MANJUL BAJPAI Mumbai – 08.01.2011 “DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TOPIC 7: SHAREHOLDERS’ RIGHTS AND REMEDIES….contd
Advertisements

European Order for Payment Procedure April 22nd, 2008 Mgr. Petra Novotna.
APARTMENT OWNERS NETWORK NOVEMBER o Outline the new District Court Procedure o o Service of Proceedings – Problems o Statute of Limitations – 6.
Interim measures in Russian courts in support of international arbitration: principles, procedure and the range of remedies available BRLA seminar 25 January.
What Regulations apply? The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulation, 2004 amended eight times till date. Which.
Home Owner & Debtor Protection (Scotland) Act 2010 – key issues for the advice sector, lay representatives & solicitors Eleanor Hamilton, Principal Solicitor.
MANJUL BAJPAI Indore – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND REDRESSAL OF CONSUMER GRIEVANCES IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”
RESIDENTIAL EVICTION QUICK GUIDE Due Process and Summary Procedure.
Stake Holders Broadcasters Multi System Operators (MSO) Franchisees/cable Operators (LCO) End Subscribers TRAI /Government.
Texas Real Estate Contracts 4 th Edition © 2015 OnCourse Learning.
1 Resolution of Intellectual Property Disputes VenueNovotel Bauhinia Shenzhen Hotel, China Date15 October 2008 Presented by Charmaine KOO Partner, Intellectual.
Forum Selection in Attorney-Client Agreements Anita Schläpfer.
The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC)
Dispute Regulation OBE-118, Section 3 Fall 2004 John McKinsey U.S. Civil Court system and how individuals use it to (hopefully) resolve their dispute and.
Drafting a Bullet-Proof ADR Clause: Lessons Learned
AGENCY IN LIBYA OVERVIEW.  In1971, the Agency Law permitted the Libyan nationals to carry out activities of commercial agency  In 1975, the Libyan government.
Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 [Chapter VI of Finance Act, 2013] Amnesty Scheme – Updated with Department Clarification.
APRESENTATIONTO TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (TDSAT) Presented by Presented by Jawahar Goel Jawahar GoelPresident Indian Broadcasting.
The Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic) made simple Western Suburbs Law Association Tuesday 4 June 2013 Michael Heaton.
PRESENTATION ON DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AND PROTECTION OF CONSUMER RIGHTS IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS UPAMANYU HAZARIKA Advocate HYDERABAD.
Chapter 26 Chapter 11: Plan Confirmation. Disclosure Statement Hearing The disclosure statement hearing is the first step in the Chapter 11 reorganization.
Pradeep. K Mittal Member Central Council of The Institute of Company Secretaries of India, New Delhi Advocate Delhi High Court, Delhi RENTING OF IMMOVABLE.
History, Structure and Function of the American Legal System 1 Court Systems and Practices.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims JUDr. Radka Chlebcová.
TDSAT Seminar- Guwahati, Dec of 15 Status of Disputes Settlement Mechanism in Telecom & Broadcasting Sectors in India Association of Unified Telecom.
Revenue Enforcement Legal Strategies Lawrence K. Nodine Ballard Spahr December 16, 2009.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.
MANJUL BAJPAI GOA EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.
MSO and the Regulatory Framework. TRUTH AT THE GROUND LEVEL  The charges payable by MSOs to broadcasters are fixed on mutually agreed / lump–sum amounts.
Service of documents within European Union Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
DAS - THE FUTURE REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS IN DIGITAL ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS (DAS) KUNAL TANDON ADVOCATE.
TDSAT SEMINAR Chennai 30 th August 2008 “Dispute Resolution Scenario in Telecom and Broadcasting Sector” Venue : Hotel Park Sheraton.
Jump to first page MANJUL BAJPAI M U M B A I – DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA.
VIETNAM. Judiciary COURT Commercial ARBITRATION CRIMINAL CIVIL LABOUR ECONOMICAL ADMINISTRATIVE The Rule of Law.
1 Application Process Process of Seeking Information Day 5.
Collective Bargaining. Legal Framework 1993 Industrial and Labour Relations Act Cap 269 of the Laws of Zambia: as Amended by Act.No.30 of 1997 & as Amended.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 5 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Wang Jing & Co. 敬海律师事务所 WANG JING & CO. Mr. WANG Jing 王敬 Managing Partner 管理合伙人 October 2013 Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in.
Marriage & Partnership Heather Lee & Victor Sevilla.
From GlobeCast Asia Broadcast Service contract:. From GlobeCast Asia Broadcast Service contract(Cont’d):
LW1210 – Labour Law in Canada
What Is Employment? Compare employee with agent and independent contractor Differences: Control test - Degree of control exercised over an employee is.
 Three things are necessary in order for there to be a contract: an offer, acceptance and consideration  Consideration is something promised mutually.
Recent Japanese Cases Regarding Standard Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing Declaration AIPLA-IPHC Meeting April 11, 2013 Shinji ODA Judge, Intellectual.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD – “REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM, BROADCASTING AND CABLE SERVICE SECTORS”
BY Suhail Anjum Siddiqui,Advocate B.com.(Hons)LL.B(Hons.) MBA.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: 25 Years 4 June 2010 “The Influence of the UNCITRAL Model Law in Hong Kong and China”
Eastern Mediterranean University BANK406 Corporate Banking Law and Practice CHP 6.
Private and Public law Invalidity and termination rights 1. Invalidity: is an agreement void and null or just voidable? 2. Termination of agreements 3.
ARBITRATION ACT. Challenge of arbitrator The appointment of an arbitrator may be challenged on the issues of – (i) impartiality, – (ii) independence,
AMINZ Conference August 2009 AMINZ Conference 2009 Sally Fitzgerald Partner Russell McVeagh THE ROLE OF THE AMINZ ARBITRATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL.
MECHANICS LIENS: NEW CHANGES & OLD ISSUES Ryan Hiss, Lyman & Nielsen, LLC Brienne Berscheid, Chicago Title Insurance Company.
Procedure and application.  Before the enactment of the consumer Protection Act,1986 a person aggrieved by the defective goods or deficiency in service.
DIGITAL ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS Vibhav Srivastava Advocate
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
Consumer Protection Act, 1986
MANJUL BAJPAI Lucknow –
MANJUL BAJPAI CHANDIGARH –
DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCENARIO IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS
Adjudication, Regulation, Telecommunication
First Collective Agreements
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
SETTLEMENT COMMISSION
Legal English and the Common Law AY 2017/2018
THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
STRUCTURE OF THE PRESENTATION
Presentation transcript:

MANJUL BAJPAI Mumbai – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”

»Know about TDSAT »Question – Answer Form §Question 1: §Who / what is TDSAT? §Answer 1: §Statutory Body under TRAI Act, since year §Jurisdiction over all telecom disputes. §Jurisdiction extended to Cable and Broadcasting in January, §Exclusive jurisdiction over telecom matters §Court of first instance - wide powers – any dispute §Both Appellate and Original jurisdictions.

§Question 2: Can I file a petition / case in civil courts? §Answer 2: No. Civil Court’s jurisdiction is expressly barred. §Question 3: Can I file a petition / case in TRAI? §Answer 3: No. §Question 4: Can I file a petition / case in High Court? §Answer 4: High Court has writ jurisdiction but generally they send telecom cases to TDSAT. §Question 5: Can I get my dispute settled through an Arbitrator, if my License issued by the Government / Interconnect Agreement provides for an arbitration clause? §Answer 5: No.

§Question 6: Can I approach TDSAT if I am an individual Subscriber? §Answer 6: No – Not as an individual Subscriber. But as a Group – You can approach TDSAT. §Question 7: Can I challenge the orders of TRAI? §Answer 7: Yes – 30 days limitation apply.

§Question 8: Can I approach TDSAT if an MSO or a Broadcaster is not providing me signals to start service? §Answer 8: Yes. You can. §Under 'Must provide clause‘ - every Broadcaster has to provide its TV signals to MSOs and every MSO has to provide its TV channels to Cable Operators, on non-discriminatory terms. You have to apply to MSO /Broadcaster and provide the details. TDSAT has held that §Apart from details mentioned in TRAI’s Regulations, signal provider is entitled to seek other or further information also because it should be prima facie satisfied that the franchisee would be able to perform its part of contract. Therefore, it may satisfy itself that: §the headend of the distributor has the requisite equipment §franchisee is capable of paying subscription amount. §Re subscriber base - information like: §the number of the direct subscriber SLR submitted to the petitioner by its link / sub-operators, §the declaration before entertainment / service tax authorities etc §may also be irrelevant for the purpose §But some information like subscriber base disclosed to other broadcasters need not be divulged. §Within 60 days the MSO / Broadcaster has to provide signals on mutually agreed terms or refuse, with reasons. Upon refusal you can approach TDSAT.

§Question 9: §Whether this Interconnect Agreement can be oral or should be in writing? §Answer 9: §Earlier TRAI’s Regulation recognized both oral and written agreements. §Recently in March 2009 TRAI has prescribed that the Subscription Agreement must be in writing. §It is now mandatory for MSO to hand over a copy of signed Interconnect Agreement to Cable Operator and obtain an acknowledgement within 15 days from the date of signing. §Similarly, Broadcasters are also obliged to follow the same procedure for agreements with MSOs.

§Question 10: Can I approach TDSAT if an MSO or a Broadcaster is threatening disconnection on grounds like under-declaration, non-payment of Subscription Fee etc? §Answer 10: Yes. you can. §Rule is that normally the agreed subscribers base will remain fixed except in exceptional circumstances. §Before disconnection the MSO / Broadcaster has to : §(i)give a public notice in Newspapers; and §(ii)give a specific Notice to you. §Notices have to be of 21 days - counted from the date of the latter Notice. §Similarly, if a Cable Operator wants to stop re-distributing channels of an MSO to its subscribers, he is also obliged to follow the same rules. §Recently TDSAT has held that even consumers are entitled to 21 days notice so as to enable them to either switch over to another channel and / or either individually approach an appropriate forum or as a group of consumers approach TDSAT, for ventilating their grievances. §But if you have defaulted in your payment, then you can’t take the benefit of 'Must Provide clause'. §Also if you demand Carriage Fee from a Broadcaster, then also you can’t take the benefit of 'Must Provide clause‘.

§Question 11: §Can my Broadcaster pressurize me to take signals from my competing MSO in the same Service Area? §Answer 11: §In this context, the Supreme Court has opined that: §If the MSO-Agent is a Commercial Agent only for collection of subscription fee, data etc., the agency is valid under the Regulation; §If the MSO-Agent of the Broadcaster itself is the Service Provider and that the feed is given to the Signal Seeker through the network of that MSO- Agent, the same is violative of the Regulation. §In other words, as long as the feed comes directly from the decoders, even though decoders are provided through the MSO-Agent, it is valid in law.

§Question 12: TRAI Regulation provides that the terms of the contract should be reasonable, but who has to decide the reasonableness of the terms? §Answer 12: Reasonableness of terms has to be decided by an authorized forum like TDSAT and not by any single party to the contract. §Question 13: In case of a dispute re non-provision of signals, which party should file a petition in TDSAT? §Answer 13: Operator seeking signals should negotiate with supplier of signals and in case negotiations fail, then the signal Seeker has to approach TDSAT. §Question 14: Can I file a Petition for Recovery of outstandings even after a Service Provider ceases to be a Cable Operator/ MSO? §Answer 14: Yes. In a recent judgment, TDSAT has held that although a person has ceased to be a MSO, the Petition against him would still maintainable.

§Question 15: Can I be penalized, if I violate TDSAT’s Orders? §Answer 15: Yes. §On willful failure to comply with order of TDSAT, you are liable to pay fine upto one lakh rupees. It increases in case of subsequent / continuing defaults. § Question 16: Can TDSAT pass an Interim Order? §Answer 16: Yes. §Question 17: Is there an Appeal against the Order of the TDSAT and where? §Answer 17: Appeal from TDSATs Final Orders lie directly to Supreme Court. §But only on substantial Questions of Law. §No appeal can be filed against interim Orders of TDSAT.

THANK YOU