciences Diagnostic Tests Evaluation.
Public Health Perspective on Radon Control in Ireland Dr. Ina Kelly Specialist Registrar in Public Health Medicine Health Service Executive Department.
SCREENING FOR DISEASE Nigel Paneth. THREE KEY MEASURES OF VALIDITY 1.SENSITIVITY 2.SPECIFICITY 3.PREDICTIVE VALUE.
1 Comunicación y Gerencia 18/4/2011Dr Salwa Tayel (Screening) بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Screening revision! By Ilona Blee. What are some UK Screening programmes?  Antenatal & newborn screening  Newborn Blood Spot  Newborn Hearing Screening.
Wilson and Jungner Criteria for Screening 1968
Principles of Epidemiology Lecture 12 Dona Schneider, PhD, MPH, FACE
Screening for Disease Guan Peng Department of Epidemiology School of Public Health, CMU.
Screening PHIL THIRKELL. What is screening?  A process of identifying apparently healthy people who may be at risk of a disease or condition  Identify.
Dr Don Ajith Karawita MBBS, PgD Ven, MD Venereology National STD/AIDS Control Programme.
Screening and Early Detection Epidemiological Basis for Disease Control – Fall 2001 Joel L. Weissfeld, M.D. M.P.H.
Screening Sherine Shawky, MD, Dr.PH Assistant Professor Public Health King Abdulaziz University College of Medicine
What is Screening? Basic Public Health Concepts Sheila West, Ph.D. El Maghraby Professor of Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Johns Hopkins University.
EPIDEMIOLOGY Epidemiology of chronic kidney injury, including prevalence and prognosis in various community groups. Screening of populations for kidney.
The Nature of Disease.
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Thomas B. Newman, MD, MPH Andi Marmor, MD, MSEd October 21, 2010.
Screening Introduction to Primary Care:
Are hospital readmissions in the elderly preventable? Antonio Sarría-Santamera MD PhD Institute of Health Carlos III University of Alcalá DUKE-NUS HSSR.
Principles and Predictive Value of Screening. Objectives Discuss principles of screening Describe elements of screening tests Calculate sensitivity, specificity.
SCREENING Asst. Prof. Sumattna Glangkarn RN, MSc. (Epidemiology), PhD (Nursing studies)
Dr K N Prasad Community Medicine
Guided by, SUBMITTED BY, Dr.Mahmood Moothedath Ayshath Dr.Aseela,Dr Ashwathi Raifa.
1 SCREENING. 2 Why screen? Who wants to screen? n Doctors n Labs n Hospitals n Drug companies n Public n Who doesn’t ?
CHP400: Community Health Program-lI Mohamed M. B. Alnoor Muna M H Diab SCREENING.
Ann Jolly1 Screening “...the identification of unrecognized disease or defect by the application of tests, examinations or other procedures...” “...sort.
Screening Puja Myles
Prostate Cancer Screening Risk Management Ben Inch.
Evaluating Screening Programs Dr. Jørn Olsen Epi 200B January 19, 2010.
Screening of diseases Dr Zhian S Ramzi Screening 1 Dr. Zhian S Ramzi.
SCREENING TTTThe search for unrecognized disease or defect by means of rapidly applied tests, examinations or other procedures in apparently healthy.
Principles of Screening
Screening and its Useful Tools Thomas Songer, PhD Basic Epidemiology South Asian Cardiovascular Research Methodology Workshop.
Diagnostic Tests Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /7/20151.
1 Wrap up SCREENING TESTS. 2 Screening test The basic tool of a screening program easy to use, rapid and inexpensive. 1.2.
Thomas B. Newman, MD, MPH Andi Marmor, MD, MSEd October 23, 2008.
Unit 15: Screening. Unit 15 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Screening.  “...the identification of unrecognized disease or defect by the application of tests, examinations or other procedures...”  “...sort out.
Estie Vermeulen Screening. Definition Screening is the organized attempt to detect, among apparently healthy people in the community, disorders or risk.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses
12/12/2009Dr. Salwa Tayel1 Comunicación y Gerencia.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Screening Tests: A Review. Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
دکتر حمیدرضا صابری
CHP400: Community Health Program-lI Mohamed M. B. Alnoor Muna M H Diab SCREENING.
Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity analysis
DR.FATIMA ALKHALEDY M.B.Ch.B;F.I.C.M.S/C.M
Cancer prevention and early detection
Clinical Epidemiology
Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Public Health Perspective
Evidence Based Screening
Principles of Epidemiology E
Comunicación y Gerencia
What is Screening? Basic Public Health Concepts Sheila West, Ph.D.
Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity analysis
Breast Cancer SKRINING
What is Screening? Basic Public Health Concepts Sheila West, Ph.D.
Newborn screening and the future – Where do we go from here?
Screening, Sensitivity, Specificity, and ROC curves
Dr. Hannah Jordan Lecturer in Public Health ScHARR
No matter what the type of genetic screening, certain core principles should be followed before a program is introduced. Principles of Screening • The.
Screening & Prevention
Presentation transcript:

SCREENING FOR DISEASE

Learning Objectives Definition of screening; Principles of Screening.

Definitions 1. Screening program -- comprehensive disease control activity based on the identification and treatment of persons with either unrecognized disease or unrecognized risk factors for disease. 2. Screening test -- specific technology (survey questionnaire, physical observation or measurement, laboratory test, radiological procedure, etc.) used to help identify persons with unrecognized disease or unrecognized risk factors for disease.

Definitions 3. Primary prevention -- disease control approach based on the elimination or reduction of risk factors for disease. Primary prevention aims to prevent the occurrence of disease. Primary prevention may use screening tests to identify persons with risk factors.

Definitions 4. Secondary prevention -- disease control approach based on the active identification and treatment of persons with unrecognized disease. Secondary prevention aims to prevent the occurrence of adverse outcomes from disease (such as fatal outcomes), without necessarily reducing the occurrence of disease. Secondary prevention must screen to identify persons with unrecognized disease.

What is Screening Screening is the testing of apparently healthy populations to identify undiagnosed diseases or people at high risk of developing a disease. Screening aims to detect early disease before it becomes symptomatic. Screening is an important aspect of prevention, but not all diseases are suitable for screening.

The Principles of Screening The choice of disease for which to screen; The nature of the screening test or tests to be used; The availability of a treatment for those found to have the disease; The relative costs of the screening.

Disease The disease must be an important health problem. There should be a recognizable latent or early symptomatic stage. The natural history of the disease, including latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood.

There should be a suitable test or examination. The test should be acceptable to the population.

Important properties of a screening test 1. Screening is simple, inexpensive, and easily diffused through the population. 2. The act of screening is safe and acceptable. 3. The screening test is reliable. 4. The screening test is accurate.

There should be an acceptable treatment for the patients with recognized disease. There should be facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available. There should be an agreed policy on whom to treat as patients.

The cost of case finding (including diagnosis and treatment of patients diagnosed) should be economically balanced in relation to possible expenditure on medical care as a whole. Case finding should be a continuing process and not a "once for all" project.

Summary Screening is the testing of apparently healthy populations to identify previously undiagnosed diseases or people at high risk of developing a disease. Principles of Screening: disease, test, treatment and cost. What is the next step? Define the validity of the screening test and

Comparison of screening test results against gold standard 1. A screening test may produce only a categorical (positive or negative) result. Important concepts include disease prevalence, test sensitivity, test specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, proportion test positive, proportion test negative, and disease yield.

THREE KEY MEASURES OF VALIDITY of the screening test 1. SENSITIVITY 2. SPECIFICITY 3. PREDICTIVE VALUE

True Disease Status Screening Test PositiveNegativeTotal Positive True Positives (TP) False Positives (FP) TP+FP Negative False Negatives (FN) True Negatives (TN) FN+TN Total TP+FNFP+TNTP+FP+FN+TN Outcomes of a Screening Test

SENSITIVITY Sensitivity tells us how well a positive test detects disease. It is defined as the fraction of the diseased who test positive. Its complement is the false negative rate, defined as the fraction of the diseased who test negative. Sensitivity and false negative rate add up to one.

SENSITIVITY AND THE FALSE NEGATIVE RATE ARE COMPLEMENTARY N who test positive + N who test negative = 1 All with disease SENSITIVITY + FALSE NEGATIVE RATE = 1

SPECIFICITY Specificity tells us how well a negative test detects non-disease. It is defined as the fraction of the non- diseased who test negative. Its complement is the false positive rate, defined as the fraction of the non-diseased who test positive. Specificity and the false positive rate add up to one.

SPECIFICITY AND THE FALSE POSITIVE RATE ARE COMPLEMENTARY N who test negative + N who test positive = 1 All without disease SPECIFICITY + FALSE POSITIVE RATE = 1

DENOMINATORS OF THESE RATES Note that all the denominators of the four rates so far defined (sensitivity, specificity and the false + and false – rates) are DISEASE STATES The denominators of specificity and the false positive rate is PEOPLE WITHOUT DISEASE

Net effects from screening 1. True negatives are exposed to the costs, inconvenience, and hazards of screening. True negatives may be reassured by knowledge of a negative screening test result. 2. False positives are exposed to the costs, inconvenience, and hazards of screening and follow-up diagnostic evaluations. The falsely positive screening test result may cause psychological and emotional distress.

Net effects from screening 3. False negatives are exposed to the costs, inconvenience, and hazards of screening. False negatives may be falsely reassured by knowledge of a negative screening test result. False negatives represent lost opportunities to prevent adverse outcomes from disease. 4. True positives are exposed to the costs, inconvenience, and hazards of screening, follow- up diagnostic evaluations, and therapeutic interventions. Only true positives have an opportunity to benefit from medical therapy.