Main Linac Issues for RDR 1/20/2006 Area group H. Hayano From Linac Area discussion posted on the web:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April SCRF Meeting FNAL08 S.Fukuda 1 HLRF Summary and Work Assignment S. FUKUDA KEK.
Advertisements

Linac Quad Field and Position Stability Chris Adolphsen SLAC.
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
ILC-BCD: Cavity Package International Linear Collider - Baseline Configuration Document: Cavity Package DESY -MPY-
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
BCD-Main Linac RF-Source: Modulator, Klystron Cavity: High Power Input Coupler, Frequency Tuner Cryomodule: Configuration RF Distribution: Configuration.
1 Q3 Main linac starting gradient, upgrade gradient, and upgrade path Results of WG5 discussions.
September 19/20, 2007 SIS 100 Magnet cooling and cryogenic distribution.
1 Main Linac Design Chris Adolphsen GDE SLAC April 6-7, 2006 MAC Review at FNAL.
For Draft List of Standard Errors Beam Dynamics, Simulations Group (Summarized by Kiyoshi Kubo)
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
STF plan overview H. Hayano, KEK LCPAC 02/25/2005.
Linac R&D Update May 15, L-Band Source Consists of a LLRF system (VME/Epics based), a SNS High Voltage Converter Modulator (on loan), a Thales 2104C.
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
NLC Status and Milestones D. L. Burke ISG9 KEK December 10-13, 2002.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 The Large Hadron Collider LHC is located at CERN CERN is located near Geneva Part of CERN is in France The LHC collides.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
BCD Status: Strengths and Weaknesses Tor Raubenheimer.
ML Planning for ILC08 First Pass + SCRF agenda Chris Adolphsen Hitoshi Hayano.
ML Planning for ILC08 First Pass Chris Adolphsen Hitoshi Hayano.
Report of 2 nd ILC Workshop (Snowmass) Working Group Kiyoshi KUBO references: Slides of the plenary talks in the workshop by P.Tenembaum and.
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
Linac RF Source Recommendations for Items 22,23,24,46,47 Chris Adolphsen.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
1 Update on Q2 Main linac starting gradient, upgrade gradient, and upgrade path Results of WG5 discussions after feedback from plenary on Tuesday New Option.
BCD input from WG2 WG2 12/08/2005 H. Hayano Chris Adolphsen Terry Garvey Hitoshi Hayano.
1 Update on Q2 Main linac starting gradient, upgrade gradient, and upgrade path Results of WG5 discussions after feedback from plenary on Tuesday New Option.
Harry Carter – T4CM meeting CERN 1/16/06 Type IV Cryomodule (T4CM) Design Team Formation & Technical Discussions H. Carter CERN – 1/16-17/2006.
Beam Test status and Plans of the ILC Main LINAC BPM
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
RDR Linac Definition  Tasked Cryomodule & Cryogenics Groups with defining cryomodule length and cryoplant layout First pass generated at Jan CERN.
KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011.
Progress and Plans for R&D and the Conceptual Design of the ILC Main Linacs H. Hayano, KEK PAC2005 5/18/2005.
DMS steering with BPM scale error - Trial of a New Optics - Kiyoshi Kubo
ILC Main Linac Chris Adolphsen SLAC
N. Walker, K. Yokoya LCWS ’11 Granada September TeV Upgrade Scenario: Straw man parameters.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
BEAMLINE HOM ABSORBER O. Nezhevenko, S. Nagaitsev, N. Solyak, V. Yakovlev Fermi National Laboratory December 11, 2007 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
Beam plan at STF phase1 12/6/2005 TTC-WG3 H. Hayano STF phase1 1st step : DC-gun + photo-cathode (2006) quick beam source( DC gun exist), no pre-acceleration,
Shuichi NoguchiTTC Meeting at Milano, Injector Cryomodule for cERL at KEK Cavity 2 Prototypes were tested. Input Coupler 2 Couplers were tested.
3.1 Main linac layout and parameters 3 SCRF Main Linacs50Yamomoto 31 Main linac layout and parameters5Adolphsen 31.1 Main Linac layout for flat site 31.2.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
TDR Cryogenics Parameters Tom Peterson 28 September 2011.
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
The Evolving ILC Project
ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop
Preparation for DESY Meeting
WP5 Elliptical cavities
ILC-SCRF Test Facilities considerations
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Summary of WG2 :CFS for staging
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
ILC Main Linac Design Status
Operational Experience - Field Emission
General presentation about recent status of DRFS
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Electron Source Configuration
Nick Walker (DESY) EU GDE Meeting Oxford
ILC Cryogenics -- Technical Design Report Planning
Dark current in TESLA linac
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
8-T Solenoid Package and Local Magnetic Shielding in FRIB Cryomodules
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Presentation transcript:

Main Linac Issues for RDR 1/20/2006 Area group H. Hayano From Linac Area discussion posted on the web:

Power source Modulator and klystron power Should we use more high power klystron, modulator? 10MW klystron drives 24 TESLA cavities, considering 7% WG loss and 11% overhead for 35MV/m operation. 0.21%/m WG loss (7% loss=33m), split/combine loss, circulator loss, attenuator loss in each branch, input coupler matching. --> Need detail of WG configuration and loss estimation. Klystron performance Currently available tubes are enough robust? It appears there are problems with tubes of Thales, CPI and Toshiba. --> should update BCD to reflect this, should strengthen R&D to solve them. RF distribution Need detail configuration design to maximize average gradient. Three way distribution system with attenuator in each cryomodule feed as an possible scheme. --> Need detail of WG configuration and loss estimation, again. Need performance simulation with cavity gradient variation for attenuator requirement.

Cryomodule(1) Cryo-plant spacing What is a reasonable value of overhead? TESLA TDR : 1.5, CERN philosophy : 1.7. The largest available cryoplant and the full allowable pressure drops in cryomodule piping determine the spacing. Overhead factor makes spacing more closer than present 5.3km. --> Need decision of overhead factor. Cavity package Lutz will mention this, later. --> Chris’s presentation. Cavity spacing TDR 283mm iris-to-iris spacing reasonable? There would be discussion at CERN cryomodule meeting. --> Chris’s presentation. HF absorber between cryomodules Need to determine specs/size of the higher frequency absorber. absorbing power, location, size would be discussed at CERN cryomodule meeting. --> Chris’s presentation. Spoilers MPS people may want to put spoilers in every cryomodule to avoid direct beam hit of cavities. beam hit to spoiler may cause deposition of materials on the cavities. --> install them at warm side, and make protection valve system to isolate cold section.

Cryomodule(2) Quadrupole spacing One in every 32 cavities for lower cost, change it back to one in every 24. To make all RF unit the same distribution system, one quad in one RF unit would be good. --> send it to CCB. Quadrupole location Quad-package in center of module is harder to do movers, not directly supported. need to stress on keeping cleanness of BPM and quad beam pipe. Independent cryostat for quad-BPM package is worth discussing. --> continue discussion and R&D. Quad type and strength Should we consider superferric quads and smaller aperture? need several size of quad to cover energy variation(5-250GeV). How do we deal with TeV upgrade to cover GeV? Independent cryostat for quad-BPM package is worth discussing for moving its position in TeV upgrade. --> continue discussion and R&D. Correctors Should we make correctors isolated from quads? corrector windings on quads will induce persistent current on quad windings resulting residual dipole field. Move corrector far away from quad or install mover on the quad? --> continue discussion and R&D.

Cryomodule(3) BPM resolution What value of Linac BPM resolution should be? LET simulations suggest to be 5 ~10µm. Resolving beam jitter request 1/3 of sigma (say a few 100nm). Tune-up operation request enough resolution with 1/10 charge of beam. Within a similar cost, better resolution should be taken. --> continue discussion, R&D and cost estimation with/by instrumentation GG.

Over all Instrumentation sections Number of diagnostic region? Need to specify the number of diagnostic section. The spoilers for MPS should include in this region. --> ask instrumentation GG. Packing fraction We should define the packing fraction of Linac. need to specify the length of quad, corrector, BPM, HF absorber. --> Chris’s presentation. End of list