From the simulation to the reconstruction: The FEDRA-MC interface Alberto Marotta University FEDERICO II & INFN - Napoli OPERA CERN, April 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ORFEOv6r3 10. GeV muons This data MC comparison was made with the last version of ORFEO. Here a new version of the smearing tool is implemented, this is.
Advertisements

A Package For Tracking Validation Chris Meyer UC Santa Cruz July 6, 2007.
IMPACT OF WATER OPTICAL PROPERTIES ON RECONSTRUCTION: HINTS FROM THE OB DATA. A PRELIMINARY STUDY ANTARES Collaboration Meeting CERN, February 07 th -10.
Status Report on the performances of a magnetized ECC (“MECC”) detector Pasquale Migliozzi INFN – Napoli L.S.Esposito,A.Longhin,M.Komatsu, A.Marotta G.De.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.
Physics coordination 21/1/09 D.Autiero, S.Dusini Introduction.
Jean Favier OPERA Meeting Ankara 3/04/09 1 Some ECC features studied with GenIma Efficiency with no fog Efficiencies with fog Micro-track number versus.
MonteCarlo simulation of neutrino interactions in PEANUT Giovanni De Lellis on behalf of Alberto Marotta and Andrea Russo Naples University.
OPERA Collaboration Meeting, Januray 2009 Status of OpEmuRec L.Chaussard 1) I/O and management of algorithms 2) Implementation of algorithms 3) Pending.
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT G.D.L., Andrea Russo, Luca Scotto Lavina Naples University.
Status of the Software and MC production Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de L’accélérateur Linéaire.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
Simulations Progress at Regina ➔ Event generation with genr8 – output in ascii format ➔ Conversion to either HDFast input (stdhep) or HDGeant input (hddm)
Root, GLAST, and IDL Heather Kelly NASA/GSFC Emergent Corporation.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
26 Jan, MEG Software Status Framework for MEG MC, Unification of LargePrototype/beam test, Schedule and DC reconstruction MEG Software Group.
Jean Favier LAPP OPERA meeting Hamburg 5/06/04 GenIma: program to simulate emulsions.
Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04 Why Monte-Carlo ? To understand and separate influences of parameters (ex: fog d, distorsions,m.i.p.
Software Tools in GLD study Akiya Miyamoto KEK For Orsay Software Workshop 2 May, Based on ACFA-SIM-J activities K.Fujii 2, Y.Fujishima 8, H.Hano.
ALICE Simulation Framework Ivana Hrivnacova 1 and Andreas Morsch 2 1 NPI ASCR, Rez, Czech Republic 2 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland For the ALICE Collaboration.
WATER PROPERTIES WITH RECONSTRUCED TRACKS : a look to the discriminatory power from the OB analysis H Yepes -Ramirez IFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València)
Andreas Morsch, CERN EP/AIP CHEP 2003 Simulation in ALICE Andreas Morsch For the ALICE Offline Project 2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and.
R.T. Jones, Newport News, May The GlueX Simulation Framework GEANT4 Tutorial Workshop Newport News, May 22-26, 2006 R.T. Jones, UConn Monte Carlo.
Simulations for CBM CBM-India Meeting, Jammu, 12 February 2008 V. Friese
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
1 Software tools for GLC studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK 20 April, 2004 Representing ACFA-Sim Group
GLAST LAT Offline SoftwareCore review, Jan. 17, 2001 Review of the “Core” software: Introduction Environment: THB, Thomas, Ian, Heather Geometry: Joanne.
SoLID simulation with GEMC Zhiwen Zhao 2015/03/26.
A New Tool For Measuring Detector Performance in ATLAS ● Arno Straessner – TU Dresden Matthias Schott – CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computing.
Brick Finding Package – Status Report A. Chukanov, S. Dmitrievsky, Yu. Gornushkin Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna LNGS 11 th October, 2006.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
Emulsion Simulation Y. Caffari (IPN Lyon) F. Juget (IPH Neuchatel) A. Marotta (CNRS-IN2P3 Lyon) CERN 3-5/05/2006.
OPERA Physics Coordination, CERN, 03/05/2006 Effect of  and  radiation on the on-line emulsion scanning M. Cozzi for the Bologna group.
European Scanning System: status report. DRY Fill factor 92.4 ± 1.6 % DB-driven Scan-back and Total Scan in Bari OIL Fill factor 93.1 ± 1.2 % Brick #8,
Page 1 of 18 Bjorn S. Nilsen, ALICE November 16 ITS Software meeting ITS Alignment Status Plus other things By Bjørn S. Nilsen The Ohio State University.
04/04/2008LNGS, OPERA Collaboration Meeting1 Simulation/Reconstruction Software activity of JINR group /Dmitry V.Naumov A.Chukanov, S.Dmitrievsky, Yu.
Valeri Tioukov GS May ROOT-based framework for the reconstruction of emulsions data Set of tools for storage, interactive reconstruction and analysis.
Javier Castillo 1 Muon Embedding Status & Open Issues PWG3 - CERN - 15/02/2011.
SIlicon VErtex TrAcker Rather than fixed common geometry the common analysis and simulation tools are needed. Such software package should provide : 
Software and Computing Status of Software development and MC production OpRoot-Fedra MC interface New CVS server Computing resources at CERN: present and.
Electron Reconstruction through OpEmuRec Collaboration meeting 22/09/10 Florian Brunet.
Status report - Tracking code - T.Gogami 9/30/2010.
Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer.
UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 1 ATLAS Trigger Simulations Present & Future? What tools exist? What are they good for? What are the limitations?
BESF Framework Development Weidong Li
Peter Križan, Ljubljana Dec 7, 2007 Mini WS, SLAC Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Simulations for SuperBelle SuperB computing.
Status of PSD simulation in Shine Oleg Petukhov Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow NA61 Analysis/Software/Calibration meeting , Warsaw.
BES III Software: Beta Release Plan Weidong Li 19 th October 2005.
21/5/03J.E Campagne Opera Framework: Status Report.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
CMOS Pixels Sensor Simulation Preliminary Results and Plans M. Battaglia UC Berkeley and LBNL Thanks to A. Raspereza, D. Contarato, F. Gaede, A. Besson,
D. Elia (INFN Bari)ALICE Offline week / CERN Update on the SPD Offline Domenico Elia in collaboration with H. Tydesjo, A. Mastroserio Overview:
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
1 GlueX Software Oct. 21, 2004 D. Lawrence, JLab.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
MICE event viewer status - Mihailo Savic - CM 45
Software development status in Rome
Status of Brunel team and next steps
E. Barbuto, C. Bozza, A. Cioffi, M. Giorgini
Silicon Tracking with GENFIT
FEDRA operation with EmuRec
Jupiter and Satellites
MUC simulation and reconstruction
BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )
Presentation transcript:

From the simulation to the reconstruction: The FEDRA-MC interface Alberto Marotta University FEDERICO II & INFN - Napoli OPERA CERN, April 2004

Outline The main goal: an interface between the MC and FEDRA Status of the work: a first phase is completed and a tool is ready to produce simulated events, in the FEDRA input format at “base tracks level“, to test algorithms and simulate test beam Next step: an upgrade of the code to produce the FEDRA input format at “micro tracks level”

software chain OpNtuple ntuple MyAna root ASCII NEGN/Jetta OpRoot OpTreeConvert OpDigit OpRec micro tracks with smearing fedra MyBrick OpRoot to FEdra cOnverter OpRootBRICK OpRoot hits emulsion digits micro tracks

software chain Reconstruction software OpRoot to FEdra cOnverter NEGN/Jetta OpRoot OpTreeConvert OpDigit emulsion digits micro tracks with smearing electronic detectors digits Real Data & MC Data Storage

OpRootBRICK OpRootBRICK vs OpRoot Changes to the source code: (new AliGenBox.cpp and AliGenBox.h) 1. it is possible to choose the Px/Pz and Py/Pz instead of and  ; 2. it is possible to select exactly the impact surface of the beam on the brick. It is implemented the geometry of a 1-brick detector. (a new directory work to be added) The new AliGenBox.* files can be changed in the official code and the new work directory can be added without any conflict with the official OpRoot release z x y

TreeH: Header Event Number nVtx nTrack nPrimary Vert_Number Vert[3] nOut OutPdg[nOut] TreeM: Micro Track Event Layer PdgId Track X Y Z Dz Tx Ty P dE MyBrick output: microtracks

from the microtracks to the FEDRA input microtracks FEDRA smearing affine transf. pulse height x, y gaussian smearing: mean=0.  m sigma=0.5  m Tx, Ty gaussian smearing: mean=0. Rad sigma=0.013 rad a 11, a 22 gaussian: m=1.,  =0.01; a 12, a 21 gaussian: m=0.,  =0.01; b 1, b 2 gaussian: m=0.,  =1000.; NO YES acceptance window 1. Gaussian pulse height 2. Poissonian pulse height 3. Data parametrization x1x1 a 11 a 12 xb1b1 y1y1 a 21 a 22 yb2b2 NO YES NO YES ORFEO = + NO YES efficiencies micro track rejection based on data efficiencies parametrization

Outlook micro tracks and base tracks are simulated with: smearing, pulse height, affine trasformation, efficiency NEXT STEPS FEDRA input format for FEDRA at “micro tracks level“ Simulate instrumental background. Idea: use Max program to generate fog grains and Sysal to reconstruct micro tracks. Then superimpose them to the MC truth Produce an output that combines electronic and emulsion reconstruction information

The simulated FEDRA input Tree s, s1, s2: x, y, z; Tx, Ty; DZ (emulsion width); P; dE; Aid[2] Aid[0]=Event Number, Aid[1]=Geant Track Number, W (pulse height); FLAG (PdgId);