Alumni Survey Results NASPAA Conference Brooklyn, NY

Number of Respondents by Degree NASPAA 2015 Alumni Survey N=551, at 58 Schools

N=551 NASPAA 2015 Alumni Survey

N=543 NASPAA 2015 Alumni Survey

N=543

NASPAA 2015 Alumni Survey N=508

NASPAA 2015 Alumni Survey N=529

NASPAA 2015 Alumni Survey

N=554 Check all that apply NASPAA 2015 Alumni Survey

N=540 check all that apply NASPAA 2015 Alumni Survey

How many people do you Supervise How large a Budget do you administer Promotions N= Min Max28027,000,000,000 (Budget Analyst Dept of Justice) 5 Average15695,735, Median52,200,0001 Supervision, Budget, Promotions NASPAA 2015 Alumni Survey

Alumni Survey: How will the Data be Made Public?

FT Methodology/ Comments Note: The 20% response rate coupled with the requirement of at least 20 completed responses means the school had to, at a minimum, graduate 100 students. This is unrealistic for our programs. For example, in the Data Report 86% of schools reported awarding fewer than 75 degrees that year; 60% reported awarding fewer than 40; and 42% reported fewer than 25. (197 programs reported on this question so about 72% of NASPAA members for that year).

FT MBA Alumni Profile

NASPAA’s Current School Profile (The current proposal is to add the Alumni Profile to the end, rather than as a separate profile)

Alumni Profile Class of alumni responded to the survey for a 35% participation rate All data comes from self-reported responses to NASPAA’s 2015 Alumni Survey.

Alumni Profile Class of alumni responded to the survey for a 20% participation rate Please note due to the low response rate and/ and or comparatively low class size the data below is not necessarily representative of the Class of 2015 and should be considered accordingly. All data comes from self-reported responses to NASPAA’s 2015 Alumni Survey. Alumni Survey Profile for Schools Small N’s that okay data being public

Alumni Profile Class of alumni responded to the survey for a 20% participation rate Please note due to the low response rate and/ and or comparatively low class size the data below is not necessarily representative of the Class of 2015 and should be considered accordingly. All data comes from self- reported responses to NASPAA’s 2015 Alumni Survey.

Alumni Profile Class of 2012 Due to either low response rate or small class size, individual year data is not available for this program. Alumni Survey Data for Small N’s (Where school has opted out of public release of data due to not meeting threshold)

Alumni Profile (Data years ), 45 alumni responded to the survey for a 25% participation rate Due to either low response rate or small class size, individual year data is not available for this program. The data below consists of an aggregation of the self reported responses to NASPAA”s Alumni Survey for the past three years. Alumni Survey Data for Small N’s (Where the program meets the threshold for releasing three year aggregate data)

Due to either low response rate or small class size, individual year data is not available for this program. The data below consists of an aggregation of the self reported responses to NASPAA”s Alumni Survey for the past three years. Alumni Profile (Data years ), 45 alumni responded to the survey for a 25% participation rate

Common Alumni Survey Pilot 2014 NASPAA Annual Conference

N= 137 March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey

N=133

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=122

Overall Current Job Situation March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=131

N=119* (Check All that Apply) March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey

Supervision and Budget How many people do you Supervise How large a Budget do you administer N=4933 Min130,000 Max30510 Billion Average ,735,757.6 Median55,000,000 March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey

N=116* Check all that Apply

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=124

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=127

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=125

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=127

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey

Percent Achieved by Category

Comparison with MBA N=109 March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey Chart from Financial Times’ Global MBA Ranking 2011 January 31, 2011

N=109 March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey

Aims Achieved MBA vs MPA* Why study an MPA? Importance and achievement of alumni aims FT 2011 Rankings data NASPAA 2014 Alumni Survey Pilot

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=112

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=112

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=114

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=115

March 2014 Pilot Alumni Survey N=115

N=117