Measurements of Intense Proton Beams using Optical Transition Radiation Vic Scarpine, Fermilab TIPP 2011 Chicago, IL June 10, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AP-0 Target Hall Experience Fermilab Anti-Proton Source P. Hurh ( ) Mechanical Support Dept. Fermilab Anti-Proton Source P. Hurh ( ) Mechanical.
Advertisements

FNAL Emittance Devices Flying Wires (FW) Sync Lite Ion Profile Monitors (IPM) aah,6/20/2000.
R Scrivens, CERN, ABI Workshop, 12/2008 The Feschenko Bunch Shape Monitor User experience at CERN Developed by INR, Troitsk. High resolution bunch shape.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
TUPD02 BEAM DIAGNOSTICS FOR THE ESS BLM BPM Trans Profile Bunch Shape BCM Preliminary System Count A. Jansson, L. Tchelidze, ESS AB, Lund, Sweden Hybrid.
Technical studies for the HIE- ISOLDE Frontend upgrade Jacobo Montaño Marie Curie Fellow; CATHI Project * The research project has been supported by a.
Scanning Electron Microscope Jamie Goings. Theory Conventional microscopes use light and glass lenses SEM uses electrons and magnetic lenses to create.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Two-dimensional and wide dynamic range profile monitor using OTR/fluorescence screens for diagnosing beam halo of intense proton beam Y. Hashimoto, T.
The 2nd Tevatron Electron Lens and tests of a new electron gun in the framework of Beam-Beam Compensation project Yu. Alexahin, V. Kamerdzhiev, G. Kuznetsov,
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 2 February 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
1 Electron Cloud Measurements at the Fermilab Main Injector Bob Zwaska Fermilab ECloud07 Workshop April 9, 2007.
F Optical Transition Radiation (OTR) Detectors for Beam Diagnostics Vic Scarpine Instrumentation Department Accelerator Division Jan. 17, 2006.
1 Proposal for a Multi-Optical Transition Radiation System in ATF2 A. Faus-Golfe, D. McCormick IFIC – SLAC 11 June th TB/SGC Meeting.
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
Particle Accelerators
Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Specifications for NuMI Primary Beam Instrumentation.
9/25/031 First Tests of an Optical Transition Radiation Detector for High-Intensity Proton Beams at FNAL September 25, 2003 Vic Scarpine.
Proton Plans at Fermilab Robert Zwaska - Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson- DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook University May 5, 2006 Outline.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
Optical diagnostics for beam halo (I) Coronagraph (II) OTR halo monitor for J-PARC T. Mitsuhashi, KEK.
Recycler Status and Plans Shekhar Mishra MID/Beams Division Fermilab AAC Review 2/4/03 Introduction to the Recycler Ring Recycler Improvements and status.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Transverse Profiling of an Intense FEL X-Ray Beam Using a Probe Electron Beam Patrick Krejcik SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
NuMI NBI03 November 7-11, 2003 FNAL thin beam windows Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 FNAL experience with thin beam windows Issue is: Survival of window in high.
Transverse beam size measurement High energy micron electron beam non-invasive diagnostics based on diffraction radiation G.Naumenko*, A.Potylitsyn, L.Sukhikh.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
Extraction from the Delivery Ring November 19, 2013 J. Morgan.
Diagnostics in the Fermilab Proton Source (Linac + Booster) Eric Prebys FNAL Beams Division.
Check lists to mouse clicks Automation Session : WAO The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research laboratory,
SEM Scanning Electron Microscope
SPATIAL RESOLUTION OF NON- INVASIVE BEAM PROFILE MONITORBASED ON OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION A.P. Potylitsyn Tomsk Polytechnic University, , pr.
The Stripping Foil Test Stand in the Linac4 Transfer Line
A. Leveling - Fermilab Recent Operating Experience at the Antiproton Source Target Hall 3 rd High Power Targetry Workshop September 12, 2007 Fermilab Accelerator.
October, 2009 Internal Review Beam Instrumentation David Gassner.
NuMI Primary BooNE / NuMI S. Childress (FNAL) Primary Beams for Mini-BooNE & NuMI 18 March, 2002 Mini-BooNE inputs from Craig Moore and Al Russell Includes.
Multi-OTR Status A.Faus-Golfe, J.Alabau, C.Blanch, J.V.Civera, J.J.García Garrigós IFIC (CSIC-UV) D.McCormick, G.White, J. Cruz SLAC aand KEK team.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagnostics Hao Zhang University of Maryland/University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute.
NON-INTERCEPTING DIAGNOSTIC FOR HIGH BRIGHTNESS ELECTRON BEAMS USING OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION INTERFERENCE (ODRI) A. Cianchi #1,2, M. Castellano 3,
Run II PMG 1/19/06 Pushpa Bhat 1 Run II Upgrades Status January 2006 Pushpa Bhat.
Recycler Flying Wires Martin Hu Recycler Department.
Proton Planning Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
High Intensity Beam Test of Beryllium for Target and Beam Window Applications Presented by: Brian Hartsell Contributors: Kavin Ammigan, Patrick Hurh NBI.
Challenges in Beam Instrumentation Rhodri Jones (BE/BI) LIU-2011 Event, 25 November 2011, CERN.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Development of a Single Ion Detector for Radiation Track Structure Studies F. Vasi, M. Casiraghi, R. Schulte, V. Bashkirov.
Brian Drendel January 24, Mu2e News Beam Delivery and Requirements Beam Intensity & Loss Measurements  DCCT  Toroids  Ion Chambers  Wall Current.
Beam on Target Diagnostics Beam on Target Meeting 2013 March Tom Shea.
HB2008 – WG F: 27 Aug. S. Childress – Diagnostics_2MW 1 NuMI Beam Diagnostics and Control Steps to 2 MW S. Childress Fermilab.
ESS | Non-Invasive Beam Profile Measurements| | C. Böhme Non-Invasive Beam Profile Measurement Overview of evaluated methods.
Maximum Credible Beam Loss in the Main Injector D. Capista January 26, 2012.
Requirements from BI and new instruments after LS1 LHC Optics Measurement and Correction Review; B.Dehning 1 Bernd Dehning CERN BE/BI
ODR Diagnostics for Hadron Colliders Tanaji Sen APC.
Primary Design Parameters July 13,2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Besides design specifications driven by physics and Main Injector beam parameters, significant.
ATF2 Status N.Terunuma, KEK
Polarized Injector Update
Emittance measurements for LI2FE electron beams
E-beam scanner experience at FNAL
Analysis of optical IPM data
Summary of experience with Tevatron synchrotron light diagnostics
at Royal Holloway Univ. London
High resolution profile measurements
Beam Tests of Ionization Chambers for the NuMI Neutrino Beam Monitoring System MINOS.
Proton Beam Diagnostics
Transverse emittance measurements
Diagnostics RF and Feedback
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Presentation transcript:

Measurements of Intense Proton Beams using Optical Transition Radiation Vic Scarpine, Fermilab TIPP 2011 Chicago, IL June 10, 2011

Transverse Beam Profile Methods for Protons Invasive: 1.Wires –Single scanning wire – multi-pulse profiling –Multi-wire – Single pulse profiling but more beam loss –Survival? Non-invasive: 1.IPM – Ionization Profile Monitor – can be single pulse; expensive 2.Electron Wire – can be single pulse; expensive 3.Beam Fluorescence – similar to IPM but usually multi-pulse Another possible invasive method is Optical Transition Radiation (OTR) –Why consider it? 6/10/2011V. Scarpine - Fermilab2

3 Optical Transition Radiation OTR is generated when a charged- particle beam transits the interface of two media with different dielectric constants –Surface phenomena OTR detectors are primary beam instruments for electron machines –Far-field and Near-field imaging A number of labs using OTR for proton profiling –CERN, JPARC Fermilab has developed a generic OTR detector for proton and antiproton beams Far-field imaging Near-field imaging 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab4 Proton/Pbar OTR Detectors at FNAL Fermilab Accelerator Complex Linac Booster Main Injector Tevatron Pbar Production NuMI 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab5 Proton/Pbar OTR Detectors at FNAL TeV OTR –Next to IPM –150 GeV Proton & Pbar Injections 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab6 Proton/Pbar OTR Detectors at FNAL TeV OTR –Next to IPM –150 GeV Proton & Pbar Injections A150 OTR –150 GeV Pbars –Emittance 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab7 Proton/Pbar OTR Detectors at FNAL TeV OTR –Next to IPM –150 GeV Proton & Pbar Injections A150 OTR –150 GeV Pbars –Emittance AP1 OTR –Up to 8e GeV protons at ~0.5 Hz 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab8 Proton/Pbar OTR Detectors at FNAL TeV OTR –Next to IPM –150 GeV Proton & Pbar Injections A150 OTR –150 GeV Pbars –Emittance AP1 OTR –Up to 8e GeV protons at ~0.5 Hz NuMI OTR –Up to ~4e GeV protons at ~0.5 Hz 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab9 Diagram of Generic OTR Detector Radiation hardened CID camera –~130  m pixels at foil Near field/far field focusing Tiltable camera to maintain focus across foil (Scheimpflug condition) Neutral density filter wheels with polarizers –~x1000 intensity range Bidirectional beam measurements with selectable foils –5 to 6  m aluminized Mylar or Kapton foils –Foils replaceable in-situ –85 mm clear aperture Vacuum certified to few /10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab10 OTR detector just in front of shield wall –Next to target SEM profile monitor 6  m aluminized Kapton –~1200 angstroms of aluminum Two foil design –Primary and Secondary foils Primary foil : ~6.5e19 protons Near-field and far-field imaging Measure beam shape for every pulse Operating at ~2e13 to 4e GeV protons per pulse at ~0.5 Hz –Beam size  ~ 1 mm –Up to 350 kW beam power NuMI OTR Detector SEM OTR 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab11 NuMI OTR Commissioning Real-time pulse-by- pulse OTR data analysis Gaussian fits to profiles -> centroid, sigma, intensity, 2D tilt, ellipticity Auto-saving every 1000 th beam OTR image -> tracking foil lifetime Front-End Controls Display 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab12 Image Processing Camera is asynchronous to beam arrival Use three images to reconstruct beam image Filter image to remove noise Sum = I1 + I2 – 2*I3 Three interlaced images Filtered Image 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab13 Apply Image Calibration Fiducial holes in foil give: Scale Orientation Perspective correction 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab14 Images Over Intensity Beam intensities of 2.4e13 and 4.1e13 Gaussian fits to beam projections Higher intensity beam has larger ellipticity and beam tilt This show an advantage of a 2-D imaging device over 1-D profile monitors 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab15 Beam Centroids, OTR vs SEM Monitor OTR and SEM over many days Compare X and Y beam centroid shapes OTR and SEM give similar beam centroid positions High Intensity Beam High Intensity Beam 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab16 Beam , OTR vs SEM xx yy Detectors track each other but… calibration error? aging foil? 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab17 Foils Damage Under Intense Beams Any darkening of foil or distortion of foil shape changes OTR distribution and intensity and hence the measurement of beam shape The left photograph is of a 3 mil thick titanium vacuum window exposed to over GeV protons. The center photograph is a similar vacuum window exposed to ~3x GeV protons but with a smaller beam spot size. The right photograph is of our prototype OTR 20  m aluminum foil exposed to ~ GeV protons with a larger beam spot size. 6/10/2011 Vacuum Windows OTR Foil

V. Scarpine - Fermilab18 Is NuMI Foil Changing with Time? Compare horizontal values of  from OTR and SEM over ~80 day time period from primary foil OTR  appears to be slowly drifting away from SEM  value Is the OTR primary foil aging? 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab19 Primary Foil Aging? Operate primary foil ~3 months of continuous beam ~6.5e19 protons Insert secondary foil under similar beam conditions Secondary foil generating ~25% more OTR Is aluminized Kapton sputtering away? 6/10/2011

Damage to NuMI Aluminized Kapton Foil Aluminum SideKapton Side 6/10/2011V. Scarpine - Fermilab20 ~ 6.5e GeV protons

Forward OTR Detector 6/10/2011V. Scarpine - Fermilab21 Utilize target vacuum window as OTR generator Eliminate reflection of material Less light collected than reverse OTR Compensate with amplified camera

V. Scarpine - Fermilab22 Conclusion NuMI OTR has operated for ~6.5e19 protons Beam position and  measured for every pulse Primary 6  m aluminized Kapton foil shows aging –Data shows aging effects –Foil show reflection changes and mechanical distortion Switch to forward OTR detection –Utilize vacuum window as OTR generator –Eliminate reflection effect –Limited light collection 6/10/2011

extra 6/10/2011V. Scarpine - Fermilab23

V. Scarpine - Fermilab24 Beam Centroid vs Intensity X and Y beam centroid changes slightly with beam intensity Note: difference in OTR and SEM mean position due to difference in (0,0) reference points. 6/10/2011

V. Scarpine - Fermilab25 Beam  vs Intensity OTR and SEM track each other with intensity but OTR has more scatter. Improvements in image processing may reduce scatter. 6/10/2011