Leadership/ communication and commitment O Safety Busing O Rules and Guidance O Reporting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Advertisements

Dr. Tracy Tucker Thomas Coy Arkansas Department of Education
6 th Annual Focus Users’ Conference 6 th Annual Focus Users’ Conference Rollover Presented by: C.J. Obartuck Software Trainer & Miranda Robinson Project.
Campus Improvement Plans
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Administrative Services Credentials 2012 CCAC Conference Teri.
New Principals’ Workshop October 5, GOVERNANCE The Principal’s Role New Principals’ Workshop.
Idaho High School Wireless Project Joyce Popp Chief Information Officer.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Student Grade Level Meetings November 7, WASD Board Policy #218 Student Discipline Student Discipline “The Board shall require each student to adhere.
1 School Year 2006–07 Accounting and Budgeting Committee Video Teleconference Kim Thompson OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services
Course Outline Process Overview for Course Convenors.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
TRANSPORTATION IN A FLORIDA EDUCATION FINANCE PROGRAM (FEFP) EXAMINATION April 9,
Summer and September Transportation Guidelines for School Staff Office of Pupil Transportation May 2013.
TIMS – The Four Seasons A Guide for the New User.
Alternative Non-traditional Education Programs Update 8/18/20151 Jerry Randolph Alternative Education Program and Magnet Schools Office of Education Support.
Presented by: Gary Quiring, CSIS Implementation Specialist Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team Charter School Closures: CALPADS Requirements 1.
Review the administrative team findings in regard to the recommendation with our two smaller schools at Lincoln Park and West Wyomissing. Review and explain.
PUPIL TRANSPORTATION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Michael L Hurley Director of Transportation Safety & Security Carlisle Area School District
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Developing an accessibility policy. In this talk we will discuss What is an accessibility policy Why do we need one? Getting started - steps to consult.
STUDENT TRANSPORTATION COSC Presentation in Boardroom Wednesday, April 8 th, :30 p.m.
Implement Educate Monitor Ask Before You Act! March 2010.
TRANSPORTATION FEFP PREPARING FOR THE “DREADED” OFFICIAL STATE AUDIT.
1 New Jersey State Funded Nonpublic School Programs School Year Nonpublic School Services Division of Charter Schools, School Choice and Educational.
Training for Extension District Boards. Sets Financial Reporting Requires Annual Registration Fee.
SALEM PUBLIC SCHOOLS STUDENT TRANSPORTATION - UPDATE July 27,
School Budget (Draft)
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK MARCH 24, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING THE PASADENA.
What is the cost associated with testing in South Carolina? By Emily Madison 4/13/2011.
Grading Policy Review, Recommendation and Rationale March 13, 2012 Mr. Ray Gravuer.
FY 2010 Data Collections Workshop Follow Up Q & A Session.
TDTIMS Overview What is TDTIMS? & Why Do We Do It?
Maine Department of Education Informational Letters on Learning Results Implementation Issues May 12, 2004.
Educator Effectiveness Updates April Updates Closing up Looking forward to
Local Policies. Athlete Discipline Hold players to a high standard of work, sportsmanship and conduct. When necessary to discipline, make the player and.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
School Transportation Unit Charter School Transportation: Danny Sanchez, Tel: (512) School Transportation Funding.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
MISSOULA SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMITS PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE NOVEMBER, 9, 2011.
Effective Contracting Pupil Transportation Mary Sansaricq New York State Education Department Pupil Transportation Services Room 475 EBA Albany, New York.
Charter School Transportation.  Charters will be required to transport students  An approved certified school bus transporter contract will be submitted.
Presented by: Gary Quiring, CSIS Implementation Specialist Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team Charter School Closure Rules: CALPADS Requirements.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
FIELD TRAINING SESSION 2 (OPENING/CLOSING/RECONFIGURING SCHOOLS) 9:05-9:30 Ethan Taylor Dept. of Administration and Finance Coordinator of Budgets and.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Federal Programs Q &A’s Presented by: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs and School Improvement.
CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE Chatham. Charter Review Committee Section 8-2 Periodic Charter Review  At least once every five years a special.
Alabama Non-Traditional High School Diploma Option Program (HSO)
Title I Equipment Inventory Requirements
Title I Equipment Inventory Requirements
DJJ Accountability Rating System
Title I Equipment Inventory Requirements
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
Title I Equipment Inventory Requirements
Georgia Fitness Assessment
* 3 steps to prepare your igc students for spring 2016 graduation
2018 Clerks Summer Conference
Just In Time Concepts & Review
Antonio Ortiz – Director, Student Services & Transportation
Student Transportation Services
Antonio Ortiz – Director, Student Services & Transportation
Title I Equipment Inventory Requirements
Roles and Responsibilities
Oak Park School District 97
School Health Advisory Council SHAC Overview October 12, 2017
Antonio Ortiz – Director, Student Services & Transportation
2019 READ Data Collection.
Antonio Ortiz – Director, Student Services & Transportation
Presentation transcript:

Leadership/ communication and commitment O Safety Busing O Rules and Guidance O Reporting

From, IAPT/TTT 2014

Required

Safety Busing O Required: O Policy O Rating instrument O Break off point O Board date, August O Ad hoc committee O Last review ( every three years) Resource: Idaho Code , , SISBO page 58. SDE measurement model.

Rules O TRANSPORTATION AUTHORIZED, IDAHO STATUE, O A board of trustees may require pupils who live less than one and one-half (1 1/2) miles from the nearest established bus stop to walk or provide their own transportation to such bus stop. That distance shall be determined by the nearest and best route from the junction of the driveway of the pupil's home and the nearest public road, to the nearest door of the schoolhouse he attends, or to the bus stop, as the case may be. The board may transport any pupil a lesser distance when in its judgment the age or health or safety of the pupil warrants.

Rules O BUS ROUTES -- NON- TRANSPORTATION ZONES. The board of trustees of each school district may establish, and alter, bus routes and establish, and alter, non-transportation zones. Such routes and zones shall be determined for each year not later than the regular August meeting of the board;

Safety Busing O All school districts submitting applications for safety busing reimbursement approval shall have established a board policy for evaluating and rating all safety busing requests and shall have on file a completed measuring or rating instrument for all submitted requests. The State Department of Education staff shall develop and maintain a measuring instrument model, which shall include an element for validating contacts with responsible organizations or persons responsible for improving or minimizing hazardous conditions. Each applying district will be required to annually affirm that conditions of all prior approved safety busing requests are unchanged. The local board of trustees shall annually, by official action ( , Idaho Code), approve all safety busing locations. School districts that receive state reimbursement of costs associated with safety busing will re-evaluate all safety busing sites at intervals of at least every three years using the local board adopted measuring or scoring instrument. In order to qualify for reimbursement the local school board will, by official action, approve the initial safety busing request and allow the students in question to be transported before the application is sent to the state. Consideration for reimbursement will be contingent on the application for safety busing being received by the State Department of Education Transportation Section on or before March 31 of the school year in which the safety busing began. Resource: Sisbo page 58

Rating Instrument Model

From, SDE safety busing model O 12.School district administrators shall develop an objective measuring instrument, which contains a scoring element for assessing hazards encountered by students while walking from home to school routes. Districts may use the sample measuring instrument provided by SDE, a sample of which available through their Web site. School districts shall re-evaluate all safety busing sites within district boundaries at intervals of at least every three years.

From, SDE safety busing model O 13.SDE recommends school district board of trustees annually approve the formation of an ad hoc supplemental transportation committee for the purpose of objectively evaluating all hazardous routes under 1.5 miles from the students’ home to school, using a board approved measuring instrument. O Resource:

From, SDE safety busing model O 15.SDE recommends that the objective measuring instrument and the related scoring element be used in determining an appropriate “cut off” for safety busing purposes when the scoring element used indicates hazards that are “reasonable” for students to encounter during their walk to and from school. The philosophy for this recommendation is based on the assumption that all students must encounter “some hazards” during the course of their travel from home to school. The intent of the objective measuring instrument is to prioritize and/or weight hazards. O Resource:

File Safety busing O Once a SDE ridership has been pulled and filed by district, you may report safety busing thru I bus. (Report due March 31). ( SDE proposed due date to change to March 1./ Reason: spring break conflict.

Reporting

Look for O Safety busing students in active areas: ( this number will change as you update areas). O Safety busing students in Last Ridership upload: Note: SDE Audits and validates the #’s reported in ridership report, ( these #’s should be used to validate safety busing number, as they are already reported in the Ridership report.)

Route Ridership Report

I bus/ safety busing O At the start of a new fiscal year, IBUS will roll all other safety busing areas to “Inactive” status.

Inactive moving to Active O Open a existing area, information will roll over expect: Board date and Actual rider #,

Re-evaluate

What you’ll need O Rating instrument, District form, with Score. O If rating instrument still supports area, nothing has changed or improved since last evaluated, Date with new date, shall be one day less than last date( last done 2/12/2012, current date 2/11/2015). O If changes have occurred that would change Rating, then re-evaluate area, Note: Evaluation shall be done during times when students would be required to travel the area in question. ( not during summer or weekend).

More on rating Instrument O Grade level, supporting area, should reflect, area of attendance, example: K-5, K-6, 7-8, 9-12, K-12. ( do not list only grade level of riders, example: K,3,5 ( this means if a 2 nd or 4 th grader move in to area, they have not been approved to ride).

Re-evaluation page

Remember O Required: O Policy O Rating instrument O Break off point O Board date, August O Ad hoc committee O Last review ( every three years) Resource: Idaho Code , , SISBO page 58. SDE measurement model

???????