Update on searches for ZZ signal in the 3 electron channel Azeddine Kasmi Bob Kehoe Many Thanks to: David, Pavel, Julia LO NLO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.
Advertisements

Possible Higgs searches at LHCb A preliminary study investigating the feasibility of finding the SM Higgs at LHCb Jonathan Anderson (UCD)
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
Higgs Detection Sensitivity from GGF H  WW Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ATLAS Higgs Meeting October 3, 2008.
ADR for Massimiliano Chiorboli Universita’ and INFN Catania
1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech 04 December 2007.
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
Some D0 Meeting December 2003 Muon Isolation Update Ken Johns University of Arizona.
1 Techincolor and Heavy Top/B search Tulika Bose Meenakshi Narain (Brown University) Work done in the context of Les Houches 2007.
1 4 th June 2007 C.P. Ward Update on ZZ->llnunu Analysis and Sensitivity to Anomalous Couplings Tom Barber, Richard Batley, Pat Ward University of Cambridge.
Di-Lepton Channel in ATLAS S. Tokár, Comenius Univ. Bratislava 9/10/2015S. Tokár, Cz-Sk meeting, Košice1.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
Multijet Resonances or how we could totally miss the new physics Amitabh Lath Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey with Sunny Chuang, Rouven Essig,
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
10 TeV Updates on Efficiencies and Event Shapes Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona) Single lepton + jets channel.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
F. Ahmadov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Institute of Physics, ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan 41th ITEP Winter School of Physics February.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
INCLUSIVE STANDARD MODEL HIGGS SEARCHES HIGGS SEARCHES WITH ATLAS Francesco Polci LAL Orsay On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. SUSY08 – Seoul (Korea)
Slides for EB3. Left Problems from EB2 1. Why muon triggers are not used in e  channel? 2. Add backgrounds estimation for signal search region 3. Add.
Lake Louise (February 2002) Ivo van Vulpen 1 Z boson pair production Ivo van Vulpen Outline: LEP and its operation between ZZ production & final.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
Jet Prob optimization for the s-channel search Hideki Maehashi University of Tsukuba 7/28/2008 Contents 1.Single Top Search 2.Jet Probability 3.Event Selection.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Summary of Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal, University of Udine Top Working Group, CERN October 29 th, 2003.
1 Diboson production with CMS Vuko Brigljevic Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Physics at LHC Cracow, July
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
EPS Manchester Daniela Bortoletto Associated Production for the Standard Model Higgs at CDF D. Bortoletto Purdue University Outline: Higgs at the.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
W→e and W→e +jets: a data-driven selection method By Alessandro Tricoli ATLAS UK SM Meeting 4 th June 2008 In Collaboration with M. Wielers (RAL) D. Prieur.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
1 Donatella Lucchesi July 22, 2010 Standard Model High Mass Higgs Searches at CDF Donatella Lucchesi For the CDF Collaboration University and INFN of Padova.
Top quark pair cross-section D0 (1 fb -1 results) Viatcheslav Sharyy for D0 collaborations CEA-Saclay / IRFU/ SPP ● Introduction ● Dilepton.
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
Update on Invisible Higgs analysis in the tth channel
15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting
Proposals for near-future BG determinations from control regions
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
Top quark search update
Stop->4 bodies signal samples with 2 leptons in final state
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Bose-Einstein correlations in 8 TeV DATA with jets
Update: High energy photon pairs Search for RS-1 Gravitons
H->ZZ->4l update
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
Generation of samples for VBF H0-->ZZ*-->bbll
Prospects for sparticle reconstruction at new SUSY benchmark points
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
 WW / ZZ separation Some clarification on
Higgs Vector Boson Fusion Production and Detection at the Tevatron
ZZ→llnn Analysis Thomas Barber University of Cambridge
ttbar Cross-Section Studies leading to ttbar Resonance
SUSY particles searches with R-parity violation at DØ, Tevatron
Study of Hb`b, c`c and gg in the `H channel
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Update on searches for ZZ signal in the 3 electron channel Azeddine Kasmi Bob Kehoe Many Thanks to: David, Pavel, Julia LO NLO

OUTLINE A search for the non-resonant ZZ signal in the ZZ  3e channel was carried out. Pt, E T miss, Isolation and Z mass cuts were used to reduce the WZ, ttbar, and Zbb backgrounds. The signal efficiencies and background rejections will be shown Conclusion and Future Plan

PT of Electrons Zbb (left) ZZ (right)

PT of Electrons WZ (left) ttbar (right)

Signal and Background after Pt cuts SignalCross Section (fb)  = 3 rec ele/truth Events with 3 ele Pt>7 & one Pt >20  *  ( fb ) ZZ  4e (NLO) 19 fb33 %6 BackgroundCross Section (fb) Ratio Bkg : Signal Ratio Bkg : Signal WZ  3e + X19010:125 %478:1 tt  3e + X :13 %24040:1 Zbb  3e + X :110 % :1

Signal + Background (scaled) Zbb  3l Omitted ttbar WZ ZZ

E T miss in signal and Background WZ ttbar Zbb ZZ M 3e E T miss

E T miss in signal and Background vs M 3e Zbb WZ ttbar ZZ E T miss M 3e E T miss

Pt cut & E T miss < 20 GeV Zbb Omitted ZZ ttbar WZ

Signal Efficiency and Background Rejection of E T miss E T miss ZZ (on shell) Signal Efficiency WZ Efficiency ttbar Efficiency Zbb Efficiency 20 GeV87%13 %6 %68%

So far ET miss is a good cut to reduce the WZ and ttbar background Further background reduction needs to be done Zbb  3l remains dominant

Signal and Background after Pt cuts & E T miss SignalCross Section (fb)  = 3 e/truth Events with 3 ele Pt>7 & one Pt >20  *  ( fb ) ZZ  4e (NLO) 19 fb33 %6Pt cut Pt cut & E T miss cut BackgroundCross Section (fb) Ratio Bkg : Signal Ratio Bkg : Signal Ratio Bkg : Signal WZ  3e + X19010:125 %478:1 1:1 tt  3e + X :13 %24040:1 3:1 Zbb  3e + X :110 % :1 196:1

Isolation The electrons from ZZ should be isolated unlike the electrons from Zbb Etcone 30 cut may be used to discriminate the Zbb

Isolation Etcone/Et in case of Zbb (left) ZZ (right) b electron Cut on 0.2

Isolation Etcone/Et in case of ttbar (left) WZ (right)

Pt cut & E T miss < 20 GeV & etcone/et <0.2 Zbb ZZ WZ ttbar

Signal and Background after Pt cuts & E T miss & Isolation SignalCross Section (fb) 3 electrons Pt>7 & one Pt >20  *  ( fb ) E T miss & Isolation ZZ  4e (NLO) 19 fb33 %6Pt cuts Signal Efficiency 77 % BackgroundCross Section (fb) Ratio Bkg : Signal Ratio Bkg : Signal Ratio Bkg : Signal WZ  3e + X19010:125 %478:1 1:1 90% Rejection tt  3e + X :13 %24040:1 1:2 99% Rejection Zbb  3e + X :110 % :1 52:1 (84% Rejection)

Use Z mass as a cut  Find which combination of 2 electrons makes a Z for both samples ZZ and Zbb  Define a variable Z_Best which takes the closest invariant mass to PDG Z of 1&3 or 2&3  This Z_Best will be used to distinguish between ZZ and Zbb Z Z e1 e3 e2 e4 Z e1 e2 b b

Mz12 (left) && Z_Best (right) Zbb_Mz12 (not scaled) ZZ_Mz12 Zbb_Z_Best (not scaled) ZZ_Z_Best

Mz12 vs Mz_Best ZZ Zbb

Pt cut & E T miss < 20 GeV & etcone/et <0.2 |Mz PDG – Z_Best| < 20 GeV Sig_eff = 51 % Bkg_rej = 94% Bkg:sig = 30:1

Z_Best vs Isolation ZZ Zbb This shows the M_ZBest as a function of the isolation of the 3 rd leading electron in both cases ZZ and Zbb.

Pt cut & E T miss < 20 GeV & Isolation on 3 rd leading electron < 0.1 |Mz PDG – Z_Best| < 10 GeV Sig_eff = 40 % Bkg_rej = 98% Bkg:sig = 15:1

Conclusion && Future Plan The E T miss is good in case of WZ and ttbar background. Zbb was reduced considerably but still not enough. Looking for another cut to reduce Zbb is crucial.  Cut on jets: the Zbb event has two leading jets from the b-quarks give some discrimination power  Try to find the 4 th candidate electron to use it to find the second Z peak Optimize the cuts Try the analysis for L= 1 fb fb -1 Higher statistics for ttbar