A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmic Rays and Space Weather
Advertisements

1 Belov A., Baisultanova L., Eroshenko E., Yanke V. (IZMIRAN, Russia), Mavromichalaki H. (Athens University, Greece), Pchelkin V. (PGI, Russia) Magnetospheric.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
Investigation of daily variations of cosmic ray fluxes in the beginning of 24 th solar activity cycle Ashot Chilingarian, Bagrat Mailyan IHY-ISWI Regional.
Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
NMDB Kiel Meeting, 3-5/12/2008 On the possibility to use on-line one-minute NM data of NMDB network and available from Internet satellite CR data for.
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
Petukhov I.S., Petukhov S.I. Yu.G. Shafer Institute for Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy SB RAS 21st European Cosmic Ray Symposium in Košice, Slovakia.
Las Cruces CRS April 21-22, 2011 F.B. McDonald 1, A.C. Cummings 2, E.C. Stone 2, B.C. Heikkila 3, N. Lal 3, W.R. Webber 4 1 Institute for Physical Science.
Towards a European Infrastructure for Lunar Observatories Bremen, Wednesday 23 rd March 2005 A 3D cosmic ray detector on the Moon X. Moussas University.
Solar Activities and Halloween Storms Ahmed Hady Astronomy Department Cairo University, Egypt.
Belle Tamir, Sharet High School Nitzan Atia, Tchernichovsky High School Netanya, Israel.
1 Interactive DataBase of Cosmic Ray Anisotropy (DB A10) Asipenka A.S., Belov A.V., Eroshenko E.F., Klepach E.G., Oleneva V. A., Yanke, V.G. IZMIRAN, Pushkov.
Further investigations of the July 23, 2012 extremely rare CME: What if the rare CME was Earth-directed? C. M. Ngwira 1,2, A. Pulkkinen 2, P. Wintoft 3.
SHINE 2008 June, 2008 Utah, USA Visit our Websites:
ОПАСНОСТИ МАГНИТНЫХ БУРЬ И ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ МИРОВОЙ СЕТИ НЕЙТРОННЫХ МОНИТОРОВ И МЮОННЫХ ТЕЛЕСКОПОВ ДЛЯ ПРЕДСКАЗАНИЯ ПОДХОДА К ЗЕМЛЕ МОЩНЫХ МЕЖПЛАНЕТНЫХ.
Katya Georgieva Boian Kirov Simeon Asenovski
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
CME-GEOMETRY AND COSMIC-RAY ANISOTROPY OBSERVED BY A PROTOTYPE MUON DETECTOR NETWORK K. Munakata 1, T. Kuwabara 1, J. W. Bieber 2, P. Evenson 2, R. Pyle.
SHINE Meeting, July 31 – August 4, 2006 Neutron Monitor Observations of the January 20, 2005 Ground Level Enhancement John W. Bieber 1, John Clem 1, Paul.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
ESWW10, Antwerpen, 2013 Cosmic ray variations caused by magnetic clouds in the interplanetary disturbances A. ABUNIN,M., ABUNINA, A. BELOV, E. EROSHENKO,
Title Relativistic Solar Particle Events of 19 th Solar Cycle: Modeling Study Yu.V. Balabin, E.V. Vashenuyk, B.B. Gvozdevsky Polar Geophysical.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Olga Khabarova Heliophysical Laboratory, Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation RAS (IZMIRAN), Moscow, Russia
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
K9LA Vancouver 2003 Disturbances to Propagation Carl Luetzelschwab K9LA CQ DX?Where’d everybody go?
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Statistical properties of southward IMF and its geomagnetic effectiveness X. Zhang, M. B. Moldwin Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences,
Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
CME trajectory deduced from cosmic ray measurements K. Munakata, T. Kuwabara and J. W. Bieber.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
By Dr. A. Mahrous Helwan University - EGYPT By Dr. A. Mahrous Helwan University - EGYPT.
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
1 IGY The ALERT signal of ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays: physics basis, the ways of realization and development Anashin V., Belov A.,
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
27-Day Variations Of The Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity And Anisotropy In Different Solar Magnetic Cycles ( ) M.V. Alania, A. Gil, K. Iskra, R.
Mapping high-latitude TEC fluctuations using GNSS I.I. SHAGIMURATOV (1), A. KRANKOWSKI (2), R. SIERADZKI (2), I.E. ZAKHARENKOVA (1,2), Yu.V. CHERNIAK (1),
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
Japan, ICRC 2003 Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather By Lev Dorman for INTAS team (A. Belov, L. Dorman,,
20th ESA Symposium Lev Dorman (1, 2) for the Team (A. Belov, I. Ben Israel, U. Dai, L. Dorman,, E. Eroshenko, N. Iucci, Z. Kaplan, O. Kryakunova, A. Levitin,
Radiation Storms in the Near Space Environment Mikhail Panasyuk, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics of Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Athens University – Faculty of Physics Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics Athens Neutron Monitor Station Study of the ground level enhancement of.
ENERGY ESTIMATION OF THE INTERPLANETARY PLASMA DURING STRONGEST GEOMAGNETIC STORMS OF THE CURRENT 24 SOLAR CYCLE ON MARCH 2015 The geomagnetic storms.
O N THE INFLUENCE OF THE CORONAL HOLE LATITUDE AND POLARITY ON THE GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY AND COSMIC RAY VARIATIONS Abunina Maria, IZMIRAN, Russia Abunin.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Understanding SEP properties through Neutron Monitor data modeling Neutron Monitor Network: a tool for revealing the relativistic SEP properties Ground.
It is considered that until now in the 24th cycle of solar activity 2 ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays (GLEs) are registered: on May 17,
29 ICRC, Pune, India, 2005 Geomagnetic effects on cosmic rays during the very strong magnetic storms in November 2003 and November 2004 Belov (a), L. Baisultanova.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
What is a geomagnetic storm? A very efficient exchange of energy from the solar wind into the space environment surrounding Earth; These storms result.
Extreme Event Symposium 2004 MAGNETOSPHERIC EFFECT in COSMIC RAYS DURING UNIQUE MAGNETIC STORM IN NOVEMBER Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
Effects of January 2010 stratospheric sudden warming in the low-latitude ionosphere L. Goncharenko, A. Coster, W. Rideout, MIT Haystack Observatory, USA.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
Magnetic Clouds: The Cylindrical Elliptic Approach
Presenter: Paul Evenson
Development of a GLE Alarm System Based Upon Neutron Monitors
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
Quantification of solar wind parameters from measurments by SOHO and DSCOVR spacecrafts during series of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections in the.
. Multipoint, galactic cosmic ray observations associated with a series of interplanetary coronal mass ejections: the case study of June 2015 A. Papaioannou1,
On the relative role of drift and convection-diffusion effects in the long-term CR variations on the basis of NM and satellite data Lev Dorman (1, 2) Israel.
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
Presentation transcript:

A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation (IZMIRAN), 42092, Troitsk, Moscow Region, Russia (2) Nuclear and Particle Physics Section, Physics Department, Athens University Pan/polis-Zografos Athens, Greece Solar Activity Abstract Figure 2: The X17 solar flare (upper right panel), originated from AR 808 (upper left panel) was recorded on board of GOES (lower panel) Cosmic Ray Modulation Conclusions References Belov A., Baisultanova L., Eroshenko E., Mavromichalaki H., Yanke V, Pchelkin V, Plainaki C., Mariatos G. Magnetospheric effects in cosmic rays during the unique magnetic storm on November 2003, JGR, VOL. 110, A09S20, doi: /2005JA011067, 2005 Belov, A. V., J. W. Bieber, E. A. Eroshenko, P. Evenson, R. Pyle, and V. G. Yanke, Pitch-angle features in cosmic rays in advance of severe magnetic storms: neutron monitor observations, 27-th ICRC, v.9, , 2001 Kiel M. 2nd ESA SWW (14-18 November 2005) Holland, spaceweather.net/spweather/workshops/eswwII/proc/Session4/Presentation_KEIL.ppshttp:// spaceweather.net/spweather/workshops/eswwII/proc/Session4/Presentation_KEIL.pps Papaioannou, A., M. Gerontidou, G. Mariatos,,H. Mavromichalaki, C. Plainaki, E. Eroshenko, A. Belov, V. Yanke. Unusually extreme cosmic ray events in July 2005, 2nd ESA SWW (14-18 November 2005)Holland, Papaioannou-Poster-pdf.pdfhttp:// Papaioannou-Poster-pdf.pdf  At the 22 nd of August an M5.6 flare recorded, originated from AR 798.  September was a highly energetic month as a total of 90 C- class, 32 M-class and 11 X-class flares were recorded. This period was distinguished by an X17 solar flare which was the 5 th on rank at the SOHO’s ‘monster flares’ catalogue.  Data on the solar wind velocity and IMF intensity as well as data of cosmic ray density and the ecliptic component of anisotropy together with data of the geomagnetic activity are presented for the period 20 August-29 September 2005 in Figure 3. As one can see from the behavior of all these parameters, each episode of solar activity has resulted well pronounced disturbance in the interplanetary space. Many shocks were produced, which sometimes, despite a remote source location reached at the Earth and caused strong geomagnetic storms. Each disturbance modulated galactic cosmic rays creating series of significant Forbush effects (FE). In Table 1 the main parameters are introduced, characterizing the situation on the Sun, in the interplanetary space, in the geomagnetic field and in the galactic cosmic rays during the period under consideration. Figure 3: Parameters of the solar wind (upper panel), density (A0) and anisotropy (Axy) of the CR (mid panel), and Dst and Kp indices of geomagnetic activity as well (lower panel) in August-September SSC – correspond to the moment of shock arrival at Earth.  Perturbation of the interplanetary space in August- September 2005 caused a series of modulation effects in CR, was a result of solar flare activity close to minimum of the solar cycle.  In the forming of this disturbed situation three eastern, one central and one western CMEs associated with X-ray flares took part.  Modulating effect of disturbed regions on the galactic cosmic rays revealed in the series of Forbush effects three of which are distinguished by the magnitude of CR density decrease: August (amplitude 6.4% for the CR with rigidity 10GV), 11 September (12.1%) and 15 September (5.1%). In all these cases very fast shocks arrived at Earth with the mean velocity of propagation exceeded 1100km/s . Western (22.08) and eastern (07 and 09.09) flares were very remote sources, but even in these cases the significant effects in CR and in the Earth’s magnetosphere were recorded.  In the 15 th of September, a big and long lasted pre- decrease in the CR density preceded the shock arrival, which is clearly isolated also by the longitude and pitch-angle distribution of the CR intensity. Aug Sept Figure 1:Sunspot number as index of solar activity during the last three solar cycles  The period under consideration was a very intense one as a number of strong solar events recorded. September 2005 which is at the end of the current solar cycle appears to be much more energetic compared to March 1991 which was at the maximum of the previous solar cycle.  The first effect in September’s series of events is associated with the shock arrival on 09.09, after the flare X17.0 occurred on the 7 th of September at E77 longitude. The jump of the SW velocity and IMF intensity were very small. The amplitude of the FE was only 3.2% and the geomagnetic activity was very weak.  The next disturbance on associated with the flare Х6.2 at longitude E66, was created a strong geomagnetic storm and caused a large FE with a fast decrease of the CR intensity down to ~12% and a high anisotropy of GCR (up to 5.8% in the ecliptic component of the 10 GV particles. The ejecta propagated with a velocity of 1328 km/s, the SW speed increased up to 980 km/s and the intensity of the IMF was up to 20 nT !  The last FE of this series is also related to a disturbance arrival on after the flare X1.5 from the eastern longitude, which did not produce strong changes in the parameters of interplanetary space and in the geomagnetic situation, but it led to a significant Forbush decrease (4.2%). 20 th ECRS, 5-8 September 2006, Lisboa Portugal Table I: Vm – mean velocity of the disturbance propagation from Sun to Earth; VH- product of the maximum SW velocity and IMF intensity in the fixed time near Earth; А0-the CR density variation, Аху- equatorial component of the CR anisotropy derived by GSM method from neutron monitor network; Kp и Dst – indices of geomagnetic activity.  On the 22 nd of August a series of perturbations, in the near Earth space, evolved because of the M5.6 solar flare. This resulted into a Forbush decrease on the 24 th of the month. Later on, two other shocks arrived at Earth and created two moderate magnetic storms (Кр~5-6) and two small Forbush decreases (~ 2-2.5%) on 31 August and 2 September  Usually, pitch angle anomalies in the CR distribution appear before severe magnetic storms. These anomalies are most often observed in the last hours before shock arrival, typically within 4 hours. In Fig. 5 (lower panel) the pitch-angle distribution is plotted for the 7-th hour on the 15 th of September almost two hours prior to the shock.  As one can see in Fig. 5 (upper panel), the distribution of the CR variations from different stations in September is presented by the asymptotic longitudes as it was determined by the “ring station” method. It is notable that about 3UT on the picture of the distribution is sharply changed: the narrow region of the longitudes (in a sector о ) with low CR intensity stands out against a background of the strong increase of CR variations. This peculiarity becomes to be especially well pronounced from ~6 UT – 3 hours prior the SSC. Figure 4: Behavior of the CR density (А0) and ecliptic component of the CR anisotropy (Ах-Ау) with rigidity 10 GV during 9-13(upper panel) & (lower panel) September Vertical vectors represent the north-south component of the anisotropy. Triangles mark timing of shock arriving.  The shock of 15 th of September came a little bit later then the onset of a CR density decrease, so this case appears to be a good example of pre decrease in the CR intensity Pre-Decrease of Cosmic Rays on the 15 th of September 2005 Figure 5: Distribution of the CR variations by the asymptotic longitudes after deduction of the isotropic part (red circles-decrease of intensity, yellow-increase relatively to the base value; the size of circle is proportional to the variation magnitude; vertical lines are the timing of the shocks (upper panel); pitch-angle distribution of the CR variations in two hours prior the SSC (lower panel) During the burst of solar activity in August-September 2005, close to the minimum of the current solar cycle, a big amount of powerful X-ray flares was recorded. Among them the flare X17.0 on September 7 was outstanding. Within a relatively short period (22 August – 17 September) two severe magnetic storms were recorded as well as several Forbush effects, which has been studied in this report using the hourly mean variations of the cosmic ray density and anisotropy derived from the data of the neutron monitor network. The behavior of certain characteristics of the high energy cosmic rays during these Forbush effects is being analyzed together with interplanetary disturbances and their solar sources in comparison with the variations of the geomagnetic activity. A big and long enough cosmic ray pre-decrease is selected before the shock arrival on September 15, Acknowledgments: This work is supported by the RFBR grants and , by the program of RAN Presidium ‘Neutrino Physics’, NSF grant ATM (USA & Canadian stations) and Greek grant Pythagoras II. We are also thankful to all collaborators providing continue ground level monitoring of the CR and to all researchers presenting operatively data on the satellite measurements on the internet Cosmic ray modulation in August-September 2005 August 2005 September 2005 Cosmic Ray Anisotropy  Both these eastern solar flares (X12; X6.2) followed by significant proton fluxes. The proton flux for particles >10MeV has increased up to 1000 pfu. Rosetta /SREM, was located 30 o behind the Earth at a distance ~1.3 a.u., registered a proton flux which was ~ pfu. Such great proton fluxes from the eastern flares (even if taking into account all flares with >E45 longitudes) had never before been observed.