Permit Application Information and Work Group Exercises Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education Leadership Meeting November 30, 2010 An Update on Special Education Compliance Monitoring Jennifer L. Kline, Esq. Education Associate.
Advertisements

METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
DRAFT IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART EEEEE.
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
Compliance Monitoring Strategy CMS Michael Pjetraj RCO.
1 The Credible Evidence Rule and Compliance Certifications Peter Westlin OAQPS, EMAD.
Radiopharmaceutical Production
General Monitoring Requirements and Options
Harmonization of Parts 60 and 75
RECLAIM Monitoring, Recordkeeping and Reporting (MRR)
CEMTEK CEMS Users Group Meeting and Forum September 24-25, 2009 Santa Ana, California RKI Specific DAHS Training and RECLAIM Updates Presented by Norm Iseri, RKI Engineering.
1 Proposed Rule: Amendments to the Protocol Gas Verification Program and Minimum Competency Requirements for Air Emission Testing Presented at May 12,
MON MACT Storage Tank & Transfer Racks Presenter: James Leonard November 5, 2003 ACC/SOCMA Conference New Orleans, LA.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Panel Peter Westlin, EMC Barrett Parker, EMC.
Proposed Amendments to Rule – Emissions from Gaseous- and Liquid- Fueled Internal Combustion Engines Presented at Southern California Gas Co. Seminar.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
Data QA/QC Techniques. Copyright VIM Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. VIM’s 10-Step Program To Compliance Success 2.
Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,
Direct PM 2.5 Emissions Data, Testing, and Monitoring Issues Ron Myers Measurement Policy Group SPPD, OAQPS.
2015 NCMA EPA Enforcement Policies and How They Affect Your Facility Michael Pjetraj, P.E. DAQ Stationary Source Compliance Branch Supervisor.
NCMA Workshop March 19 and 24, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Compliance Update NCMA 2015.
Source Testing Company Accreditation and Qualified Individual Certification Programs A Status Report Peter Westlin, OAQPS, SPPD, MPG September 13, 2007.
© Copyright, Yorke Engineering, LLC 2008 SCAQMD Rule Compliance Steps and Strategies Judy Yorke and Bipul K. Saraf Yorke Engineering, LLC
Managing Air Quality Data 101 Presented by: Chris Bellusci & Claire Lund, PE (Sanborn Head) International Conference for Environmental.
Lecture Seven Chapter Six
Particulate Matter Monitoring Required by the Utility MATS Eric Swisher| | ext. 17 August 22, 2012 Presented to ARIPPA.
Rocky Mountain RAPS Process Validation Presentation 6/7/06 By Clay Anselmo.
New Orleans / ACC / SOCMA November 2003 Randy McDonald, OAR, USEPA.
1 Title V Permitting and CAM Planning Title V Permitting and CAM Planning APPA E&O Technical Conference April 19, 2005 Robert M. Iwanchuk, C.C.M. ENSR.
FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Start-up Shutdown Malfunction Plan Development and Implementation Duncan F. Kimbro
1 Dec. 8, 1997 LEADS Quality Assurance Summary Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Guidance on Establishing Monitoring to Comply with CAM and Other Title V Requirements A Summary of Technical and Policy Materials Barrett Parker, EPA,
Differences and similarities with informal and formal reports
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Region 4 – Atlanta, GA Dec , 2010.
Quality assurance / Quality control system for the Greek GHG emissions inventory Yannis Sarafidis, Elena Georgopoulou UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems.
PA Department of Environmental Protection Continuous Source Monitoring Manual (Manual, Revision 8)
Title V: The Big Picture
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Massachusetts Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulation 310 CMR 7.71 Stacy DeGabriele & Will Space MassDEP Climate Strategies December 10 th and 11 th, 2009.
TITLE: EVENTS DATA RECORDERS PRESENTER’S NAME: NAME ECONOMY: REP. OF KOREA.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Region 9 Title V Permit Review Guidelines Ray Vogel EPA/OAQPS.
Hardware Analyser vs Software Analyser
Control of Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide – LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 Dustin Duhon Air Permits Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality March 23,
Virtual Analyser What is it Have you ever faced an analyser failure that requires a plant shut down to repair & wished that there.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) November 24, 2009.
New Product Developments World Leaders in Combustion Management Solutions C.E.M.S., MCERTs & E.P.A. Exhaust Gas Analysers C.E.M.S., MCERTs.
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
New Product Developments World Leaders in Combustion Management Solutions C.E.M.S., MCERTs & E.P.A. Exhaust Gas Analysers C.E.M.S., MCERTs.
Voluntary Superior Monitoring Source Testing in the New Regulatory World IV October 30, 2002.
General Operating Permits
On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) II Regulatory Update Mobile Source Control Division California Air Resources Board April 25, 2002 Sacramento, California.
Alternatives to BART Rule Discussion with WRAP Nov , 2006.
Write Title (statement that relates the IV & DV) By (your name)
Emissions Events Cynthia Gandee, Air Program Liaison Office of Compliance and Enforcement Program Support Section Austin Jon Williams, Work Leader Office.
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
Preparing for Permit Review
Monitoring aspects of permits and inspections (1)
Off-cycle Emissions GTR – Status Report for GRPE
What is the Boiler NESHAP?
Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4
Easier, Better, Faster Permitting
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Brandon Marsh, P.E. TCEQ Air Permits Division
Presentation transcript:

Permit Application Information and Work Group Exercises Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS

Outline of Permit Submittal re: Monitoring Provisions Background information Monitoring approach description and level of detail Justification and support

Basic Background Emissions unit (PSEU) Applicable regulations, emission limits, and monitoring requirements Control technology (e.g., control device (CAM), compliance fuel or raw material, process controls, operation and maintenance protocols)

Monitoring Approach (CAM) Measurement method (what and how) Monitoring frequency and averaging procedures Excursion or exceedance definition (indicator range for CAM) Performance criteria – QA/QC procedures

Other Permit Content Factors Commitment to corrective action Reporting and recordkeeping Verification of operational status QIP Threshold (optional) Data availability (optional) Table format (for clarity in permit)

Justification Brief description of source/control device Rationale for selecting indicators Rationale for selecting indicator ranges Supporting information (e.g., test data, design factors, historical data, margin of compliance)

Monitoring Approach– Title V Permit Table (example) Indicator Combustion TOutlet CO conc. Measurement approachThermocoupleCO CEMS Indicator rangeExcursion: 50 ppmv Data representativenessInstalled in incinerator PS 4, 40 CFR 60, App. B chamber QA/QCRedundant t-couple and span gas Monitoring frequencyMeasure continuouslyDaily zero (+ 30F) Measure continuously (10 sec) Data collectionRecord continuously Record 1-min averages procedureson chart recorderby DAS (electronic) Averaging periodNone1-hr average QIP thresholdNo more than six No more than 10 excursions excursions 7

Questions? Let’s divide into groups