Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Search for Large Extra Dimensions at the Tevatron Bob Olivier, LPNHE Paris XXXVI ème Rencontre de Moriond Mars Search for Large Extra Dimensions.

Advertisements

Isolated Photon Cross Section at DØ Ashish Kumar State Univ of New York at Buffalo On behalf of the DØ Collaboration.

INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.

14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.

09/30/'06SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.

10/03/'06 SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi 1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.

Ali Hanks - APS Direct measurement of fragmentation photons in p+p collisions at √s = 200GeV with the PHENIX experiment Ali Hanks for the PHENIX.

Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.

DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.

Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.

A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.

Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.

November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.

Xiaoyan LinQuark Matter 2006, Shanghai, Nov , Study B and D Contributions to Non- photonic Electrons via Azimuthal Correlations between Non-

1 Low-x Meeting July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ collaboration Jet Physics at DØ.

Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,

CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.

PIC 2001 Michael Strauss The University of Oklahoma Recent Results on Jet Physics and  s XXI Physics in Collision Conference Seoul, Korea June 28, 2001.

W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.

W/Z + jets measurements at D0 On behalf of the DØ Collaboration N.Skachkov (JINR, Dubna)

Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.

Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.

August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.

16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.

Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.

HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)

Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.

Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.

Godparents: W. Wester, J. Dittman, G. Feild. The B cross section Introduction NLO calculation Previous measurements Final RUN 1 CDF measurement New theoretical.

Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.

Radiative penguins at hadron machines Kevin Stenson University of Colorado.

Hadronic Event Shapes at 7 TeV with CMS Detector S,Banerjee, G. Majumdar, MG + ETH, Zurich CMS PAS QCD M. Guchait DAE-BRNS XIX High Energy Physics.

2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)

LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.

Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.

DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.

Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.

Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.

Isolated Prompt Photon Production in Photon-Photon Collisions at  s ee = GeV T. Schörner-Sadenius on behalf of the OPAL Collaboration ICHEP 2002,

Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.

April 5, 2003Gregory A. Davis1 Jet Cross Sections From DØ Run II American Physical Society Division of Particles and Fields Philadelphia, PA April 5, 2003.

7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.

Some recent QCD results at the Tevatron N. B. Skachkov (JINR, Dubna)

Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.

Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.

Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.

October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.

Don LincolnExperimental QCD and W/Z+Jet Results 1 Recent Dijet Measurements at DØ Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ Collaboration.

April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.

Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.

Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.

Moriond QCD March 24, 2003Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D01 b-production cross-section at the TeVatron Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D0 for the CDF and D0 collaborations.

Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.

Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,

Recent QCD Measurements at the Tevatron Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for the CDF and DØ Collaborations.

QCD Prospects for ATLAS Rainer Stamen Universität Mainz On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration QCD 06 Montpellier, July 3rd 2006.

QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.

Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.

Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.

QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for.

Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.

Azimuthal Decorrelations and

Studies of prompt photon identification and 0 isolation in first p-p collisions at √s=10 TeV May 20, 2009 Meeting Frascati Raphaëlle Ichou.

Photon Cross Sections at Ecm=2TeV

W Charge Asymmetry at CDF

Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS

Katarzyna Kowalik (LBNL) For the STAR Collaboration

Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1

Presentation transcript:

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon + Jet Cross Section in p-pbar Collisions at 1.96 TeV Nikolay Skachkov JINR, Dubna On behalf of D0 Collaboration

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 This work is a natural development of the previous Run II publication: “Measurements of the isolated photon cross section in pbarp Collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B {639}, 151 (2006), where the problem of photon identification was carefully studied (more material appeared in the detector after Run I). The main background is caused by the EM-jets from QCD events in which parton jets contain high energetic -,  -,  - mesons accompanying by soft particles. Fraction of W  e events is suppressed to a level of <1%. The same methods of photon identification are used in this analysis.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 There is also another diagram that describes fragmentation into a photon. Its contribution is supressed by photon isolation criteria and drops with -growth

(The rates of collected events in these Regions are: ~34.4% in Region 1, ~30.2% in Region 2, ~20.1% in Region 3, ~13.3% in Region 4.) The corresponding “photon + jet” relative angular orientations look as follows: Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 The measurement of the triple differential cross-section for “ppbar   + jet + X” was done in 4 pseudorapidity regions, defined by the following boundaries: a) central photons with b) central jets with or forward jets with (the kinematic domain in the x – Q² plain covered by this 4 regions and the chosen range significantly extends previous “  + jet(s)” measurements of ISR-AFS-, UA2- and CDF-Collaborations.)

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007  ln(tg  )

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007  ln(tg  )

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 Fraction of direct(  +jet) / (direct(  +jet)+fragmentation) where (direct(  +jet) + fragmentation) is estimated with JETPHOX PYTHIA6 gives an estimate of gluonic Compton process fraction. JETPHOX (P.Aurenche et.al) allows to estimate fragmentaion photon effect. Fraction of qg  qg process estimated with PYTHIA

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July Leading Jet : 2. Photon: 3.  - Jet separation in  -  : 4. vertex includes at least 3 charged tracks 5. (cracks,, cosmics and W’s) 6. Events are required to pass one of the unprescaled EM-trigger General selection cuts:

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July  - candidate is an isolated cluster of energy in calorimeter layers EM1 – EM4 ( cells 0.1 x 0.1 of 2, 2, 7 and 10 rad. length)  - candidate originates from the best primary vertex: fit of: 1. center of gravity of EM cluster energy in EM1 – EM4 layers & 2. Central Preshower cluster position 4. EM fiducial cuts (internal calorimeter structure + cracks) total geometrical acceptance A=0.80 – 0.83 Photon candidate selection cuts:

8.Additional cut on the ANN output:, is applied. Three additional variables (used for the inclusive photon analysis ) 1) number of cells in EM1 (with ) 2) fraction of E deposited in EM1 (with ) 3) in the ring (0.05 ≤ R ≤ 0.4) (with ) used as input for ANN (JETNET) Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July EM fraction in calorimeter: EMFr > 0.96 (deposited E) 6.Probability of charged track matching ≤ Limit on the width of energy cluster in the finely-segmented EM3 layer (cells with 0.05 x 0.05 size) Photon candidate selection cuts:

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 Plot shows the normalized distribution of ANN output for from decay in data and MC events. ANN methods allowed to achieve a good agreement between D0 data and MC.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 The plot shows the normalized distribution for data, MC “  + jet” signal and QCD dijet “jet + jet” background events (one jet appears as EM-jet) for after application of the main selection criteria. ANN methods developed for analysis D0 data were applied to separate signal “  + jet” from background.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 The photon selection eff. as function of (statistical uncertainties are shown) overall systematical uncertainty varies within % depending on interval. It is caused by: 1. anti-track match cut: 3% 2. photon pointing cut uncertainty: 2% 3. ANN cut uncertainty: 2% 4.correction due to difference from Z→ee events: 1.5-2% 5.fitting uncertainty: <1%.

Dependence of the “  + jet” events PURITY on In Region 1. Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July N of signal events - N of bkgd events. Main purity fitting function Plot shows default fit (red full lines), statistical error band from the default fit (purple dashed lines), a band in systematic uncertainty (green dotted lines) and the total uncertainty (blue dash-dotted lines). Purity is determined from the fit of ANN output in the two MC sources (signal and background) to the data.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 PURITY uncertainty (4-10%) appears mainly due to: 1.uncertainties of fitting functions parameters; 2.choice of different forms of fitting functions; 3.choice of the binning (3.5%); 4.statistics in bin of distribution plots for data and MC events; 5. uncertainty in the choice of parameters of fragmentation functions of photon parents mesons used in Pythia generator for MC production. This uncertainty was found to be 5% at, 2% at, and 1% at.

- total integrated luminosity; - bin sizes; Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July trigger efficiency: 0.95 – 1.0; - photon selection criteria efficiency: 0.60 – 0.75; - leading jet selection criteria efficiency: from 94% to %, with syst. uncertainties of 5.7% at and 2% at. A - geometric acceptance: A = 0.80 – 0.83; N - number of selected “  + jet” events after cuts  N_ selected = 2.4*10E+6 events, what corresponds to =1.1  0.07fb-1 P - photon purity: ~0.5 – 1.0 (depends on the rapidity Region ); - unsmearing correction factor: 0.95 – 0.98;

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 Now DZero has collected almost 3 fb-1 of data (i. e. doubling every year).

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section “  + jet” cross section versus for the 4 Regions (scaled by factors 3.0 and 0.3 for Regions 1 and 4). The full (systematic  statistical) errors are shown. The curves are theoretical NLO QCD predictions from the JETPHOX program with the choice of CTEQ6.1M PDF. The data are plotted at the -weighted average of the fit function for each bin. Preliminary D0 Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 Preliminary D0 data

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 Total statistical errors are: about 0.2% % in Regions 1 and 2; about 0.3% - 21% in Regions 3 and 4. Total systematical errors are: about 11.1% % in Regions 1 and 2; about 11.2% % in Regions 3 and 4; overall normalization uncertainty is 7.8%. Total errors are: about 13.8% % in Regions 1 and 2; about 14.3% % in Regions 3 and 4. For more details see Tables of differential cross sections for different Regions.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section The main systematic uncertainties for the triple differential cross section measured in Region 1. Region 1 Preliminary D0 data Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section The main systematic uncertainties for the triple differential cross section measured in Region 3. Region 3 Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 Preliminary D0 data

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Theory to Data (preliminary) ratio for Reg.1 and Reg. 2 Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Theory to Data (preliminary) ratio for Reg.3 and Reg. 4 Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section The ratio of the measured cross section in Regions 1 and 2 to the NLO QCD predictions done with various PDF. Statistical uncertainties are shown. Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 Region 1 Region 2

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section The ratio of the measured cross section in Regions 3 and 4 to the NLO QCD predictions done with various PDF. Statistical uncertainties are shown. Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 Region 3 Region 4

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Region 1/Region 2Region 1/Region 3 The ratio of the differential cross sections in Region 1 to Region 2 (left). Right plot is the ratio of cross sections in Region 1 to Region 3. Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Region 2/Region 3Region 3/Region 4 The ratio of the differential cross sections in Region 2 to Region 3 (left). Right plot is the ratio of cross sections in Region 3 to Region 4. Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 Summary 1.D0 performed a measurement of triple differential cross section of “  +jet” events production with high statistics: = 2.4*10E+6, i.e. =1.1fb-1  (~34.4% in Region 1, ~30.2% in Region 2, ~20.1% in Region 3, ~13.3% in Region 4). 2. Preliminary data (that show 5 orders of magnitude variation in the cross section) qualitatively fit to QCD NLO predictions in four kinematical regions defined by photon and jet pseudorapidities. The dependence of Data/Theory ratio on PDFs and QCD scale parameters choice is studied. 3.Nevertheless, the ratios of cross sections from different pseudorapidity Regions (especially between Regions 1 and 3 as well as between Regions 2 and 3) show a noticeable deviation from theory predictions.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 TABLE I: Differential cross section for Region 1 with statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 TABLE II: Differential cross section for Region 2 with statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 TABLE III: Differential cross section for Region 3 with statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 TABLE IV: Differential cross section for Region 4 with statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 TABLE V: Ratio of differential cross sections in Region 1 to Region 2 with statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 TABLE VI: Ratio of differential cross sections in Region 1 to Region 3 with statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 TABLE VII: Ratio of differential cross sections in Region 2 to Region 3 with statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 TABLE VIII: Ratio of differential cross sections in Region 3 to Region 4 with statistical and systematic uncertainties.