Repairing Sensor Network Using Mobile Robots Y. Mei, C. Xian, S. Das, Y. C. Hu and Y. H. Lu Purdue University, West Lafayette ICDCS 2006 Speaker : Shih-Yun.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geographic Routing Without Location Information AP, Sylvia, Ion, Scott and Christos.
Advertisements

1 GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks B. Karp, H. T. Kung Borrowed slides from Richard Yang.
Bidding Protocols for Deploying Mobile Sensors Reporter: Po-Chung Shih Computer Science and Information Engineering Department Fu-Jen Catholic University.
Decentralized Reactive Clustering in Sensor Networks Yingyue Xu April 26, 2015.
A Distributed Algorithm for the Dead End Problem of Location Based Routing in Sensor Networks Le Zou, Mi Lu, Zixiang Xiong, Department of Electrical Engineering,
CS710 IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology 2005 A Distributed Algorithm for the Dead End Problem of Location Based Routing in Sensor Networks Le Zou,
An Application-Specific Protocol Architecture for Wireless Microsensor Networks Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan (MIT)
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Guang Tan, Stephen A. Jarvis, and Anne-Marie Kermarrec IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, VOL. 8, NO.6, JUNE Yun-Jung Lu.
Geographic Routing Without Location Information A. Rao, S. Ratnasamy, C. Papadimitriou, S. Shenker, I. Stoica Paper and Slides by Presented by Ryan Carr.
1 Location-Aided Routing (LAR) in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Young-Bae Ko and Nitin H. Vaidya Yu-Ta Chen 2006 Advanced Wireless Network.
Coverage Preserving Redundancy Elimination in Sensor Networks Bogdan Carbunar, Ananth Grama, Jan Vitek Computer Sciences Department Purdue University West.
Ranveer Chandra , Kenneth P. Birman Department of Computer Science
TTDD: A Two-tier Data Dissemination Model for Large- scale Wireless Sensor Networks Haiyun Luo Fan Ye, Jerry Cheng Songwu Lu, Lixia Zhang UCLA CS Dept.
KAIST Adaptive Triangular Deployment Algorithm for Unattended Mobile Sensor Networks Suho Yang (September 4, 2008) Ming Ma, Yuanyuan Yang IEEE Transactions.
Span: An Energy-Efficient Coordination Algorithm for Topology Maintenance in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks ACM Wireless Networks Journal, 2002 BENJIE CHEN,
Haiyun Luo, Fan Ye, Jerry Cheng, Songwu Lu, Lixia Zhang
Differentiated Surveillance for Sensor Networks Ting Yan, Tian He, John A. Stankovic CS294-1 Jonathan Hui November 20, 2003.
Dissemination protocols for large sensor networks Fan Ye, Haiyun Luo, Songwu Lu and Lixia Zhang Department of Computer Science UCLA Chien Kang Wu.
A Hierarchical Energy-Efficient Framework for Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 55, NO. 3, MAY.
1 GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks B. Karp, H. T. Kung Borrowed some Richard Yang‘s slides.
Fault Tolerant and Mobility Aware Routing Protocol for Mobile Wireless Sensor Network Name : Tahani Abid Aladwani ID :
Mobility Limited Flip-Based Sensor Networks Deployment Reporter: Po-Chung Shih Computer Science and Information Engineering Department Fu-Jen Catholic.
A Framework for Energy- Saving Data Gathering Using Two-Phase Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks Wook Chio, Prateek Shah, and Sajal K. Das Center for.
2008/2/191 Customizing a Geographical Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Proceedings of the th International Conference on Information.
Localization With Mobile Anchor Points in Wireless Sensor Networks
Grammati Pantziou 1, Aristides Mpitziopoulos 2, Damianos Gavalas 2, Charalampos Konstantopoulos 3, and Basilis Mamalis 1 1 Department of Informatics, Technological.
College of Engineering Non-uniform Grid- based Coordinated Routing Priyanka Kadiyala Major Advisor: Dr. Robert Akl Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Ubiquitous Networks WSN Routing Protocols Lynn Choi Korea University.
WMNL Sensors Deployment Enhancement by a Mobile Robot in Wireless Sensor Networks Ridha Soua, Leila Saidane, Pascale Minet 2010 IEEE Ninth International.
Minimal Hop Count Path Routing Algorithm for Mobile Sensor Networks Jae-Young Choi, Jun-Hui Lee, and Yeong-Jee Chung Dept. of Computer Engineering, College.
Efficient Deployment Algorithms for Prolonging Network Lifetime and Ensuring Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Yong-hwan Kim Korea.
Dynamic Source Routing in ad hoc wireless networks Alexander Stojanovic IST Lisabon 1.
1 A Bidding Protocol for Deploying Mobile Sensors GuilingWang, Guohong Cao, and Tom LaPorta Department of Computer Science & Engineering The Pennsylvania.
VAPR: Void Aware Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks
Co-Grid: an Efficient Coverage Maintenance Protocol for Distributed Sensor Networks Guoliang Xing; Chenyang Lu; Robert Pless; Joseph A. O ’ Sullivan Department.
Deployment Strategy for Mobile Robots with Energy and Timing Constraints Yongguo Mei, Yung-Hsiang Lu, Y. Charlie Hu, and C.S. George Lee School of Electrical.
A Novel Mechanism for Flooding Based Route Discovery in Ad Hoc Networks Jian Li and Prasant Mohapatra GlobeCom’03 Speaker ︰ CHUN-WEI.
Connectivity-Aware Routing (CAR) in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Valery Naumov & Thomas R. Gross ETH Zurich, Switzerland IEEE INFOCOM 2007.
WEAR: A Balanced, Fault-Tolerant, Energy-Aware Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Kewei Sha, Junzhao Du, and Weisong Shi Wayne State University.
Selection and Navigation of Mobile sensor Nodes Using a Sensor Network Atul Verma, Hemjit Sawant and Jindong Tan Department of Electrical and Computer.
GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks EECS 600 Advanced Network Research, Spring 2005 Shudong Jin February 14, 2005.
Dual-Region Location Management for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Yinan Li, Ing-ray Chen, Ding-chau Wang Presented by Youyou Cao.
Location Directory Services Vivek Sharma 9/26/2001 CS851: Large Scale Deeply Embedded Networks.
“Controlled Straight Mobility and Energy-Aware Routing in Robotic Wireless Sensor Networks ” Rafael Falcon, Hai Liu, Amiya Nayak and Ivan Stojmenovic
Coverage and Energy Tradeoff in Density Control on Sensor Networks Yi Shang and Hongchi Shi University of Missouri-Columbia ICPADS’05.
1 Presented by Jing Sun Computer Science and Engineering Department University of Conneticut.
An Energy-Efficient Geographic Routing with Location Errors in Wireless Sensor Networks Julien Champ and Clement Saad I-SPAN 2008, Sydney (The international.
A Dynamic Query-tree Energy Balancing Protocol for Sensor Networks H. Yang, F. Ye, and B. Sikdar Department of Electrical, Computer and systems Engineering.
Localized Low-Power Topology Control Algorithms in IEEE based Sensor Networks Jian Ma *, Min Gao *, Qian Zhang +, L. M. Ni *, and Wenwu Zhu +
Simulation of DeReClus Yingyue Xu September 6, 2003.
Energy Efficient Data Management for Wireless Sensor Networks with Data Sink Failure Hyunyoung Lee, Kyoungsook Lee, Lan Lin and Andreas Klappenecker †
Load Balanced Link Reversal Routing in Mobile Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Nabhendra Bisnik, Alhussein Abouzeid ECSE Department RPI Costas Busch CSCI Department.
SenSys 2003 Differentiated Surveillance for Sensor Networks Ting Yan Tian He John A. Stankovic Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia November.
Using Ant Agents to Combine Reactive and Proactive strategies for Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Fredrick Ducatelle, Gianni di caro, and Luca Maria.
TreeCast: A Stateless Addressing and Routing Architecture for Sensor Networks Santashil PalChaudhuri, Shu Du, Ami K. Saha, and David B. Johnson Department.
Selection and Navigation of Mobile Sensor Nodes Using a Sensor Network Atul Verma, Hemjit Sawant and Jindong Tan Department of Electrical and Computer.
SERENA: SchEduling RoutEr Nodes Activity in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks Pascale Minet and Saoucene Mahfoudh INRIA, Rocquencourt Le Chesnay.
Distributed Algorithms for Dynamic Coverage in Sensor Networks Lan Lin and Hyunyoung Lee Department of Computer Science University of Denver.
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
Structure-Free Data Aggregation in Sensor Networks.
TTDD: A Two-tier Data Dissemination Model for Large- scale Wireless Sensor Networks Haiyun Luo, Fan Ye, Jerry Cheng, Songwu Lu, Lixia Zhang (UCLA) Mobicom.
1 Hierarchical Data Dissemination Scheme for Large Scale Sensor Networks Anand Visvanathan and Jitender Deogun Department of Computer Science and Engg,
Mobile Networks and Applications (January 2007) Presented by J.H. Su ( 蘇至浩 ) 2016/3/21 OPLab, IM, NTU 1 Joint Design of Routing and Medium Access Control.
A Spatial-based Multi-resolution Data Dissemination Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks Jian Chen, Udo Pooch Department of Computer Science Texas A&M University.
2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010)
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Net 435: Wireless sensor network (WSN)
Coverage and Connectivity in Sensor Networks
Speaker : Lee Heon-Jong
Presentation transcript:

Repairing Sensor Network Using Mobile Robots Y. Mei, C. Xian, S. Das, Y. C. Hu and Y. H. Lu Purdue University, West Lafayette ICDCS 2006 Speaker : Shih-Yun Hsu

Outline  Introduction  Goal  Assumptions  Coordination Algorithm  Simulation  Conclusions

Introduction  Many sensor networks studies focus on  Effectively collect data and transfer data  Energy-aware  Fault tolerant routing techniques  Sensor deployment  Sensor nodes may fail and leave holes in coverage  Sensor replacement

Introduction  Using some redundant mobile sensors relocating themselves to fill the holes  Mobility is an expensive feature, as mobile sensors need to have motors, motion control, and GPS modules

Goal  Using robots to assist sensor replacement  Characteristics of robots  Mobile  Can pick, carry, and unload sensor nodes  Minimize the motion overhead and the messaging overhead  Energy  Time require

Assumptions  Sensor nodes are randomly uniformly distributed deployed  Location-aware  Limited lifetime

Assumptions  Robots are initially randomly uniformly distributed deployed  Each robot carries a certain number of functional nodes  Travel at a constant speed  Location-aware  The number of robots is much smaller than the number of sensor nodes

Assumptions  Robots’ transmission range are larger than sensor nodes’ transmission range

Algorithm overview guardee guardian detect sensors Robot report

Algorithm concepts  Initialization  Setting up the roles of robots  Manager  Maintainer  Setting up the initial relationship between the sensor nodes and the robots  Setting up the guardian-guardee relationship among sensor nodes  Failure detection and reporting  Failure handling

Coordination Algorithm  Centralized algorithm  Fixed algorithm  Dynamic algorithm

Centralized algorithm  Initialization  Failure detection and reporting  Failure handling

Sensor Robot Manager Centralized algorithm - Initialization Phase - Manager move to the center of sensor network Maintainer

Centralized algorithm - Initialization Phase - Sensor Robot Manager broadcast to all sensors and maintainers

Centralized algorithm - Initialization Phase - Sensor Robot Maintainer sends its location to manager

Centralized algorithm - Initialization Phase - Sensor Robot Maintainer sends its location to one-hop neighbor sensor nodes

Centralized algorithm - Initialization Phase - Sensor Robot Each sensor node sends its location to one-hop neighbor

Centralized algorithm - Initialization Phase - Sensor Robot Each sensor will pick its nearest neighbor Sensor as its guardian guardian guardee

Centralized algorithm - Failure detection - Sensor Robot Guardian conceives that the guardee has failed for a certain amount of time guardian guardee Each sensor node periodically sends beacon messages to its one-hop neighbor nodes

Centralized algorithm - Failure reporting - Sensor Robot Guardian sends a failure message with the failed node's location to the manager guardian guardee

Centralized algorithm - Failure handling - Sensor Robot Manager selects the robot whose current location is the closest to the failure guardian guardee Robot move to the failure location

Centralized algorithm - Failure handling -  When the robot is moving towards a failed sensor node, it still can receive failure repair request forwarding from the manager  First-come-first-serve

Centralized algorithm - Failure handling -  Robot has moved a certain threshold distance on its way to repair a failed robot, it sends an update of its location to the manager via geographic routing and to the one-hop neighbor sensor nodes via broadcast  Threshold is a distance that should be decided based on the transmission range

Fixed algorithm Each grid has one robot All robots are both the manager and the maintainer in their own grid

Fixed algorithm

Dynamic algorithm

The overhead of maintain voronoi graphs is too heavy Each sensor selects the nearest robot to be the maintainer

Dynamic algorithm

Simulation  Simulator : GlomoSim  Maintenance robots : k 2 = 4, 9, and 16  Total area : 200 × 200 × k 2 m 2  Total sensors : 50 × k 2  Robot transmission range : 250 m  Sensor transmission range : 63 m  Sensor nodes’ beaconing period : 10 sec  Geographic Routing : GPSR  Threshold distance : 20 m

Motion overhead

Message overhead

Repair time

Conclusions  This paper presented three different algorithms using mobile robots for sensor network repairing  The three algorithms have different properties, and the optimal choice of the coordination algorithm depends on specific scenarios and objectives being optimized