Belief Networks CS121 – Winter 2003. Other Names Bayesian networks Probabilistic networks Causal networks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bayesian networks Chapter 14 Section 1 – 2. Outline Syntax Semantics Exact computation.
Advertisements

Probabilistic Reasoning Bayesian Belief Networks Constructing Bayesian Networks Representing Conditional Distributions Summary.
Artificial Intelligence Universitatea Politehnica Bucuresti Adina Magda Florea
BAYESIAN NETWORKS. Bayesian Network Motivation  We want a representation and reasoning system that is based on conditional independence  Compact yet.
P ROBABILISTIC I NFERENCE. A GENDA Conditional probability Independence Intro to Bayesian Networks.
Belief networks Conditional independence Syntax and semantics Exact inference Approximate inference CS 460, Belief Networks1 Mundhenk and Itti Based.
1 Bayesian Networks Slides from multiple sources: Weng-Keen Wong, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University.
Reasoning under Uncertainty Department of Computer Science & Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
1 Knowledge Engineering for Bayesian Networks. 2 Probability theory for representing uncertainty l Assigns a numerical degree of belief between 0 and.
For Monday Finish chapter 14 Homework: –Chapter 13, exercises 8, 15.
Bayesian Networks Chapter 14 Section 1, 2, 4. Bayesian networks A simple, graphical notation for conditional independence assertions and hence for compact.
I NFERENCE IN B AYESIAN N ETWORKS. A GENDA Reading off independence assumptions Efficient inference in Bayesian Networks Top-down inference Variable elimination.
CPSC 322, Lecture 26Slide 1 Reasoning Under Uncertainty: Belief Networks Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 27 (Textbook Chpt 6.3) March, 16, 2009.
Review: Bayesian learning and inference
Bayesian Networks. Motivation The conditional independence assumption made by naïve Bayes classifiers may seem to rigid, especially for classification.
Probabilistic Reasoning Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Chapter 14 (14.1, 14.2, 14.3, 14.4) Capturing uncertain knowledge Probabilistic.
Bayesian networks Chapter 14 Section 1 – 2.
Bayesian Belief Networks
Bayesian Networks Russell and Norvig: Chapter 14 CMCS424 Fall 2003 based on material from Jean-Claude Latombe, Daphne Koller and Nir Friedman.
Belief Networks Russell and Norvig: Chapter 15 CS121 – Winter 2002.
Bayesian Reasoning. Tax Data – Naive Bayes Classify: (_, No, Married, 95K, ?)
1 Probabilistic Belief States and Bayesian Networks (Where we exploit the sparseness of direct interactions among components of a world) R&N: Chap. 14,
Bayesian Networks Russell and Norvig: Chapter 14 CMCS421 Fall 2006.
Bayesian networks More commonly called graphical models A way to depict conditional independence relationships between random variables A compact specification.
CSCI 121 Special Topics: Bayesian Network Lecture #1: Reasoning Under Uncertainty.
Artificial Intelligence CS 165A Tuesday, November 27, 2007  Probabilistic Reasoning (Ch 14)
Bayesian networks Chapter 14. Outline Syntax Semantics.
1 CS 343: Artificial Intelligence Bayesian Networks Raymond J. Mooney University of Texas at Austin.
Bayesian networks Chapter 14 Section 1 – 2. Bayesian networks A simple, graphical notation for conditional independence assertions and hence for compact.
An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Chapter 13 & : Uncertainty & Bayesian Networks Ramin Halavati
B AYESIAN N ETWORKS. S IGNIFICANCE OF C ONDITIONAL INDEPENDENCE Consider Grade(CS101), Intelligence, and SAT Ostensibly, the grade in a course doesn’t.
Learning in neural networks Chapter 19 DRAFT. Biological neuron.
CS 4100 Artificial Intelligence Prof. C. Hafner Class Notes March 13, 2012.
B AYESIAN N ETWORKS. S OME A PPLICATIONS OF BN Medical diagnosis Troubleshooting of hardware/software systems Fraud/uncollectible debt detection Data.
Probabilistic Belief States and Bayesian Networks (Where we exploit the sparseness of direct interactions among components of a world) R&N: Chap. 14, Sect.
1 CS 391L: Machine Learning: Bayesian Learning: Beyond Naïve Bayes Raymond J. Mooney University of Texas at Austin.
Bayesian networks. Motivation We saw that the full joint probability can be used to answer any question about the domain, but can become intractable as.
Bayesian Statistics and Belief Networks. Overview Book: Ch 13,14 Refresher on Probability Bayesian classifiers Belief Networks / Bayesian Networks.
Introduction to Bayesian Networks
An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Chapter 13 & : Uncertainty & Bayesian Networks Ramin Halavati
P ROBABILISTIC I NFERENCE. A GENDA Conditional probability Independence Intro to Bayesian Networks.
CS B 553: A LGORITHMS FOR O PTIMIZATION AND L EARNING Monte Carlo Methods for Probabilistic Inference.
Marginalization & Conditioning Marginalization (summing out): for any sets of variables Y and Z: Conditioning(variant of marginalization):
Review: Bayesian inference  A general scenario:  Query variables: X  Evidence (observed) variables and their values: E = e  Unobserved variables: Y.
CS B 553: A LGORITHMS FOR O PTIMIZATION AND L EARNING Bayesian Networks.
1 Probability FOL fails for a domain due to: –Laziness: too much to list the complete set of rules, too hard to use the enormous rules that result –Theoretical.
Conditional Probability, Bayes’ Theorem, and Belief Networks CISC 2315 Discrete Structures Spring2010 Professor William G. Tanner, Jr.
CPSC 322, Lecture 26Slide 1 Reasoning Under Uncertainty: Belief Networks Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 27 (Textbook Chpt 6.3) Nov, 13, 2013.
Bayesian Networks Russell and Norvig: Chapter 14 CS440 Fall 2005.
PROBABILISTIC REASONING Heng Ji 04/05, 04/08, 2016.
Chapter 12. Probability Reasoning Fall 2013 Comp3710 Artificial Intelligence Computing Science Thompson Rivers University.
CS 2750: Machine Learning Bayesian Networks Prof. Adriana Kovashka University of Pittsburgh March 14, 2016.
CS 2750: Machine Learning Review
CS 2750: Machine Learning Directed Graphical Models
Bayesian Networks Chapter 14 Section 1, 2, 4.
Bayesian networks Chapter 14 Section 1 – 2.
Presented By S.Yamuna AP/CSE
Qian Liu CSE spring University of Pennsylvania
Conditional Probability, Bayes’ Theorem, and Belief Networks
Bayesian Networks Probability In AI.
CSCI 121 Special Topics: Bayesian Networks Lecture #2: Bayes Nets
Probabilistic Reasoning; Network-based reasoning
Structure and Semantics of BN
CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2007
Structure and Semantics of BN
Hankz Hankui Zhuo Bayesian Networks Hankz Hankui Zhuo
Belief Networks CS121 – Winter 2003 Belief Networks.
Bayesian networks Chapter 14 Section 1 – 2.
Probabilistic Reasoning
Presentation transcript:

Belief Networks CS121 – Winter 2003

Other Names Bayesian networks Probabilistic networks Causal networks

Probabilistic Belief There are several possible worlds that are indistinguishable to an agent given some prior evidence. The agent believes that a logic sentence B is True with probability p and False with probability 1-p. B is called a belief In the frequency interpretation of probabilities, this means that the agent believes that the fraction of possible worlds that satisfy B is p The distribution (p,1-p) is the strength of B

Problem At a certain time t, the KB of an agent is some collection of beliefs At time t the agent’s sensors make an observation that changes the strength of one of its beliefs How should the agent update the strength of its other beliefs?

Toothache Example A certain dentist is only interested in two things about any patient, whether he has a toothache and whether he has a cavity Over years of practice, she has constructed the following joint distribution: Toothache  Toothache Cavity  Cavity

In particular, this distribution implies that the prior probability of Toothache is 0.05 P(T) = P((T  C)v(T  C)) = P(T  C) + P(T  C) Toothache Example Using the joint distribution, the dentist can compute the strength of any logic sentence built with the proposition Toothache and Cavity Toothache  Toothache Cavity  Cavity

Toothache  Toothache Cavity  Cavity She now makes an observation E that indicates that a specific patient x has high probability (0.8) of having a toothache, but is not directly related to whether he has a cavity New Evidence

She now makes an observation E that indicates that a specific patient x has high probability (0.8) of having a toothache, but is not directly related to whether he has a cavity She can use this additional information to create a joint distribution (specific for x) conditional to E, by keeping the same probability ratios between Cavity and  Cavity The probability of Cavity that was 0.1 is now (knowing E) Adjusting Joint Distribution Toothache|E  Toothache|E Cavity|E  Cavity|E

Corresponding Calculus P(C|T) = P(C  T)/P(T) = 0.04/0.05 Toothache  Toothache Cavity  Cavity

Corresponding Calculus P(C|T) = P(C  T)/P(T) = 0.04/0.05 P(C  T|E) = P(C|T,E) P(T|E) = P(C|T) P(T|E) Toothache|E  Toothache|E Cavity|E  Cavity|E C and E are independent given T

Corresponding Calculus P(C|T) = P(C  T)/P(T) = 0.04/0.05 P(C  T|E) = P(C|T,E) P(T|E) = P(C|T) P(T|E) = (0.04/0.05)0.8 = Toothache|E  Toothache|E Cavity|E  Cavity|E

Generalization n beliefs X 1,…,X n The joint distribution can be used to update probabilities when new evidence arrives But: The joint distribution contains 2 n probabilities Useful independence is not made explicit

Purpose of Belief Networks Facilitate the description of a collection of beliefs by making explicit causality relations and conditional independence among beliefs Provide a more efficient way (than by using joint distribution tables) to update belief strengths when new evidence is observed

Alarm Example Five beliefs A: Alarm B: Burglary E: Earthquake J: JohnCalls M: MaryCalls

A Simple Belief Network BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls causes effects Directed acyclic graph (DAG) Intuitive meaning of arrow from x to y: “x has direct influence on y” Nodes are beliefs

Assigning Probabilities to Roots BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls P(B) P(E) 0.002

Conditional Probability Tables BEP(A| … ) TTFFTTFF TFTFTFTF BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls P(B) P(E) Size of the CPT for a node with k parents: 2 k

Conditional Probability Tables BEP(A| … ) TTFFTTFF TFTFTFTF BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls P(B) P(E) AP(J|…) TFTF AP(M|…) TFTF

What the BN Means BEP(A| … ) TTFFTTFF TFTFTFTF BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls P(B) P(E) AP(J|…) TFTF AP(M|…) TFTF P(x1,x2,…,xn) =  i=1,…,n P(xi|Parents(Xi))

Calculation of Joint Probability BEP(A| … ) TTFFTTFF TFTFTFTF BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls P(B) P(E) AP(J|…) TFTF AP(M|…) TFTF P(J  M  A   B   E) = P(J|A)P(M|A)P(A|  B,  E)P(  B)P(  E) = 0.9 x 0.7 x x x =

What The BN Encodes Each of the beliefs JohnCalls and MaryCalls is independent of Burglary and Earthquake given Alarm or  Alarm The beliefs JohnCalls and MaryCalls are independent given Alarm or  Alarm BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls For example, John does not observe any burglaries directly

What The BN Encodes Each of the beliefs JohnCalls and MaryCalls is independent of Burglary and Earthquake given Alarm or  Alarm The beliefs JohnCalls and MaryCalls are independent given Alarm or  Alarm BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls For instance, the reasons why John and Mary may not call if there is an alarm are unrelated Note that these reasons could be other beliefs in the network. The probabilities summarize these non-explicit beliefs

Set E of evidence variables that are observed with new probability distribution, e.g., {JohnCalls,MaryCalls} Query variable X, e.g., Burglary, for which we would like to know the posterior probability distribution P(X|E) Distribution conditional to the observations made Inference In BN ???????? TFTFTFTF TTFFTTFF P(B| … )MJ

Inference Patterns BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls Diagnostic BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls Causal BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls Intercausal BurglaryEarthquake Alarm MaryCallsJohnCalls Mixed Basic use of a BN: Given new observations, compute the new strengths of some (or all) beliefs Other use: Given the strength of a belief, which observation should we gather to make the greatest change in this belief’s strength

Applications /researchApps.html Medical diagnosis, e.g., lymph-node deseases Fraud/uncollectible debt detection Troubleshooting of hardware/software systems

Neural Networks CS121 – Winter 2003

Function-Learning Formulation Goal function f Training set: (x i, f (x i )), i = 1,…,n Inductive inference: find a function h that fits the point well Issues: Representation Incremental learning Neural nets

Unit (Neuron)  g xixi x0x0 xnxn y wiwi y = g (  i=1,…,n w i x i ) g(u) = 1/[1 + exp(-  u)]

Particular Case: Perceptron  g xixi x0x0 xnxn y wiwi y = g (  i=1,…,n w i x i )

Particular Case: Perceptron  g xixi x0x0 xnxn y wiwi y = g (  i=1,…,n w i x i ) ?

Neural Network Network of interconnected neurons  g xixi x0x0 xnxn y wiwi  g xixi x0x0 xnxn y wiwi Acyclic (feed-forward) vs. recurrent networks

Two-Layer Feed-Forward Neural Network InputsHidden layer Output layer

Backpropagation (Principle) New example Y k = f(x k ) Error function: E(w) = ||y k – Y k || 2 w ij (k) = w ij (k-1) –   E/  w ij Backprojection: Update the weights of the inputs to the last layer, then the weights of the inputs to the previous layer, etc.

Issues How to choose the size and structure of networks? If network is too large, risk of over- fitting (data caching) If network is too small, representation may not be rich enough Role of representation: e.g., learn the concept of an odd number

What is AI? Discipline that systematizes and automates intellectual tasks to create machines that: Act like humansAct rationally Think like humansThink rationally

What Have We Learned? Collection of useful methods Connection between fields Relation between high-level (e.g., logic) and low-level (e.g., neural networks) representations Impact of hardware What is intelligence? Our techniques are better than our understanding