1 Antonio Romanazzi 3D CFD study of the ATLAS (UX15) ventilation system.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CFD ANALYSIS OF CROSS FLOW AIR TO AIR TUBE TYPE HEAT EXCHANGER
Advertisements

SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Environmental Conditions in the LHC Experimental Caverns JCOV Thursday 18 th March.
1. Convergence research. Convergence (convection between multilayers of BIL and BOL)
2003 International Congress of Refrigeration, Washington, D.C., August 17-22, 2003 CFD Modeling of Heat and Moisture Transfer on a 2-D Model of a Beef.
Youngwook Kang, Cornell University Andrei Simion, The Cooper Union
Heat transfer in boilers
Copyright © Siemens AG All rights reserved. Fluistcom Project Meeting Belfast 24th of December FLUISTCOM Exchange Program at SIEMENS-Muelheim Daniele.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Computer Aided Thermal Fluid Analysis Lecture 10
Chapter 2: Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient
TS/CV/DC CFD Team CFD Simulation of a Fire in CERN Globe of Science and Innovation Sara C. Eicher CERN, CH.
Analysis of Simple Cases in Heat Transfer P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Gaining Experience !!!
Flow over an Obstruction MECH 523 Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics Presented by Srinivasan C Rasipuram.
Simulation of Air-Cooling for the Gear Unit in Pump and Turbine Generator Systems M. Fujino* and T. Sakamoto** *Information Technology Center, Nippon Institute.
Thermo-fluid Analysis of Helium cooling solutions for the HCCB TBM Presented By: Manmeet Narula Alice Ying, Manmeet Narula, Ryan Hunt and M. Abdou ITER.
Thermal Analysis of Helium- Cooled T-tube Divertor S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, Madison (June 14-15, 2005) G. W. Woodruff School.
Al 2 O 3 Post Combustion Chamber Post Combustion Chamber ANSYS Thermal Model (Embedded Fuel Grain Concept) Outer radius: 1.25” ( m) Inner radius:
ATLAS muon chambers heat transfer efficient description RFNC – VNIITF SUE «Strela» Snezhinsk, 2003
CAViDS Consortium Fan Drive CFD For CAViDS Consortium Internal Use Only 1 07/31/14 For CAViDS Consortium Internal Use Only Viscous Fan Drive 3D CFD Conjugate.
TMM of the CLIC Two-Beam Module T0 in the LAB – Proceedings to structural FEA Riku Raatikainen
Cooling design of the frequency converter for a wind power station
CFD team supports CERN development 19 May M.Battistin CERN May 19 th 2011 C omputational F luid D ynamics team C omputational F luid D ynamics team.
STEADY HEAT TRANSFER AND THERMAL RESISTANCE NETWORKS
Fouling Factor: After a period of operation the heat transfer surfaces for a heat exchanger become coated with various deposits present in flow systems,
Gyeongsang National University Hanshik Chung. CONTENTS  Background of Study  Introduction & Objective  Results and discussion  Conclusions.
TS/CV/DC CFD Team Computational Fluid Dynamics at CERN Michele Battistin CERN, Geneva - Switzerland.
1 Calorimeter Thermal Analysis with Increased Heat Loads September 28, 2009.
I-DEAS 11 TMG Thermal and ESC Flow New Features
About TIME STEP In solver option, we must define TIME STEP in flow solver.
1 Numerical study of the thermal behavior of an Nb 3 Sn high field magnet in He II Slawomir PIETROWICZ, Bertrand BAUDOUY CEA Saclay Irfu, SACM Gif-sur-Yvette.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Content  Turbulent Validation  Thermal Validation  Simple Model Test  Plans for Next Period.
CLIC Prototype Test Module 0 Super Accelerating Structure Thermal Simulation Introduction Theoretical background on water and air cooling FEA Model Conclusions.
CFX-10 Introduction Lecture 1.
M. Gomez Marzoa1 13th December 2012 PSB-Dump: first CFD simulations Enrico DA RIVA Manuel GOMEZ MARZOA 13 th December 2012.
Lecture Objectives -Finish Particle dynamics modeling -See some examples of particle tracking -Eulerian Modeling -Define deposition velocity -Fluid Dynamics.
PRESENTATION OF CFD ACTIVITIES IN CV GROUP Daniel Gasser.
STUDY OF THE AIR TEMPERATURE AND VELOCITY AROUND THE ATLAS MUON CHAMBERS Emma Vigo Castellvi ST/CV Design.
Chapter 9: Natural Convection
Atlas Muon Spectrometer: installation and commissioning L. Pontecorvo INFN Roma.
Chapter 2: Heat Conduction Equation
Some slides on UCLA LM-MHD capabilities and Preliminary Incompressible LM Jet Simulations in Muon Collider Fields Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion.
MULTLAB FEM-UNICAMP UNICAMP Workshop on Thermal Boundary Conditions Several thermal boundary conditions will be explored in this workshop modifying the.
TS/CV/DC CFD Team CFD Study of the L3 Thermal Environment Sara C. Eicher
6 th September 20061S. Eicher, M. Battistin Upgrade Thermal Management Workshop September 6 th 2006 Bdg 40 Sara Eicher, Michele Battistin CFD Calculations.
TS/CV/DC CFD Team June 2005 – CERN & CFD Presentation1M. Battistin TS/CV/Detector Cooling - CFD Team CERN June 24 th 2005 Michele Battistin CERN presentation.
Additional muon stations for the Upgrade of the Elevator Regions in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. Installation scenario, status on the installation tools.
E. Da Riva/M. Gomez Marzoa1 WG4 Meeting - 27th June 2012 Air Cooling by means of carbon fiber structure Enrico DA RIVA (EN-CV-PJ) Manuel GOMEZ MARZOA (EN-CV-PJ)
Muon barrel cooling G. Aielli and J. Godlewski LS1 TC planning.
1 Modeling of heat transfer in an accelerator superconducting coil with a ceramic insulation in supercritical helium S. Pietrowicz, B. Baudouy, CEA Saclay/
Power, Cooling, Cables, Simulations of Heat Dissipation Short overview of ongoing work on these points Technical Coordination (Rolf Lindner et al.) Cooling.
Tony Arts Carlo Benocci Patrick Rambaud
Heat Transfer by Convection
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 8 Internal flow.
Lecture Objectives: Accuracy of the Modeling Software.
Workshop 6 Electronics Cooling with Natural Convection and Radiation
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
WATER AND LEAD-BISMUTH EXPERIMENTS: FLUENT AND STAR-CD SIMULATION
Thermal-Structural Finite Element Analysis of CLIC module T0#2
Xiaomin Pang, Yanyan Chen, Xiaotao Wang, Wei Dai, Ercang Luo
ATLAS ITk CO₂ Cooling pipe routing CO₂ Meeting, 28 June 2016
ATLAS ITk CO₂ Cooling pipe routing Common Mechanics meeting
Installation plans from mid 2005
Computational Fluid Dynamic at CERN
Phoebus 2A, Nuclear Thermal Element
Heat Transfer Coefficient
Thermal behavior of the LHCb PS VFE Board
Conjugate Heat Transfer simulation of Argon Gas Heater for Argon Recirculation and Purification System in Pyroprocessing facility Sourabh Agarwal, K. Revathy.
PANDA Collaboration Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 Antonio Romanazzi 3D CFD study of the ATLAS (UX15) ventilation system

2 Agenda The 3D model The 2D simulations of Muon chambers

3 Problem specification Three dimensional model of the UX15 cavern and the main components of the ATLAS experiment to analyze: Ventilation system of UX15 cavern Temperature map around the muon chambers Bi dimensional models of the muon chamber to study: Temperature profiles on the solid part of the chambers

4 Existing 3D CATIA models has been simplified before exportation to Star-CD. Simplifications: –Muon chambers are simplified regular solids (parallelepipeds) –All solid parts are considered “empty volumes” (no conduction) –HS structure are simplified to zero-dimensional porous buffers –No cables, no services –Cavern walls are considered as adiabatic (less than 1.5 kW/ EDMS ) Main simplifications from CATIA model Original CATIA model Simplified CATIA model The mesh has been generated in Star-CD

5 3D Model generation in Star-CD From CATIA geometry we retrieved the closed surfaces on which was produced a preliminary surface mesh The volume mesh was produced with a automatic meshing system The resulting model consists of about 12,000,000 tetrahedral and hexahedral cells (hybrid mesh) Fluid domine only Once the model is finished we define the boundary conditions

6 Ventilation in UX15 2 outlets total 60,000 m 3 /h 12 inlets, 60,000 m 3 /h total air at 17°C Argon extraction has not been considered The air flow is limited by UX15 installed equipments

7 Obstacles to the air flow HS/O Platforms: To simulate the grid effect, the platforms are modeled as porous material. Flexible chains: No thermal impact

8 Heat sinks Toroids: -4.8W/m 2 Thermal screens : Fixed temperature 18 °C sectors

9 Wheels Heat generation 2 BW TGC: 12 kW per side BW MDT: 1.5 kW per side BW EO: 3 kW per side BW TGC: 5 kW per side Small Wheels: 1 kW per side Inner detector and Calorimeters: Adiabatic

10 Barrel Heat Generation BOL [W]BOS [W]BML [W]BMS [W]BIL [W]BIS [W] PADs & Splitters18,46515,76011,7589, MDT electronics 3,900 2,741 3,447 Tot (75,785 W) 22,36519,66014,49912,3673,447 Outer Layer Medium Layer Inner Layer The model is ready for computation

11 Computation Development Model generation more than 10 months Run time ≈ 4 months over 12÷20 Openlab nodes Post processing and computing time more than 6 months Development time 1,5 years Set-up Buoyancy driven flow k-ε turbulent model/low Reynolds numbers SIMPLE solver Steady state simulation Openlab CFD cluster:20 4 CPU Intel Itanium 1.6 Ghz, running IA64 Linux.

12 Results show the overall energy balance of the caverne Big Wheels=45,000 W Muon Chambers= 75,785 W Muon Barrel 112 kW Thermal Screens= -94 W Coils= W Inlet Temperature= 17 °C ∆ Flow Energy Outlet average Temperature= 22.4 °C 112 kW Flow rate = m 3 /h = 17 kg/s Cp= 1006 J/kgK

13 Results – Temperature Maps Z Sections from C to A side

14 Results – Velocity Maps Z Sections from C to A side The average velocity in the model is about 0.1 m/s

15 Air stagnation in sector 5 between level M and O Recirculation between M and O layers in sect 05 No evident effect of experiment inclination on the flow … and this has an impact on the temperature field

16 Stagnation in sector 05 should be investigated

17 Hot spots in sector 13 Surface with splitters and PADs in M and O layer Highest temperatures are on BML and BOL of sector 13, positioned on the Splitters/PADs surface. For all other sectors temperature keeps below 30°C We suggest experimental measurements in this critical area

18 Thermal Screens act on the flow pattern Heat removed by the screens: -94 W Descending flow Average temperature on the outside surface of the screen: 19°C

19 Cavern temperature gradient leads Big Wheels EO one…

20 … and the Big Wheels TGC too

21 Big Wheels MDT Air flow reduced in the big wheel’s gap

22 From 3D to 2D model At this moment we have the “environmental” condition of the cavern. We want to obtain the detail of temperature on the solid. We can get this level of detail using 2D models.

23 2D simulation on Chambers 2D models Natural/forced convection Variable flow rate adjusted to the 3D model Variable orientation of chambers Same heat load of 3D model Air at 20°C PADs are modeled detached from the chamber (highest heat load section on the chamber) Material properties from study of Snezhinsk Institute Sector 05 Sector 09 Sector 10 Sector 12

24 2D models use Evaluate the temperature map on the muons chambers with the level of detail that would not be possible in the overall 3D simulation. Two conditions have been investigated: Inlet velocity equal to the average velocity of the air inside the muons chambers volume in the 3D model. Inlet velocity equal to the minimum velocity detected in the 3D model.

25 Results from 2D Models / Example Air reference temperature / Sector Tavg RPC [°C] Tmax RPC [°C] Tavg MDT [°C] Tmax MDT [°C] ∆Tx on MDT ∆Ty on MDT Tavg MDT electronics [°C] Tmax MDT electronics [°C] Tavg PADs [°C] Tmax PADs [°C]BOL 22°C / Simulation Temperatures are corrected by 3D simulation average temperature (air reference temperature ). In this case from 20°C to 22°C.

26 Expected Temperatures on Muons Chambers at 0.1m/s Air reference temperature / Sector Tavg RPC [°C] Tmax RPC [°C] Tavg MDT [°C] Tmax MDT [°C] ∆Tx on MDT ∆Ty on MDT Tavg MDT electronic s [°C] Tmax MDT electronics [°C] Tavg PADs [°C] Tmax PADs [°C] BOLBOLBOLBOL 22°C / °C / °C / °C / BMLBMLBMLBML 21°C / °C / °C / °C / BILBILBILBIL 20°C / °C / °C / °C / Chambers position

27 Expected Temperatures on Muons Chambers at 0.1m/s Chambers position Air reference temperature / Sector Tavg RPC [°C] Tmax RPC [°C] Tavg MDT [°C] Tmax MDT [°C] ∆Tx on MDT ∆Ty on MDT Tavg MDT electronics [°C] Tmax MDT electronics [°C] Tavg PADs [°C] Tmax PADs [°C] BOSBOSBOSBOS 22°C / °C / °C / °C / BMSBMSBMSBMS 20°C / °C / °C / °C / BISBISBISBIS 20°C / °C / °C / °C /

28 How to find point with the worst thermal conditions Temperature on MDT 3D model surface used to locate “critical” positions on Z axis. Velocity conditions retrieved from the 3d model and implemented in 2D. Lowest velocity value

29 2D model with the worst air velocity conditions Air reference temperature / Sector Tavg RPC [°C] Tmax RPC [°C] Tavg MDT [°C] Tmax MDT [°C] ∆Tx on MDT ∆Ty on MDT T avg MDT electronics [°C] T max MDT electronics [°C] T avg PADs [°C] T max PADs [°C] BOLBOLBOLBOL 22°C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s BMLBMLBMLBML 21°C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s BILBILBILBIL 20°C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s Chambers position

30 2D model with the worst air velocity conditions Air reference temperature / Sector Tavg RPC [°C] Tmax RPC [°C] Tavg MDT [°C] Tmax MDT [°C] ∆Tx on MDT ∆Ty on MDT Tavg MDT electronics [°C] Tmax MDT electronics [°C] T avg PADs [°C] Tmax PADs [°C] BOSBOSBOSBOS 22°C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s BMSBMSBMSBMS 20°C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s BISBISBISBIS 20°C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s °C / m/s Chambers position

31 Temperature dependence on air flow With a flow between 0.01 and 0.1 natural convection drives heat transfer

32 CONCLUSIONS Air stagnation in sector 05 should be investigated Presence of hot spots in sector 13 suggests experimental test to verify the phenomena Natural convection process leads the heat extraction form the muons chambers. RPC average temperature should stay under 25°C.

33

34 Sect 02 Sect 10 Sect 12 Sect 04 Back to 0.1 vel Back to min vel Sect 06 Sect 14

35 Sect 05 Sect 13 Sect 01 Sect 09 Back to min velBack to 0.1 vel

36 Heat transfer on PAD P= α∙∆T∙S α≈1W/m 2 K 2400[W/m 3] ∙0.5∙0.06∙ L=1∙∆T∙(2 ∙0.5 ∙L) ∆T=P/(α ∙S)=70K 0.5m S real > S model ∆T real < ∆T model 0.06m

37 BOL - Sector m/s

38 BOL – Sector m/s

39 BOL - Sector m/s

40 BOL - Sector m/s

41 BML – Sector m/s

42 BML - Sector m/s

43 BML - Sector m/s

44 BML - Sector m/s

45 BIL – Sector m/s

46 BIL – Sector m/s

47 BIL - Sector m/s

48 BIL - Sector m/s

49 BOS - Sector m/s

50 BOS - Sector m/s

51 BOS - Sector m/s

52 BOS – Sector m/s

53 BMS - Sector m/s

54 BMS – Sector m/s

55 BMS - Sector m/s

56 BMS – Sector m/s

57 BIS – Sector m/s

58 BIS – Sector m/s

59 BIS - Sector m/s

60 BIS – Sector m/s

61 BOL - Sector m/s

62 BOL – Sector m/s

63 BOL - Sector m/s

64 BOL - Sector m/s

65 BML – Sector m/s

66 BML - Sector m/s

67 BML - Sector m/s

68 BML - Sector m/s

69 BIL – Sector m/s

70 BIL – Sector m/s

71 BIL - Sector m/s

72 BIL - Sector m/s

73 BOS - Sector m/s

74 BOS - Sector m/s

75 BOS - Sector m/s

76 BOS – Sector m/s

77 BMS - Sector m/s

78 BMS – Sector m/s

79 BMS - Sector m/s

80 BMS – Sector m/s

81 BIS – Sector m/s

82 BIS – Sector m/s

83 BIS - Sector m/s

84 BIS – Sector m/s