Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC monojet measurements and interpretations David Berge, CERN, ATLAS Measurements by ATLAS and CMS ADD interpretations WIMP interpretations.
Advertisements

1 Data Analysis II Beate Heinemann UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hadron Collider Physics Summer School, Fermilab, August 2008.
Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
1 Annual Report Zongru Wan Rutgers  Proton/antiproton collisions at Fermilab  CDF detector  Tau’s - physics, decay and reconstruction  Exercise: tau.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
Electroweak Physics at the Tevatron Adam Lyon / Fermilab for the DØ and CDF collaborations 15 th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics June 2004.
Update on Pileup Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei, Mario Aletti (U. Arizona)
1 Techincolor and Heavy Top/B search Tulika Bose Meenakshi Narain (Brown University) Work done in the context of Les Houches 2007.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
22. April 2004, New Phenomena MeetingChristian Autermann - Resonant Slepton Production1 Overview R-parity violating Supersymmetry Cross section and Run.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
L. Bellagamba, Excited fermions and other searches at HERA 1 International Conference on High Energy Physics Amsterdam July 2002 Excited fermions.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
LHC France 2013, 3 rd April ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair production cross section in dilepton channel Frédéric Derue, LPNHE Paris Rencontres.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
María Cepeda (CIEMAT, Madrid) Valencia, II CPAN days 1.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
Tth study Lepton ID with BDT 2015/02/27 Yuji Sudo Kyushu University 1.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
5/28/2002UTA group meeting1 An update of top to stop analysis How to estimate W->e cross section? Why the w to e cross section I used is so big? Next Choose.
By Henry Brown Henry Brown, LHCb, IOP 10/04/13 1.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
HEP Conference 1 NMSSM Higgs Search Search for neutral NMSSM Higgs Studies at 10 TeV, and with the TeV Jehad Mousa University of.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Fixing Tau HLT (Part 1.5/2) ‏ M.Bachtis. 2 L1 Seeding Fix L1: Seeding with High Et Jet paths to increase efficiency with High Et Still using corrected.
Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Measuring the t-tbar Cross-Section in the Dilepton Channel at CDF* J. Incandela for C. Mills Jan. 17, 2008 DOE Site Visit UC Santa Barbara * PhD Thesis.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
1 Top activities in Milano. 2 Overview Study of W+jets background to semileptonic tt –I. Besana (1 st year PhD student, continuing work of diploma thesis)
Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
Benchmark analysis of tau-pairs
15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
Stop->4 bodies signal samples with 2 leptons in final state
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Top Quark Production at the Large Hadron Collider
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Observation and measurement of HW+W-
Status of the H4l CSC Note (HG2)
The others’ latest result about SUSY search with same-sign dimuon
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003

 Decay and Identification hadronic  decays No L1 track trigger  Use leptons  Choose for muon  type  type

Z     hadronic 

hadronic  Reconstruction Understanding the Tau –Reconstruction

hadronic  Reconstruction Understanding the Tau oTrack matching Tracks, pT > 1.5 in 0.5 cone 2nd, 3rd track: consider invariant mass + charge 3 prong tracking efficiency: unknown 1 prong as 3 prong: pickup tracks 3 prong as 1 prong: inefficiency

hadronic  Selection (  -type)

Signal sample and Trigger Select  had candidates: Clean, high pT muon Muon is isolated –Cut on max(E T Halo +  p T trk in 0.5) –Used cut is used in optimization of cut Require  with uncorrected ET > 10 GeV MU_TAU10_L2M0 Trigger contains muon terms at L1 and L2 L1: + 1 trigger tower (0.2x0.2 in  ) above 5 GeV CJT  -specific term at L3 a L3 track > 5 GeV Require a match of tau to trigger objects

hadronic  L  L  rigger Understanding the Tau –Reconstruction –Separation into Types –Selection using Square Cuts –Trigger Efficiency Not many taus in data Thus use QCD jets that are tau-like Checked “box”-result with profile weighting

Towards the Z  had cross-section Muon+Tau Efficiencies Isolation Trigger Efficiency Background –From: QCD W  Z  ->opposite sign! WW tt same chg = opp chg small, from MC Reject w. cuts

Backgrounds (I) –From: QCD W  Z  ->opposite sign! WW tt same chg = opp chg Reject w. cuts Additional (  > 0.5) loose mu (in fid region) Isolated track w. pT > 15 (in non-fid region) Use Z  in data  to get # of remaining events in signal

Background (II) –From: QCD W  Z  ->opposite sign! WW tt same chg = opp chg small, from MC Reject w. cuts Use MC muon, account for data efficiencies, use tau + electron efficiencies

Backgrounds (III) –From: QCD W  Z  ->opposite sign! WW tt same chg = opp chg small, from MC Reject w. cuts

The candidates in the  case …are expected to be back-to back …and have an invariant mass of the muon and tau 10<m<60 GeV

Putting the pieces together

Systematics on selection Three sources of systemtatics in selection: –JES when cut on ET/pT –Tracking efficiency for track isolation –MC modeling for shape cut JES: vary E by 10% Tracking isolation –Compare Z  MC and data Shape cuts: –Look at os – ss events, –Correct with CM efficiency  constant?

Systematic check: electrons as taus For main seletion: Take electron factor from MC Check with cross section Including electron cut  : fractor  1.3

Isolated muon Muon is isolated –Muons from Z  are like muons from Z  –Signal: use Z mm –Background: events with low MET –Used cut is used in optimized

hadronic  L  rigger Understanding the Tau –Reconstruction –Separation into Types –Selection using Square Cuts –Trigger Efficiency Not many taus in data Thus use QCD jets that are tau-like