Top couplings: ILC-B physics interplay Top couplings: ILC-B physics interplay TYL-FJPPL B physics TYL-FJPPL B physics February 20, 2015 LAL February 20,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Α s from inclusive EW observables in e + e - annihilation Hasko Stenzel.
Advertisements

IFIC. I. Top-pair production near threshold ● Heaviest known quark (plays an important role in EWSB in many models) ● Important for quantum effects affecting.
Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.
Hep-ph/ , with M. Carena (FNAL), E. Pontón (Columbia) and C. Wagner (ANL) New Ideas in Randall-Sundrum Models José Santiago Theory Group (FNAL)
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
K. Kumar, W. Marciano, Y. Li Electroweak physics at EIC - Summary of week 7 INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider.
QCD Studies at HERA Ian C. Brock Bonn University representing the ZEUS and H1 Collaborations.
Discovery Potential for MSSM Higgs Bosons with ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration International Europhysics Conference on.
Mitsuru Kakizaki (University of Toyama)
01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL1 Multiparameter Fits in tt Threshold Scan Manel Martinez, IFAE (Barcelona) Ramon Miquel, LBNL (Berkeley) Introduction. The.
As a test case for quark flavor violation in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
Tobias Haas: Recent results from HERA The Dynamics of Proton Structure: Recent Results from HERA 23 August, 2005 Tobias Haas Deutsches Elektronensynchrotron.
Energy and Luminosity reach Our charge asks for evaluation of a baseline machine of 500 GeV with energy upgrade to about 1 TeV. (the “about” came about.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Constraint on new physics by measuring the HVV Couplings at e+e- LC In collaboration with.
New Physics Search through  → t t → l X / b X Kazumasa OHKUMA (Fukui Tech.) Village hep-ph/ th International Symposium on.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Programme of Lectures Motivations and introduction What we know now The future? –Supersymmetric Higgses –Higgs factories.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
The experimentalists point of view Contributions from André, Reisaburo, Pierre, Marumi … 1.
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Presice measurement of the Higgs-boson electroweak couplings at Linear Collider and its physics.
Semileptonic decays of polarized top quarks: V+A admixture and QCD corrections Yoshiaki Umeda with W. Bernreuther and M. Fuecker 1 Introduction 2 Formalism.
Report on LHT at the LHC ~ Some results from simulation study ~ Shigeki Matsumoto (Univ. of Toyama) 1.What kinds of LHT signals are expected, and how accurately.
X ± -Gauge Boson Production in Simplest Higgs Matthew Bishara University of Rochester Meeting of Division of Particles and Fields August 11, 2011  Simplest.
Top quark IIHE Future interests  Towards data taking → new software  Have a broader physics output  Link theory-experiment  Calibration and.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
Report on New Physics Subgroup Activities Nobuchika Okada (KEK) 5th general meeting of the ILC physics working group May 31, KEK Past activities.
IWLC10, Geneva, 20/10/10 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick 1 Impact of polarized positrons for top/QCD and electroweak physics Gudrid Moortgat-Pick Hamburg University.
Yingchuan Li Electroweak physics at EIC Brookhaven National Lab Feb. 3rd 2011, BNL.
IFIC. 1/23 Outline 2/23 I. Top-pair production near threshold Precise determination of the top mass, the width and the Yukawa coupling Seidel, Simon,
Top/QCD program (b) Higher Order EW + QCD Fixed order vs resummed Normalization (and peak position) stabilised by higher orders; –summation of leading.
High Q 2 Structure Functions and Parton Distributions Ringberg Workshop 2003 : New Trends in HERA physics Benjamin Portheault LAL Orsay On behalf of the.
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
Summary of Group C B. Barish, F. Boruzmati, A. Cohen, M. Endo, K. Fujii, M. Ibe, A. Ishikawa, S. Kanemura, E. Kato, R. Kitano, J. Lykken, M. Nojiri, T.
SWADHIN TANEJA (STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY) K. BOYLE, A. DESHPANDE, C. GAL, DSSV COLLABORATION 2/4/2016 S. Taneja- DIS 2011 Workshop 1 Uncertainty determination.
Present and future constraints on top EW couplings Present and future constraints on top EW couplings F. Richard June François Richard LAL/Orsay.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
Higgs boson pair production in new physics models at hadron, lepton, and photon colliders October Daisuke Harada (KEK) in collaboration.
Charged Higgs boson at the LHC 이강영 ( 건국대학교 연세대학교
Impact of quark flavour violation on the decay in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
H1 QCD analysis of inclusive cross section data DIS 2004, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, April 2004 Benjamin Portheault LAL Orsay On behalf of the H1 Collaboration.
Randall- Sundrum Gravitons and Black Holes at the LHC Kevin Black Harvard University For the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations.
B s Mixing Parameters and the Search for CP Violation at CDF/D0 H. Eugene Fisk Fermilab 14th Lomonosov Conference Moscow State University August ,
Marc M. Baarmand – Florida Tech 1 TOP QUARK STUDIES FROM CMS AT LHC Marc M. Baarmand Florida Institute of Technology PHYSICS AT LHC Prague, Czech Republic,
F. Richard ECFA Study June 2008 A 4th generation scenario F. Richard LAL/Orsay Beyond the 3SM generation at the LHC era.
Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity 1 Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: E. Asakawa ( Meiji-gakuin.
Backup slides Z 0 Z 0 production Once  s > 2M Z ~ GeV ÞPair production of Z 0 Z 0 via t-channel electron exchange. e+e+ e-e- e Z0Z0 Z0Z0 Other.
TtH(H->bb) searches in ATLAS and CMS Ricardo Gonçalo Collider Cross Talk, 18 October 2012.
IFIC. 1/15 Why are we interested in the top quark? ● Heaviest known quark (plays an important role in EWSB in many models) ● Important for quantum effects.
Future Colliders Gordon Watts University of Washington/Seattle APS NW Meeting May 12-14, 2016.
New Physics effect on Higgs boson pair production processes at LHC and ILC Daisuke Harada (KEK, Graduate University for Advanced Studies) in collaboration.
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
CPV with top quaks at ILC
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
Dark Matter at a LC Third JCL (Journées Collisionneur Linéaire) 1-3 December 2014 LPSC Grenoble François Richard LAL/Orsay F. Richard December 2014.
Physics Progress and Plans Adrian Bevan
Direct Detection of Vector Dark Matter
Current status and future prospects
Complementarity between FCC-ee and FCC-hh Searches for BSM Physics
Global QCD Analysis and Collider Phenomenology — CTEQ
Compositeness at ILC250 ? F. Richard LAL-Orsay
Higgs Strahlung and W fusion
Finish off Higgs reach at Tevatron and CMS
Daisuke Harada (Sokendai, KEK)
Physics at LHC: Selected results from EW sector and news on Run II
Greg Heath University of Bristol
Fine-tuning in the models with non-universal gaugino masses
Presentation transcript:

Top couplings: ILC-B physics interplay Top couplings: ILC-B physics interplay TYL-FJPPL B physics TYL-FJPPL B physics February 20, 2015 LAL February 20, 2015 LAL F. Richard February François Richard LAL/Orsay

Introduction  Top EW couplings direct measurements can only be carried at HE colliders like ILC and LHC  This talk discusses indirect measurements at B factories and at LEP1/SLC (T observable)  I will compare the accuracies which are reachable with these various set ups F. Richard February 20152

LHC  ATLAS and CMS are reaching an accuracy of a few % on Vtb e.g. CMS gives |V tb |=0.998±0.0038(exp.)±0.016(theo.)  If one assumes a SM CKM with V tb ~1 this is translated into a constraint on the WbLtL coupling which, under mild assumptions, can be related to ZtLtL and ZbLbL (measured precisely at LEP1)  Knowing ZtLtL one can use the ttZ cross section to extract ZtRtR  Unfortunately this cross section is known to ±35% and since ZtRtR²/ZtLtL²~0.2, this measurement is insensitive to ZtRtR and this will remain true for long since this measurement is systematics limited to ~5% which corresponds to an error of ~15% on ZtRtR F. Richard February 20153

ILC  ILC produces top quarks through  and Z exchange  Using polarized beams one can separately extract Z axial and vector couplings and the photon coupling (neglecting tensorial terms)  4 observables are available : tt and AFBt for the two polarisations  ILC operates at 500 GeV centre of mass well above tt threshold to avoid large coulombic QCD corrections and to keep good sensitivity to the axial term  Statistical accuracies are overwhelmingly good, beyond theoretical present uncertainties, specially EW corrections F. Richard February 20154

Comparisons LHC ILC  The very large errors at LHC are due to the sign uncertainty which is absent at ILC due to Z- interference  The tensorial terms F2V is obtained assuming SM vectorial terms  F2A can be independently measured by measuring CPV distributions  I will concentrate on Z couplings F. Richard February 20155

Top coupling through loops  The B factory cleanest mode seems to be:  Depends on WbLtL and ZtLtL  The T parameter also depends on top loops  In both cases beware that additional BSM loops (heavy quarks, Z’) can also contribute F. Richard February 20156

EFT  From one writes  T=  SU(2)L gives  There are only 2 EFT parameters simply related to gL and gR Truly most general ?  Looking at concrete BSM models, I believe that this not the case F. Richard February 20157

Results  As expected B physics red band is almost horizontal  The black ellipse is due to the very tight T constraint  ILC errors which correspond to dgL/gL=1% and dgR/gR=2% are correlated (-0.8)  Systematics are ignored so far  LHC and B physics are inaccurate for gR (ignoring T) F. Richard February

Comments  It can be shown that the SMALL residual sensitivity of B physics to ZtRtR is due to the large top mass  These comparisons are useful to evaluate the sensitivity of the various set ups but do not give the whole picture  New physics can provide additional diagrams which can influence differently the direct and indirect measurements  As an example one can have a Z’ which is not flavor diagonal and contributes to B->µµ but not to ILC couplings  At ILC a Z’ can be observed through its propagator with an effect going like ~s/M²z’ (energy dependent) F. Richard February 20159

Conclusions  A precise and model independent determination of top EW couplings requires ILC with polarised beams  The high accuracy achievable allows to reach very large BSM scales, beyond LHC (e.g. KK exchange in RS) but beware the theory errors  The T parameter seems to play a crucial part but this constraint has to be taken with a grain of salt given that it it is far from clear that the EFT formalism covers all BSM scenarios (counterexample in Little Higgs model)  B factories can add a crucial piece of information since these results also depend on loops which can be affected differently by BSM exchanges (e.g. flavour non diagonal Z’ in Bs->µµ) F. Richard February

F. Richard February BACK UP SLIDES

Expected deviations F. Richard February

Little Higgs model F. Richard February

Future F. Richard February

Ref F. Richard February

T/ 1  b F. Richard February

EFT F. Richard February