1 Surface CDM Sub-team Concept of Operations Briefing Marshall Mowery (FAA CDM Lead) Dan Allen, FedEx Express (Industry CDM Lead) Carl Calcasola, ATM PBI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
October 31, Metron Aviation, Inc. Dan Rosman Assessing System Impacts: Miles-in-Trail and Ground Delays.
Advertisements

Vastly Distributed System ATCSCC CDM net TFM hub TRACONs TRACON(s) Towers ARTCC ARTCC(s) Towers Airports Industry AOC(s) GA International.
Reduced EDCT Window CDM A&D Meeting December 13, CDM Meeting Daytona Beach, FL Presented by Roger Beatty - AAL SOC.
Airside Capacity Enhancement
Modeling Airport Capacity
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/ASBU/2012.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
SESAR TEN-T day. Content ●SESAR investments and timing ●Network effect ●Validation and certification activities ●Conclusion.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-15/PIA 1 Improve Traffic Flow Through Runway Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)
NCHRP Task 254 Project Vehicle Size & Weight Management Technology Transfer/Best Practices.
By: Steve Lang Date: September 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Wake Vortex R&D Status Briefing NBAA Convention.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi.
Airport Planning. errata Traditional forecasting techniques are still in play, but are considered archaic. US airlines are focused on international travel.
LMI Airline Responses to NAS Capacity Constraints Peter Kostiuk Logistics Management Institute National Airspace System Resource.
Federal Aviation Administration Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Briefing to COMSTAC Kelvin Coleman May 16, 2008.
1 DLR/EEC Total Airport Management Christoph Meier & Peter Eriksen European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing and NextGen Implementation 1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing.
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
1 Arrival Scenario 1 November, Scenario Overview Sharing of Flight and Status data via AWIMSharing of Flight and Status data via AWIM –Parking.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
Presented to: By: Date: File: apo130\Airport Efficiency\TAER SAER Updated Briefing(2).ppt 1030 Federal Aviation Administration Presentation of System Airport.
Air traffic controllers (ATC) consideration and ATC solutions Session 5 Presentation 4.
Winter Operations GENEVA CASE AIRPORT OPERATIONS IN EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS (winter )
Integrating information towards Digital ATM Mini Global Demonstration Presented By: Thien Ngo Date:August 28, 2013.
Federal Aviation Administration Valuation of NextGen Capacity Benefits A Consumer Surplus Approach to the Monetization of NASPAC Results For: INNOVATIONS.
Server Virtualization: Navy Network Operations Centers
Workshop on National Airspace System Resource Allocation: Economics and Equity Organizers: Mike Ball, University of Maryland George Donohue, Karla Hoffman,
1 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA. 2 Matt Davis Assistant Director of Planning Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport
Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM Operational Trial
ICAO-IATA Cross-Border ATFM Workshop
LMINET2: An Enhanced LMINET Dou Long, Shahab Hasan December 10, 2008.
FPAW – Weather Forecast Performance Requirements Validation 25 August 2015 Chris Ermatinger, Ops. Research Analyst Aviation Weather Division, Policy and.
1 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation 1 st Annual Workshop – NAS-Wide Simulation in Support of NextGen Dec. 10th – George Mason.
Draft High Level Operational Concept V0.4 Mode of Operation for the Single European Sky Deployable from /11/04.
Embry-Riddle’s NextGen Role NextGen Research DB NextGen Test Bed Management Consortium Leadership NextGen Program Management Wade Lester Program Manager.
Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Program Operational Trials in Domestic Airspace Presented to:Data Comm Implementation Team (DCIT) By:Jerry.
F066-B © 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. MITRE-CAASD’s systemwideModeler State and Near-Term Plans Pete Kuzminski 10 December 2008.
Harris.com Alex Murray | DCIS Benefits Lead DCIT Brief Data Comm Benefits & Metrics Alignment with DC Program, NIWG, & NAC.
KLM - Operations at Schiphol: how does ASAS fit? ASAS TN2: final seminar, April, Paris E. Kleiboer Sr. Manager Strategy ATM.
Quantifying Monetary Impacts of Forecasts Rick Curtis Southwest Airlines 11/1/12.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 Houston, TX.
1 Departure Scenario 1 November 14, Scenario Overview Entry of Flight Data into AWIM SystemEntry of Flight Data into AWIM System –Embry Riddle.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM) Testimony before the National Civil Aviation Review Commission Testimony.
182a_N00FEB23_DG 1 Local Area Augmentation System CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS Alaska Regional Briefing Anchorage October 1, 2002.
NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System
Presented to: Demonstrations and Prototypes TIM By: Steve Hodges Date: 05/04/2011 Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Access to SWIM (AAtS) FY11 planned.
Benefits of CDM Within AFI Region Presented by: Mikateko Chabani.
Dan Allen MEM DCL Trials. 2 FedEx Corporation Operate Independently, Compete Collectively, Manage Collaboratively.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 7 “Formulating CDM Strategies”
COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
Using Simulation in NextGen Benefits Quantification
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Tradeoff Optimization at STL: a Case Study Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo tel.: (617) CDM.
Programme Status ECTL AAB February FACTS  A mature approach: 2500 contributors Release process organises the delivery cycle ATM Engineering:
Project Life Presented by Chuck Ray, PMP ITS Project Manager.
Project Management Methodology Project Closing. Project closing stage Must be performed for all projects, successfully completed or shut off by management.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
International Civil Aviation Organization
Collaborative Decision Making “Formulating CDM Strategies”
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Data Communications Program
Airport-ANSP Growth & Efficiency ACDM-CATFM
Pilot considerations and pilot solutions
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
A Concept for Launch and Reentry Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)
Operation Context and Use Case Focus Group
Presentation transcript:

1 Surface CDM Sub-team Concept of Operations Briefing Marshall Mowery (FAA CDM Lead) Dan Allen, FedEx Express (Industry CDM Lead) Carl Calcasola, ATM PBI Bernie Davis, ATC Manager US Airways Tuesday, May 3, 2011

2 Metrics Provide a written summary describing the appropriate metrics that validate the benefits of the Surface CDM capabilities and are consistent with the FAA NextGen Implementation Plan. Provide recommendations for metrics that address the overall concept, as well as individually described capabilities.  Identified 31 items

3 Policy Development of CONOPS Identified policy issues that need to be considered from FAA, DOT, Airlines and Airports Ongoing effort

4 Concept of Operations February 2011 Delivered final submission of CONOPS after being vetted by CSG

5 Background Intro to ConOps – What it is  Information sharing  Demand and capacity predictions  Queue management

6 Additional needs Develop tool sets in order to gain a better understanding of the CONOPS Enhancement of Scenarios Development of Airport Categorization

7 Scenario Overview Surface CDM capabilities may allow operators to manage planned delay in a more cost effective manner by holding aircraft at the gate to avoid excessive departure queues at the runway

8 Plug and Play Concept

9 Airport Surface CDM Scenario and Implementation Notional Airport

10 Departure Metering Procedures will be Implemented 1300z: DRM receives departing flight info  Departure demand exceeds 32/hr capacity beginning at 1500z and is expected to continue for the next 6 hours 1315z: DRM develops spot allocation plan using Ration by Schedule, or other industry accepted alternatives

11 Changes to the Allocation/Reallocation of Flights 1400z: Unscheduled maintenance will delay a 1500z allocated flight, Operator A notifies DRM that another flight will be reassigned to that time window. 1455z: 1st flight requests and receives pushback, others follow same process in order to meet 1500z allocation when demand exceeds capacity  1 st slots are managed but are not delayed Time period Z Z Z Z SchAllocDelSchAllocDelSchAllocDelSchAllocDel Operator A Operator B Total (1)10 8 (1)

12 Changes to the Allocation/Reallocation of Flights 1514z: GA aircraft calls DRC for spot allocation 1515z: DRC assigned average delay to GA flight with a movement area entry time of 1530z 1530z: GA aircraft taxis to movement area entry location

13 Changes to the Allocation/Reallocation of Flights 1615: EDCT or other TFM or ATC generated delays

14 Capacity Change 1630z: Capacity exceeds demand due to rapidly improving weather or GA flights that never materialized 1745z: Runway configuration change due to weather

15 Capacity Change 1800z: Deicing is conducted. DMP is in effect 1810z:A flight operator cannot meet allocation and does not notify the DRM. This is a “missed” allocation

16 What’s Next? Define and gain consensus on a Work Plan to develop information exchange requirements per RTCA Task Force Recommendations  Types of data to be exchanged  Timing of data exchange, when data is to be sent and/or received  Opportunities for integrations  Human in the Loop analyses  Test site opportunities and locations  Timeframes  Funding information. (Who, what, where)

17 Final Products Information Exchange Requirements Work Plan Revised Surface CDM System (SCS) Functional Requirements Document Updated Surface CDM Conops

18 Questions? Thank You

19 Suggestions for Variances

20 Comment Iteration Process

21 Final Delivery Deadline – May 6 th

22 Airport Surface Categories Category 1  ATC handles all push-backs at an airport Category 2  ATC + 1 other surface stakeholder handle push-backs at an airport Category 3 (most complex)  ATC + 2 or more CDM stakeholders handle push-backs at an airport