Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity 1 Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: E. Asakawa ( Meiji-gakuin Univ.), K. Fujii ( KEK ), T. Kusano ( Tohoku Univ.), S. Matsumoto (Univ. of Toyama ), R. Sasaki ( Tohoku Univ.), Y. Takubo ( Tohoku Univ.)

Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity 2 Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: E. Asakawa ( Meiji-gakuin Univ.), K. Fujii ( KEK ), T. Kusano ( Tohoku Univ.), S. Matsumoto (Univ. of Toyama ), R. Sasaki ( Tohoku Univ.), Y. Takubo ( Tohoku Univ.) LHT

3 In LHT, SM NEW H ΦHΦH W H Z H A H q H l H q l g W Z A Particles & these partners are same spin. New particles get mass by VEV f ~ 1 TeV. (New gauge boson masses depend only on VEV f.) In this study, we estimate… measurement accuracy of new gauge boson masses determination of VEV f determination of new particle ILC. Gauge boson fermion Higgs Littlest Higgs model with T-parity (LHT) is one of attractive models for TeV new physics. LHT could solve the little hierarchy problem, and contains a dark matter candidate.

Introduction What is the LHT? How to measure the LHT at ILC? Simulation results Summary 4 Plan

What is the LHT? 5

m h 2 = m Λ 2 Fine-tuning! The SM is the successful model describing physics below ~ 100 GeV. If we assume that Hierarchy problem (related to quadratic divergence to the Higgs mass term) ⇔ But... SM is valid all the way up to the GUTs scale, Λ~10 15 GeV, EW scale higgs mass require

m h 2 = m Λ 2 No fine-tuning The SM is the successful model describing physics below ~ 100 GeV. If we require that Hierarchy problem (related to quadratic divergence to the Higgs mass term) ⇔ But... there are no fine-tuning for Higgs mass m h, No fine-tuning Λ ~ 1 TeV Cut off scale

m h 2 = m Λ 2 No fine-tuning The SM is the successful model describing physics below ~ 100 GeV. However… Hierarchy problem (related to quadratic divergence to the Higgs mass term) ⇔ But... LEP experiments require that the cut off scale is larger than 5 TeV! Λ ~ 1 TeV R.Barbieri and A.Strumia (’00) LEP experiments Cut off scale Little Hierarchy problem! Still fine-tuning appear!

Little Higgs model with T-parity is solution of little hierarchy problem! Even if Λ ~ 10TeV, there are still no fine-tuning, Because of … Collective symmetry breaking (VEV f ) T-parity SM ⇔ SM, New ⇔ - New The model contains dark matter candidate! (Heavy photon A H ) W h h g2g2 + WHWH h h – g 2 N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, H. Georgi ( ’ 01) ZHZH SM H. C. Cheng, I. Low ( ’ 03) SM In order to avoid constraints from EWPM, Z 2 symmetry called T-parity are introduced. Higgs boson is regarded as Pseudo NG boson of a global symmetry at some higher scale. Explicit breaking of the global symmetry is specially arranged to cancel quadratic divergent corrections to m h at 1-loop level by new gauge bosons and fermions. Little Higgs mechanism

, W ±, Z, h [Arkani-Hamed, Cohen, Katz and Nelson (2002)]  H, W H ±, Z H, Φ t T cancel Particle contents Gauge-Higgs sector Top sector Due to the cancelation of quadratic divergences, partners are introduced. In the fermion sector, only top partner is required to cancel the quadratic divergences because other fermion Yukawa couplings are small. In order to Implement the Little Higgs Mechanism… LHT is based on the non-linear sigma model breaking SU(5)/SO(5) symmetry breaking. The subgroup [SU(2)×U(1)] 2 in SU(5) is gauged, which is broken down to the SM gauge group by vev f. gauge group [SU(2)×U(1)] 2 VEV [SU(2)×U(1)] SM U em (1) 〈 h 〉 f ~ O(1) TeV Fermion sector b… h h + + h t t T T Cancel! cancel

[Arkani-Hamed, Cohen, Katz and Nelson (2002)] Particle contents T-odd partners are introduced for each fermions. In order to Implement the Little Higgs Mechanism… LHT is based on the non-linear sigma model breaking SU(5)/SO(5) symmetry breaking. The subgroup [SU(2)×U(1)] 2 in SU(5) is gauged, which is broken down to the SM gauge group by vev f. gauge group [SU(2)×U(1)] 2 VEV [SU(2)×U(1)] SM U em (1) 〈 h 〉 f ~ O(1) TeV h h + + h t t T T Cancel! , W ±, Z, h  H, W H ±, Z H, Φ t T cancel Gauge-Higgs sector Top sector Fermion sector b… T-parity t H T H bH…bH… T-parity In order to implement the T-parity…

How to measure the LHT at ILC? 12

, W ±, Z, h  H, W H ±, Z H, Φ t T cancel Gauge-Higgs sector Top sector Fermion sector b… t H T H bH…bH… O (f) O (v) 500 GeV Dark Matter can be measured at LHC. too heavy to produced at ILC. can be produced at ILC! cannot measure masses at LHC with good accuracy at ILC Top sector Gauge sector We should measure the gauge sector in the LHT at ILC. Q. H. Cao, C. R. Chen (07) S. Matsumoto, T. Moroi, K. Tobe (08) and ……. In order to verify the LHT, we should measure the Little Higgs mechanism!

e-e- e+e+ AHAH AHAH eHeH γ, Z WHWH WHWH ZHZH AHAH eHeH Which mode can be measured at the ILC ? can produce easily m AH + m AH < 500 GeV No signal can 500 GeV: m AH + m ZH < 500 GeV cross section is small It is difficult to 500 GeV cross section is large e-e- e+e+ e-e- e+e+ In the gauge sector, 14 O (f) O (v) 500 GeV Dark Matter

Our strategy 500 GeV ILC, we estimate the measurement of gauge boson masses & vev f using e + e -  A H Z H 2.Using e + e -  W H W H, we estimate the improvement of gauge boson masses & vev f 1 TeV ILC. γ, Z WHWH WHWH ZHZH AHAH eHeH can 500 GeV: m AH + m ZH < 500 GeV cross section is small It is difficult to 500 GeV cross section is large e-e- e+e+ e-e- e+e+

Representative point of our simulation 16

17 Relic abundance Shaded area is WMAP allowed region. DM abundance is determined by the Higgs mass & vev f. At this WMAP allowed region, the model also satisfys other experimental constraints! e + e -  A H Z H Mode &Representative point e + e -  W H W H WMAP allowed region Dark matter (A H ) Which particle can produced at the ILC ? → It depends on VEV f. Because heavy gauge boson masses depend only on vev f. M. A, S. Matsumoto, N. Okada,Y. Okada PhysRevD ↓ dark matter relic abundance in this model ↓

18 Relic abundance Mode &Representative point WMAP allowed region Which particle can produced at the ILC ? → It depends on VEV f. Because heavy gauge boson massed depend only on vev f. M. A, S. Matsumoto, N. Okada,Y. Okada PhysRevD Shaded area is WMAP allowed region. DM abundance is determined by the Higgs mass & vev f. At this WMAP allowed region, the model also satisfys other experimental constraints! e + e -  A H Z H e + e -  W H W H Dark matter (A H ) Fine-tuning Λ ~ 4π f > 10TeV If f is larger than ~800GeV, the hierarchy problem appears again.

19 Relic abundance Mode &Representative point WMAP allowed region e + e -  A H Z H e+e-  WHWHe+e-  WHWH Which particle can produced at the ILC ? → It depends on VEV f. Because heavy gauge boson massed depend only on vev f. New gauge bosons are too heavy m WH +m WH > 1TeV m AH + m ZH > 500GeV M. A, S. Matsumoto, N. Okada,Y. Okada PhysRevD Fine-tuning Λ ~ 4π f > 10TeV Shaded area is WMAP allowed region. DM abundance is determined by the Higgs mass & vev f. At this WMAP allowed region, the model also satisfys other experimental constraints! Dark matter (A H )

Mode &Representative point e + e -  A H Z H e + e -  W H W H Which particle can produced at the ILC ? → It depends on VEV f. Because heavy gauge boson massed depend only on vev f. 20 Relic abundance WMAP allowed region M. A, S. Matsumoto, N. Okada,Y. Okada PhysRevD Fine-tuning Λ ~ 4π f > 10TeV Mass spectrum f 580 e H 410 Z H 369 W H 368 A H 82 Higgs 134 Point I (GeV) Sample points satisfy all experimental & cosmological constraints. New gauge bosons are too heavy m WH +m WH > 1TeV m AH + m ZH > 500GeV

Simulation results 21

22 Simulation We simulate using Physsim & PYTHIA for generating BG, MadGraph for generating signal, JSFQuickSimulator for simulating 500 GeV 1 TeV ILC Integrated luminosity 500 fb -1 Cross section Signal A H Z H 1.9 fb BG ννZ -> ννbb 44.3 fb ννZ -> ννcc 34.8 fb ννh -> ννbb 34.0 fb …… Integrated luminosity 500 fb -1 Cross section Signal W H + W H fb BG W + W fb e + e - W + W fb …… e + e -  A H Z H  A H A H h e + e -  W H W H  A H A H WW from edges of W± energy distribution. from edges of higgs energy distribution. We determine heavy gauge masses

500 GeV ILC e + e -  A H Z H  A H A H 1 TeV ILC e + e -  W H W H  A H A H WW For details, see next talk (T. Kusano). For details, see next next talk (R. Sasaki). Because the simulation shows end points clearly, It allow us to extract the property of heavy gauge bosons and DM!

500 GeV ILC e + e -  A H Z H  A H A H 1 TeV ILC e + e -  W H W H  A H A H WW For details, see next talk (T. Kusano). For details, see next next talk (R. Sasaki). Because the simulation shows end points clearly, It allow us to extract the property of heavy gauge bosons and DM!

25 Simulation 500 GeV 1 TeV ILC W H spin using production angle of W H +. W helicity using angular distribution of jets. We can also determine e + e -  A H Z H  A H A H he + e -  W H W H  A H A H WW Mass determination Fit results m AH = 80.1 ± 7.3 GeV true(81.85) m ZH = 366 ± 17 GeV true(368.1) f determination f = 580 ± 22 GeV true(580) Mass determination Fit results m AH = ± 1.09 GeV true(81.85) m WH = ± 0.9 GeV true(368.1) f determination f = 580 ± 1.3 GeV true(580)

Littest Higgs model with T-parity (LHT) is one of attractive models for physics beyond the SM. Important model parameter (f) can be determined by gauge boson sector with good 500 GeV ILC, we can measure LHT using e + e - → A H Z 1 TeV ILC, we can measure LHT using e + e - → W H W H with very high accuracy. Our simulation shows the clear edge in signal events, which allow us to extract the model parameters precisely. Results obtained from the collider experiments will be compared to those from astrophysical experiments 26 Summary Cosmological impact will be talked by S. Matsumoto in today’s cosmological session.