July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1/L2 Trigger Algorithms L1-DAQ Trigger Farms, July 22, 2002 F.Teubert on behalf of the Trigger Software.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.

Advertisements

Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.

Measuring the bb cross- section using B  D o X   decays Liming Zhang & Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.

B Tagging with CMS Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa B  Workshop Helsinki 29 May – 1 June 2002.

More on making fake TT clusters More creating Fake TT clusters We can compute the number of combinations instead of the purity (following all the possible.

7 Nov 2002Niels Tuning - Vertex A vertex trigger for LHCb The trigger for LHCb ….. and the use of the Si vertex detector at the first and second.

Outline: HLT overview Objectives of muon+hadron Algorithm flow Selection parameters Monitoring Summary required Determination of parameters Antonio Pérez-Calero.

High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.

B triggering Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa Consorzio CMS Italia Firenze 7 Sept

CMS High Level Trigger Selection Giuseppe Bagliesi INFN-Pisa On behalf of the CMS collaboration EPS-HEP 2003 Aachen, Germany.

The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …

27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.

September 27, 2005FAKT 2005, ViennaSlide 1 B-Tagging and ttH, H → bb Analysis on Fully Simulated Events in the ATLAS Experiment A.H. Wildauer Universität.

Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.

Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT S. Blusk Sept 02, 2009 SU Group Meeting.

Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire, Orsay, France and CERN Olivier Callot on behalf of the LHCb collaboration Implementation and Performance of the.

A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.

EM shower reconstruction and located neutrino event analysis Ciro Pistillo (Bern LHEP) on behalf of the Swiss OPERA groups.

1 Track reconstruction and physics analysis in LHCb Outline Introduction to the LHCb experiment Track reconstruction → finding and fitting Physics analysis.

1 T1-T3 in L1 algorithm  Idea (F. Teubert) Use extra tracking information to measure the large Pt that triggers the event (L1, HLT). Based in the fact.

Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.

Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.

1 T1-T3 in L1 algorithm  Outlook: I) Summary of L1-confirmation II) About the TrgForwardTracking package III) Confirming (preliminary)  L1-confirmation.

M. Poli Lener XI Spring School - "Bruno Touschek" 1 Luminosity measurements with dimuon and single muon reconstruction of Z 0 and W decays OUTLINE:  LHCb.

B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics

Difference between Roman Pots and VELO Very forward tracking is typically done using detectors located in Roman pots. They are far away from the interaction.

Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,

Methods for fast reconstruction of events Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg FutureDAQ Workshop, München March 25-26, 2004 KIP.

Cellular Automaton Method for Track Finding (HERA-B, LHCb, CBM) Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Second FutureDAQ Workshop, GSI.

CPPM (IN2P3-CNRS et Université de la Méditerranée), Marseille, France Olivier Leroy, for the Marseille group Trigger meeting, CERN19 April 2004 b-tagging.

Barbara Storaci, Wouter Hulsbergen, Nicola Serra, Niels Tuning 1.

K 0 s reconstruction in ALICE Giuseppe Lo Re INFN, Sezione di Catania, and Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Italy, March 2002.

1 Selection of non-triggering muons in J/ψ  μμ events for the calibration of the Muon System 1)Offline Selection:  use of Mass Constrained Global Fit.

Calo Calibration Meeting 29/04/2009 Plamen Hopchev, LAPP Calibration from π 0 with a converted photon.

2 nd Workshop on CKM Unitarity Triangle – April 5-9, 2003, DurhamMassimiliano Ferro-Luzzi 1 The LHCb trigger strategy and performance Overview Level-0Detectors,

A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.

1 HLT (confirmation, generic)  Idea Reconstruct only a fraction tracks In hand:  better PT estimation  signal (secondary) vertices  Data TDR DaVinci.

Tommaso Boccali SNS and INFN Pisa Vertex 2002 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 3-8 November 2002 High Level Triggers at CMS with the Tracker.

Confirming L1 decision Use: DaVinci v7r4 field 043 Idea (Teubert’s) : Most of min.bias L1 possitive trigger are due to missmeasurements of Pt (P) How mutch.

KIP Ivan Kisel, Uni-Heidelberg, RT May 2003 A Scalable 1 MHz Trigger Farm Prototype with Event-Coherent DMA Input V. Lindenstruth, D. Atanasov,

LHCb trigger: algorithms and performance Hugo Ruiz Institut de Ciències del Cosmos March 12 th -17 th 2009, Tsukuba, Japan On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.

Trigger Strategy and Performance of the LHCb Detector Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) Thursday 7 th July 2005.

Electron and Photon HLT alley M. Witek K. Senderowska, A. Żurański.

 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.

1 HLT (generic)  Data TDR DaVinci v9r3 DC04 DaVici v12r0 DC04 DaVici v12r1  Outlook! # of track candidates!!! Comparation DC04 & TDR data  L1 does a.

Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.

More technical description:

Converted photons efficiency

Converted photons efficiency

The LHC collider in Geneva

VELO systematics and physics LHCb VELO meeting, CERN, 28 March 2008

The Level-0 Calorimeter Trigger and the software triggers

High Level Trigger for rare decays at LHCb

on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

The LHCb Trigger Niko Neufeld CERN, PH.

Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger

LHCb Trigger, Online and related Electronics

LHCb Particle Identification and Performance

8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and

The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001

Missing B-tracks in L1 trigger

on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

Summary of validation studies of the simplified geometry

Trigger Strategy and Performance of the LHCb Detector

Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).

LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:

Northern Illinois University / NICADD

Presentation transcript:

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1/L2 Trigger Algorithms L1-DAQ Trigger Farms, July 22, 2002 F.Teubert on behalf of the Trigger Software group Introduction L1 Algorithm L2 algorithm Summary

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert Introduction Minimum bias vs B-events: L0 Pileup Veto (VELO) (VELO) Track,  s properties L0 High Pt tracks,  s (CAL0/MUON) (CAL0/MUON) L1 Impact parameter and high Pt tracks. (VELO + TT1 + L0) Event properties L2 Secondary vertex Lifetime (VELO) (time consuming) Mass (VELO+STs) (precision) 10 MHz 1 MHz 40 kHz 5 kHz 0.2 kHz

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1 Algorithm The L1 algorithm under development is based on: m 2D VELO tracks + Primary vertex reconstruction (~4 ms) m About 10 3D-tracks (~2 ms) to be extrapolated to TT1 and/or matched to L0 objects (~0.5 ms) matched to L0 objects (~0.5 ms) m Assign b-event probability based on Impact parameter and Pt. Input Data:

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1 Algorithm Performance Pt from TT1  Pt/Pt ~ 25 % Pt from L0+VELO  Pt/Pt ~ 3 %

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1 Algorithm Performance blue: minimum bias red: signal in acceptance define a trigger variable L1 = L1(PT1, PT2, IPS1, IPS2) where tracks are required to have impact parameter between 0.1 and 3 mm, and are ordered according to their pt. If a L0  /e remove cut on impact parameter significance.

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1 Algorithm Performance Pt from TT1 Pt from L0

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1 Algorithm Limitations L1 limitations. 1) Pileup events left over from the L0 pileup, affect L1 at low output rates (<20 kHz). Need to work on an optimized algorithm to deal with these events at L1. 2) Momentum resolution not good enough to use mass information in an effective way. What L2 can do? 1) Downstream tracking of few selected candidates to ST1-ST3. 2) Confirm L1 decision. 3) Use mass information and displaced vertex to form a b-event probability. Channel dependent cuts left to L3.

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L2 Algorithm Input # offline clusters in TT1 + IT # offline clusters in OT # offline clusters in VELO B 0 d   -  + after L0 Db v248r2 Noise+spillover+pileup+…

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L2 algorithm feasibility study Simple/fast downstream tracking:  Pt/Pt

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L2 algorithm feasibility study B.Hommels, M.Merck LHCb week (29/05/02) Efficient for P > 5 GeV 1.7 ms/track  ~20 ms/event

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L2 algorithm feasibility study Confirm L1 decision: log(ip1/  1) + log(ip2/  2) log(Pt1) + log(Pt2) Example: 40 kHz  25 kHz  (B 0 s  D - s K + ) 93%  ( B 0 d   -  + ) 95% If  Pt/Pt ~ 2% available at L1, the output rate can be reduced by a factor 2 for the same signal efficiency. + use of sec. Vertices and use of sec. Vertices and invariant mass invariant mass

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1 output rate optimization  B 0 d   +  -  B 0 s  D - s K + No L2 10 kHz 5 kHz First attempt to use secondary vertices and invariant mass at L2 (LHCb week 29/05/02)

July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert Summary L1 Algorithm: INPUT: VELO+TT1+L0 summary, total ~1500 digital clusters ALGORITHM: select few VELO tracks (~10)/event to assign Pt. Compute b-event probability using the two highest Pt tracks. PERFORMANCE: typically 80-90% signal efficiency for events finally “analyzed”, at kHz output rate.Takes per event in a 1GHz CPU today. L2 Algorithm: INPUT: VELO+TT1+ST1-3, total ~3200 offline clusters. ALGORITHM: Confirm L1 decision with  Pt/Pt ~ 2%. Select few VELO+ST1-3 tracks to form a secondary vertex, and compute invariant mass. PERFORMANCE: expect typically 80-90% signal efficiency for events finally “analyzed”, at 5-10 kHz output rate. Expect per event, but we don’t really have a measurement today.