Conditional Automation (Level 3) Use-Case Description Submitted by the Experts of OICA as Input to the IWG ITS/AD November 3, 2015 Geneva Submitted by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tennessee Practice Test #4: Signs This sign means: a. no left turn can be made here b. a left turn can be made only after stopping c. all traffic.
Advertisements

© Ricardo plc 2012 Eric Chan, Ricardo UK Ltd 21 st October 2012 SARTRE Demonstration System The research leading to these results.
OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
Automatically Commanded Steering Function
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
Definition for Levels of Automation
1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
By Ayushi Pradhan News Event: Article: New Cars Won’t Let You Sleep! By Shweta Dhadiwal Under Automobiles from Electronics For You Issue March 2010.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
Robert Brydia Project Lead, I-35 Traveler Information During Construction Texas A&M Transportation Institute WORK ZONES & LARGE TRUCKS THE CENTRAL TEXAS.
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
Section III Day 3 1 DMV Manual pgs The day has finally arrived. You are officially a licensed driver. It is such a big event that the school paper.
Document No. ITS/AD (6th ITS/AD, 03 November 2015, agenda item 3-2) INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS Automated Driving Submitted.
Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal.
1 GRPE Informal Working Group on Heavy Duty Hybrids UNITED NATIONS Report to GRPE 65 Geneva, 17 January 2013 Informal document No. GRPE (65th GRPE,
Research on HMI Homework item 1 (ACSF-01-13)
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
Autonomous Vehicle Submitted by ISO TC 22Document No. ITS/AD (8th ITS/AD, 9 March 2016, agenda item 4)
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Informal document GRRF-84-32
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system
Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07
VIAQ (Vehicle Interior Air Quality) Informal Working Group
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization
GRSG-113 Agenda point 5 – Awareness of Vulnerable Road Users proximity
Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
Submitted by OICA Document No. ITS/AD-14-07
Expansion of consideration target of ITS-AD IWG
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
DATA STORAGE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED DRIVING (DSSAD)
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Signalling of information and warnings
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
Submitted by OICA Document No. ITS/AD Rev1
ACSF B1+C functional description
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS
The comparison of warning effectiveness
Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin
Safety concept for automated driving systems
Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1
Highlights of the 177th WP.29 session and
Submitted by the Secretary
ACSF B1+C functional description
Emergency Steering Function
Interpretation of CSF warnings #2
ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
Driver initiated transition demand and system reaction
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Conditional Automation (Level 3) Use-Case Description Submitted by the Experts of OICA as Input to the IWG ITS/AD November 3, 2015 Geneva Submitted by OICADocument No. ITS/AD (6th ITS/AD, 3 November 2015, agenda item 3-2)

NOTE: Exemplary HMI - R&D is ongoing to find optimal solutions Level 3 system outline StatusSystem Off (Manual Driving) Nominal system operation Take over scenario(Warning cascade)System OFF (Manual driving) Optional takeover request Takeover demand Driver HMI (Example) Text message (Example) traffi c Lv3 Stand-byLv3 ActivateTake over! Lv3 Stand-by 03. November 2015, IWG ITS/AD, United Nations, Geneva | Slide #3

NOTE: Exemplary HMI - R&D is ongoing to find optimal solutions Illustrated version for OICA Use-Case Description of Level 3 ■ Example A : Traffic Jam Function V=0-60km/h, Highway only, Same lane only, preceding vehicle needed Driver can always override the system. Manual driving Nominal system operation Takeover scenario(Warning cascade)Manual driving Optional takeover request Takeover demand Driver *L & L control Environment monitoring Ready to resume to driving takeover*L & L control Environment monitoring SystemStand-by *L & L control Environment monitoring Stand-by HMI (Example) Lv3 Activate Takeover! Lv3 Stand-by Lv3 Stand-by Yellow or red cluster symbol Text messages in the instrument cluster Etc. Red cluster symbol Non-visual alert, like an acoustic or haptic alert *L & L control : Lateral & Longitudinal control 03. November 2015, IWG ITS/AD, United Nations, Geneva | Slide #3

NOTE: Exemplary HMI - R&D is ongoing to find optimal solutions Illustrated version for OICA Use-Case Description of Level 3 ■ Example B : Motorway driving Function V=0-130km/h, Highway only, lane change include Driver can always override the system. Manual driving Nominal system operation Takeover scenario(Warning cascade)Manual driving Optional takeover request Takeover demand Driver *L & L control Environment monitoring Ready to resume to driving takeover*L & L control Environment monitoring SystemStand-by *L & L control Environment monitoring Stand-by HMI (Example) Abcd.. Takeover! Takeover Lv3 Activate Lv3 Stand-by Lv3 Stand-by Yellow or red cluster symbol Text messages in the instrument cluster Etc. Red cluster symbol Non-visual alert, like an acoustic or haptic alert *L & L control : Lateral & Longitudinal control 03. November 2015, IWG ITS/AD, United Nations, Geneva | Slide #3

NOTE: Exemplary HMI - R&D is ongoing to find optimal solutions Illustrated version for OICA Use-Case Description of Level 3 ■ Example B : Motorway driving Function - Takeover scenario V=0-130km/h, Highway only, lane change include Driver can always override the system. Approaching Construction Zone (Warning cascade) Weather(rain) become worse (Warning cascade) Optional takeover request Takeover demandOptional takeover request Takeover demand Drivertakeover System*L & L control Environment monitoring *L & L control Environment monitoring HMI (Example) Takeover! Takeover Takeover! Takeover Takeover! Takeover Takeover! Takeover Yellow or red cluster symbol Text messages in the instrument cluster Etc. Red cluster symbol Non-visual alert, like an acoustic or haptic alert Yellow or red cluster symbol Text messages in the instrument cluster Etc. Red cluster symbol Non-visual alert, like an acoustic or haptic alert *L & L control : Lateral & Longitudinal control 03. November 2015, IWG ITS/AD, United Nations, Geneva | Slide #3